2012 Multispectral Color Orthophotography at .30m GSD, UTM z2S projection, GeoTIFF file format for American Samoa.
OCM Partners
Data Set
(DS)
| ID: 49496
| Published / External
Created: 2017-11-15
|
Last Modified: 2024-01-10
Project (PRJ) | ID: 49403
ID: 49496
Data Set (DS)
* Discovery• First Pass
» Metadata Rubric
Item Identification
* » Title | 2012 Multispectral Color Orthophotography at .30m GSD, UTM z2S projection, GeoTIFF file format for American Samoa. |
---|---|
Short Name | 2012_american_samoa |
* Status | Completed |
Creation Date | |
Revision Date | |
• Publication Date | |
* » Abstract |
The 2012 American Samoa aerial photography project produced 1' (.30m) GSD multispectral digital orthoimagery for approximately 85 square miles of the American Samoa islands of Tutuila, Aunu'u, Ofu, Olosega, and Ta'u. An orthoimage is remotely sensed image data in which displacement of features in the image caused by terrain relief and sensor orientation have been mathematically removed, thus it combines the image characteristics of a photograph with the geometric qualities of a map. Original contact information: Contact Name: Mike Duncan Contact Org: United States Geological Survey Phone: 573-308-3579 Email: e-mail: jduncan@usgs.gov |
* Purpose |
The digital orthoimagery is both high resolution and spatially accurate, and can serve as a raster base image for mapping projects as well as a data source to support the derivation of new raster and vector data sets. |
Notes |
11942 |
Other Citation Details | |
• Supplemental Information |
Digital aerial imagery was obtained in August 2012 using a large format Microsoft Vexcel Ultracam, equipped with Airborne GPS/IMU. A total of three areas consisting of 26 flight lines with 671 frames were acquired under a single task order, in multispectral (RGB and NIR) 8 bits per band format. The imagery was acquired with a 100.5 mm focal length at an altitude of 9,000' above mean terrain, to yield a raw pixel resolution of 1' (.30m) suitable for photogrammetric mapping and orthophoto production. The 'leaf condition' was not a concern but imagery was collected in the summer of 2012 under conditions free from flooding and excessive soil moisture. Within populated areas, no more than 5% clouds, cloud shadows, smoke, and haze are permitted. In the uninhabited areas of the islands 10% of clouds, cloud shadows, smoke, and haze may exist. There is no tide coordination. The sun angle threshold was 30 degrees. The imagery consisted of panchromatic, blue, green, red and near infrared bands. The three color bands and near infrared bands were pan sharpened and archived as frame imagery. All 4 bands were used in the orthophoto production. The two mission baseline information are as follows: August 2, 2012 minimum baseline length is 0.476km; maximum baseline length is 32.432km; and mean baseline length is 12.358km. August 3, 2012 minimum baseline length is 0.022km; maximum baseline length is 40.399km; and mean baseline length is 14.860km. |
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) | |
DOI Registration Authority | |
DOI Issue Date |
Keywords
Theme Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
ISO 19115 Topic Category | imageryBaseMapsEarthCover |
None | image map |
None | natural color orthophoto |
None | orthoimage |
None | orthophoto |
None | rectified image |
None | rectified photograph |
Temporal Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
* Spatial Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1987, Codes for the Identification of the States, the District of Columbia and the outlying areas of the United States, and associated areas (Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) 5-2): Washington, D.C., National | AS |
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1995, Countries, Dependencies, Areas of Special Sovereignty, and Their Principal Administrative Divisions (Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) 10-4): Washington, D.C., National Institute of Standards and Techno | US |
None | American Samoa |
None | Aunu'u |
None | Ofu |
None | Olosega |
None | Ta'u |
None | Tutuila |
Stratum Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Instrument Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Platform Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Physical Location
• » Organization | Office for Coastal Management |
---|---|
• » City | Charleston |
• » State/Province | SC |
• Country | |
• » Location Description |
Data Set Information
* Data Set Scope Code | Data Set |
---|---|
• Data Set Type | |
• Maintenance Frequency | Unknown |
Maintenance Note | |
» Data Presentation Form | Image (digital) |
• Entity Attribute Overview |
These digital orthophotos are composed of 4 bands or channels of information. Each band comprises a grid of pixels containing digital numbers ranging from 0-255, and representing colors in the red, green, blue (RGB) or near infrared (NIR) portions of the electromagnetic spectrum. |
Entity Attribute Detail Citation |
None |
Entity Attribute Detail URL | |
Distribution Liability |
Woolpert prepared the original data as set forth in the Scope of Services, in accordance with reasonable care and due diligence as set forth in this Agreement, however, due to the easily alterable nature of electronic media, files, documents, and other deliverables, Woolpert, Inc. makes no warranties, either expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, merchantability, or fitness for any particular purpose, including, but not limited to, use of any/all data as described within this metadata file, by any user of this data. Any use will be at the end-user's sole risk. |
Data Set Credit | Orthophotos were produced for USGS by Photo Science under the USGS Geospatial Production and Services Contract, Contract Number G10PC00026, Task Order G12PD00480. |
Support Roles
* » Support Role | Data Steward |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2016-05-23 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | Distributor |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2016-05-23 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | Metadata Contact |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2016-05-23 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | Point of Contact |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2016-05-23 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | |
Date Effective To | |
* » Contact | |
* Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | |
Date Effective To | |
* » Contact | |
* Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | |
Date Effective To | |
* » Contact | |
* Contact Instructions |
Extents
Currentness Reference | Ground Condition |
---|
Extent Group 1
Extent Description |
---|
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 1
* » W° Bound | -170.851644 |
---|---|
* » E° Bound | -169.405585 |
* » N° Bound | -14.147592 |
* » S° Bound | -14.382132 |
* » Description |
Extent Group 1 / Vertical Extent
EPSG Code | |
---|---|
Vertical Minimum | |
Vertical Maximum |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 1
* » Time Frame Type | Range |
---|---|
* » Start | 2012-08-02 |
End | 2012-08-03 |
Alternate Start As Of Info | |
Alternate End As Of Info | |
Description |
Spatial Information
Spatial Resolution
Angular Distance | |
---|---|
Angular Distance Units | |
Horizontal Distance | |
Horizontal Distance Units | |
Vertical Distance | |
Vertical Distance Units | |
Equivalent Scale Denominator | |
Level of Detail Description |
Spatial Representation
Grid Representation Used? | Yes |
---|---|
Vector Representation Used? | |
Text / Table Representation Used? | |
TIN Representation Used? | |
Stereo Model Representation Used? | |
Video Representation Used? |
Grid Representation
Dimension Count | 2 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cell Geometry | Point | ||||||||||||
Transformation Parameters Available? | No | ||||||||||||
Axis Dimension |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Axis Dimension |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Axis Dimension |
|||||||||||||
|
Grid Representation
Dimension Count | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cell Geometry | |||||||||||||
Transformation Parameter Available? | |||||||||||||
Axis Dimension |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Axis Dimension |
|||||||||||||
|
Vector Representation
Topology Level | |
---|---|
Complex Object Present? | |
Complex Object Count | |
Composite Object Present? | |
Composite Object Count | |
Curve Object Present? | |
Curve Object Count | |
Point Object Present? | |
Point Object Count | |
Solid Object Present? | |
Solid Object Count | |
Surface Object Present? | |
Surface Object Count |
Reference Systems
Reference System
EPSG Code | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Horizontal Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vertical Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Access Information
Data License | |
---|---|
Data License URL | |
Data License Statement | |
* » Security Class | Unclassified |
* Security Classification System | |
Security Handling Description | |
• Data Access Policy | |
» Data Access Procedure |
https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer. This data set is dynamically generated based on user-specified parameters.; |
• » Data Access Constraints |
None |
• Data Use Constraints |
The United States Geological Survey shall not be held liable for any errors in this data. This includes errors of omission, errors of commission, content errors, and relative and positional accuracy errors in the data. This data should not be construed to be a legal document. Primary sources from which this data was compiled must be consulted for verification of information contained in this data. This data is in the public domain, and may not be resold. |
Metadata Access Constraints |
None |
Metadata Use Constraints |
None |
Distribution Information
Start Date | 2024-01-10 |
---|---|
End Date | Present |
» Download URL | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/imagery/search/where:id=1417/details/1417 |
Distributor | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) (2016-05-23 - Present) |
File Name | |
Description |
custom download app |
File Date/Time | |
File Type (Deprecated) | |
Distribution Format | Not Applicable |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | Uncompressed |
Review Status |
Start Date | 2024-01-10 |
---|---|
End Date | Present |
» Download URL | https://coastalimagery.blob.core.windows.net/digitalcoast/American_Samoa_2012_1417/index.html |
Distributor | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) (2016-05-23 - Present) |
File Name | |
Description |
data files |
File Date/Time | |
File Type (Deprecated) | |
Distribution Format | GeoTIFF |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | Uncompressed |
Review Status |
Start Date | |
---|---|
End Date | |
» Download URL | |
Distributor | |
File Name | |
Description | |
File Date/Time | |
File Type | |
FGDC Content Type | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
Start Date | |
---|---|
End Date | |
» Download URL | |
Distributor | |
File Name | |
Description | |
File Date/Time | |
File Type | |
FGDC Content Type | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
Start Date | |
---|---|
End Date | |
» Download URL | |
Distributor | |
File Name | |
Description | |
File Date/Time | |
File Type | |
FGDC Content Type | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
Archive Information
Location | |
---|---|
File Identifier | |
File Name | |
URL | |
Description | |
DOI | |
Archive Date | |
Archive Update Frequency |
Location | |
---|---|
File Identifier | |
File Name | |
URL | |
Description | |
DOI | |
Archive Date | |
Archive Update Frequency |
Location | |
---|---|
File Identifier | |
File Name | |
URL | |
Description | |
DOI | |
Archive Date | |
Archive Update Frequency |
URLs
URL | |
---|---|
Name | |
URL Type | |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
URL | |
---|---|
Name | |
URL Type | |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
URL | |
---|---|
Name | |
URL Type | |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
Activity Log
Activity Time | 2016-05-23 |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Date that the source FGDC record was last modified. |
Activity Time | 2017-11-14 |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Converted from FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (version FGDC-STD-001-1998) using 'fgdc_to_inport_xml.pl' script. Contact Tyler Christensen (NOS) for details. |
Activity Time | 2018-02-08 |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Partial upload of Positional Accuracy fields only. |
Activity Time | |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Activity Time | |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Activity Time | |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Issues
Issue Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Issue |
Issue Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Issue |
Issue Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Issue |
Technical Environment
Description |
|
---|
Data Quality
Representativeness | |
---|---|
Accuracy |
Radiometry was verified by visual inspection of the digital orthophotos. Slight systematic radiometric differences may exist between adjacent orthoimage files; these are due primarily to differences in source image capture dates and sun angles along flight lines. These differences can be observed in an image's general lightness or darkness when it is compared to adjacent orthoimage file coverages. Tonal balancing was performed over a group of images during the mosaicking process in order to lighten or darken adjacent images for better color tone matching. |
Analytical Accuracy | |
Horizontal Positional Accuracy |
This 0.30m Ground Sample Distance (GSD) digital ortho imagery was compiled to meet a 1.52 meter (5') horizontal accuracy at 95% confidence level(0.88-meters Root Mean Squared (RMSE) Error XY (0.62 meter RMSE X or Y) based on NSSDA testing guidelines. This accuracy requirement is not applicable in areas where the ground is obscured on the aerial imagery by foliage, prevalent smoke, or dense shadow.; Quantitative Value: 0.709 meters, Test that produced the value: RMSE at CE95 in meters. Please see Accuracy Analyst report. |
Vertical Positional Accuracy |
There is no vertical component for orthophotos. |
Quantitation Limits | |
Bias | |
Comparability | |
Completeness Measure | |
Precision | |
Analytical Precision | |
Field Precision | |
Sensitivity | |
Detection Limit | |
Completeness Report |
The 'leaf condition' was not a concern but imagery was collected in the summer of 2012 under conditions free from flooding and excessive soil moisture. Within populated areas, no more than 5% clouds, cloud shadows, smoke, and haze are permitted. In the uninhabited areas of the islands 10% of clouds, cloud shadows, smoke, and haze may exist. There is no tide coordination. The sun angle threshold was 30 degrees. To ensure complete coverage, photography was collected for all tiles that intersected the islands of American Samoa (Tutuila, Aunnu'u, Ofu, Olosega, and Ta'u). Orthoimages were visually inspected for completeness to ensure that no gaps or image misplacements exist within and between adjacent images. |
Conceptual Consistency |
All GeoTIFF tagged data and image file sizes were validated using commercial GIS software to ensure proper loading before being archived. This validation procedure ensured correct physical format and field values for tagged elements. Seam lines and tile edges were visually inspected. |
» Quality Control Procedures Employed |
Data Management
» Have Resources for Management of these Data Been Identified? | |
---|---|
» Approximate Percentage of Budget for these Data Devoted to Data Management | |
» Do these Data Comply with the Data Access Directive? | |
» Is Access to the Data Limited Based on an Approved Waiver? | |
» If Distributor (Data Hosting Service) is Needed, Please Indicate | |
» Approximate Delay Between Data Collection and Dissemination | |
» If Delay is Longer than Latency of Automated Processing, Indicate Under What Authority Data Access is Delayed |
|
» Actual or Planned Long-Term Data Archive Location | |
» If World Data Center or Other, Specify | |
» If To Be Determined, Unable to Archive, or No Archiving Intended, Explain |
|
» Approximate Delay Between Data Collection and Archiving | |
» How Will the Data Be Protected from Accidental or Malicious Modification or Deletion Prior to Receipt by the Archive? |
|
Lineage
» Lineage Statement |
---|
Sources
Citation Title | Exterior Orientation File |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | Photo Science |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | Discrete |
Extent Start Date/Time | 2012 |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Scale Denominator | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Source Contribution |
Exterior Orientation (EO) Parameters (x,y,z,omega,phi,kappa) were produced to provide precise photocenter locations for each frame of imagery. The two mission baseline information are as follows: August 2, 2012 minimum baseline length is 0.476km; maximum baseline length is 32.432km; and mean baseline length is 12.358km. August 3, 2012 minimum baseline length is 0.022km; maximum baseline length is 40.399km; and mean baseline length is 14.860km. Aerotriangulation was necessary to achieve the accuracy requirements of the project. | Source Geospatial Form: ASCII Text File | Type of Source Media: disc |
Citation Title | Georeferenced Aerial Imagery |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | Photo Science |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | Discrete |
Extent Start Date/Time | 2012 |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Scale Denominator | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Source Contribution |
Targeted ground control was collected for use in the Aerotriangulation process. Sixty-five (65) photo identifiable ground control points were selected and surveyed to adequately cover the entire state. Details of each point can be found in the full control report. | Source Geospatial Form: remote-sensing image | Type of Source Media: External Hard Drive |
Citation Title | LiDAR_DEM |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | Photo Science |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | Discrete |
Extent Start Date/Time | 2012 |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Scale Denominator | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Source Contribution |
Photo Science developed classified, bare earth, .LAS LiDAR data at a 1-meter nominal post spacing with a fundamental 15 cm vertical accuracy at 95% confidence interval. Some areas of Ta'u were missing LiDAR so a stereocompiled DEM was created from the imagery. | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: External |
Citation Title | Orthorectified Image |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | Photo Science |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | Discrete |
Extent Start Date/Time | 2012 |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Scale Denominator | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Source Contribution |
Orthorectified images were geometrically corrected to achieve a uniform scale. Each frame was adjusted for topographic relief, lens distortion and camera tilt. | Source Geospatial Form: remote-sensing image | Type of Source Media: disc, DVD or online |
Citation Title | Raw Aerial Imagery |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | Photo Science |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | Discrete |
Extent Start Date/Time | 2012-08-28 |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Scale Denominator | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Source Contribution |
The digital aerial imagery was obtained using a large format Microsoft Vexcel Ultracam. Aerial imagery was supplemented with the simultaneous acquisition of airborne GPS/IMU data, which captured the ground coordinate for the nadir point of each photograph. Aerial imagery was exposed at an altitude of 9,000' above mean terrain yielding an approximate GSD of 1 foot. A minimum of 70% forward gain and 40% sidelap was collected to ensure full stereo coverage. The aerial images are used in the production of orthophotos. | Source Geospatial Form: remote-sensing image | Type of Source Media: External Hard Drive |
Citation Title | SoftCopy Aerotriangulation |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | Photo Science |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | Discrete |
Extent Start Date/Time | 2012 |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Scale Denominator | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Source Contribution |
SoftCopy Aerotriangulation is a computer process of densifying the ground control network from locations in a few of the digital images to numerous points in each digital image that is to be used in the mapping process. This process is dependent on the location and coordinate positions of the ABGPS and GPS photo control points as well as a precise camera calibration for the Microsoft Vexcel Ultracam camera used to capture the images. | Source Geospatial Form: ASCII Report File | Type of Source Media: disc |
Citation Title | Stereo Imagery |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | Photo Science |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | Discrete |
Extent Start Date/Time | 2012 |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Scale Denominator | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Source Contribution |
The stereoimages are the product of the processed stereo imagery frames and the Aerotriangulation solution. Digital imagery was produced in TIF file format, 4-band, 8-bit stereo pairs. | Source Geospatial Form: remote-sensing image | Type of Source Media: External Hard Drive |
Citation Title | Tile definition |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | Photo Science |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | Discrete |
Extent Start Date/Time | 2012 |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Scale Denominator | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Source Contribution |
The tile definition was used to cut orthorectified imagery into manageable, usable images in UTM projection. The UTM deliverables defined by this tile definition were modeled after the U.S. National Grid and references NAD83 UTM projection, units of Meters. Each tile is 1500 X 1500 meters. | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: disc |
Citation Title | Tiled Orthophoto |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | Photo Science |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | Discrete |
Extent Start Date/Time | 2012 |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Scale Denominator | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Source Contribution |
The tiled orthophoto was the result of mosaicking orthorectified imagery and using the tile definition to cut the data into manageable, usable orthophotos. 173 ortho tiles for delivery to USGS were created. | Source Geospatial Form: remote-sensing image | Type of Source Media: disc, DVD or online |
Citation Title | |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Scale Denominator |
Citation Title | |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Scale Denominator |
Citation Title | |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Scale Denominator |
Process Steps
Process Step Number | 1 |
---|---|
» Description |
Sixty-five (65) photo identifiable control locations were selected and surveyed to adequately cover the entire state. Details of each point can be found in the full control report. Accuracies of 10cm or better (horizontally and vertically) were required. | Source Produced: Georeferenced Aerial Imagery |
Process Date/Time | 2012-01-01 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 2 |
---|---|
» Description |
New digital aerial imagery was obtained in the spring of 2012 using a large format Microsoft Vexcel Ultracam equipped with Airborne GPS/IMU. A total of 22 flight lines with 671 frames were collected in multispectral (RGB and NIR) 12 bits per band format. The imagery was acquired with a 100.5 mm focal length at an altitude of 9,000' above mean terrain, to yield a raw pixel resolution of 1' (.30 m) suitable for photogrammetric mapping and orthophoto production. The 'leaf condition' was not a concern but imagery was collected in the summer of 2012 under conditions free from flooding and excessive soil moisture. Within populated areas, no more than 5% clouds, cloud shadows, smoke, and haze are permitted. In the uninhabited areas of the islands 10% of clouds, cloud shadows, smoke, and haze may exist. There is no tide coordination. The sun angle threshold was 30 degrees. To ensure complete coverage, photography was collected for all tiles that intersected the islands of American Samoa (Tutuila, Aunnu'u, Ofu, Olosega, and Ta'u). Orthoimages were visually inspected for completeness to ensure that no gaps or image misplacements exist within and between adjacent images. | Source Produced: Raw Aerial Imagery |
Process Date/Time | 2012-01-01 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 3 |
---|---|
» Description |
Imagery and AGPS/IMU data is downloaded from the hard drive on the plane to the hard drive on the ground. AGPS/IMU mission data is processed together with continuously collected ground-based CORS GPS base station data in forward and reverse directions. This precisely determines the aerial camera's position and orientation in the terrain (project) coordinate system and allows for correct orientation of the imagery. | Source Produced: Exterior Orientation File |
Process Date/Time | 2012-01-01 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 4 |
---|---|
» Description |
The EOFILE, raw frames, and control points were input into ISAT in order to complete the SoftCopy Aerotriangulation, described in ATSOL source contribution, and assembled into a block. A second degree block adjustment is run along with the full least squares bundle adjustment. Once the last set of blunders and adjustments are complete, a final block bundle adjustment is run to produce the final solution. The final adjustment of the block is accomplished by using a rigorous simultaneous least squares bundle adjustment. The general procedure is to remove all blunders from the data using automatic blunder detection. The bundle adjustment is then run with minimal ground control to test the photogrammetric measurements for consistency. Next, the full ground control data set, including ABGPS data, is added to the adjustment. The horizontal control is then tightened and the effect on the vertical control and the photogrammetric residuals are inspected. The final adjustment makes sure that all of the measurements are in balance with each other and properly represent the actual conditions. | Source Produced: Stereo Imagery |
Process Date/Time | 2012-01-01 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source | Raw Aerial Imagery |
Process Step Number | 5 |
---|---|
» Description |
The rectification process required as input a digital elevation model (LiDAR_DEM), imagery (IMG1) and soft copy aerotriangulation solution (ATSOL). The orthorectified imagery was produced using Intergraph Orthopro software. It used ImageStation Photogrammetric Manager (ISPM) for photogrammetry project setup, file management, and importing triangulation data from a user defined ASCII file (ATSOL). The ortho project records all the operations, including all the parameters that are defined through the OrthoPro workflow, such as the project area coordinates, pixel size, rotation angle, ISPM project and its unorthorectified source images, product areas (TLDEF) orthorectification settings, seamlines and so on. The results are single frame images that have yet to be mosaicked into manageable tiled orthos. The single frame orthos were checked for accuracy against the surveyed ground control before further image editing. |
Process Date/Time | 2012-01-01 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 6 |
---|---|
» Description |
Orthorectified imagery was mosaicked, locally color-balanced and cut to the tile definition boundaries (TLDEF) using Intergraph Orthopro software. Tiled orthophotos then went through a rigorous manual QC process to evaluate for remaining hotspots (sun reflectance over water), tone quality, color balance and the feathering area along seamlines. Any imperfections at this point were manually edited. Clouds and cloud shadows were attempted to be minimized by using alternate views from adjoining frames. The tiled images were then converted to the required file format (GeoTIFF) and transferred to external hard drives for delivery to USGS. | Source Produced: Tiled Orthophoto |
Process Date/Time | 2012-01-01 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | |
---|---|
» Description | |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | |
---|---|
» Description | |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | |
---|---|
» Description | |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Acquisition Information
Instruments
Instrument Unavailable Reason |
---|
Identifier | |
---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |
Instrument / Gear | |
Instrument Type | |
Description |
Identifier | |
---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |
Instrument / Gear | |
Instrument Type | |
Description |
Identifier | |
---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |
Instrument / Gear | |
Instrument Type | |
Description |
Platforms
Platform Unavailable Reason |
---|
Identifier | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |||||||
Description | |||||||
Mounted Instruments |
|||||||
|
Identifier | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |||||||
Description | |||||||
Mounted Instruments |
|||||||
|
Identifier | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |||||||
Description | |||||||
Mounted Instruments |
|||||||
|
FAQs
Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Question | |
Answer |
Child Items
Rubric scores updated every 15m
Score | Type | Title |
---|---|---|
Related Items
Item Type | Relationship Type | Title |
---|---|---|
Catalog Details
Catalog Item ID | 49496 |
---|---|
Metadata Record Created By | Anne Ball |
Metadata Record Created | 2017-11-15 15:15+0000 |
Metadata Record Last Modified By | Kirk Waters |
» Metadata Record Last Modified | 2024-01-10 20:34+0000 |
Metadata Record Published | 2018-02-08 |
Owner Org | OCMP |
Metadata Publication Status | Published Externally |
Do Not Publish? | N |
Metadata Workflow State | Published / External |
Metadata Last Review Date | 2018-02-08 |
Metadata Review Frequency | 1 Year |
Metadata Next Review Date | 2019-02-08 |
Tags |
---|