gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:39553
eng
UTF8
dataset
National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science
resourceProvider
NCCOS Scientific Data Coordinator
NCCOS.data@noaa.gov
pointOfContact
2024-02-29T00:00:00
ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata Part 2 Extensions for imagery and gridded data
ISO 19115-2:2009(E)
point
1663
Underwater Video and Still Ground Validation Imagery of the Florida Keys
south_florida_gv_metadata_old
2008
publication
NOAA/NMFS/EDM
39553
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/39553
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
Full Metadata Record
View the complete metadata record on InPort for more information about this dataset.
information
Jeffrey, Chris
chris.jeffrey@noaa.gov
principalInvestigator
http://ccma.nos.noaa.gov/ecosystems/coralreef/fl_mapping/
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
Citation URL
Online Resource
download
This project is a cooperative effort between the NationalOcean Service, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Center forCoastal Monitoring and Assessment, the state of Florida andAnalytical Laboratories of Hawaii, LLC. The goal of the work is to useNOAA-developed mapping methods to produce benthic habitat maps of southern Florida.The maps are generated by photo interpreting georeferenced IKONOS satellite imagery.These underwater video and still images are collected to perform ground validation ofseafloor habitat features during map preparation.
The National Ocean Service is conducting research todigitally map biotic resources and coordinate a long-term monitoringprogram that can detect and predict change in U.S. coral reefs, andtheir associated habitats and biological communities. The purpose ofthis survey was to investigate areas of imagery where uncertaintiesexist on the photo interpreter's behalf during the decision makingprocess of benthic habitat type for southern Florida.
completed
NCCOS Scientific Data Coordinator
NCCOS.data@noaa.gov
pointOfContact
NCCOS Scientific Data Coordinator
NCCOS.data@noaa.gov
custodian
notPlanned
Geographic Information > Ecological Characterization
theme
CoRIS Discovery Thesaurus
EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Aquatic Habitat > Reef Habitat
EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Aquatic Habitat > Reef Habitat > Description
EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Zoology > Corals > Reef monitoring and assessment
EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Zoology > Corals > Reef monitoring and assessment > In situ biological
EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Coastal Processes > Coral Reefs
EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Coastal Processes > Coral Reefs > Coral reef ecology > Habitats
theme
CoRIS Theme Thesaurus
Environmental Monitoring
theme
NOS Data Explorer Topic Category
COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > Florida
COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > Florida > Monroe County > Key West (25N080W0016)
COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > Florida > Monroe County > Summerland Key (24N081W0005)
COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > Florida > Monroe County > Western Sambos (24N081W0014)
OCEAN BASIN > Atlantic Ocean > North Atlantic Ocean > Florida
OCEAN BASIN > Atlantic Ocean > North Atlantic Ocean > Florida Reef Tract > Lower Florida Keys > Key West (25N080W0016)
OCEAN BASIN > Atlantic Ocean > North Atlantic Ocean > Florida Reef Tract > Lower Florida Keys > Summerland Key (24N081W0005)
OCEAN BASIN > Atlantic Ocean > North Atlantic Ocean > Florida Reef Tract > Lower Florida Keys > Western Sambos (24N081W0014)
place
CoRIS Place Keyword Thesaurus
aquatic vegetation
coral reef
coralline algae
cover
habitat
point
reef
structure
submerged
unconsolidated sediments
zone
theme
United States
place
DOC/NOAA/NOS/NCCOS > National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Ocean Service, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce
dataCentre
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Data Center Keywords
2017-04-24
publication
8.5
FL_Key_Benthic
project
InPort
otherRestrictions
Cite As: National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, [Date of Access]: Underwater Video and Still Ground Validation Imagery of the Florida Keys [Data Date Range], https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/39553.
NOAA provides no warranty, nor accepts any liability occurring from any incomplete, incorrect, or misleading data, or from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading use of the data. It is the responsibility of the user to determine whether or not the data is suitable for the intended purpose.
otherRestrictions
Access Constraints: None
otherRestrictions
Use Constraints: Not for navigation
otherRestrictions
Distribution Liability: These data were prepared by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. Any views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Although all data have been used by NOAA, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by NOAA as to the accuracy of the data and/or related materials. The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed by NOAA in the use of these data or related materials.
unclassified
NOAA Data Management Plan (DMP)
NOAA/NMFS/EDM
39553
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inportserve/waf/noaa/nos/nccos/dmp/pdf/39553.pdf
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
NOAA Data Management Plan (DMP)
NOAA Data Management Plan for this record on InPort.
information
crossReference
vector
eng; US
environment
geoscientificInformation
location
oceans
Microsoft Windows XP Version 5.1 (Build 2600) Service Pack 1; ESRI ArcCatalog 9.0.0.535
-83
-80.2
24.5
25.25
| Currentness: Ground Condition
2007-06-21
2008-01-10
false
eng
false
ERT_IMSG_merge_GVdbf_4_GE.xls
2017-04-11
publication
MP4
JPEG
NCCOS Scientific Data Coordinator
NCCOS.data@noaa.gov
distributor
http://nosimagery.noaa.gov/images/ikonos/fl_keys_sampling_locations.kmz
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
http://nosimagery.noaa.gov/images/ikonos/fl_keys_sampling_locations.kmz
Downloadable Data
download
http://nosimagery.noaa.gov/images/ikonos/fl_keys_sampling_locations.kmz
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
http://nosimagery.noaa.gov/images/ikonos/fl_keys_sampling_locations.kmz
Downloadable Data
download
dataset
Accuracy
The GPS points in this thematic data layer were acquired by GPS data using a Trimble GeoExplorer 3 with acustomized data dictionary designed to reflect the NOAA Classification Scheme for Benthic Habitats of the southern Florida.All habitat determinations were made in the field, recorded in the GPS data logger and seamlessly transferred to ArcView GISusing Trimble Path Finder Office Software. Attributes are all expected to be correct.
Horizontal Positional Accuracy
Point accuracy was determinedby three tests producing circular RMS statistic. Point GPS data wereacquired by repeated occupation of a fixed point yielding a 95% sigmaRMS of 5 meters compared to the position mean. Replicate GPSpositions were collected after navigating to a way point by boatyielding RMS value of 5 meters. Registered monuments were occupiedand replicate positions collected yielding an RMS value of 3 meters.Thus, all point features in these ground validation data are at least95% sigma of 5 meters.
Completeness Report
Several hundred ground validation field positions wereoccupied and habitat characterization conducted for ground validationduring this work. These data were included in the dataset as a GISlayer and the first draft map was edited based on this ground truth.All areas where uncertainty existed on the part of thephoto interpreter during habitat delineation were investigated in thefield. All data were collected and integrated into the mappedproducts as planned.
Conceptual Consistency
The sites for collecting underwater video and still imagery for ground validation were selected to specificallyinvestigate habitat types and gradients of habitat spectral signatures and spatial extent. All areas where uncertaintyexisted on the part of the photo interpreter during habitat delineation were investigated in the field. Waypoints inthese habitats areas were generated on the georeferenced imagery using a GIS. The waypoints were then loaded into a GPS and,using a boat, were navigated to. Underwater video or still imagery and exact GPS positioning were obtained. For GPSpositioning, one hundred GPS positions were collected at one-second intervals. The 100 positions wereaveraged to obtain a single survey point. The data were post processed for differential correction. The general area wasexplored and, as needed, additional underwater or still imagery and GPS positions were collected to mark transitionsbetween habitat types of areas mapped at the level of the minimum mapping unit (MMU). These data are believed to be consistent.
The first draft of each benthic habitat map was generated by visualinterpretation of the habitat boundaries from remote sensing imagery,and areas where habitat determination was uncertain were identified.Waypoints in these areas were generated on the geo-referenced imageryand over laid on the draft maps in the GIS. The areas were printedand water proofed in preparation for taking them into the field.The waypoints were navigated to and occupied using the appropriatesize boats. The habitat was observed and GPS data collected. Onehundred GPS positions were collected at one-second intervals for eachsurvey site. The positions were averaged to obtain a single surveypoint. The data were post processed for differential correction to the nearest CORS.The general area was explored and, as needed, additional GPSpositions were collected to mark transitions between habitat types ofareas mapped at the level of the minimum mapping unit (MMU).The underwater video or still imagery ground validation data were overlaidon the imagery with the first draft habitat map in the GIS. The habitat polygons wereedited to resolve uncertainties. These ground validation point dataare provided in this thematic GIS shape file.
2008-01-01T00:00:00