gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:51889
eng
UTF8
dataset
Elevation
OCM Partners
resourceProvider
NOAA Office for Coastal Management
(843) 740-1202
2234 South Hobson Ave
Charleston
SC
29405-2413
coastal.info@noaa.gov
https://coast.noaa.gov
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
NOAA Office for Coastal Management Website
NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page
information
pointOfContact
2024-02-29T00:00:00
ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata Part 2 Extensions for imagery and gridded data
ISO 19115-2:2009(E)
2013 Queen Annes County HD LiDAR & Hydro
QAC_HD-LiDAR_Metadata.xml
2014-12-31
publication
NOAA/NMFS/EDM
51889
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/51889
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
Full Metadata Record
View the complete metadata record on InPort for more information about this dataset.
information
https://coast.noaa.gov/
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
NOAA's Office for Coastal Management (OCM) website
Information on the NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM)
download
https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
NOAA's Office for Coastal Management (OCM) Data Access Viewer (DAV)
The Data Access Viewer (DAV) allows a user to search for and download elevation, imagery, and land cover data for the coastal U.S. and its territories. The data, hosted by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management, can be customized and requested for free download through a checkout interface. An email provides a link to the customized data, while the original data set is available through a link within the viewer.
download
The County of Queen Anne Maryland requested delivery of three dimensional classified point cloud and hydro-flattened terrain data derived from LiDAR(Light Detection and Ranging) technology for the entirety of Queen Anne's County, MD. Remotely sensed, geographically referenced elevation measurements were collected by Axis Geospatial, LLC using airborne LiDAR sensors.
The purpose of this project was to acquire LiDAR for The County of Queen Anne Maryland covering the entirety of Queen Anne's County, MD plus 200 feet, to allow the generation of the required topography.
The LIDAR for this project were done by Axis Geospatial, LLC of Easton, Maryland., Axis Geospatial
completed
NOAA Office for Coastal Management
(843) 740-1202
2234 South Hobson Ave
Charleston
SC
29405-2413
coastal.info@noaa.gov
https://coast.noaa.gov
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
NOAA Office for Coastal Management Website
NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page
information
pointOfContact
NOAA Office for Coastal Management
(843) 740-1202
2234 South Hobson Ave
Charleston
SC
29405-2413
coastal.info@noaa.gov
https://coast.noaa.gov
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
NOAA Office for Coastal Management Website
NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page
information
custodian
notPlanned
https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/8489/supplemental/2013_QAC_area.kmz
This graphic displays the footprint for this lidar data set.
KML
EARTH SCIENCE > LAND SURFACE > TOPOGRAPHY > TERRAIN ELEVATION
EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > COASTAL PROCESSES > COASTAL ELEVATION
theme
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords
17.0
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
VERTICAL LOCATION > LAND SURFACE
VERTICAL LOCATION > SEA FLOOR
place
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords
17.0
LIDAR > Light Detection and Ranging
instrument
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Instrument Keywords
17.2
Airplane > Airplane
platform
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords
17.2
Centreville
Kent Island
Maryland
Queen Anne's County
place
Geographic Names Information System
beach
erosion
theme
Lidar - partner (no harvest)
project
InPort
otherRestrictions
Cite As: OCM Partners, [Date of Access]: 2013 Queen Annes County HD LiDAR & Hydro [Data Date Range], https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/51889.
NOAA provides no warranty, nor accepts any liability occurring from any incomplete, incorrect, or misleading data, or from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading use of the data. It is the responsibility of the user to determine whether or not the data is suitable for the intended purpose.
otherRestrictions
Access Constraints: None
otherRestrictions
Use Constraints: Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations.
otherRestrictions
Distribution Liability: The data represents the results of data collection/processing for this specific project and describes the general existing condition on the ground at the time of the acquisition. As such the data is only valid for its intended use, content, time, accuracy, and scale specifications. The user is responsible for the results of any application of the data for other than its intended purpose.
Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of NOAA, the Office for Coastal Management or its partners
unclassified
NOAA Data Management Plan (DMP)
NOAA/NMFS/EDM
51889
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inportserve/waf/noaa/nos/ocmp/dmp/pdf/51889.pdf
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
NOAA Data Management Plan (DMP)
NOAA Data Management Plan for this record on InPort.
information
crossReference
eng; US
elevation
Microsoft Windows 7 Version 6.1 (Build 7601) Service Pack 1
-76.3776
-75.74641
38.85122
39.26307
| Currentness: Ground Condition
2013-02-14
| Currentness: Ground Condition
2013-03-05
| Currentness: Ground Condition
2014-01-13
| Currentness: Ground Condition
2014-12-31
false
eng
false
The attributes and classifications met contract specifications.
LAS/LAZ - LASer
Zip
NOAA Office for Coastal Management
(843) 740-1202
2234 South Hobson Ave
Charleston
SC
29405-2413
coastal.info@noaa.gov
https://coast.noaa.gov
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
NOAA Office for Coastal Management Website
NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page
information
distributor
https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=8489
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
Customized Download
Create custom data files by choosing data area, product type, map projection, file format, datum, etc.
download
https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/8489/index.html
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
Bulk Download
Bulk download of data files in LAZ format, geographic coordinates, orthometric heights.
download
dataset
Horizontal Positional Accuracy
This data meets RMSEr <50 cm
Vertical Positional Accuracy
This data meets the Digital Elevation Data Vertical Accuracy - Class IV. Non-vegetated: 10 cm RMSEz; 20 cm @ 95% confidence. Vegetated: 30 cm @ 95 percentile. Relative Accuracy Swath-to-Swath in Non-vegetated Terrain: 8 cm RMSDz; 16 cm Max Diff
Completeness Report
The data covers the Queen Annes County LiDAR project area located in Queen Annes County, Maryland. The project area includes Kent Island and the Chesapeake Bay on the western side and extends east to the Delaware State line. The total project acquisition area covers 510 square miles.
Conceptual Consistency
Data for the Queen Annes County LiDAR project was visually inspected by Axis Geospatial, LLC for both vertical and horizontal accuracy. Checks are done to ensure that the data is seamless from one tile to the next before being combined and the project requirements have been met across the entire project area. All data are seamless from one tile to the next, containing no gaps or "no data" areas.
Using a Trimble Harrier 68i High Definition LiDAR sensor on board a Cessna 206, 185 flight lines of high-density data were collected during 18 separate missions, flown as close together as the weather conditions permitted, to ensure consistent ground conditions across the project area, at a nominal pulse spacing (NPS) of 0.46 m achieved a point density of 4.73 ppm2, were collected by Axis Geospatial, LLC covering Queen Annes County, MD (approximately 510 square miles). Data Acquisition Height = 2,034 feet Above Ground Level (AGL) - Aircraft Speed = 116 Knots. Multiple returns were recorded for each laser pulse along with an intensity value for each return. A total of 17 missions were flown from February 14th, 2013 to March 5th, 2013 with one additional collection on January 13th, 2014. The presence of a strong CORS (Continuously Operating Reference Station) configuration allowed for the LiDAR to be acquired with Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) techniques and procedures. 92 ground control points were surveyed through static methods. The GEOID used to reduce satellite-derived elevations to orthometric heights was GEOID12A. Data for the task order is referenced to the Maryland State Plane, North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83), and North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88), in US Survey Feet. Airborne GPS data was differentially processed and integrated with the post-processed inertial measurement unit (IMU) data to derive a smoothed best estimate of trajectory (SBET). The SBET was used to reduce the lidar slant range measurements to a raw reflective surface for each flight line. The coverage was classified to extract a bare earth digital elevation model (DEM) and separate last returns.
2013-02-14T00:00:00
During the project data acquisition by Axis Geospatial, LLC, East-West cross flights were flown over each of the 7 delivery block areas in order to tie the data together from multi-day North-South collections.
2013-02-14T00:00:00
Once the data acquisition and GPS processing phases are complete, the lidar data were processed immediately by Axis Geospatial, LLC to verify the coverage had no voids. The GPS and IMU data were post-processed using ApplanixPOSPac v.6.1 software to derive a best estimate of trajectory. The quality of the solution was verified to be consistent with the accuracy requirements of the project.
2013-02-14T00:00:00
The individual flight lines were inspected by Axis Geospatial, LLC to ensure the systematic and residual errors have been identified and removed. Then, the flight lines were compared to adjacent flight lines for any mismatches to obtain a homogenous coverage throughout the project area. Axis Geospatial, LLC compared LiDAR intensity values against known control point locations that were on defineable features such as the end of a paint line and measured the apparent offsets; these values were then averaged to come up with the X and Y values used for the horizontal correction. Additionally Axis Geospatial, LLC compared a TIN (Triangulated Irregular Network) of LiDAR points within 25 feet of each surveyed control point and measured the apparent vertical offsets; these values were then averaged to come up with the Z value used for the vertical correction. Next the point cloud underwent a classification process to determine bare-earth points and non-ground points utilizing TerraSolid, TerraScanLiDAR processing and modeling software. v. 014.013. This process determined Default (Class 1), Ground (Class 2), Noise (Class 7), and Water (Class 9) classifications. The bare-earth (Class 2 - Ground) lidar points underwent a manual QA/QC step to verify that artifacts have been removed from the bare-earth surface. The surveyed ground control points are used to perform the accuracy checks and statistical analysis of the lidar dataset.
2014-12-31T00:00:00
Axis Geospatial, LLC located a total of 43 check points for use in the analysis of the lidar data quality. The points were located on relatively flat terrain on surfaces that generally consisted of grass, gravel, or bare earth. Vertical RMSE for FVA (based on 12 points) was found to 0.104 feet; SVA Field (based on 25 points) was found to be 0.181 feet; and SVA Woods (based on 6 points) was found to be 0.373 feet.
Applanix software (PosPAC MMS) was used in the post processing of the airborne GPS and inertial data, which are critical to the positioning and orientation of the sensor during all flights. POSPac MMS provides the smoothed best estimate of trajectory (SBET) that is necessary for the post processor to develop the point cloud from the lidar missions. The point cloud is the mathematical three-dimensional collection of all returns from all laser pulses as determined from the aerial mission. The GEOID used to reduce satellite derived elevations to orthometric heights was GEOID12A. Data for the task order is referenced to the Maryland State Plane, NAD83, and NAVD88, in US Survey Feet. At this point the data are ready for analysis, classification, and filtering to generate a bare-earth surface model in which the above ground features are removed from the data set. The point cloud was manipulated by the Optech or Leica software; GeoCue, TerraScan, and TerraModeler software were used for the automated data classification, manual cleanup, and bare-earth generation from the data. Project specific macros were used to classify the ground.
All data were manually reviewed and any remaining artifacts removed using functionality provided by TerraScan and TerraModeler.
All ground (ASPRS Class 2) lidar data inside of a Lake Pond and Double Line drain were classified to water (ASPRS Class 9) using digitized breaklines and TerraScan macro functionality. All Lake Pond and Double Line Island features were checked to ensure that the ground (ASPRS Class 2) were reclassified to the correct classification after the automated classification was completed.
Data were then run through additional macros to ensure deliverable classification levels matching the ASPRS LAS Version 1.2 Classification structure. GeoCue functionality was then used to ensure correct LAS Versioning. In-house software was used as a final QA/QC check to provide LAS Analysis of the delivered tiles. QA/QC checks were performed on a per tile level to verify final classification metrics and full LAS header information.
2014-12-31T00:00:00
Axis Geospatial, LLC used the bare-earth (Class 2 - Ground) lidar points and Hydro 3-D breaklines to generate Hydro-flattened Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) using Blue Marble Geographics Global Mapper v15.2.9 software. The DEMs were exported to an Erdas Imagine File (.img) format with 32-bit floating point samples and a 2-foot sample spacing (pixel size). The DEMs were tiled out into the same 565 MD State delivery tiles (6000 feet x 4000 feet) as the LiDAR delivery. Note that much of the hydro within the project area, specifically the Sea Shore features (Chesapeake Bay, Chester River, shores around Wye Island) are influenced by the tide. The LiDAR acquisition took place over the course of 18 different missions at varying tidal stages; because of this, there may be anomalies in the hydro-flattening between data from different missions as a result of the tide.
2014-12-31T00:00:00
NOAA OCM downloaded the data from the Maryland iMAP (imap.maryland.gov). Data were reprojected into geographic coordinates and transformed to ellipsoid heights (meters) vertically. The geoid12a model was used for the transform.
2018-03-07T00:00:00
Office for Coastal Management
processor