2016 USGS QL2 Lidar: Buffalo, Portage, Taylor, and Washburn Counties, WI
OCM Partners
Data Set
(DS)
| ID: 71692
| Published / External
Created: 2023-12-19
|
Last Modified: 2023-12-19
Project (PRJ) | ID: 49401
ID: 71692
Data Set (DS)
* Discovery• First Pass
» Metadata Rubric
Item Identification
* » Title | 2016 USGS QL2 Lidar: Buffalo, Portage, Taylor, and Washburn Counties, WI |
---|---|
Short Name | consolidated.xml |
* Status | Completed |
Creation Date | |
Revision Date | |
• Publication Date | 2023-12-19 |
* » Abstract |
This metadata covers four of the six counties covered in the 2016 Wisconsin Statewide Lidar project - Buffalo, Portage, Taylor, and Washburn. Area coverages were approximately 717, 830, 992, and 860 square miles respectively, which includes a 100 meter buffer around each county boundary. The lidar data was acquired at a nominal point spacing (NPS) of 0.7 meters and a single swath nominal point density (NPD) of 2.0. Project specifications are based on Buffalo County requirements and on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program Lidar Base Specification, Version 1.2. The data was developed based on a horizontal projection/datum of NAD83(2011) / WISCRS appropriate for each county in US survey feet, and vertical datum of NAVD88 - Geoid12A (Feet). Lidar data was acquired using the Orion Optech H300 sensor from March 21st, 2016 to March 22nd, 2016. Acquisition occurred with leaves absent from deciduous trees, when no snow was present on the ground, and with rivers at or below normal levels. |
* Purpose |
This data, along with its derivatives, is the result of a cooperative partnerships from the counties, Wisconsin DOA, and the USGS 3DEP program. It is part of an effort to obtain statewide lidar coverage in Wisconsin and in the nation. |
Notes | |
Other Citation Details | |
• Supplemental Information |
The following are the USGS lidar fields in JSON: {
"ldrinfo" : {
"ldrspec" : "USGS-NGP Lidar Base Specification v1.2", "ldrsens" : "Optech Orion H300_SN309", "ldrmaxnr" : "5", "ldrnps" : "0.69", "ldranps" : "0.69", "ldrdens" : "2.19", "ldradens" : "2.19", "ldrfltht" : "1700", "ldrfltsp" : "140", "ldrscana" : "38", "ldrscanr" : "52", "ldrpulsr" : "225", "ldrpulsd" : "4", "ldrpulsw" : "0.41", "ldrwavel" : "1064", "ldrmpia" : "1", "ldrbmdiv" : "0.25", "ldrswatw" : "1170.71", "ldrswato" : "25", "ldrgeoid" : "National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Geoid12A" }, "ldraccur" : {
"ldrchacc" : "n/a", "rawnva" : "0.072", "rawnvan" : "49" }, "lasinfo" : {
"lasver" : "1.4", "lasprf" : "6", "laswheld" : "n/a", "lasolap" : "Swath "overage" points were identified in these files using the standard LAS overlap bit.", "lasintr" : "11", "lasclass" : {
"clascode" : "1", "clasitem" : "Processed, but Unclassified" }, "lasclass" : {
"clascode" : "2", "clasitem" : "Bare Earth" }, "lasclass" : {
"clascode" : "5", "clasitem" : "High Vegetation" }, "lasclass" : {
"clascode" : "6", "clasitem" : "Building" }, "lasclass" : {
"clascode" : "7", "clasitem" : "Noise" }, "lasclass" : {
"clascode" : "9", "clasitem" : "Water" }, "lasclass" : {
"clascode" : "10", "clasitem" : "Ignored Ground" }, "lasclass" : {
"clascode" : "17", "clasitem" : "Bridge Decks" }, "lasclass" : {
"clascode" : "18", "clasitem" : "High Noise" } }} |
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) | |
DOI Registration Authority | |
DOI Issue Date |
Keywords
Theme Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords | EARTH SCIENCE > LAND SURFACE > TOPOGRAPHY > TERRAIN ELEVATION |
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords | EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > COASTAL PROCESSES > COASTAL ELEVATION |
ISO 19115 Topic Category | elevation |
Temporal Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
* Spatial Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords | CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords | CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > WISCONSIN |
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords | VERTICAL LOCATION > LAND SURFACE |
Stratum Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Instrument Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Instrument Keywords | LIDAR > Light Detection and Ranging |
Platform Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords | Airplane > Airplane |
Physical Location
• » Organization | Office for Coastal Management |
---|---|
• » City | Charleston |
• » State/Province | SC |
• Country | |
• » Location Description |
Data Set Information
* Data Set Scope Code | Data Set |
---|---|
• Data Set Type | Elevation |
• Maintenance Frequency | None Planned |
Maintenance Note | |
» Data Presentation Form | Model (digital) |
• Entity Attribute Overview | |
Entity Attribute Detail Citation | |
Entity Attribute Detail URL | |
Distribution Liability |
Distributor assumes no liability for misuse of data. Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of NOAA, the Office for Coastal Management or its partners |
Data Set Credit | USGS; Wisconsin DOA; Ayres Associates |
Support Roles
* » Support Role | Data Steward |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2023 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | Distributor |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2023 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | Metadata Contact |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2023 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | Point of Contact |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2023 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | |
Date Effective To | |
* » Contact | |
* Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | |
Date Effective To | |
* » Contact | |
* Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | |
Date Effective To | |
* » Contact | |
* Contact Instructions |
Extents
Currentness Reference | Ground Condition |
---|
Extent Group 1
Extent Description |
Buffalo County |
---|
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 1
* » W° Bound | -92.086993 |
---|---|
* » E° Bound | -91.52568 |
* » N° Bound | 44.598244 |
* » S° Bound | 44.023895 |
* » Description |
Extent Group 1 / Vertical Extent
EPSG Code | |
---|---|
Vertical Minimum | |
Vertical Maximum |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 1
* » Time Frame Type | Range |
---|---|
* » Start | 2016-03-21 |
End | 2016-03-22 |
Alternate Start As Of Info | |
Alternate End As Of Info | |
Description |
Extent Group 2
Extent Description |
Portage County |
---|
Extent Group 2 / Geographic Area 1
* » W° Bound | -89.847744 |
---|---|
* » E° Bound | -89.220283 |
* » N° Bound | 44.687251 |
* » S° Bound | 44.24181 |
* » Description |
Extent Group 2 / Vertical Extent
EPSG Code | |
---|---|
Vertical Minimum | |
Vertical Maximum |
Extent Group 2 / Time Frame 1
* » Time Frame Type | Range |
---|---|
* » Start | 2016-04-05 |
End | 2016-04-14 |
Alternate Start As Of Info | |
Alternate End As Of Info | |
Description |
Extent Group 3
Extent Description |
Taylor County |
---|
Extent Group 3 / Geographic Area 1
* » W° Bound | -90.930018 |
---|---|
* » E° Bound | -90.039885 |
* » N° Bound | 45.384621 |
* » S° Bound | 45.02863 |
* » Description |
Extent Group 3 / Vertical Extent
EPSG Code | |
---|---|
Vertical Minimum | |
Vertical Maximum |
Extent Group 3 / Time Frame 1
* » Time Frame Type | Range |
---|---|
* » Start | 2016-04-14 |
End | 2016-04-16 |
Alternate Start As Of Info | |
Alternate End As Of Info | |
Description |
Extent Group 4
Extent Description |
Washburn County |
---|
Extent Group 4 / Geographic Area 1
* » W° Bound | -92.052574 |
---|---|
* » E° Bound | -91.536933 |
* » N° Bound | 46.158845 |
* » S° Bound | 45.636744 |
* » Description |
Extent Group 4 / Vertical Extent
EPSG Code | |
---|---|
Vertical Minimum | |
Vertical Maximum |
Extent Group 4 / Time Frame 1
* » Time Frame Type | Range |
---|---|
* » Start | 2016-04-12 |
End | 2016-04-14 |
Alternate Start As Of Info | |
Alternate End As Of Info | |
Description |
Spatial Information
Spatial Resolution
Angular Distance | |
---|---|
Angular Distance Units | |
Horizontal Distance | |
Horizontal Distance Units | |
Vertical Distance | |
Vertical Distance Units | |
Equivalent Scale Denominator | |
Level of Detail Description |
Spatial Representation
Grid Representation Used? | No |
---|---|
Vector Representation Used? | Yes |
Text / Table Representation Used? | No |
TIN Representation Used? | No |
Stereo Model Representation Used? | No |
Video Representation Used? | No |
Grid Representation
Dimension Count | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cell Geometry | |||||||||||||
Transformation Parameter Available? | |||||||||||||
Axis Dimension |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Axis Dimension |
|||||||||||||
|
Vector Representation
Topology Level | |
---|---|
Complex Object Present? | |
Complex Object Count | |
Composite Object Present? | |
Composite Object Count | |
Curve Object Present? | |
Curve Object Count | |
Point Object Present? | Yes |
Point Object Count | 44711868006 |
Solid Object Present? | |
Solid Object Count | |
Surface Object Present? | |
Surface Object Count |
Vector Representation
Topology Level | |
---|---|
Complex Object Present? | |
Complex Object Count | |
Composite Object Present? | |
Composite Object Count | |
Curve Object Present? | |
Curve Object Count | |
Point Object Present? | |
Point Object Count | |
Solid Object Present? | |
Solid Object Count | |
Surface Object Present? | |
Surface Object Count |
Reference Systems
Reference System
EPSG Code | EPSG:3857 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Horizontal Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vertical Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reference System
EPSG Code | EPSG:5703 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Horizontal Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vertical Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reference System
EPSG Code | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Horizontal Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vertical Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Access Information
Data License | |
---|---|
Data License URL | |
Data License Statement | |
* » Security Class | Unclassified |
* Security Classification System | |
Security Handling Description | |
• Data Access Policy | |
» Data Access Procedure |
Data is available online for bulk or custom downloads |
• » Data Access Constraints |
None |
• Data Use Constraints |
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. |
Metadata Access Constraints | |
Metadata Use Constraints |
Distribution Information
Start Date | 2023-12-19 |
---|---|
End Date | Present |
» Download URL | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=10004/details/10004 |
Distributor | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) (2023 - Present) |
File Name | Customized Download |
Description |
Create custom data files by choosing data area, product type, map projection, file format, datum, etc. A new metadata will be produced to reflect your request using this record as a base. Change to an orthometric vertical datum is one of the many options. |
File Date/Time | |
File Type (Deprecated) | |
Distribution Format | Not Applicable |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | Zip |
Review Status |
Start Date | |
---|---|
End Date | |
» Download URL | |
Distributor | |
File Name | |
Description | |
File Date/Time | |
File Type | |
FGDC Content Type | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
Start Date | |
---|---|
End Date | |
» Download URL | |
Distributor | |
File Name | |
Description | |
File Date/Time | |
File Type | |
FGDC Content Type | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
Start Date | |
---|---|
End Date | |
» Download URL | |
Distributor | |
File Name | |
Description | |
File Date/Time | |
File Type | |
FGDC Content Type | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
URLs
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/ |
---|---|
Name | NOAA's Office for Coastal Management (OCM) Data Access Viewer (DAV) |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | HTML |
Description |
The Data Access Viewer (DAV) allows a user to search for and download elevation, imagery, and land cover data for the coastal U.S. and its territories. The data, hosted by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management, can be customized and requested for free download through a checkout interface. An email provides a link to the customized data, while the original data set is available through a link within the viewer. |
URL | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/metadata/WI_Statewide_2016_A16/ |
---|---|
Name | Reports |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
Directory containing reports and metadata. Divided by county. This site is maintained by USGS. |
URL | |
---|---|
Name | |
URL Type | |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
URL | |
---|---|
Name | |
URL Type | |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
URL | |
---|---|
Name | |
URL Type | |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
Activity Log
Activity Time | |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Activity Time | |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Activity Time | |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Issues
Issue Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Issue |
Issue Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Issue |
Issue Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Issue |
Technical Environment
Description |
|
---|
Data Quality
Representativeness | |
---|---|
Accuracy | |
Analytical Accuracy | |
Horizontal Positional Accuracy | |
Vertical Positional Accuracy |
The project specifications require the vertical accuracy of the lidar data to be calculated and reported according to Non-vegetated Vertical Accuracy (NVA) and Vegetated Vertical Accuracy (VVA) classifications. The required NVA for this project is 19.6 cm (0.643 survey feet) calculated at the 95 percent confidence level (AccuracyZ). The 95 percent confidence level statistic is derived according to National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA) methodologies using RMSEz * 1.9600. This requirement is for the vertical accuracy testing of the raw swath lidar data and the derived digital elevation model (DEM). The AccuracyZ statistic is assessed and reported using National Digital Elevation Program (NDEP)/ASPRS Guidelines. The minimum required number of NVA checkpoints for this project area is 45.
The required VVA for this project is 29.4 cm (0.965 survey feet) calculated at the 95th percentile derived according to ASPRS Guidelines, Vertical Accuracy Reporting for Lidar Data, i.e., based on the 95th percentile error in all vegetated land cover classes combined. This requirement is for the vertical accuracy testing of the derived digital elevation model (DEM). The minimum required number of VVA checkpoints for this project area is 35. The NVA (bare earth and urban area land cover classes) and VVA (tall weeds, forested, and swamp land cover classes) checkpoints were distributed throughout the project area and were surveyed using GPS techniques. See survey report for additional survey methodologies. Elevations from the hydro flattened raster DEM were measured for the x,y location of each check point. Elevations interpolated from the hydro flattened raster DEM surface were then compared to the elevation values of the surveyed control points. Quantitative value: 0.09 meters, AccuracyZ at 95% confidence level, Test that produced the value: Buffalo County: Tested 0.072 meters (0.235 survey feet) NVA at the 95 percent confidence level. The NVA of the raw swath was calculated using 49 independent checkpoints located in the Bare Earth and Urban land cover categories. Portage County: Tested 0.084 meters (0.277 survey feet) NVA at the 95 percent confidence level. The NVA of the raw swath was calculated using 92 independent checkpoints located in the Bare Earth and Urban land cover categories. Taylor County: Tested 0.084 meters (0.274 survey feet) NVA at the 95 percent confidence level. The NVA of the raw swath was calculated using 58 independent checkpoints located in the Bare Earth and Urban land cover categories. Washburn County: Tested 0.121 meters (0.398 survey feet) NVA at the 95 percent confidence level. The NVA of the raw swath was calculated using 56 independent checkpoints located in the Bare Earth and Urban land cover categories. Weighted Average = 0.09 meters at 95 percent confidence level. |
Quantitation Limits | |
Bias | |
Comparability | |
Completeness Measure | |
Precision | |
Analytical Precision | |
Field Precision | |
Sensitivity | |
Detection Limit | |
Completeness Report |
Spatial consistency of coverage of the project area was maintained throughout the dataset. |
Conceptual Consistency |
Spatial consistency of coverage of the project area was maintained throughout the dataset. |
» Quality Control Procedures Employed |
Data Management
» Have Resources for Management of these Data Been Identified? | Yes |
---|---|
» Approximate Percentage of Budget for these Data Devoted to Data Management | Unknown |
» Do these Data Comply with the Data Access Directive? | Yes |
» Is Access to the Data Limited Based on an Approved Waiver? | |
» If Distributor (Data Hosting Service) is Needed, Please Indicate | |
» Approximate Delay Between Data Collection and Dissemination | |
» If Delay is Longer than Latency of Automated Processing, Indicate Under What Authority Data Access is Delayed | |
» Actual or Planned Long-Term Data Archive Location | NCEI-NC |
» Approximate Delay Between Data Collection and Archiving | |
» How Will the Data Be Protected from Accidental or Malicious Modification or Deletion Prior to Receipt by the Archive? |
Data is backed up to cloud storage. |
Lineage
» Lineage Statement |
---|
Sources
Citation Title | |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Scale Denominator |
Citation Title | |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Scale Denominator |
Citation Title | |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Scale Denominator |
Process Steps
Process Step Number | 1 |
---|---|
» Description |
Lidar processing utilizes several software packages, including GeoCue and the TerraSolid suite of processing components. The GeoCue software is a database management system for housing the lidar dataset (usually multiple gigabytes in size). GeoCue incorporates a thorough checklist of processing steps and quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures that assist in the lidar workflow. The TerraSolid software suite is used to automate the initial classification of the lidar point cloud based on a set of predetermined parameters. Lidar technicians refer to ground cover research (natural and cultural features) within the project area and determine algorithms most suitable for the initial automated lidar classification. (Some algorithms/filters recognize the ground in forests well, while others have greater capability in urban areas). During this process each point is given an initial classification (e.g., as ground, vegetation, or noise) based on the point's coordinates and the relation to its neighbors. Classifications to be assigned include all those outlined by ASPRS standards. The initial classifications produce a coarse and inexact dataset, but offer an adequate starting point for the subsequent manual classification procedure. During this step, "overlap" points are automatically classified (those originating from neighboring flightlines) using information gathered from the ABGPS and IMU data. Any duplicate points existing from adjacent flightlines are removed during this process. Hydrographic breaklines are collected using lidargrammetry to ensure hydroflattened water surfaces. This process involves manipulating the lidar data's intensity information to create a metrically sound stereo environment. From this generated "imagery", breaklines are photogrammetrically compiled. Breakline polygons are created to represent open water bodies. The lidar points that fall within these areas are classified as "water." All hydrographic breaklines include a 3.125 foot buffer, with the Class 2 (bare earth) points being re-classified as Class 10 (ignored ground). TerraSolid is further used for the subsequent manual classification of the lidar points allowing technicians to view the point cloud in a number of ways to ensure accuracy and consistency of points and uniformity of point coverage. |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 2 |
---|---|
» Description |
USGS converted the original data to Entwine Point Tile (EPT) format in Web Mercator projection. All units were converted to meters. The EPT files are: https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/USGS_LPC_WI_Buffalo_2016/ept.json https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/USGS_LPC_WI_Portage_2016/ept.json https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/USGS_LPC_WI_Taylor_2016/ept.json https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/USGS_LPC_WI_Washburn_2016/ept.json https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/USGS_LPC_WI_Washburn_TL_2016_LAS_2019/ept.json NOAA ingested these EPT references into the Digital Coast Data Access Viewer to allow custom processing of the data. This metadata record was created to support that usage. |
Process Date/Time | 2023-12-19 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Phone (Voice) | (843) 740-1202 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Source |
Process Step Number | |
---|---|
» Description | |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | |
---|---|
» Description | |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | |
---|---|
» Description | |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Acquisition Information
Instruments
Instrument Unavailable Reason |
---|
Identifier | |
---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |
Instrument / Gear | |
Instrument Type | |
Description |
Identifier | |
---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |
Instrument / Gear | |
Instrument Type | |
Description |
Identifier | |
---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |
Instrument / Gear | |
Instrument Type | |
Description |
Platforms
Platform Unavailable Reason |
---|
Identifier | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |||||||
Description | |||||||
Mounted Instruments |
|||||||
|
Identifier | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |||||||
Description | |||||||
Mounted Instruments |
|||||||
|
Identifier | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |||||||
Description | |||||||
Mounted Instruments |
|||||||
|
FAQs
Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Question | |
Answer |
Child Items
Rubric scores updated every 15m
Score | Type | Title |
---|---|---|
Related Items
Item Type | Relationship Type | Title |
---|---|---|
Catalog Details
Catalog Item ID | 71692 |
---|---|
Metadata Record Created By | Kirk Waters |
Metadata Record Created | 2023-12-19 18:20+0000 |
Metadata Record Last Modified By | Kirk Waters |
» Metadata Record Last Modified | 2023-12-19 18:35+0000 |
Metadata Record Published | 2023-12-19 |
Owner Org | OCMP |
Metadata Publication Status | Published Externally |
Do Not Publish? | N |
Metadata Workflow State | Published / External |
Metadata Last Review Date | 2023-12-19 |
Metadata Review Frequency | 3 Years |
Metadata Next Review Date | 2026-12-19 |
Tags |
---|