2012 FEMA Lidar: Region 3 (MD, VA, WV)
OCM Partners
Data Set
(DS)
| ID: 52042
| Published / External
Created: 2018-03-14
|
Last Modified: 2023-10-17
Project (PRJ) | ID: 49401
ID: 52042
Data Set (DS)
* Discovery• First Pass
» Metadata Rubric
Item Identification
* » Title | 2012 FEMA Lidar: Region 3 (MD, VA, WV) |
---|---|
Short Name | 2012 FEMA Region 3 |
* Status | Completed |
Creation Date | |
Revision Date | |
• Publication Date | 2012-07 |
* » Abstract |
Dewberry collected LiDAR for ~3,942 square miles in Virginia, West Virginia, and Maryland Counties. Those counties are: Maryland - Allegany, Frederick, Washington Virginia - Clarke, Fairfax, Fauquier, Frederick West Virginia - Berkeley, Jefferson, Morgan The acquisition was performed by Geodigital. The nominal pulse spacing for this project is 1.6 ft (0.5 meters). This project was collected with a sensor which collects intensity values for each discrete pulse extracted from the waveform. GPS Week Time, Intensity, Flightline and echo number attributes were provided for each LiDAR point. Dewberry used proprietary procedures to classify the LAS according to contract specifications: 1-Unclassified, 2-Ground, 7-Noise, 9-Water, 10-Ignored Ground due to breakline proximity, and 11-Withheld. |
* Purpose |
The purpose of this LiDAR data was to produce high accuracy 3D elevation products, including tiled LiDAR in LAS 1.2 format, 3D breaklines, and a 1 m cell size hydro flattened Digital Elevation Models (DEM). |
Notes | |
Other Citation Details | |
• Supplemental Information |
A complete description of this dataset is available in the Final Project Report. |
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) | |
DOI Registration Authority | |
DOI Issue Date |
Keywords
Theme Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords | EARTH SCIENCE > LAND SURFACE > TOPOGRAPHY > TERRAIN ELEVATION |
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords | EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > COASTAL PROCESSES > COASTAL ELEVATION |
ISO 19115 Topic Category | elevation |
Temporal Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
* Spatial Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords | CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords | CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > MARYLAND |
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords | VERTICAL LOCATION > LAND SURFACE |
Stratum Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Instrument Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Instrument Keywords | LIDAR > Light Detection and Ranging |
Platform Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords | Airplane > Airplane |
Physical Location
• » Organization | Office for Coastal Management |
---|---|
• » City | Charleston |
• » State/Province | SC |
• Country | |
• » Location Description |
Data Set Information
* Data Set Scope Code | Data Set |
---|---|
• Data Set Type | Elevation |
• Maintenance Frequency | As Needed |
Maintenance Note | |
» Data Presentation Form | map |
• Entity Attribute Overview | |
Entity Attribute Detail Citation | |
Entity Attribute Detail URL | |
Distribution Liability |
This data was produced for the USGS according to specific project requirements. This information is provided "as is". Further documentation of this data can be obtained by contacting: USGS/NGTOC, 1400 Independence Road, Rolla, MO 65401. Telephone (573) 308-3587. Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of NOAA, the Office for Coastal Management or its partners |
Data Set Credit | FEMA Region 3, USGS, Dewberry |
Support Roles
* » Support Role | Data Steward |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2018 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | Distributor |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2018 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | Metadata Contact |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2018 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | Point of Contact |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2018 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | |
Date Effective To | |
* » Contact | |
* Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | |
Date Effective To | |
* » Contact | |
* Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | |
Date Effective To | |
* » Contact | |
* Contact Instructions |
Extents
Currentness Reference | Ground Condition |
---|
Extent Group 1
Extent Description |
---|
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 1
* » W° Bound | -78.383395 |
---|---|
* » E° Bound | -77.442101 |
* » N° Bound | 39.723097 |
* » S° Bound | 39.327819 |
* » Description |
Extent Group 1 / Vertical Extent
EPSG Code | |
---|---|
Vertical Minimum | |
Vertical Maximum |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 1
* » Time Frame Type | Range |
---|---|
* » Start | 2012-01-31 |
End | 2012-03-27 |
Alternate Start As Of Info | |
Alternate End As Of Info | |
Description |
Spatial Information
Spatial Resolution
Angular Distance | |
---|---|
Angular Distance Units | |
Horizontal Distance | 0.5 |
Horizontal Distance Units | Meter |
Vertical Distance | |
Vertical Distance Units | |
Equivalent Scale Denominator | |
Level of Detail Description |
Spatial Representation
Grid Representation Used? | |
---|---|
Vector Representation Used? | Yes |
Text / Table Representation Used? | |
TIN Representation Used? | |
Stereo Model Representation Used? | |
Video Representation Used? |
Grid Representation
Dimension Count | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cell Geometry | |||||||||||||
Transformation Parameter Available? | |||||||||||||
Axis Dimension |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Axis Dimension |
|||||||||||||
|
Vector Representation
Topology Level | |
---|---|
Complex Object Present? | |
Complex Object Count | |
Composite Object Present? | |
Composite Object Count | |
Curve Object Present? | |
Curve Object Count | |
Point Object Present? | |
Point Object Count | |
Solid Object Present? | |
Solid Object Count | |
Surface Object Present? | |
Surface Object Count |
Reference Systems
Reference System
EPSG Code | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Horizontal Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vertical Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Access Information
Data License | |
---|---|
Data License URL | |
Data License Statement | |
* » Security Class | Unclassified |
* Security Classification System | |
Security Handling Description | |
• Data Access Policy | |
» Data Access Procedure |
Data is available online for custom downloads |
• » Data Access Constraints |
None |
• Data Use Constraints |
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. |
Metadata Access Constraints | |
Metadata Use Constraints |
Distribution Information
Start Date | 2018 |
---|---|
End Date | Present |
» Download URL | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=8496 |
Distributor | |
File Name | Customized Download |
Description |
Create custom data files by choosing data area, product type, map projection, file format, datum, etc. |
File Date/Time | |
File Type (Deprecated) | |
Distribution Format | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | Zip |
Review Status |
Start Date | 2018 |
---|---|
End Date | Present |
» Download URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/8496/index.html |
Distributor | |
File Name | Bulk Download |
Description |
Bulk download of data files in LAZ format, geographic coordinates, orthometric heights. |
File Date/Time | |
File Type (Deprecated) | LAZ |
Distribution Format | LAS/LAZ - LASer |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | Zip |
Review Status |
Start Date | |
---|---|
End Date | |
» Download URL | |
Distributor | |
File Name | |
Description | |
File Date/Time | |
File Type | |
FGDC Content Type | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
Start Date | |
---|---|
End Date | |
» Download URL | |
Distributor | |
File Name | |
Description | |
File Date/Time | |
File Type | |
FGDC Content Type | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
Start Date | |
---|---|
End Date | |
» Download URL | |
Distributor | |
File Name | |
Description | |
File Date/Time | |
File Type | |
FGDC Content Type | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
Archive Information
Location | |
---|---|
File Identifier | |
File Name | |
URL | |
Description | |
DOI | |
Archive Date | |
Archive Update Frequency |
Location | |
---|---|
File Identifier | |
File Name | |
URL | |
Description | |
DOI | |
Archive Date | |
Archive Update Frequency |
Location | |
---|---|
File Identifier | |
File Name | |
URL | |
Description | |
DOI | |
Archive Date | |
Archive Update Frequency |
URLs
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov/ |
---|---|
Name | NOAA's Office for Coastal Management (OCM) website |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | HTML |
Description |
Information on the NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/ |
---|---|
Name | NOAA's Office for Coastal Management (OCM) Data Access Viewer (DAV) |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | HTML |
Description |
The Data Access Viewer (DAV) allows a user to search for and download elevation, imagery, and land cover data for the coastal U.S. and its territories. The data, hosted by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management, can be customized and requested for free download through a checkout interface. An email provides a link to the customized data, while the original data set is available through a link within the viewer. |
URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/8496/supplemental/2012_FEMA_reg3_area.kmz |
---|---|
Name | Browse graphic |
URL Type | Browse Graphic |
File Resource Format | KML |
Description |
This graphic displays the footprint for this lidar data set. |
URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/8496/supplemental/Dewberry_ProjectReport_Jefferson_Fauquier_Fairfax_Frederick.pdf |
---|---|
Name | Project report - Jefferson, Fauquier, Frederick, and Fairfax Counties |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
Project report by Dewberry. |
URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/8496/supplemental/Dewberry_ProjectReport_Berkeley_Clarke_Frederick_Morgan.pdf |
---|---|
Name | Project report - Berkeley, Clark, Frederick, and Morgan Counties |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
Project report by Dewberry. |
URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/8496/supplemental/VA-MD-WV_FEMA-lidar-R3Lot5_2012_QA_REPORT.pdf |
---|---|
Name | QA report, Lot 5 |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/8496/supplemental/VA-WV-MD_FEMA-LIDAR-R3Lot4_2012_QA_REPORT.pdf |
---|---|
Name | QA report, Lot 4 |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
URL | |
---|---|
Name | |
URL Type | |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
URL | |
---|---|
Name | |
URL Type | |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
URL | |
---|---|
Name | |
URL Type | |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
Activity Log
Activity Time | |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Activity Time | |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Activity Time | |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Issues
Issue Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Issue |
Issue Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Issue |
Issue Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Issue |
Technical Environment
Description |
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Version 6.1 (Build 7601) Service Pack 1; ESRI ArcCatalog 10.0.0.2414 |
---|
Data Quality
Representativeness | |
---|---|
Accuracy | |
Analytical Accuracy | |
Horizontal Positional Accuracy |
Lidar source compiled to meet 1 meter horizontal accuracy at the 95 percent confidence level. Qualitative value: 3.28 ft, Test that produced the valued: Dewberry does not perform independent horizontal accuracy testing on the LiDAR. LiDAR vendors perform calibrations on the LiDAR sensor and compare data to adjoing flight lines to ensure LiDAR meets the 1 meter horizontal accuracy standard at the 95% confidence level. Please see the final project report for more details. |
Vertical Positional Accuracy |
Washington: The vertical accuracy of the DEMs was tested by Dewberry with 116 independently collected checkpoints. The survey checkpoints are distributed throughout the project area. These 116 checkpoints contain 28 open terrain points, 12 crops/weeds points, 24 forested points, 27 urban points, and 25 points located around brush lands and trees. The 116 checkpoints were used to compute the Fundamental Vertical Accuracy (FVA) and the Consolidated Vertical Accuracy (CVA). Project specifications required a FVA of 0.245 meters for open terrain and a CVA of 0.363 meters. Allegany County: The vertical accuracy of the LiDAR was tested by Dewberry with 30 independently collected checkpoints. The survey checkpoints are distributed throughout the project area. These 30 checkpoints contain 5 open terrain points, 7 crops/weeds points, 5 forested points, 7 urban points, and 6 points located around brush lands and trees. The 27 checkpoints were used to compute the Fundamental Vertical Accuracy (FVA) and the Consolidated Vertical Accuracy (CVA). Project specifications required a FVA of 0.245 meters for open terrain and a CVA of 0.363 meters. Fairfax, Faucquier, Frederick, and Jefferson Counties: The vertical accuracy of the DEMs was tested by Dewberry with 206 independently collected checkpoints. The survey checkpoints are distributed throughout the project area. These 206 checkpoints contain 42 open terrain points, 40 crops/weeds points, 41 forested points, 42 urban points, and 41 points located around brush lands and trees. Project specifications required a FVA of 0.245 meters for open terrain and a CVA of 0.363 meters. |
Quantitation Limits | |
Bias | |
Comparability | |
Completeness Measure | |
Precision | |
Analytical Precision | |
Field Precision | |
Sensitivity | |
Detection Limit | |
Completeness Report |
A visual qualitative assessment was performed to ensure data completeness and bare earth data cleanliness. No void or missing data, the bare earth surface is of good quality and data passes vertical accuracy specifications. |
Conceptual Consistency |
Data covers the tile scheme provided for the project area. |
» Quality Control Procedures Employed |
Data Management
» Have Resources for Management of these Data Been Identified? | |
---|---|
» Approximate Percentage of Budget for these Data Devoted to Data Management | |
» Do these Data Comply with the Data Access Directive? | |
» Is Access to the Data Limited Based on an Approved Waiver? | |
» If Distributor (Data Hosting Service) is Needed, Please Indicate | |
» Approximate Delay Between Data Collection and Dissemination | |
» If Delay is Longer than Latency of Automated Processing, Indicate Under What Authority Data Access is Delayed |
|
» Actual or Planned Long-Term Data Archive Location | |
» If World Data Center or Other, Specify | |
» If To Be Determined, Unable to Archive, or No Archiving Intended, Explain |
|
» Approximate Delay Between Data Collection and Archiving | |
» How Will the Data Be Protected from Accidental or Malicious Modification or Deletion Prior to Receipt by the Archive? |
|
Lineage
» Lineage Statement |
---|
Sources
Citation Title | FEMA Region 3 FY 12 LiDAR |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | 2012-07-27 |
Extent Type | Range |
Extent Start Date/Time | 2012-01-31 |
Extent End Date/Time | 2012-03-27 |
Scale Denominator | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Source Contribution |
LiDAR data representing FEMA Region 3FT Task Order to be used for various analyses and research purposes. |
Citation Title | |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Scale Denominator |
Citation Title | |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Scale Denominator |
Citation Title | |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Scale Denominator |
Process Steps
Process Step Number | 1 |
---|---|
» Description |
- Establishment of survey points to support the LiDAR data collection. six existing published NGS stations (AI6312, AJ8025, DM6144, HV3503, JV4103, JV6141) were observed in a GPS control network and used to establish five new points for the primary control for this site. AI6312, AJ8025, DM6144, HV3503, JV4103, JV6141, 335DEW09, 335DEW10, 335DEW20, 335DEW21, 335DEW22 were observed and used to control all flight missions and static ground surveys. The following are the final coordinates of the control points used for this project: SurveyBlock, Station, Latitude(D M S Hem), Longitude(D M S Hem), H-Ell(m), H-MSL(m) 335_DEW_11, 335DEW09, 39 02 32.49529, -77 31 34.98309, 91.1625, 123.3164 335_DEW_11, 335DEW10, 38 45 06.58533, -77 44 53.11093, 105.8415, 138.0279 335_DEW_11, 335DEW20, 39 33 44.04655, -78 37 05.79616, 152.4477, 185.5792 335_DEW_11, 335DEW21, 39 24 00.80394, -78 04 35.85693, 204.8443, 238.8695 335_DEW_11, 335DEW22, 39 29 36.03322, -77 34 08.01429, 150.5777, 183.7722 335_DEW_11, AI6312, 39 41 43.29694, -78 47 16.08769, 182.8978, 215.3993 335_DEW_11, AJ8025, 39 17 34.38480, -77 18 53.40005, 146.1161, 178.2409 335_DEW_11, DM6144, 38 35 08.87989, -77 42 43.87127, 64.7557, 96.8580 335_DEW_11, HV3503, 38 58 29.39869, -77 41 26.89214, 109.6036, 141.9908 335_DEW_11, JV4103, 39 32 18.83476, -77 59 06.07081, 122.8047, 157.0112 335_DEW_11, JV6141, 39 04 51.93707, -77 33 30.18563, 81.9107, 114.2138 |
Process Date/Time | 2012-01-01 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 2 |
---|---|
» Description |
- Airborne acquisition of Lidar GeoDigital used two Optech ALTM 3100EA system to collect the data. The Optech System was configured in the following method: Aircraft Speed 150 knots Data Acquisition Height 950 m AGL Swath Width 680.00 m Distance between Flight Lines 470.00 m Overlap 30 % Scanner Field Of View 22 +/- degrees (+/-2 degrees flagged as withheld) Pulse Repetition Rate 70 KHz Scan Frequency 40 Hz Number of Returns per Pulse 4 Discrete returns Beam Divergence 0.3 mRad Flight Line Length shorter than 70km Base Station Distance shorter than 40km Resultant Raw Point Density ~1 pt/m2 with overlap Aircraft Speed 150 knots Data Acquisition Height 950 m AGL Swath Width 680.00 m Distance between Flight Lines 350.00 m Overlap 55 % Scanner Field Of View 22 +/- degrees (+/-2 degrees flagged as withheld) Pulse Repetition Rate 70 KHz Scan Frequency 40 Hz Number of Returns per Pulse 4 Discrete returns Beam Divergence 0.3 mRad Flight Line Length shorter than 70km Base Station Distance shorter than 40km Resultant Raw Point Density ~1 pt/m2 with overlap Aircraft platforms were used in the collection of this project: A Cessna 310 aircraft was used to conduct the aerial survey. The Cessna 310 is a fixed wing aircraft that have an endurance of approximately 5 hours. -GPS-IMU: High accuracy IMU (200Hz) and GPS information (1Hz) concerning the attitude and position of the sensor were acquired at the same time as the Laser data. Ground based GPS stations also acquired consecutive GPS information for the duration of the flights. A combination of Sokkia GSR 2600 and NovAtel DL-4+ dual-frequency GPS receivers were used to support the airborne operations of this survey.
- Flights and Flight Lines The area is covered by several missions, a mission is defined as the block of acquisition between aircraft take-off and landing flown under good meteorological and GPS conditions, and each mission includes multiple flightlines. List of Base Stations: JV6141 Number of Missions: 74 List Of Missions: o112031a, o112031b, o112034a, o112034a, o112034b, o112050b, o112051a, o112051b, o112053a, o112057a, o112057b, o112066a, o112070a, o112070b, o112071a, o112071b, 0112072a, o112072b, o112073a, o112073b, o112082a, o112083a, o112083b, o112086a, o112029a o112029b o112030a o112031a o112031b o112034a o112064b, o112070a o112070b o112071a o112071b o112072a o112072b o112073a o112082a o112083a o112083b o112086a o112090a o112092a o112093a o112093b o112093c o112094a o112094b o112094c o112094d o112095a o112095b o112096a o112096b o112096c o112097a o112097b o112098a o112100a o112101a o112103a o112103b o112104a o112104b o112104c o112105a o212094a o212095a o212096a o212096b o212097a o212097b o112046a o112046b o112048a o112048b |
Process Date/Time | 2012-01-01 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 3 |
---|---|
» Description |
- Airborne GPS Kinematic processing Airborne GPS kinematic data was processed on-site using GrafNav kinematic On-The-Fly (OTF) software. Flights were flown with a minimum of 6 satellites in view (13 degrees above the horizon) and with a PDOP of better than 4. Distances from base station to aircraft were kept to a maximum of 40 km, to ensure a strong OTF (On-The-Fly) solution. For all flights, the GPS data can be classified as excellent, with GPS residuals of 3cm average but no larger than 10 cm being recorded. The Geoid09 geoid model, published by the NGS, was used to transform all ellipsoidal heights to orthometric. |
Process Date/Time | 2012-03-01 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 4 |
---|---|
» Description |
- Generation and Calibration of laser points Laser data points are generated using Optech's software Dashmap. Those software combine the raw laser range and angle data file with the finalized GPS/IMU trajectory information. Each mission is evaluated in Terrasolid's Terramatch software to correct any residual roll pitch heading misalignments, if necessary those values are to the data. The resulting point cloud is projected into the desired coordinate system and created in LAS format. One file per swath, files bigger than 2Gb split in 2. On a project level, a coverage check is carried out to ensure no slivers are present. |
Process Date/Time | 2012-03-01 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 5 |
---|---|
» Description |
- Mission to mission adjustments of Lidar data All missions are validated and adjusted against the adjoining missions for relative vertical biases and collected GPS static and kinematic ground truthing points for absolute vertical accuracy purposes. |
Process Date/Time | 2012-03-01 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 6 |
---|---|
» Description |
- Deliverable Product Generation *Raw Calibrated LIDAR Point Cloud Raw LiDAR point cloud, was provided in the following formats/parameters: - LAS V1.2, point record format 1, Adjusted GPS time, georeferencing information populated in header - The following fields are included in the LAS file: 1. Adjusted GPS time reported to the nearest microsecond 2. Flight line ID 3. Easting (reported to the nearest 0.01 m) 4. Northing (reported to the nearest 0.01 m) 5. Elevation (reported to the nearest 0.01 m) 6. intensity 7. Echo number 8. Classification 9. Scan angle 10. Edge of scan 11. Scan direction - Full swaths, all collected points delivered (except discarded flightline) - The Withheld bit flags the last 2 degrees of the swath (Additional areas are classified with the withheld in areas where wind or vegetation affected the quality of the data long the edge of the flight line. The classification of the additional withheld areas does not affect the density of the data.) - 1 file per swath, 1 swath per file (except when swath had to be divided in section for size or calibration) |
Process Date/Time | 2012-04-01 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 7 |
---|---|
» Description |
Dewberry utilizes a variety of software suites for inventory management, classification, and data processing. All LiDAR related processes begin by importing the data into the GeoCue task management software. GeoCue allows the data to retain its delivered tiling scheme (1500 m by 1500 m). The tiled data is then opened in Terrascan where Dewberry uses proprietary ground classification routines to remove any non-ground points and generate an accurate ground surface. The ground routine consists of three main parameters (building size, iteration angle, and iteration distance); by adjusting these parameters and running several iterations of this routine an initial ground surface is developed. The building size parameter sets a roaming window size. Each tile is loaded with neighboring points from adjacent tiles and the routine classifies the data section by section based on this roaming window size. The second most important parameter is the maximum terrain angle, which sets the highest allowed terrain angle within the model. Once the ground routine has been completed a manual quality control routine is done using hillshades, cross-sections, and profiles within the Terrasolid software suite. After this QC step, a peer review and supervisor manual inspection is completed on a percentage of the classified tiles based on the project size and variability of the terrain. After the ground classification corrections were completed, the dataset was processed through a water classification routine that utilizes breaklines compiled by Dewberry to automatically classify hydrographic features. The water classification routine selects ground points within the breakline polygons and automatically classifies them as class 9, water. During this water classification routine, points which are in close proximity (1 m) to the hydrographic features are moved to class 10, an ignored ground. In addition to classes 1, 2, 8, 9, and 10, the project allows for a Class 7, noise points. This class was only used if needed when points could manually be identified as low/high points. Dewberry also used Class 11 - Withheld points. The fully classified dataset is then processed through Dewberry's comprehensive quality control program. The data was classified as follows: Class 1 = Unclassified. This class includes vegetation, buildings, noise etc. Class 2 = Ground Class 7 = Noise Class 8 = Model Key Points Class 9 = Water Class 10 = Ignored Ground Class 11 = Withheld The LAS header information was verified to contain the following: Class (Integer) GPS Week Time (0.0001 seconds) Easting (0.01 m) Northing (0.01 m) Elevation (0.01 m) Echo Number (Integer 1 to 4) Echo (Integer 1 to 4) Intensity (8 bit integer) Flight Line (Integer) Scan Angle (Integer degree) |
Process Date/Time | 2012-06-01 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 8 |
---|---|
» Description |
Dewberry used GeoCue software to develop raster stereo models from the LiDAR intensity. The raster resolution was 1 meter. |
Process Date/Time | 2012-06-01 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 9 |
---|---|
» Description |
LiDAR intensity stereopairs were viewed in 3-D stereo using Socet Set for ArcGIS softcopy photogrammetric software. The breaklines are collected directly into an ArcGIS file geodatabase to ensure correct topology. The LiDARgrammetry was performed under the direct supervision of an ASPRS Certified Photogrammetrist. The breaklines were stereo-compiled in accordance with the Data Dictionary. The data dictionary defines Tidal Waters as the land and water interface at the time of LiDAR acquisition of tidally influenced bodies of water. There is no minimum area requirement. Tidal variations over the course of a collection or between different collections will result in discontinuities along shorelines. This is considered normal and these "anomalies" should be retained. Variations in water surface elevation resulting in tidal variations during a collection should NOT be removed or adjusted, as this would require either the removal of valid, measured ground points or the introduction of unmeasured ground into the DEM. The USGS priority is on the ground surface, and accepts there may be occasional, unavoidable irregularities in water surface. Breaklines must be captured at or just below the elevations of the immediately surrounding terain. Under no circumstances should a feature be elevated above the surrounding LiDAR points. If it can be reasonably determined where the edge of water most probably falls, beneath the dock or pier, then the edge of water will be collected at the elevation of the water where it can be directly measured. If there is a clearly-indicated headwall or bulkhead adjacent to the dock or pier and it is evident that the waterline is most probably adjacent to the headwall or bulkhead, then the water line will follow the headwall or bulkhead at the elevation of the water where it can be directly measured. If there is no clear indication of the location of the waters edge beneath the dock or pier, then the edge of water will follow the outer edge of the dock or pier as it is adjacent to the water, at the measured elevation of the water. Breaklines shall snap and merge seamlessly with linear hydrographic features. |
Process Date/Time | 2012-06-01 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 10 |
---|---|
» Description |
NOAA OCM downloaded the point cloud data from the USGS . Data were in LAZ format, NAVD88(Geoid09) meters, and UTM 17 or 18N depending on county. Data were converted to geographic coordinates and transformed to ellipsoid heights. Data were then ingested in the Digital Coast Data Access Viewer for distribution. |
Process Date/Time | 2018-03-14 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | Office for Coastal Management (OCM) |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | |
---|---|
» Description | |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | |
---|---|
» Description | |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | |
---|---|
» Description | |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Acquisition Information
Instruments
Instrument Unavailable Reason |
---|
Identifier | |
---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |
Instrument / Gear | |
Instrument Type | |
Description |
Identifier | |
---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |
Instrument / Gear | |
Instrument Type | |
Description |
Identifier | |
---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |
Instrument / Gear | |
Instrument Type | |
Description |
Platforms
Platform Unavailable Reason |
---|
Identifier | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |||||||
Description | |||||||
Mounted Instruments |
|||||||
|
Identifier | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |||||||
Description | |||||||
Mounted Instruments |
|||||||
|
Identifier | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |||||||
Description | |||||||
Mounted Instruments |
|||||||
|
FAQs
Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Question | |
Answer |
Child Items
Rubric scores updated every 15m
Score | Type | Title |
---|---|---|
Related Items
Item Type | Relationship Type | Title |
---|---|---|
Catalog Details
Catalog Item ID | 52042 |
---|---|
Metadata Record Created By | Kirk Waters |
Metadata Record Created | 2018-03-14 14:26+0000 |
Metadata Record Last Modified By | SysAdmin InPortAdmin |
» Metadata Record Last Modified | 2023-10-17 16:12+0000 |
Metadata Record Published | 2022-03-16 |
Owner Org | OCMP |
Metadata Publication Status | Published Externally |
Do Not Publish? | N |
Metadata Workflow State | Published / External |
Metadata Last Review Date | 2022-03-16 |
Metadata Review Frequency | 1 Year |
Metadata Next Review Date | 2023-03-16 |
Tags |
---|