2017 - 2021 USGS Lidar: Southwest GA 22 County
OCM Partners
Data Set
(DS)
| ID: 66622
| Published / External
Created: 2022-02-14
|
Last Modified: 2023-10-17
Project (PRJ) | ID: 49401
ID: 66622
Data Set (DS)
* Discovery• First Pass
» Metadata Rubric
Item Identification
* » Title | 2017 - 2021 USGS Lidar: Southwest GA 22 County |
---|---|
Short Name | ga2017_22county_m9451_metadata |
* Status | Completed |
Creation Date | 2017 |
Revision Date | |
• Publication Date | Unknown |
* » Abstract |
USGS NGTOC task order G17PD00242 required Spring 2017 LiDAR surveys to be collected over 7,931 square miles covering part or all of 22 counties in SW Georgia. These counties are Baker, Bleckley, Crawford, Crisp, Decatur, Dodge, Dooly, Early, Houston, Macon, Meriwether, Miller, Muscogee, Peach, Pulaski, Seminole, Telfair, Terrell, Troup, Turner, Twiggs, and Wilcox. Aerial LiDAR data for this task order was planned, acquired, processed, and produced at an aggregate nominal pulse spacing (ANPS) of 0.7 meters and in compliance with USGS National Geospatial Program LiDAR Base Specification version 1.2. Isolated gaps in GPS data were identified in several missions covering this project. As both, the IMU data and pulse data, were present across these gaps, using the fixed positions of the GPS on either end, the aircraft velocity across the gaps, and the IMU data, LiDAR calibration staff were able to reach an effective solution to address the GPS voids. Because these gaps were not uniform in size or correction, this extended the iterative LiDAR calibration efforts on this project. Subsequent rigorous data checking confirmed adequate results to meet the required accuracy specs. The USGS QA Team reviewed affected data (blocks) for this project and found no QA/QC discrepancies to report regarding those gaps.
In three missions 123_20190317_1, 123_20190318_1, and 123_20190318_2 there were symptoms of skunk striping present in the collected data. These artifacts are manifested by low noise points at nadir and are believed to have been caused by exhaust from the aircraft during collection. Atlantic isolated the points affected by channel and by intensity, and classed them out to noise and flagged them as withheld. We were able to maintain the integrity of the surface and still meet density requirements to meet spec. This metadata supports the data entry in the NOAA Digital Coast Data Access Viewer (DAV). For this data set, the DAV is leveraging the Entwine Point Tiles (EPT) hosted by USGS on Amazon Web Services. |
* Purpose |
The produced data (DEMs and derivative products) will aid in planning and management purposes of the participating counties and participants. |
Notes | |
Other Citation Details | |
• Supplemental Information |
Prime Contractor: The Atlantic Group, LLC. Lidar data were acquired and calibrated by The Atlantic Group. All follow-on processing was completed by the prime contractor.
The following are the USGS lidar fields in JSON: {
"ldrinfo" : {
"ldrspec" : "1.2", "ldrsens" : "Leica ALS70-HP", "ldrmaxnr" : "Unlimited", "ldrnps" : "1.5623", "ldrdens" : "0.4097", "ldranps" : "1.9352", "ldradens" : "0.2670", "ldrfltht" : "2000", "ldrfltsp" : "130", "ldrscana" : "45", "ldrscanr" : "33.9", "ldrpulsr" : "256,400", "ldrpulsd" : "0", "ldrpulsw" : "0", "ldrwavel" : "1064", "ldrmpia" : "1", "ldrbmdiv" : "0.15", "ldrswatw" : "1740", "ldrswato" : "20", "ldrgeoid" : "12B" }, "ldraccur" : {
"ldrchacc" : "0", "rawnva" : "0", "rawnvan" : "0", "clsnva" : "0", "clsnvan" : "0", "clsvva" : "0", "clsvvan" : "0" }, "lasinfo" : {
"lasver" : "1.4", "lasprf" : "6", "laswheld" : "Withheld (ignore) points were identified in these files using the standard LAS Withheld bit.", "lasolap" : "Swath "overage" points were identified in these files using the standard LAS overlap bit.", "lasintr" : "16", "lasclass" : {
"clascode" : "1", "clasitem" : "Processed but unclassified" }, "lasclass" : {
"clascode" : "2", "clasitem" : "Bare-earth ground" }, "lasclass" : {
"clascode" : "3", "clasitem" : "Low Vegetation (0.5 â 5 feet)" }, "lasclass" : {
"clascode" : "4", "clasitem" : "Medium Vegetation (5 â 20 feet)" }, "lasclass" : {
"clascode" : "5", "clasitem" : "High Vegetation (>20 feet)" }, "lasclass" : {
"clascode" : "7", "clasitem" : "Low Noise" }, "lasclass" : {
"clascode" : "9", "clasitem" : "Water" }, "lasclass" : {
"clascode" : "10", "clasitem" : "Ignored Ground (Breakline Proximity)" }, "lasclass" : {
"clascode" : "17", "clasitem" : "Bridge Decks" }, "lasclass" : {
"clascode" : "18", "clasitem" : "High Noise" } }} |
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) | |
DOI Registration Authority | |
DOI Issue Date |
Keywords
Theme Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords | EARTH SCIENCE > LAND SURFACE > TOPOGRAPHY > TERRAIN ELEVATION |
ISO 19115 Topic Category | elevation |
Temporal Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
* Spatial Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords | CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords | CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > GEORGIA |
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords | VERTICAL LOCATION > LAND SURFACE |
None | Baker |
None | Bleckley |
None | Crawford |
None | Crisp |
None | Decatur |
None | Dodge |
None | Dooly |
None | Early |
None | Houston |
None | Macon |
None | Meriwether |
None | Miller |
None | Muscogee |
None | Peach |
None | Pulaski |
None | Seminole |
None | Telfair |
None | Terrell |
None | Troup |
None | Turner |
None | Twiggs |
None | Wilcox |
Stratum Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Instrument Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Instrument Keywords | LIDAR > Light Detection and Ranging |
Platform Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords | Airplane > Airplane |
Physical Location
• » Organization | Office for Coastal Management |
---|---|
• » City | Charleston |
• » State/Province | SC |
• Country | |
• » Location Description |
Data Set Information
* Data Set Scope Code | Data Set |
---|---|
• Data Set Type | Elevation |
• Maintenance Frequency | Unknown |
Maintenance Note | |
» Data Presentation Form | Model (digital) |
• Entity Attribute Overview | |
Entity Attribute Detail Citation | |
Entity Attribute Detail URL | |
Distribution Liability |
Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of NOAA, the Office for Coastal Management or its partners. |
Data Set Credit | The Atlantic Group, LLC, USGS |
Support Roles
* » Support Role | Data Steward |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2022 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | Distributor |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2022 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | Distributor |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2021 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | U.S. Geological Survey |
Address |
12201 Sunrise Valley Drive Reston, VA 20191 USA |
Email Address | |
Phone | |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://usgs.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | Metadata Contact |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2022 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | Point of Contact |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2022 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | |
Date Effective To | |
* » Contact | |
* Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | |
Date Effective To | |
* » Contact | |
* Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | |
Date Effective To | |
* » Contact | |
* Contact Instructions |
Extents
Currentness Reference | Ground Condition |
---|
Extent Group 1
Extent Description |
---|
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 1
* » W° Bound | -85.237589 |
---|---|
* » E° Bound | -82.644524 |
* » N° Bound | 33.232394 |
* » S° Bound | 30.689091 |
* » Description |
Extent Group 1 / Vertical Extent
EPSG Code | |
---|---|
Vertical Minimum | |
Vertical Maximum |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 1
* » Time Frame Type | Range |
---|---|
* » Start | 2017-11-27 |
End | 2019-03-18 |
Alternate Start As Of Info | |
Alternate End As Of Info | |
Description |
Block 4 |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 2
* » Time Frame Type | Range |
---|---|
* » Start | 2021-01-19 |
End | 2021-01-30 |
Alternate Start As Of Info | |
Alternate End As Of Info | |
Description |
Block 5 |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 3
* » Time Frame Type | Range |
---|---|
* » Start | 2017-03-15 |
End | 2017-11-24 |
Alternate Start As Of Info | |
Alternate End As Of Info | |
Description |
Blocks 1a, 1b, 2 |
Spatial Information
Spatial Resolution
Angular Distance | |
---|---|
Angular Distance Units | |
Horizontal Distance | 0.4 |
Horizontal Distance Units | Meter |
Vertical Distance | |
Vertical Distance Units | |
Equivalent Scale Denominator | |
Level of Detail Description |
Spatial Representation
Grid Representation Used? | |
---|---|
Vector Representation Used? | Yes |
Text / Table Representation Used? | |
TIN Representation Used? | |
Stereo Model Representation Used? | |
Video Representation Used? |
Grid Representation
Dimension Count | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cell Geometry | |||||||||||||
Transformation Parameter Available? | |||||||||||||
Axis Dimension |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Axis Dimension |
|||||||||||||
|
Vector Representation
Topology Level | |
---|---|
Complex Object Present? | |
Complex Object Count | |
Composite Object Present? | |
Composite Object Count | |
Curve Object Present? | |
Curve Object Count | |
Point Object Present? | |
Point Object Count | |
Solid Object Present? | |
Solid Object Count | |
Surface Object Present? | |
Surface Object Count |
Reference Systems
Reference System
EPSG Code | EPSG:3857 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Horizontal Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vertical Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reference System
EPSG Code | EPSG:5703 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Horizontal Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vertical Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reference System
EPSG Code | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Horizontal Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vertical Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Access Information
Data License | |
---|---|
Data License URL | |
Data License Statement | |
* » Security Class | Unclassified |
* Security Classification System | |
Security Handling Description | |
• Data Access Policy | |
» Data Access Procedure |
Data is available online for bulk and custom downloads. |
• » Data Access Constraints |
None |
• Data Use Constraints |
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. |
Metadata Access Constraints | |
Metadata Use Constraints |
Distribution Information
Start Date | 2022-02-14 |
---|---|
End Date | Present |
» Download URL | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=9451/details/9451 |
Distributor | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) (2022 - Present) |
File Name | Customized Download |
Description |
Create custom data files by choosing data area, product type, map projection, file format, datum, etc. A new metadata will be produced to reflect your request using this record as a base. Change to an orthometric vertical datum is one of the many options. |
File Date/Time | |
File Type (Deprecated) | Zip |
Distribution Format | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | Zip |
Review Status |
Start Date | 2022-02-14 |
---|---|
End Date | Present |
» Download URL | https://rockyweb.usgs.gov/vdelivery/Datasets/Staged/Elevation/LPC/Projects/GA_SW_Georgia_22_County_Lidar_2017_B17/ |
Distributor | U.S. Geological Survey (2021 - Present) |
File Name | Bulk Download |
Description |
Bulk download of data files in LAZ format, based on a horizontal datum/projection of GA State Plane East and West, NAD83(2011) (EPSG: 6445 and 6447), and a vertical datum of NAVD88 (GEOID12B) and units in US Survey feet (EPSG: 6360). This url links to the USGS copy of the files, from which the Entwine Point Tile files originated. These have not been reviewed by OCM and the link is provided here for convenience. |
File Date/Time | |
File Type (Deprecated) | LAZ |
Distribution Format | LAS/LAZ - LASer |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | Zip |
Review Status |
Start Date | |
---|---|
End Date | |
» Download URL | |
Distributor | |
File Name | |
Description | |
File Date/Time | |
File Type | |
FGDC Content Type | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
Start Date | |
---|---|
End Date | |
» Download URL | |
Distributor | |
File Name | |
Description | |
File Date/Time | |
File Type | |
FGDC Content Type | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
Start Date | |
---|---|
End Date | |
» Download URL | |
Distributor | |
File Name | |
Description | |
File Date/Time | |
File Type | |
FGDC Content Type | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
Archive Information
Location | |
---|---|
File Identifier | |
File Name | |
URL | |
Description | |
DOI | |
Archive Date | |
Archive Update Frequency |
Location | |
---|---|
File Identifier | |
File Name | |
URL | |
Description | |
DOI | |
Archive Date | |
Archive Update Frequency |
Location | |
---|---|
File Identifier | |
File Name | |
URL | |
Description | |
DOI | |
Archive Date | |
Archive Update Frequency |
URLs
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/ |
---|---|
Name | NOAA's Office for Coastal Management (OCM) Data Access Viewer (DAV) |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | HTML |
Description |
The Data Access Viewer (DAV) allows a user to search for and download elevation, imagery, and land cover data for the coastal U.S. and its territories. The data, hosted by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management, can be customized and requested for free download through a checkout interface. An email provides a link to the customized data, while the original data set is available through a link within the viewer. |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov/htdata/lidar4_z/geoid12b/data/9451/supplemental/ga2017_22county_m9451.kmz |
---|---|
Name | Browse graphic |
URL Type | Browse Graphic |
File Resource Format | KML |
Description |
This graphic displays the footprint for this lidar data set. |
URL | https://rockyweb.usgs.gov/vdelivery/Datasets/Staged/Elevation/metadata/GA_SW_Georgia_22_County_Lidar_2017_B17/ |
---|---|
Name | USGS Provided Data |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
Link to the additional information available for this data set from the USGS. This information includes reports, tile index shapefiles, and hydro breaklines. |
URL | https://rockyweb.usgs.gov/vdelivery/Datasets/Staged/Elevation/metadata/GA_SW_Georgia_22_County_Lidar_2017_B17/USGS_GA_SW_Georgia_22County_Lidar_2017_B17_WP_report.pdf |
---|---|
Name | USGS Work Package Report |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
This USGS report provides the project information, vertical accuracy results, list of classifications, sensor used, and work unit information. |
URL | |
---|---|
Name | |
URL Type | |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
URL | |
---|---|
Name | |
URL Type | |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
URL | |
---|---|
Name | |
URL Type | |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
Activity Log
Activity Time | |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Activity Time | |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Activity Time | |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Issues
Issue Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Issue |
Issue Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Issue |
Issue Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Issue |
Technical Environment
Description |
|
---|
Data Quality
Representativeness | |
---|---|
Accuracy | |
Analytical Accuracy | |
Horizontal Positional Accuracy | |
Vertical Positional Accuracy |
This data set was produced to meet ASPRS Positional Accuracy Standard for Digital Geospatial Data (2014) for a 10-cm RMSEz Vertical Accuracy Class. USGS Determined Vertical Accuracy Non-Vegetated Vertical Accuracy (NVA) = 5.86 cm RMSE Vegetated Vertical Accuracy (VVA) = 28.73 cm at the 95th Percentile |
Quantitation Limits | |
Bias | |
Comparability | |
Completeness Measure | |
Precision | |
Analytical Precision | |
Field Precision | |
Sensitivity | |
Detection Limit | |
Completeness Report |
Area of interest covers project area. A visual qualitative assessment was performed to ensure data completeness. No void areas or missing data exist. The raw point cloud is of good quality and data passes NVA specifications. Void areas (i.e., areas outside the project boundary but within the tiling scheme) are coded using a unique NODATA value. This value is identified in the appropriate location within the file header. |
Conceptual Consistency |
All lidar data and lidar derived data covers the entire area of interest. All lidar point cloud tiles show no edge artifacts or mismatches from tile to tile. Void areas (i.e. areas outside the project boundary but within the tiling scheme) are coded using a unique NODATA value. This value is identified in the appropriate location within the file header. Data cover the entire area specified for this project.
Isolated gaps in GPS data were identified in several missions covering this project. As both, the IMU data and pulse data, were present across these gaps, using the fixed positions of the GPS on either end, the aircraft velocity across the gaps, and the IMU data, LiDAR calibration staff were able to reach an effective solution to address the GPS voids. Because these gaps were not uniform in size or correction, this extended the iterative LiDAR calibration efforts on this project. Subsequent rigorous data checking confirmed adequate results to meet the required accuracy specs. The USGS QA Team reviewed affected data (blocks) for this project and found no QA/QC discrepancies to report regarding those gaps.
In three missions 123_20190317_1, 123_20190318_1, and 123_20190318_2 there were symptoms of skunk striping present in the collected data. These artifacts are manifested by low noise points at nadir and are believed to have been caused by exhaust from the aircraft during collection. Atlantic isolated the points affected by channel and by intensity, and classed them out to noise and flagged them as withheld. We were able to maintain the integrity of the surface and still meet density requirements to meet spec. |
» Quality Control Procedures Employed |
Data Management
» Have Resources for Management of these Data Been Identified? | Yes |
---|---|
» Approximate Percentage of Budget for these Data Devoted to Data Management | Unknown |
» Do these Data Comply with the Data Access Directive? | Yes |
» Is Access to the Data Limited Based on an Approved Waiver? | |
» If Distributor (Data Hosting Service) is Needed, Please Indicate | |
» Approximate Delay Between Data Collection and Dissemination | |
» If Delay is Longer than Latency of Automated Processing, Indicate Under What Authority Data Access is Delayed | |
» Actual or Planned Long-Term Data Archive Location | NCEI-CO |
» Approximate Delay Between Data Collection and Archiving | |
» How Will the Data Be Protected from Accidental or Malicious Modification or Deletion Prior to Receipt by the Archive? |
Data is backed up to tape and to cloud storage. |
Lineage
» Lineage Statement |
The Southwest GA 22 County lidar was ingested into the Data Access Viewer for custom product generation by leveraging USGS hosted Entwine Point Tiles. |
---|
Sources
Citation Title | Entwine Point Tiles on AWS |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | Publisher |
Contact Type | Organization |
Contact Name | USGS |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Scale Denominator | |
Citation URL | https://usgs.entwine.io/ |
Citation URL Name | USGS Entwine Point Cloud |
Citation URL Description | |
Source Contribution |
Citation Title | |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Scale Denominator |
Citation Title | |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Scale Denominator |
Citation Title | |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Scale Denominator |
Process Steps
Process Step Number | 1 |
---|---|
» Description |
Aircraft and Sensor Information and Flight Plan Execution: Blocks B1a, B1b, B2: Atlantic operated a Cessna (N732JE) outfitted with a Leica ALS70-HP LiDAR system during the collection of the project area. Atlantic acquired 220 passes of the AOI as a series of perpendicular and/or adjacent flight-lines executed in 32 flight missions conducted between March 15, 2017 and November 24, 2017. Onboard differential Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) unit(s) recorded sample aircraft positions at 2 hertz (Hz) or more frequency. LiDAR data was only acquired when a minimum of six (6) satellites were in view. Twenty-three (23) Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) were used to control the LiDAR acquisition for the defined project area. Block 5: Atlantic operated a Caravan (N167PM) outfitted with an Optech Galaxy T2000 LiDAR system during the collection of the project area. Atlantic acquired 85 passes of the AOI as a series of perpendicular and/or adjacent flight-lines executed in 7 flight missions conducted between January 19, 2021 and January 30, 2021. Onboard differential Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) unit(s) recorded sample aircraft positions at 2 hertz (Hz) or more frequency. LiDAR data was only acquired when a minimum of six (6) satellites were in view. Sixteen (16) Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) were used to control the LiDAR acquisition for the defined project area. |
Process Date/Time | 2017-11-24 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 2 |
---|---|
» Description |
Ground Control Survey: Blocks B1a, B1b, B2: A total of 156 ground survey points were collected in support of this project, including 32 LiDAR Control Points (LCP), 73 Non-vegetated Vertical Accuracy (NVA) and 51 Vegetated Vertical Accuracy (VVA) points. Point cloud data accuracy was tested against a Triangulated Irregular Network (TIN) constructed from LiDAR points in clear and open areas. A clear and open area can be characterized with respect to topographic and ground cover variation such that a minimum of five (5) times the Nominal Pulse Spacing (NPS) exists with less than 1/3 of the RMSEZ deviation from a low-slope plane. Slopes that exceed ten (10) percent were avoided. Each land cover type representing ten (10) percent or more of the total project area were tested and reported with a VVA. In land cover categories other than dense urban areas, the tested points did not have obstructions forty-five (45) degrees above the horizon to ensure a satisfactory TIN surface. The VVA value is provided as a target. It is understood that in areas of dense vegetation, swamps, or extremely difficult terrain, this value may be exceeded. The NVA value is a requirement that must be met, regardless of any allowed âbustsâ in the VVA(s) for individual land cover types within the project. Checkpoints for each assessment (NVA and VVA) are required to be well-distributed throughout the land cover type, for the entire project area. Block 5: A total of 39 ground survey points were collected in support of this project, including 8 LiDAR Control Points (LCP), 17 Non-vegetated Vertical Accuracy (NVA) and 14 Vegetated Vertical Accuracy (VVA).Point cloud data accuracy was tested against a Triangulated Irregular Network (TIN) constructed from LiDAR points in clear and open areas. A clear and open area can be characterized with respect to topographic and ground cover variation such that a minimum of five (5) times the Nominal Pulse Spacing (NPS) exists with less than 1/3 of the RMSEZ deviation from a low-slope plane. Slopes that exceed ten (10) percent were avoided. Each land cover type representing ten (10) percent or more of the total project area were tested and reported with a VVA. In land cover categories other than dense urban areas, the tested points did not have obstructions forty-five (45) degrees above the horizon to ensure a satisfactory TIN surface. The VVA value is provided as a target. It is understood that in areas of dense vegetation, swamps, or extremely difficult terrain, this value may be exceeded. The NVA value is a requirement that must be met, regardless of any allowed âbustsâ in the VVA(s) for individual land cover types within the project. Checkpoints for each assessment (NVA and VVA) are required to be well-distributed throughout the land cover type, for the entire project area. |
Process Date/Time | 2017-04-30 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 3 |
---|---|
» Description |
LiDAR Point Cloud Generation: Atlantic used Leica software products to download the IPAS ABGNSS/IMU data and raw laser scan files from the airborne system. Waypoint Inertial Explorer is used to extract the raw IPAS ABGNSS/IMU data, which is further processed in combination with controlled base stations to provide the final Smoothed Best Estimate Trajectory (SBET) for each mission. The SBETs are combined with the raw laser scan files to export the LiDAR ASCII Standard (*.las) formatted swath point clouds. |
Process Date/Time | 2019-04-18 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 4 |
---|---|
» Description |
LiDAR Calibration: Using a combination of GeoCue, TerraScan and TerraMatch; overlapping swath point clouds are corrected for any orientation or linear deviations to obtain the best fit swath-to-swath calibration. Relative calibration was evaluated using advanced plane-matching analysis and parameter corrections derived. This process was repeated interactively until residual errors between overlapping swaths, across all project missions, was reduced to ≤2cm. A final analysis of the calibrated lidar is preformed using a TerraMatch tie line report for an overall statistical model of the project area. Individual control point assessments for this project can be found in Section VI of this report. Upon completion of the data calibration, a complete set of elevation difference intensity rasters (dZ Orthos) are produced. A user-defined color ramp is applied depicting the offsets between overlapping swaths based on project specifications. The dZ orthos provide an opportunity to review the data calibration in a qualitative manner. Atlantic assigns green to all offset values that fall below the required RMSDz requirement of the project. A yellow color is assigned for offsets that fall between the RMSDz value and 1.5x of that value. Finally, red values are assigned to all values that fall beyond 1.5x of the RMSDz requirements of the project. |
Process Date/Time | 2019-04-18 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 5 |
---|---|
» Description |
LiDAR Classification: Multiple automated filtering routines are applied to the calibrated LiDAR point cloud identifying and extracting bare-earth and above ground features. GeoCue, TerraScan, and TerraModeler software was used for the initial batch processing, visual inspection and any manual editing of the LiDAR point clouds. Atlantic utilized collected breakline data to preform classification for class 9 (Water). |
Process Date/Time | 2019-04-18 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 6 |
---|---|
» Description |
Original point clouds in LAS/LAZ format were restructured as Entwine Point Tiles and stored on Amazon Web Services. The data were re-projected horizontally to WGS84 Web Mercator (EPSG 3857). Vertically, the data were converted to meters and no changes were made to the vertical datum (NAVD88 GEOID12B; EPSG 5703). |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | U.S. Geological Survey |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 7 |
---|---|
» Description |
References to the entwine point tiles and data reports were ingested into the Digital Coast Data Access Viewer. No changes to the data were made at this point. The Data Access Viewer will access the point cloud as it resides on AWS under the usgs-lidar-public container. |
Process Date/Time | 2022-02-14 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | Office for Coastal Management (OCM) |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | |
---|---|
» Description | |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | |
---|---|
» Description | |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | |
---|---|
» Description | |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Acquisition Information
Instruments
Instrument Unavailable Reason |
---|
Identifier | |
---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |
Instrument / Gear | |
Instrument Type | |
Description |
Identifier | |
---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |
Instrument / Gear | |
Instrument Type | |
Description |
Identifier | |
---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |
Instrument / Gear | |
Instrument Type | |
Description |
Platforms
Platform Unavailable Reason |
---|
Identifier | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |||||||
Description | |||||||
Mounted Instruments |
|||||||
|
Identifier | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |||||||
Description | |||||||
Mounted Instruments |
|||||||
|
Identifier | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |||||||
Description | |||||||
Mounted Instruments |
|||||||
|
FAQs
Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Question | |
Answer |
Child Items
Rubric scores updated every 15m
Score | Type | Title |
---|---|---|
Related Items
Item Type | Relationship Type | Title |
---|---|---|
Catalog Details
Catalog Item ID | 66622 |
---|---|
Metadata Record Created By | Rebecca Mataosky |
Metadata Record Created | 2022-02-14 20:20+0000 |
Metadata Record Last Modified By | SysAdmin InPortAdmin |
» Metadata Record Last Modified | 2023-10-17 16:12+0000 |
Metadata Record Published | 2022-02-15 |
Owner Org | OCMP |
Metadata Publication Status | Published Externally |
Do Not Publish? | N |
Metadata Workflow State | Published / External |
Metadata Last Review Date | 2022-02-15 |
Metadata Review Frequency | 1 Year |
Metadata Next Review Date | 2023-02-15 |
Tags |
---|