40505
Sensitivity of Coastal Environments and Wildlife to Spilled Oil: North Carolina: INDEX (Index Polygons)
North_Carolina_index
Data Set
Published / External
46682
North Carolina, 2011
Project
Completed
2011-07
This data set contains vector polygons representing the boundaries of all hardcopy cartographic products produced as part of the Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) for North Carolina. This data set comprises a portion of the ESI data for North Carolina. ESI data characterize the marine and coastal environments and wildlife by their sensitivity to spilled oil. The ESI data include information for three main components: shoreline habitats, sensitive biological resources, and human-use resources.
The ESI data were collected, mapped, and digitized to provide environmental data for oil spill planning and response. The Clean Water Act with amendments by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 requires response plans for immediate and effective protection of sensitive resources.
2005
Prepared by Research Planning, Inc., Columbia, South Carolina for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service, Office of Response and Restoration, Emergency Response Division, Seattle, Washington.
Theme
ISO 19115 Topic Category
biota
Theme
ISO 19115 Topic Category
environment
Theme
NOS Data Explorer Topic Category
Environmental Monitoring
Theme
Coastal Zone Management
Theme
Coastal resources
Theme
ESI
Theme
Environmental Monitoring
Theme
Oil spill planning
Theme
Sensitivity maps
Theme
Wildlife
Spatial
North Carolina
Office of Response and Restoration
Silver Spring
MD
Data Set
None Planned
vector digital data
In addition to the geographic data layers, relational attribute or data tables are used to store information in the ESI data structure. The entity-relationship diagram describes relationships between attribute tables in the ESI data structure. This particular geographic data layer (INDEX) does not link to other ESI tables.
A complete description of entity types, attributes, and attribute values for ESI atlases can be found in the NOAA ESI Guidelines (http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/esi_guidelines).
Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by NOAA regarding the utility of the data on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. NOAA warrants the delivery of this product in computer-readable format, and will offer a replacement copy of the product when the product is determined unreadable by computer input peripherals, or when the physical medium is delivered in damaged condition.
This project was supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service (NOS), Office of Response and Restoration (OR&R), Emergency Response Division (ERD), Seattle, Washington; the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4: Southeast, Atlanta, Georgia; and the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Incident Management and Preparedness, Washington, D.C.
44635
INDEX.PAT
INDEX.PAT
Published / External
Completed
The INDEX.PAT table contains attribute information for the vector polygons representing the boundaries of the maps and digital data boundaries used in the creation of the ESI atlas. | Description Source: NOAA ESI Guidelines
Converted from FGDC using 'fgdc_to_inport_xml_entity.pl' script.
1
TILE-NAME
NUMBER
No
No
Active
The TILE-NAME contains the map number according to the specified layout of the atlas. | Description Source: NOAA ESI Guidelines
1 - 134
2
TOPO-NAME
Unknown
No
No
Active
USGS Topographic map name, short description of location, or atlas name. | Description Source: NOAA ESI Guidelines
Acceptable values change from atlas to atlas.
3
SCALE
VARCHAR
No
No
Active
SCALE contains the value of the denominator of the scale at which the map is plotted in the final map product. | Description Source: NOAA ESI Guidelines
24000: Scale = 1:24,000 |
4
MAPANGLE
NUMBER
No
No
Active
MAPANGLE contains the value to rotate the final map product so that it is situated straight up and down. | Description Source: NOAA ESI Guidelines
Degree
-2.0390 - 0.0000
5
PAGESIZE
VARCHAR
No
No
Active
PAGESIZE contains the value of the width and height of the map in the final map product. | Description Source: NOAA ESI Guidelines
11,17: Page size= 11" by 17" |
Data Steward
2011-07
Position
ESI Program Manager
orr.esi@noaa.gov
7600 Sand Point Way NE
Seattle
WA
98115
Distributor
2011-07
Position
ESI Program Manager
orr.esi@noaa.gov
7600 Sand Point Way NE
Seattle
WA
98115
Metadata Contact
2011-07
Position
ESI Program Manager
orr.esi@noaa.gov
7600 Sand Point Way NE
Seattle
WA
98115
Point of Contact
2011-07
Position
ESI Program Manager
orr.esi@noaa.gov
7600 Sand Point Way NE
Seattle
WA
98115
The data were compiled during 2010-2011. The currentness dates for the data range from 1949 to 2010 and are documented in the Lineage section.
-78.625
-75.399
36.625
33.75
Range
1949
2010
Yes
Yes
152
Yes
3365
Yes
153
Yes
214
Unclassified
Contact NOAA for distribution options (see Distributor). ESI data are processed into multiple formats to make them useful to the widest community of GIS/mapping users. Distribution formats include Geodatabase; ARC export, MOSS, and Shape files; and MARPLOT map folders. An ArcMap .mxd file, an ArcView 3.x ESI project, and an ESI_Viewer product for use with the MARPLOT data are also included on the distribution CDs/DVDs for ease of use of the ESI data. The database files are distributed both in the NOAA standard relational database format (see NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS ORCA 115) and in a simplified desktop flat file format. This metadata document includes information on both of these database formats.;
None
DO NOT USE MAPS FOR NAVIGATIONAL PURPOSES. Besides the above warning, there are no use constraints on these data. Note that the ESI database should not be used to the exclusion of other pertinent data or information held by state or federal agencies or other organizations. Likewise, information contained in the database cannot be used in place of consultations with environmental, natural resource, and cultural resource agencies, or in place of field surveys. Recognize that the information contained in the ESI database represents known concentration areas or occurrences of natural, cultural, and human-use resources, but does not necessarily represent the full distribution or range of each species or resource. This is particularly important to recognize when considering potential impacts to protected resources, such as endangered species, wetlands, etc. Acknowledgment of the originators, publishers, contributors, and sources listed would be appreciated in products derived from these data.
http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/esi
Online Resource
2011-10-15
Date that the source FGDC record was last modified.
2017-04-05
Converted from Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata (version FGDC-STD-001-1998) using 'fgdc_to_inport_xml.pl' script. Contact Tyler Christensen (NOS) for details.
2017-09-13
Partial upload of Spatial Info section only.
2017-11-01
Replaced entire Lineage section to populate new Source Contribution field.
2018-02-08
Partial upload of Positional Accuracy fields only.
The software packages used to develop the atlas are Environmental Systems Research Institute's ARC/INFO(R) (version 9.3) and SQL SERVER(R) (version 2000). The hardware configuration is PC's with Windows Operating System (2000/XP/2003). The Spatial_Data_Organization Information section refers only to the source files in the ARC export format. The following files are included in the data set: birds.e00, esi.e00, fish.e00, habitats.e00, hydro.e00, index.e00, invert.e00, m_mammal.e00, mgt.e00, nests.e00, reptiles.e00, socecon.e00, t_mammal.e00, and wetlands.e00. Associated relational and desktop data tables provided in Arc export and text format are bio_lut.e00, biofile.e00, biores.e00, breed.e00, breed_dt.e00, seasonal.e00, soc_dat.e00, soc_lut.e00, sources.e00, species.e00, and status.e00.
A multi-stage error checking process is used to verify both attribute accuracy and logical consistency throughout data production. The process includes a standardized data entry methodology, hardcopy data review by in-house and external resource experts, a final Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) process, and multiple automated logical consistency checks. Quantitative data (such as densities, counts, abundances, or concentrations) provided by resource experts for inclusion in the data set may vary widely in attribute accuracy, depending upon the methodology used to collect and compile such data. For a more detailed evaluation of source data attribute accuracy, contact the sources listed in the Lineage section.
The index polygons in this data layer were generated in ArcInfo from the coordinates of the USGS 1:24,000 topographic map corners. Some small amount of positional error may be present along the arcs forming the boundaries of these polygons, particularly away from the polygon corners. Some boundaries were developed from pre-existing digital and hardcopy sources and reflect the positional accuracy of these original data. See the Lineage and Process_Description sections for more information on the original source data and how these data were integrated or manipulated to create the final data set.
These data represent the boundaries of all hardcopy cartographic products and digital data extents produced as part of the North Carolina ESI atlas.
A multi-stage error checking process, described in the above Attribute_Accuracy_Report, is used to verify both attribute accuracy and logical consistency throughout data production. This process includes multiple automated logical consistency checks that test the files for missing or duplicate data, rules for proper coding, GIS topological consistencies (such as dangles, unnecessary nodes, etc.), and SQL SERVER(R) to ARC/INFO(R) consistencies. A final review is made by the GIS manager, where the data are written to CD/DVD and the metadata are written. After the data are delivered to NOAA, they are again subjected to a number of quality and consistency checks.
INDEX ARCS
RESEARCH PLANNING, INC.
2010-01-01
Discrete
2010
24000
INDEX INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: DIGITAL
TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
2010-01-01
Range
1949
1993
24000
ARAPAHOE, N.C. (1993); ASKIN, N.C. (1983); ATLANTIC, N.C. (1949); AURORA, N.C. (1993); BARCO, N.C. (1982); BATH, N.C. (1993); BEAUFORT, N.C. (1987); BELHAVEN, N.C. (1974); BLOUNTS BAY, N.C. (1993); BLUFF POINT, N.C. (1951); BROAD CREEK, N.C. (1980); BROWNS INLET, N.C. (1988); BUFFALO CITY, N.C. (1980); BUXTON, N.C. (1983); CALABASH, N.C.-S.C. (1990); CAMDEN POINT, N.C. (1982); CAMP LEJEUNE, N.C. (1971); CAPE FEAR, N.C. (1970); CAPE HATTERAS, N.C. (1983); CAPE LOOKOUT, N.C. (1951); CAROLINA BEACH, N.C. (1970); CASTLE HAYNE, N.C. (1970); CHERRY POINT, N.C. (1983); COINJOCK, N.C. (1982); COLUMBIA EAST, N.C. (1974); COLUMBIA WEST, N.C. (1974); CORE CREEK, N.C. (1983); COROLLA, N.C. (1982); CREEDS, VA.-N.C. (1986); CURRITUCK, N.C. (1982); DAVIS, N.C. (1983); EAST LAKE SE, N.C. (1987); EAST LAKE, N.C. (1975); EDENHOUSE, N.C. (1982); EDENTON, N.C. (1981); ELIZABETH CITY, N.C. (1982); ENGELHARD EAST, N.C. (1983); ENGELHARD NE, N.C. (1980); ENGELHARD NW, N.C. (1987); ENGELHARD WEST, N.C. (1983); FAIRFIELD NE, N.C. (1974); FAIRFIELD NW, N.C. (1983); FAIRFIELD, N.C. (1983); FORT LANDING, N.C. (1974); FRYING PAN, N.C. (1974); GREAT ISLAND, N.C. (1951); GREEN ISLAND, N.C. (1983); HAMPSTEAD, N.C. (1970); HARKERS ISLAND, N.C. (1983); HARVEY NECK, N.C. (1982); HATTERAS, N.C. (1987); HAVELOCK, N.C. (1983); HERTFORD, N.C. (1982); HOLDEN BEACH, N.C. (1990); HOLLY RIDGE, N.C. (1970); HORSEPEN POINT, N.C. (1950); HOWARD REEF, N.C. (1980); HUBERT, N.C. (1988); JACKSONVILLE SOUTH, N.C. (1988); JARVISBURG, N.C. (1982); JONES BAY, N.C. (1993); KITTY HAWK, N.C. (1982); KNOTTS ISLAND, VA.-N.C. (1971); KURE BEACH, N.C. (1979); LEONARDS POINT, N.C. (1974); LITTLE FISHING POINT, N.C. (1974); LITTLE KINNAKEET, N.C. (1983); LITTLE RIVER, S.C.-N.C. (1990); LOCKWOODS FOLLY, N.C. (1990); LONG BAY, N.C. (1987); LONG SHOAL POINT, N.C. (1951); LOWLAND, N.C. (1993); MANNS HARBOR, N.C. (1974); MANSFIELD, N.C. (1983); MANTEO, N.C. (1983); MARTIN POINT, N.C. (1982); MERRIMON, N.C. (1983); MIDDLETOWN ANCHORA
1
Primarily, 1:24,000 USGS topographic maps were used to provide boundaries for cartographic products. In some cases the polygons represent USGS topographic maps that were re-tiled, moved, or extended to provide better cartographic coverage of the study area.
2011-07-01T00:00:00
44635
Entity
INDEX.PAT
gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:40505
Tyler Christensen
2017-04-05T14:52:09
SysAdmin InPortAdmin
2023-05-30T18:09:25
2018-02-08
Office of Response and Restoration
ORR
1002
Public
No
2018-02-08
1 Year
2019-02-08