gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:40371
eng
UTF8
dataset
GIS Files
Office of Response and Restoration
resourceProvider
ESI Program Manager
7600 Sand Point Way NE
Seattle
WA
98115
orr.esi@noaa.gov
pointOfContact
2024-02-29T00:00:00
ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata Part 2 Extensions for imagery and gridded data
ISO 19115-2:2009(E)
geometryOnly
complex
56401
Maine and New Hampshire 2016 ESI Polygons
Maine and New Hampshire 2016 ESI Polygons
2016
publication
NOAA/NMFS/EDM
40371
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/40371
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
Full Metadata Record
View the complete metadata record on InPort for more information about this dataset.
information
https://response.restoration.noaa.gov/esi_guidelines
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
ESI Guidelines
Guidelines for developing ESI data content and overview of ESI data structure. Useful for data collectors and users requiring more in depth information on the ESI process.
download
https://response.restoration.noaa.gov/esi
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
ESI Overview
Overview of ESI data content and uses.
download
mapDigital
Prepared by Woolpert, Inc., Dayton, Ohio for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service, Office of Response and Restoration, Emergency Response Division, Seattle, Washington.
This data set contains vector polygons representing the coastal shoreline and hydrography used in the creation of the Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) for Maine and New Hampshire. As a whole, the ESI data characterize the marine and coastal environments and wildlife by their sensitivity to spilled oil, and include information for three main components: shoreline habitats, sensitive biological resources, and human-use resources. See also the HYDROL (Hydrography Lines), HYDROP (Hydrography Polygons), ESIL (ESI Shoreline Types - Lines) data layer for additional shoreline/hydrography information.
The ESI data are intended to provide baseline environmental data for oil spill planning and response. The Clean Water Act with amendments by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 requires response plans for immediate and effective protection of sensitive resources. The ESI data may be appropriate for many other coastal management efforts, though the original intent should be kept in mind.
This project was supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service (NOS), Office of Response and Restoration (OR&R), Emergency Response Division (ERD), Seattle, Washington.
completed
ESI Program Manager
7600 Sand Point Way NE
Seattle
WA
98115
orr.esi@noaa.gov
pointOfContact
ESI Program Manager
7600 Sand Point Way NE
Seattle
WA
98115
orr.esi@noaa.gov
custodian
asNeeded
Data content is considered static once published. However, if issues with the Geodatabase linkages or table contents are identified, the Geodatabase and/or the associated Map Document may be updated. Assure most current data is being used by downloading from https://response.restoration.noaa.gov/esi_download and/or comparing modification dates provided at this site.
https://response.restoration.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/ESI-Browse-Graphic.pdf
ESI Browse Graphic depicts the relationships between the spatial data layers and the attribute data tables for the Maine and New Hampshire ESI data.
pdf
EARTH SCIENCE > HUMAN DIMENSIONS > ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS > OIL SPILLS
theme
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords
17.0
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > MAINE
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > NEW HAMPSHIRE
place
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords
17.0
Coastal Zone Management
Coastal resources
ESI
Environmental Monitoring
Intertidal habitats
Oil spill planning
Sensitivity maps
Shorelines
theme
DOC/NOAA/NOS/ORR > Office of Response and Restoration, National Ocean Service, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce
dataCentre
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Data Center Keywords
2017-04-24
publication
8.5
Maine and New Hampshire, 2016
project
InPort
otherRestrictions
Cite As: Office of Response and Restoration, [Date of Access]: Maine and New Hampshire 2016 ESI Polygons [Data Date Range], https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/40371.
NOAA provides no warranty, nor accepts any liability occurring from any incomplete, incorrect, or misleading data, or from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading use of the data. It is the responsibility of the user to determine whether or not the data is suitable for the intended purpose.
otherRestrictions
Access Constraints: None
otherRestrictions
Use Constraints: DO NOT USE MAPS FOR NAVIGATIONAL PURPOSES. Management boundaries are not to be considered legal boundaries. Edges may have been altered for cartographic processes. Note that the ESI database should not be used to the exclusion of other pertinent data or information held by state or federal agencies or other organizations. Likewise, information contained in the database cannot be used in place of consultations with environmental, natural resource, and cultural resource agencies, or in place of field surveys. Recognize that the information contained in the ESI database represents known concentration areas or occurrences of natural, cultural, and human-use resources, but does not necessarily represent the full distribution or range of each species or resource. This is particularly important to recognize when considering potential impacts to protected resources, such as endangered species, wetlands, etc. Besides the above warnings, there are no use constraints on these data. Acknowledgment of the originators, publishers, contributors, and sources listed would be appreciated in products derived from these data.
otherRestrictions
Distribution Liability: Although these data have been processed and used successfully on a computer system at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by NOAA regarding the utility of the data on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. NOAA warrants the delivery of this product in computer-readable format. If problems are encountered in downloading the ESI data or with file corruption, contact NOAA (see Distributor). These data represent a snapshot in time and temporal changes may have occurred. The data are not intended to include all biological or human-use resources present in an area; they focus on species and resources particularly sensitive to oiling. In the event of a spill, they should be used for a first assessment only. The data providers are the experts with regard to individual resources. They should be contacted to confirm if more current data exist or if in-depth information is needed about a particular resource.
unclassified
NOAA Data Management Plan (DMP)
NOAA/NMFS/EDM
40371
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inportserve/waf/noaa/nos/orr/dmp/pdf/40371.pdf
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
NOAA Data Management Plan (DMP)
NOAA Data Management Plan for this record on InPort.
information
crossReference
vector
textTable
eng; US
biota
environment
The software packages used to develop the atlas are Environmental Systems Research Institute's ArcGIS for Desktop 10.2(R). The hardware configuration is PCs with Windows Operating System 7.
-71.0981
-66.8576
42.8061
45.1917
This reflects the extent of all land and water features included in the overall Maine and New Hampshire ESI study region. The bounding box for this particular feature class may vary depending on occurrences identified and mapped.
Time Frame Range starts with ESI Project Start Year, and ends with ESI Atlas Publication Year. | Currentness: Publication Date
2014
2016
false
eng
false
ESIP
2018-09-28
publication
SOURCES
2018-09-28
publication
ESRI File Geodatabase
Zip
ESI Program Manager
7600 Sand Point Way NE
Seattle
WA
98115
orr.esi@noaa.gov
distributor
https://response.restoration.noaa.gov/esi_download
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
Maine_NewHampshire_2016_ESI.gdb
This feature class is part of the downloadable Esri Arc Geodatabase.
download
dataset
Accuracy
A multi-stage error checking process is used to verify both attribute accuracy and logical consistency throughout data production. The process includes a standardized data entry methodology, data review by in-house and external resource experts, a final Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) process, and multiple automated logical consistency checks. Quantitative data (such as densities, counts, abundances, or concentrations) provided by resource experts for inclusion in the data set may vary widely in attribute accuracy, depending upon the methodology used to collect and compile such data. For a more detailed evaluation of source data attribute accuracy, contact the sources listed in the Lineage section.
Horizontal Positional Accuracy
The spatial location of the ESI shoreline was developed from pre-existing digital sources and reflects the positional accuracy of these original data. The horizontal positional accuracy of 1:24,000 USGS topographic quads should conform to National Map Accuracy Standards at scales of 1:24,000. See the Lineage and Process_Description sections for more information on the original source data and how these data were integrated or manipulated to create the final data set.
Completeness Report
These data represent coastal habitat polygons classified according to the Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) classification system. See also the HYDROL (Hydrography Lines), HYDROP (Hydrography Polygons), ESIL (ESI Shoreline Types - Lines) data layer for additional shoreline/hydrography information.
Conceptual Consistency
A multi-stage error checking process, described in the above Attribute Accuracy Report, is used to verify both attribute accuracy and logical consistency throughout data production. This process includes multiple automated logical consistency checks that test the files for missing or duplicate data, rules for proper coding, GIS topological consistencies, and SQL SERVER(R) to ArcGIS(R) consistencies. A final review is made by the GIS manager, before the final Geodatabase and metadata are created. After the data are delivered to NOAA, they are again subjected to several consistency checks, and processed into the final delivery format.
The shoreline and classifications were fully updated using the sources and methods described below. The shoreline and intertidal habitats were delineated using a mapped sequence of Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and high resolution digital orthophotography datasets. The LiDAR data was obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic LiDAR: LiDAR for the North East program (2011) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Topographic LiDAR: Cumberland and York Counties, Maine program (2006).The base shoreline was compiled at Mean Higher High Water (MHHW) first by LiDAR extraction, then refined within a Geographic Information System (GIS) utilizing high resolution digital orthophotos. After the shoreline was delineated, digital ortho-imagery from various sources was used to classify shoreline segments using the nationally, standardized ESI scale (see below). Imagery from the Maine Office of Geographic Information Systems (2014), USDA-FSA Aerial Photography Field Office (2014), and the Piscataqua Region Estuaries Partnership (2013), as well as various imagery sources for Google Earth and Bing Maps (2014) was used during the classification phase. Imagery was produced by Woolpert as part of the ESI data collection effort; however, schedules dictated that shoreline classification must occur prior to the completion of imagery collection and processing. Therefore, the new imagery was not used for the shoreline classification.Shoreline features of 10 meters (m) or greater in length were classified. In addition, wetland polygon datasets originally created by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory (NWI) were modified and updated to be used in conjunction with the ESI shoreline. The data was visually reviewed and classified against the aerial imagery and adjusted where necessary to allow for proper classification. All classifications were determined by the specifications outlined in the Environmental Sensitivity Index Guidelines version 3.0 (2002). Where necessary, multiple types were described for each shoreline segment. GIS quality control measures were implemented to ensure that all data met the required specifications.
2016-01-01T00:00:00
ESI Program Manager
orr.esi@noaa.gov
processor
Source Contribution: ESIP information | Source Geospatial Form: remote-sensing image | Type of Source Media: online
2013 1-FT. RESOLUTION IMAGERY FOR COASTAL NEW HAMPSHIRE
2014-01-01
publication
PISCATAQUA REGION ESTUARIES PARTNERSHIP (PREP)
http://www.granit.unh.edu/data/search
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
Source Citation URL
Source Citation URL
information
2013
Source Contribution: ESIP information | Source Geospatial Form: remote-sensing image | Type of Source Media: online
MAINE STATEWIDE ORTHOIMAGERY PROJECT
2014-01-01
publication
MAINE OFFICE OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS
http://www.maine.gov/megis/catalog/
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
Source Citation URL
Source Citation URL
information
2012
2014
Source Contribution: ESIP information | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: online
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY (NWI) - WETLANDS
2014-01-01
publication
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS)
http://www.fws.gov/wetlands
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
Source Citation URL
Source Citation URL
information
1977
2014
Source Contribution: ESIP information | Source Geospatial Form: remote-sensing image | Type of Source Media: online
USDA-APFO NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL INVENTORY PROJECT
2014-01-01
publication
THE USDA-FSA AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY FIELD OFFICE
http://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/aerial-photography/index
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
Source Citation URL
Source Citation URL
information
2013
2014