57942
2018 OLC Lidar DEM: Santiam, OR
OLC_Santiam_HYDROFLATTENED_BE_DEM_OGIC.xml
Data Set
Published / External
49404
DEMs - partner (no harvest)
Project
Completed
2019-03-21
This bare earth hydro flattened digital elevation model (DEM) represents the earth's surface with all vegetation and human-made structures removed and hydro flattening performed within the OLC Santiam defined project area. Bare Earth Hydro Flattened DEMs were derived from LiDAR data using TIN processing of the ground point returns. The DEM grid cell size is 1 meter. The dataset encompasses 110,378 acres within Polk County and Marion County in Oregon. The nominal pulse density is eight pulses per square meter. The bare earth (BE) digital elevation model (DEM) raster grid cell size is 3 feet. The native projection is Oregon Statewide Lambert, Lambert Conformal Conic, units are in international feet. The native horizontal datum is NAD83(2011) and the native vertical datum is NAVD88 (Geoid 12B). Quantum Geospatial Inc. collected the lidar and created this dataset for the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI).
A link to the points and hydro-breaklines used to create this DEM can be found in the Related Items and URL sections, below.
This dataset provides high resolution elevation data that is used to produce three-dimensional models of the earth surface for the purpose of managing natural resources and mapping natural hazards.
The data were collected for the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries by Quantum Spatial Inc. under State of Oregon Agency-Specific Price Agreement 7525. The price agreement specifies in Section 2.2 that the Quantum Spatial Inc. provide classified LAS files, intensity grids, digital elevation models (DEMs), digital surface models (DSMs), vector files, and a survey report.
Theme
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords
EARTH SCIENCE > LAND SURFACE > TOPOGRAPHY > TERRAIN ELEVATION
Theme
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords
EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > BATHYMETRY/SEAFLOOR TOPOGRAPHY > SEAFLOOR TOPOGRAPHY
Theme
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords
EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > COASTAL PROCESSES > COASTAL ELEVATION
Spatial
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Spatial
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords
VERTICAL LOCATION > LAND SURFACE
Spatial
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords
VERTICAL LOCATION > SEA FLOOR
Instrument
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Instrument Keywords
LIDAR > Light Detection and Ranging
Platform
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords
Airplane > Airplane
Platform
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords
DEM > Digital Elevation Model
Theme
Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office Metadata Keyword Thesaurus
bare earth
Theme
Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office Metadata Keyword Thesaurus
digital terrain model (DTM)
Theme
Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office Metadata Keyword Thesaurus
hillshade
Theme
Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office Metadata Keyword Thesaurus
hydroflattened digital elevation model (DEM)
Theme
Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office Metadata Keyword Thesaurus
lidar
Theme
Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office Metadata Keyword Thesaurus
quadrangle
Theme
Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office Metadata Keyword Thesaurus
topography
Spatial
Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office Metadata Keyword Thesaurus
Continent > North America > United States Of America > Oregon
Spatial
Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office Metadata Keyword Thesaurus
North America
Office for Coastal Management
Charleston
SC
Data Set
Elevation
None Planned
raster
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this dataset was collected and that some parts of these data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, surveying, or site specific purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. Acknowledgement of Oregon Department of Geology and Industries (DOGAMI) would be appreciated for products derived from these data.
Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of NOAA, the Office for Coastal Management or its partners
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI)
Data Steward
2019
Organization
NOAA Office for Coastal Management
NOAA/OCM
coastal.info@noaa.gov
2234 South Hobson Ave
Charleston
SC
29405-2413
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page
Online Resource
Distributor
2019
Organization
NOAA Office for Coastal Management
NOAA/OCM
coastal.info@noaa.gov
2234 South Hobson Ave
Charleston
SC
29405-2413
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page
Online Resource
Metadata Contact
2019
Organization
NOAA Office for Coastal Management
NOAA/OCM
coastal.info@noaa.gov
2234 South Hobson Ave
Charleston
SC
29405-2413
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page
Online Resource
Point of Contact
2019
Organization
NOAA Office for Coastal Management
NOAA/OCM
coastal.info@noaa.gov
2234 South Hobson Ave
Charleston
SC
29405-2413
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page
Online Resource
Ground Condition
-123.131443
-122.705748
45.044279
44.709907
Range
2018-11-18
2018-11-20
Unclassified
Data is available online for custom downloads
None
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations.
2019-10-11
https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=8897
2019
Organization
NOAA Office for Coastal Management
Customized Download
Create custom data files by choosing data area, map projection, file format, etc. A new metadata will be produced to reflect your request using this record as a base.
Zip
Zip
2019-10-11
https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/dem/OLC_SANTIAM_2018_8897/index.html
2019
Organization
NOAA Office for Coastal Management
Bulk Download
Bulk download of data files in the original coordinate system.
https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid12b/8895/supplemental/extent_m8895.kmz
Browse graphic
Browse Graphic
KML
This graphic displays the footprint for this lidar data set.
https://coast.noaa.gov/
NOAA's Office for Coastal Management (OCM) website
Online Resource
HTML
Information on the NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM)
https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/
NOAA's Office for Coastal Management (OCM) Data Access Viewer (DAV)
Online Resource
HTML
The Data Access Viewer (DAV) allows a user to search for and download elevation, imagery, and land cover data for the coastal U.S. and its territories. The data, hosted by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management, can be customized and requested for free download through a checkout interface. An email provides a link to the customized data, while the original data set is available through a link within the viewer.
https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid12b/8895/breaklines/index.html
Breaklines
Online Resource
SHP
Link to hydrobreaklines and associated metadata used to create this DEM.
https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid12b/8895/supplemental/2018_OLC_Santiam_Data_Report.pdf
Project Report
Online Resource
PDF
Project report for overall dataset,.
LiDAR Mapping Suite 2.4, Applanix PosPac 7.1, Microstation Version 8.0, TerraScan Version 16, TerraModeler Version 16, TerraMatch Version 16, ESRI ArcGIS 10.3.1, Windows 7 Operating System
State of Oregon Agency-Specific Price Agreement 7525 required that Quantum Spatial Inc. calculate fundamental vertical accuracy of lidar point data by comparing ground survey points (GSPs) on flat surfaces in areas where ground classified point resolution is both high, and the ground surface is open, smooth and without vegetation, to a local triangulated irregular network (TIN) surface of ground classified points. The fundamental vertical accuracy did not exceed 9.25 cm RMSE.Qualitative value:0.022 m RMSE, Test that produced the value: The vertical accuracy was tested using 20 reserved ground survey points (GSPs), or quality assurance points (QAPs) located in open terrain. The QAPs were uniformly distributed throughout the project area. The 20 QAPs were established using GPS or other techniques that result in vertical and horizontal accuracies of 1.5 cm root-mean-square-error (RMSE) or better. Vertical accuracy was assessed by QSI by calculating and averaging the distances between GSPs that are not clustered and a surface interpolated from lidar first returns. The RMSE was computed to be 2.20 centimeters as defined by the National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA); assessed and reported using National Digital Elevation Program (NDEP)/ASPRS Guidelines.
A visual qualitative assessment was performed to ensure data completeness. No void areas or missing data exist.
Data covers the entire area specified for this project.
See the acceptance report for this project area.
Range
2018-11-18
2018-11-20
These data were used to assess the vertical accuracy of the LiDAR point cloud data.
See the report PDF for this project area.
Organization
Quantum Spatial, Inc.
Originator
Discrete
2018-11-21
https://quantumspatial.com/
Quantum Spatial
Data Vendor
This data was used, along with GPS/IMU data, to georeference LIDAR point cloud data.
See the report PDF for this project area.
Discrete
2018-11-21
These data was used to classify LiDAR point cloud data.
1
1. TRAJECTORY: Aircraft trajectory (position and attitude) were calculated based on on-board GPS and IMU data with post-processing refinement through coincident static GPS collection.
2. POST-PROCESSING: Laser point return coordinates (x,y,z) were computed using sensor-specific post processing software, combining LiDAR return range and intensity information with aircraft trajectory information.
3. INITIAL QAQC: The post-processed LiDAR files were assembled into flight lines and reviewed for gaps and consistency, as well as systematic noise.
4. CALIBRATION: Custom algorithms evaluated individual swaths for misalignments based on IMU configuration as well as aircraft attitude variability. Offsets were resolved through surface and linear matching algorithms that minimize variability in elevation and slope. Descriptive statistics, thresholds, and specifications providing transparency for data calibration are discussed in the accompanying Data Report.
5. GROUND MODELING: Ground classified point cloud was generated through proprietary data processing tools, with settings and thresholds appropriate to landscape and vegetation condition.
6. ARTIFACT FILTRATION: Noise and processing artifacts were filtered using post-processing software and proprietary quality control methods.
7. ACCURACY ASSESSMENT: Vertical accuracy for the LiDAR dataset was assessed against reserved Quality Assurance Points (QAPs) distributed throughout the study area and not used during calibration processes. See the accompanying Data Report for methodology, descriptive statistics, and relevant standards and reporting language.
8. DATA PRODUCT: LiDAR points classified as 'ground' were output as a digital elevation model (DEM).
9. Hydro Flattening Breakline Processing: Class 2 LiDAR was used to create a bare earth surface model. E-Cognition utilized rasters created within Bentley Microstation to auto-generate breaklines of inland streams and rivers with a 100 foot nominal width and Inland Ponds of 2 acres or greater surface area. Breaklines for Lakes with surface area greater than 2 acres were generated using heads-up digitization. Elevation values were assigned to all Inland Ponds and Lakes within ESRI ArcMap; Inland Pond and Lake Islands, Inland Stream and River Islands were assigned elevation values from within ESRI ArcMap. All ground (ASPRS Class 2) LiDAR data inside of the collected inland breaklines were then classified to water (ASPRS Class 9) using TerraScan macro functionality. A buffer of 2.1 meter was also used around each hydro-flattened stream. These points were moved from ground (ASPRS Class 2) to Ignored Ground (ASPRS Class 10). The breakline files were then translated to ESRI File-Geodatabase format using ESRI conversion tools.
2018-11-21T00:00:00
2
Data was obtained by NOAA Office for Coastal Management from DOGAMI. Data were in Oregon Lambert NAD83(HARN) international feet with NAVD88(Geoid03) international feet vertically. Data were in ArcGrid proprietary format and were converted to GeoTiff format using GDAL 2.4.0 to comply with the open data policy and for ingest into the Digital Coast Data Access Viewer.
2019-10-11T00:00:00
Organization
NOAA Office for Coastal Management
NOAA/OCM
coastal.info@noaa.gov
2234 South Hobson Ave
Charleston
SC
29405-2413
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page
Online Resource
57943
Data Set
2018 OLC Lidar: Santiam, OR
Cross Reference
Lidar Point Cloud
gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:57942
Blake Waring
2019-10-11T17:44:50
Kirk Waters
2024-01-10T19:08:43
2024-01-10
OCM Partners
OCMP
1002
Public
No
2022-03-16
1 Year
2023-03-16