SEDAR 32 South Atlantic Blueline Tilefish and Gray Triggerfish

SEDAR 32 addresses benchmark stock assessments for South Atlantic Gray Triggerfish and Blueline Tilefish.

The Data Workshop was held February 11-15, 2013 in Charleston, SC; the Assessment process was conducted via a series of webinars from May through August 2013.

During the assessment process, and it was subsequently removed from SEDAR 32. The Review Workshop for Blueline Tilefish was held August 27-30, 2013 in Morehead City, NC.

To assess Blueline Tilefish and Gray Triggerfish.

An ageing issue was identified with Gray Triggerfish during the assessment.

The assessment for gray triggerfish was done in SEDAR 41

Open To everyone

Download files from url at SEDAR website

None

** NOTE: SEDAR Working papers document the methods, datasets, and preliminary analyses that are under consideration at the various workshops and therefore do not necessarily represent final consensus opinions of workshop participants. Working paper findings and methods may change following workshop review. Working papers should not be cited without author permission. ***

SEDAR assessment projects follow one of three approaches approved by the Steering Committee: benchmark, standard and update. Each provides a peer reviewed stock assessment, they simply vary in the details of how the project is managed as well as the time and analyses required. The Benchmark Approach is used to develop first-time assessments for stocks and to incorporate new datasets or new analytical methods into existing assessments. In this case, a panel or group of independent experts reviews the data and assessment to determine if the methods applied are scientifically sound. The standard approach is used to incorporate recent information into existing assessments. Peer review of standard assessments is provided by a Cooperators technical panel such as a Council Scientific and Statistical Committee. The update approach is used strictly to incorporate the most recent information into assessment analyses. Updates only allow for applying additional years of data to an existing assessment. Similar to the Standard process, peer review is provided by a Cooperators technical panel such as a Council Scientific and Statistical Committee.