Florida Panhandle: BIRDS (Polygons)
Data Set (DS) | Office of Response and Restoration (ORR)GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:78081 | Updated: March 4, 2026 | Published / External
-
View As
- Full List View
- EXPORTS
- InPort XML
- ISO 19115
- WAF Files
- View in Hierarchy
Summary
Short Citation
Office of Response and Restoration, 2026: Florida Panhandle: BIRDS (Polygons), https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/78081.
Full Citation Examples
This data set contains sensitive biological resource data for diving birds, gulls, terns, passerines, pelagic birds, raptors, shorebirds, wading birds, and waterfowl for the Florida Panhandle. Vector polygons in this data set represent bird nesting, migratory staging, and wintering sites and other spatial/temporal concentration areas. Species specific abundance, seasonality, status, life history, and source information are stored in relational data tables (described below) designed to be used in conjunction with this spatial data layer. This data set comprises a portion of the ESI data for Florida. ESI data characterize the marine and coastal environments and wildlife by their sensitivity to spilled oil. The ESI data include information for three main components: shoreline habitats, sensitive biological resources, and human-use resources.
The ESI data provide sensitive areas data for oil spill planning and response and other environmental management and natural resource purposes. The Clean Water Act with amendments by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 requires response plans for immediate and effective protection of sensitive areas. These data also support other related state and federal regulatory requirements for oil spill prevention, planning, response, and restoration.
Data Access & Downloads
-
ESRI File Geodatabase
Data access URL
Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by NOAA regarding the utility of the data on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. NOAA warrants the delivery of this product in computer-readable format, and will offer a replacement copy of the product when the product is determined unreadable by computer input peripherals, or when the physical medium is delivered in damaged condition.
Controlled Theme Keywords
biota, environment
Child Items
No Child Items for this record.
Contact Information
Metadata Contact
ESI Program Manager
orr.esi@noaa.gov
Extents
-87.53319° W,
-83.69784° E,
30.77393° N,
29.54792° S
2022 - 2023
The data were compiled during 2021-2023. The currentness dates for this data range from 2022 to 2023 and are documented in the Lineage section.
Item Identification
| Title: | Florida Panhandle: BIRDS (Polygons) |
|---|---|
| Status: | Completed |
| Publication Date: | 2025-09 |
| Abstract: |
This data set contains sensitive biological resource data for diving birds, gulls, terns, passerines, pelagic birds, raptors, shorebirds, wading birds, and waterfowl for the Florida Panhandle. Vector polygons in this data set represent bird nesting, migratory staging, and wintering sites and other spatial/temporal concentration areas. Species specific abundance, seasonality, status, life history, and source information are stored in relational data tables (described below) designed to be used in conjunction with this spatial data layer. This data set comprises a portion of the ESI data for Florida. ESI data characterize the marine and coastal environments and wildlife by their sensitivity to spilled oil. The ESI data include information for three main components: shoreline habitats, sensitive biological resources, and human-use resources. |
| Purpose: |
The ESI data provide sensitive areas data for oil spill planning and response and other environmental management and natural resource purposes. The Clean Water Act with amendments by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 requires response plans for immediate and effective protection of sensitive areas. These data also support other related state and federal regulatory requirements for oil spill prevention, planning, response, and restoration. |
Keywords
Theme Keywords
| Thesaurus | Keyword |
|---|---|
| ISO 19115 Topic Category |
biota
|
| ISO 19115 Topic Category |
environment
|
| UNCONTROLLED | |
| None | biota |
| None | Bird |
| None | Coastal resources |
| None | Coastal Zone Management |
| None | environment |
| None | Environmental Monitoring,ESI |
| None | Oil spill planning |
| None | Sensitivity maps |
| None | Wildlife |
Spatial Keywords
| Thesaurus | Keyword |
|---|---|
| UNCONTROLLED | |
| None | Florida |
Data Set Information
| Data Set Scope Code: | Data Set |
|---|---|
| Data Presentation Form: | Map (digital) |
Support Roles
Data Steward
| Date Effective From: | 2025-09 |
|---|---|
| Date Effective To: | |
| Contact (Position): | ESI Program Manager |
| Address: |
7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, WA 98115 |
| Email Address: | orr.esi@noaa.gov |
Distributor
| Date Effective From: | 2025-09 |
|---|---|
| Date Effective To: | |
| Contact (Organization): | Office of Response and Restoration (ORR) |
| Address: |
1305 East-West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 |
| ROR: | https://ror.org/03g5tqa50 |
| URL: | ORR Home Page |
Metadata Contact
| Date Effective From: | 2025-09 |
|---|---|
| Date Effective To: | |
| Contact (Position): | ESI Program Manager |
| Address: |
7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, WA 98115 |
| Email Address: | orr.esi@noaa.gov |
Extents
Extent Group 1
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 1
| W° Bound: | -87.53319 | |
|---|---|---|
| E° Bound: | -83.69784 | |
| N° Bound: | 30.77393 | |
| S° Bound: | 29.54792 |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 1
| Time Frame Type: | Range |
|---|---|
| Start: | 2022 |
| End: | 2023 |
| Description: |
The data were compiled during 2021-2023. The currentness dates for this data range from 2022 to 2023 and are documented in the Lineage section. |
Spatial Information
Reference Systems
Reference System 1
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Access Information
| Security Class: | Unclassified |
|---|---|
| Data Use Constraints: |
Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by NOAA regarding the utility of the data on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. NOAA warrants the delivery of this product in computer-readable format, and will offer a replacement copy of the product when the product is determined unreadable by computer input peripherals, or when the physical medium is delivered in damaged condition. |
Distribution Information
Distribution 1
| Download URL: | https://response.restoration.noaa.gov/esi |
|---|---|
| Distributor: | Office of Response and Restoration (ORR) (2025-09 - Present) |
| Description: |
Data access URL |
| Distribution Format: | ESRI File Geodatabase |
Data Quality
| Accuracy: |
A multi-stage error checking process is used to verify both attribute accuracy and logical consistency throughout data production. The process includes a standardized data entry methodology, data review by in-house and external resource experts, a final Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) process, and multiple automated logical consistency checks. Quantitative data (such as densities, counts, abundances, or concentrations) provided by resource experts for inclusion in the data set may vary widely in attribute accuracy, depending upon the methodology used to collect and compile such data. For a more detailed evaluation of source data attribute accuracy, contact the sources listed in the Lineage section. The attribute accuracy is estimated to be 'good' given the years of ESI experience, the data input methodology, the quality control review sessions, and the digital logical consistency checks. |
|---|---|
| Horizontal Positional Accuracy: |
Spatial components for the biological data layers can come from expert interviews, hardcopy, or digital sources. Some of the spatial components of the biological data layers may have been developed using regional experts who estimate concentration areas. It is difficult to estimate the positional accuracy of such data, except to state that they are compiled on hardcopy base maps with a scale of 1:24,000. Some of the spatial components of the biological data sets are developed from pre-existing digital or hardcopy sources and reflect the positional accuracy of these original data. Note that biological resource data by their very nature are considered "fuzzy", and this should be understood when considering the positional accuracy of vector digital objects representing these resources. See the Lineage and Process_Description sections for more information on the original source data and how these data were integrated or manipulated to create the final data set. |
| Completeness Report: |
These data represent a synthesis of expert knowledge, available hardcopy documents, survey data, maps, and digital data on bird nesting, migratory staging, and wintering sites and other spatial/temporal concentration areas. These data do not necessarily represent all bird occurrences in Florida Panhandle. The following species are included in this data set: (Species_ID, Common Name, Scientific Name [n/a if not applicable]): 1, Common loon, Gavia immer; 8, Double-crested cormorant, Phalacrocorax auritus; 12, Canada goose, Branta canadensis; 15, Snow goose, Chen caerulescens; 16, Mallard, Anas platyrhynchos; 17, Northern pintail, Anas acuta; 18, Green-winged teal, Anas crecca; 20, Northern shoveler, Anas clypeata; 21, Canvasback, Aythya valisineria; 23, Lesser scaup, Aythya affinis; 24, Common goldeneye, Bucephala clangula; 26, Bufflehead, Bucephala albeola; 27, Long-tailed duck, Clangula hyemalis; 33, Red-breasted merganser, Mergus serrator; 34, American coot, Fulica americana; 35, Parasitic jaeger, Stercorarius parasiticus; 38, Herring gull, Larus argentatus; 40, Ring-billed gull, Larus delawarensis; 42, Bonaparte's gull, Larus philadelphia; 45, Common tern, Sterna hirundo; 54, Great blue heron, Ardea herodias; 55, Whimbrel, Numenius phaeopus; 58, Greater yellowlegs, Tringa melanoleuca; 59, Lesser yellowlegs, Tringa flavipes; 62, Least sandpiper, Calidris minutilla; 63, Dunlin, Calidris alpina; 64, Short-billed dowitcher, Limnodromus griseus; 66, Western sandpiper, Calidris mauri; 67, Sanderling, Calidris alba; 69, Semipalmated plover, Charadrius semipalmatus; 70, Killdeer, Charadrius vociferus; 71, Black-bellied plover, Pluvialis squatarola; 73, Ruddy turnstone, Arenaria interpres; 76, Bald eagle, Haliaeetus leucocephalus; 77, Osprey, Pandion haliaetus; 86, Least tern, Sternula antillarum; 87, Little blue heron, Egretta caerulea; 88, Great egret, Ardea alba; 89, Snowy egret, Egretta thula; 90, Black-crowned night-heron, Nycticorax nycticorax; 91, Glossy ibis, Plegadis falcinellus; 93, Cattle egret, Bubulcus ibis; 94, Tricolored heron, Egretta tricolor; 97, Green heron, Butorides virescens; 98, Laughing gull, Leucophaeus atricilla; 107, Peregrine falcon, Falco peregrinus; 115, White ibis, Eudocimus albus; 118, Brown pelican, Pelecanus occidentalis; 119, Magnificent frigatebird, Fregata magnificens; 120, Yellow-crowned night-heron, Nyctanassa violacea; 124, Redhead, Aythya americana; 126, Brown noddy, Anous stolidus; 127, Sooty tern, Onychoprion fuscatus; 128, Masked booby, Sula dactylatra; 132, Wood stork, Mycteria americana; 133, Black skimmer, Rynchops niger; 134, Gull-billed tern, Gelochelidon nilotica; 135, Sandwich tern, Thalasseus sandvicensis; 136, Caspian tern, Hydroprogne caspia; 137, Royal tern, Thalasseus maximus; 138, Forster's tern, Sterna forsteri; 139, Snowy plover, Charadrius nivosus; 142, Black-necked stilt, Himantopus mexicanus; 148, Ruddy duck, Oxyura jamaicensis; 152, American oystercatcher, Haematopus palliatus; 153, Piping plover, Charadrius melodus; 154, Wilson's plover, Charadrius wilsonia; 155, Willet, Tringa semipalmata; 162, Gadwall, Anas strepera; 163, Reddish egret, Egretta rufescens; 167, Northern gannet, Morus bassanus; 169, American wigeon, Anas americana; 173, American white pelican, Pelecanus erythrorhynchos; 180, Ring-necked duck, Aythya collaris; 181, Northern harrier, Circus hudsonius; 186, American black duck, Anas rubripes; 190, Blue-winged teal, Anas discors; 191, Wood duck, Aix sponsa; 193, Black tern, Chlidonias niger; 199, Pomarine jaeger, Stercorarius pomarinus; 210, Marbled godwit, Limosa fedoa; 211, Mottled duck, Anas fulvigula; 220, Merlin, Falco columbarius; 261, Brown booby, Sula leucogaster; 277, Seaside sparrow, Ammodramus maritimus; 283, Bridled tern, Onychoprion anaethetus; 287, Audubon's shearwater, Puffinus lherminieri; 293, Yellowlegs, Tringa spp.; 299, Scaup, Aythya spp.; 302, Scoters, Melanitta spp.; 305, Red-cockaded woodpecker, Picoides borealis; 309, Florida sandhill crane, Antigone canadensis pratensis; 339, Band-rumped storm-petrel, Oceanodroma castro; 406, Cinnamon teal, Anas cyanoptera; 445, Wilson's storm-petrel, Oceanites oceanicus; 459, Florida burrowing owl, Athene cunicularia floridana; 461, Southeastern American kestrel, Falco sparverius paulus; 529, Cory's shearwater, Calonectris diomedea; 603, Black-capped petrel, Pterodroma hasitata; 859, Scott's seaside sparrow, Ammodramus maritimus peninsulae; 865, Great shearwater, Puffinus gravis; 952, Red knot, Calidris canutus rufa; 966, Marian's marsh wren, Cistothorus palustris marianae; 967, Eastern black rail, Laterallus jamaicensis jamaicensis; 1002, Shorebirds, n/a; 1005, Raptors, n/a. |
| Conceptual Consistency: |
A multi-stage error checking process, described in the above Attribute_Accuracy_Report, is used to verify both attribute accuracy and logical consistency throughout data production. This process includes multiple automated logical consistency checks that test the files for missing or duplicate data, rules for proper coding, GIS topological consistencies, and SQL SERVER(R) to ArcGIS(R) consistencies. A final review is made by the ESI manager, where the data are written to CD-ROM and the metadata are written. RARNUM's are defined on an element basis, so 'resources at risk' groupings will contain only a single element. |
Lineage
Sources
BIRD DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE
| Contact Role Type: | Originator |
|---|---|
| Contact Type: | Organization |
| Contact Name: | APALACHICOLA RIVERKEEPER |
| Publish Date: | 2011-01-01 |
| Source Contribution: |
BIRDS INFORMATION |
GULF OF MEXICO MARINE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM FOR PROTECTED SPECIES (GOMMAPPS) PELAGIC SEABIRD SURVEYS- CUMULATIVE HABITAT SUITABILITY INDEX MODEL
| Contact Role Type: | Originator |
|---|---|
| Contact Type: | Organization |
| Contact Name: | BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, NOAA SOUTHEAST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER, US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY |
| Publish Date: | 2022-01-01 |
Please see the metadata record in the ESI package for a full list of data originators
Process Steps
Process Step 1
| Description: |
Three main sources of data were used for this bird distribution and seasonality data layer: 1) personal interviews with experts from organizations like Apalachicola Riverkeeper, USFWS, FWC, Eglin Air Force Base, DEP, and NPS; 2) digital data sets from these agencies (including FNAI); and 3) published and unpublished reports. Shorebird wintering distributions, including Piping plover (FT, ST) and Rufa red knot (FT, ST), were mapped using survey data from Eglin Air Force Base and USFWS Critical Habitat layers (Piping plover 2001, Rufa red knot proposed 2023). Concentration was the maximum number of birds observed (2006-2022). FWC Florida Shorebird Database (FSD) data (2011-2022) covered solitary and colonial beach nesters, diving birds, gulls, and terns. Due to over 8,000 records, locations were consolidated into polygonal shoreline buffers. Solitary nesters' nests were binned into "High," "Medium," and "Low" concentrations. Colonial nesters' maximum adult numbers (2011-2022) were represented as "UP TO XX ADULTS." Additional shorebird data, especially for non-breeding and wintering birds, came from eBird hotspots, which provide citizen scientist counts. Hotspots were spatially combined, and high counts per species were summarized in bins of "10s," "100s," "1000s," or "10,000." Diving birds, gulls, and terns survey data were provided by various agencies via shapefiles, spreadsheets, literature, and expert knowledge, supplemented by eBird. This data was generally mapped to habitat, park, refuge, or specific locations per expert recommendations. Colonial wading bird data from Apalachicola Riverkeeper (AR), Choctawhatchee Audubon Society (CAS), and USFWS included surveys (CAS) and expert knowledge (AR and USFWS). Concentration for survey data was categorized as "Common," "Occasional," and "Less common." Waterfowl data for the Florida Panhandle came from FWC 1999-2003 mid-winter surveys, supplemented by eBird hotspots. Concentrations are reported as species counts binned into "1s," "10s," "100s," "1,000," or "10,000." Gulf of Mexico seabirds were mapped using model data from the Gulf of Mexico Marine Assessment Program for Protected Species (GOMMAPPS), which used vessel survey and environmental data to model predicted probability of occurrence (PPO). Black-capped petrel (FE, SE) was mapped individually using GOMMAPPS and Natural Resource Damage Assessment survey data, also estimating PPO. High relative PPO for black-capped petrel was mapped as "High-vessel srvy PPO." Raptors, including merlin, peregrine falcon, and northern harrier, were mapped from Audubon of Florida data. Bald eagle nest survey data (2017) from FWC mapped nest locations as polygons. Osprey were mapped to a nearshore polygon. Florida burrowing owl (ST) and southeastern American kestrel (ST) were mapped from FNAI element occurrence data. Threatened and Endangered species (T/E) data were provided by various agencies and sources. FNAI habitat and element of occurrence (EO) data supplemented other sources for species like Eastern black rail (FT, ST), Marian's marsh wren (ST), Piping plover (FT, ST), Red-cockaded woodpecker (FE, SE), Scott's seaside sparrow (ST), and Wood stork (FT, ST). These digital and/or hardcopy sources were compiled by a project biologist to create the BIRDS data layer. Data compilation approaches included: 1) compiling interview and hardcopy information onto U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000 topographic quadrangles and digitizing; 2) digitizing hardcopy maps at their source scale; and 3) evaluating and using digital data layers "as is" or integrating them with hardcopy sources. The ESI, biology, and human-use data are compiled into the standard ESI digital data format. A second round of expert interviews reviews the compiled data, and edits are made based on recommendations before final maps and digital data are created. |
|---|---|
| Process Date/Time: | 2023-06-01 00:00:00 |
| Process Contact: | Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC-FWRI) |
| Phone (Voice): | (727)-896-8626 |
Catalog Details
| Catalog Item ID: | 78081 |
|---|---|
| GUID: | gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:78081 |
| Metadata Record Created By: | Adam Rotert |
| Metadata Record Created: | 2025-09-24 17:57+0000 |
| Metadata Record Last Modified By: | SysAdmin InPortAdmin |
| Metadata Record Last Modified: | 2026-03-04 19:17+0000 |
| Metadata Record Published: | 2025-09-30 |
| Owner Org: | ORR |
| Metadata Publication Status: | Published Externally |
| Do Not Publish?: | N |
| Metadata Last Review Date: | 2025-09-30 |
| Metadata Review Frequency: | 1 Year |
| Metadata Next Review Date: | 2026-09-30 |
