gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:49921 eng UTF8 dataset OCM Partners resourceProvider NOAA Office for Coastal Management (843) 740-1202 2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston SC 29405-2413 coastal.info@noaa.gov https://coast.noaa.gov WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link NOAA Office for Coastal Management Website NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page information pointOfContact 2026-04-30T00:00:00 ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata Part 2 Extensions for imagery and gridded data ISO 19115-2:2009(E) 2011 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) Lidar: Burns Study Area or2011_dogami_burns_m1427_metadata 2012 publication NOAA/NMFS/EDM 49921 https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/49921 WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link Full Metadata Record View the complete metadata record on InPort for more information about this dataset. information https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link Citation URL Online Resource download https://coast.noaa.gov WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link Citation URL Online Resource download The Oregon Department of Geology & Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) contracted with Watershed Sciences, Inc. to collect high resolution topographic LiDAR data for multiple areas within the State of Oregon. The areas for LiDAR collection have been designed as part of a collaborative effort of state, federal, and local agencies in order to meet a wide range of project goals. This LiDAR data set was collected from June 19 - 21, 2011 and encompasses a portion of Harney County in Oregon. This data set consists of bare earth and unclassified points. The average pulse density is 8.25 pulses per square meter over terrestrial surfaces. The area of interest (AOI) totals 79 square miles (49,083 acres) and the total area flown (TAF) covers 80 square miles (51,401 acres). The TAF acreage is greater than the original AOI acreage due to buffering and flight planning optimization. In some areas of heavy vegetation or forest cover, there may be relatively few ground points in the LiDAR data. Elevation values for open water surfaces are not valid elevation values because few LiDAR points are returned from water surfaces. LiDAR intensity values were also collected. Original contact information: Contact Name: Ian Madin Contact Org: DOGAMI Phone: 971-673-1542 Email: ian.madin@dogami.state.or.us Provide high resolution terrain elevation and land cover elevation data. DOGAMI completed NOAA Office for Coastal Management (843) 740-1202 2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston SC 29405-2413 coastal.info@noaa.gov https://coast.noaa.gov WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link NOAA Office for Coastal Management Website NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page information pointOfContact NOAA Office for Coastal Management (843) 740-1202 2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston SC 29405-2413 coastal.info@noaa.gov https://coast.noaa.gov WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link NOAA Office for Coastal Management Website NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page information custodian notPlanned https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/1427/supplemental/2011_Oregon_DOGAMI_Burns_Lidar.kmz This graphic shows the lidar coverage for the Burns Study Area. kmz Bare earth Bare ground DOGAMI High-resolution Light Detection and Ranging theme Lidar - partner (no harvest) project InPort otherRestrictions Cite As: OCM Partners, [Date of Access]: 2011 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) Lidar: Burns Study Area [Data Date Range], https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/49921. NOAA provides no warranty, nor accepts any liability occurring from any incomplete, incorrect, or misleading data, or from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading use of the data. It is the responsibility of the user to determine whether or not the data is suitable for the intended purpose. otherRestrictions Access Constraints: None otherRestrictions Use Constraints: Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. otherRestrictions Distribution Liability: Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI), the Office for Coastal Management or its partners. unclassified vector eng; US elevation Microsoft Windows XP Version 5.1 (Build 2600) Service Pack 2; ESRI ArcCatalog 9.2.0.1324 -119.173407 -118.870607 43.495661 43.698861 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2011-06-19 2011-06-21 The final LiDAR Report for the Burns study area may be accessed at: https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/1427/supplemental/OLC_Burns.pdf A footprint of this data set may be viewed in Google Earth at: https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/1427/supplemental/2011_Oregon_DOGAMI_Burns_Lidar.kmz NOAA Office for Coastal Management (843) 740-1202 2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston SC 29405-2413 coastal.info@noaa.gov https://coast.noaa.gov WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link NOAA Office for Coastal Management Website NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page information distributor https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=1427 WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link Customized Download Create custom data files by choosing data area, product type, map projection, file format, datum, etc. download https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/1427/index.html WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link Bulk Download Simple download of data files. download dataset Horizontal Positional Accuracy Not specified in final report, assumed to be 1 m. Vertical Positional Accuracy The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of the data is 0.03 meters. Accuracy was assessed using 594 RTK (real time kinematic) ground survey points. These ground survey points are distributed throughout the Burns study area. The final LiDAR Report for the Burns study area may be accessed at: https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/1427/supplemental/OLC_Burns.pdf Completeness Report LiDAR data has been collected and processed for all areas within the project study area. Conceptual Consistency LiDAR flight lines have been examined to ensure that there is at least 50% sidelap, that there are no gaps between flightlines, and that overlapping flightlines have consistent elevation values. Shaded relief images have been visually inspected for data errors such as pits, border artifacts, gaps, and shifting. No metadata was provided to NOAA OCM along with this lidar data set. The following process step contains information derived from the metadata record of another 2011 Oregon DOGAMI lidar data set and the Watershed Sciences, Inc. lidar report. This lidar report may be accessed at: https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/1427/supplemental/OLC_Burns.pdf Acquisition 1. The lidar data were collected between June 19 - 21, 2011. 2. The survey used a Leica SN094 sensor mounted in a Cessna Caravan 208B. 3. Near nadir scan angles were used to increase penetration of vegetation to ground surfaces. 4. Ground level GPS and aircraft IMU were collected during the flight. Processing 1. Flight lines and data were reviewed to ensure complete coverage of the study area and positional accuracy of the laser points. 2. Laser point return coordinates were computed using ALS Post Processor software and IPAS Pro GPS/INS software, based on independent data from the LiDAR system, IMU, and aircraft. 3. The raw LiDAR file was assembled into flight lines per return with each point having an associated x, y, and z coordinate. 4. Visual inspection of swath to swath laser point consistencies within the study area were used to perform manual refinements of system alignment. 5. Custom algorithms were designed to evaluate points between adjacent flight lines. Automated system alignment was computed based upon randomly selected swath to swath accuracy measurements that consider elevation, slope, and intensities. Specifically, refinement in the combination of system pitch, roll and yaw offset parameters optimize internal consistency. 6. Noise (e.g., pits and birds) was filtered using ALS postprocessing software, based on known elevation ranges and included the removal of any cycle slips. 7. Using TerraScan and Microstation, ground classifications utilized custom settings appropriate to the study area. 8. The corrected and filtered return points were compared to the RTK ground survey points collected to verify the vertical and horizontal accuracies. 9. Points were output as laser points, TINed and GRIDed surfaces 2011-01-01T00:00:00 The NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) received the files in las format. The files contained LiDAR elevation and intensity measurements. The data were in UTM Zone 11, NAD83 (CORS96) coordinates, NAVD88 (Geoid03) vertical datum and units in meters. OCM performed the following processing for data storage and Digital Coast provisioning purposes: 1. The data were converted from UTM Zone 11 coordinates to geographic coordinates. 2. The data were converted from NAVD88 (orthometric) heights to GRS80 (ellipsoid) heights using Geoid03. 3. The data were sorted by time and zipped to laz format. 2012-12-01T00:00:00