Evaluating and Enhancing Eelgrass Resiliency and Restoration Potential in a Changing Climate - NERRS/NSC(NERRS Science Collaborative)
Data Set (DS) | Office for Coastal Management (OCM)GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:78322 | Updated: March 4, 2026 | Published / External
-
View As
- Full List View
- EXPORTS
- InPort XML
- ISO 19115
- WAF Files
- View in Hierarchy
Summary
Short Citation
Office for Coastal Management, 2026: Evaluating and Enhancing Eelgrass Resiliency and Restoration Potential in a Changing Climate - NERRS/NSC(NERRS Science Collaborative), https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/78322.
Full Citation Examples
A network of the intended users from reserves, state agencies, and Chesapeake Bay nonprofits developed a framework to guide eelgrass restoration efforts with an emphasis on climate resilience.
In the lower Chesapeake Bay, Virginia, warmer water temperatures in recent years have resulted in large scale diebacks of eelgrass meadows (Zostera marina). Historically stable, dense eelgrass meadows have converted to low-density, ephemeral meadows. In contrast, many eelgrass populations in Back Sound, North Carolina appear to be more resilient to warming water temperatures. Restoring this iconic species in Virginia and beyond will require understanding the drivers of eelgrass resilience to climate change.
By coordinating a network of the intended users from reserves, state agencies, and Chesapeake Bay nonprofits, this project compared resiliency traits of eelgrass populations in Virginia and North Carolina. The project team worked with a user advisory group, which held regular brainstorming meetings, to design an approach that would inform management decisions related to eelgrass, especially restoration. The team conducted reciprocal restoration trials of Virginia and North Carolina eelgrass seeds (i.e. planting seeds sourced from NC at restoration sites in VA, and vice versa). In addition, the team performed whole genome sequencing of eelgrass sourced from both VA and NC. Restoration trials showed that seeds sourced from NC performed better than local VA seeds at some, but not all, of the restoration sites in VA. Genomic results confirmed that eelgrass populations in VA and NC are locally adapted and use different molecular pathways to achieve resilience to warming conditions.
These results offer insights into the drivers of these regional differences in eelgrass resilience. They indicate the importance of seed sources in potential future eelgrass restoration, in addition to focusing on site selection. The team used the results to develop a draft decision-making framework to guide eelgrass restoration efforts with an emphasis on climate resilience. The framework integrates genomic data, environmental monitoring, and site-specific stressor assessments to inform donor site selection and restoration planning. This framework not only synthesized a wide range of data but also incorporated early and consistent input from the End User Advisory Group, which helped ensure that it was both scientifically rigorous and practically relevant.
The Impact
Generated new insights into spatial and temporal patterns of eelgrass resiliency in both North Carolina and Virginia and set the stage for future comparative work with other submerged aquatic vegetation communities.
Directly supported the development of two major externally funded initiatives, including a large-scale restoration project funded by the National Park Service and the National Park Foundation, which examines eelgrass populations from North Carolina to Massachusetts.
Advanced an innovative framework for eelgrass restoration projects in Chesapeake Bay that incorporates resilience to climate change.
Provided professional development opportunities for undergraduate and graduate students to practice bridging research with real-world management needs.
Data Access & Downloads
None
Cite this dataset when used as a source: NOAA retains the right to analyze, synthesize and publish summaries of the NERRS/NSC data. The NERRS/NSC retains the right to be fully credited for having collected and process the data. Following academic courtesy standards, the NERR site where the data were collected should be contacted and fully acknowledged in any subsequent publications in which any part of the data are used. The data enclosed within this package/transmission are only as accurate as the quality assurance and quality control procedures that are described in the associated metadata reporting statement allow. The user bears all responsibility for its subsequent use/misuse in any further analyses or comparisons. The Federal government does not assume liability to the Recipient or third persons, nor will the Federal government reimburse or indemnify the Recipient for its liability due to any losses resulting in any way from the use of this data. Requested citation format: NOAA National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS) Science Collaborative(NSC).
Controlled Theme Keywords
RECLAMATION/REVEGETATION/RESTORATION
URLs
Child Items
| Type | Title |
|---|---|
| Entity | N/A |
Contact Information
Metadata Contact
Jeremy Cothran
jeremy.cothran@gmail.com
Extents
-76.91° W,
-76.35° E,
37.6° N,
37.2° S
Chesapeake Bay, VA NERR
2022-10 - 2025-03
Item Identification
| Title: | Evaluating and Enhancing Eelgrass Resiliency and Restoration Potential in a Changing Climate - NERRS/NSC(NERRS Science Collaborative) |
|---|---|
| Status: | Completed |
| Creation Date: | Unknown |
| Revision Date: | Unknown |
| Publication Date: | 2025-03 |
| Abstract: |
A network of the intended users from reserves, state agencies, and Chesapeake Bay nonprofits developed a framework to guide eelgrass restoration efforts with an emphasis on climate resilience. In the lower Chesapeake Bay, Virginia, warmer water temperatures in recent years have resulted in large scale diebacks of eelgrass meadows (Zostera marina). Historically stable, dense eelgrass meadows have converted to low-density, ephemeral meadows. In contrast, many eelgrass populations in Back Sound, North Carolina appear to be more resilient to warming water temperatures. Restoring this iconic species in Virginia and beyond will require understanding the drivers of eelgrass resilience to climate change. By coordinating a network of the intended users from reserves, state agencies, and Chesapeake Bay nonprofits, this project compared resiliency traits of eelgrass populations in Virginia and North Carolina. The project team worked with a user advisory group, which held regular brainstorming meetings, to design an approach that would inform management decisions related to eelgrass, especially restoration. The team conducted reciprocal restoration trials of Virginia and North Carolina eelgrass seeds (i.e. planting seeds sourced from NC at restoration sites in VA, and vice versa). In addition, the team performed whole genome sequencing of eelgrass sourced from both VA and NC. Restoration trials showed that seeds sourced from NC performed better than local VA seeds at some, but not all, of the restoration sites in VA. Genomic results confirmed that eelgrass populations in VA and NC are locally adapted and use different molecular pathways to achieve resilience to warming conditions. These results offer insights into the drivers of these regional differences in eelgrass resilience. They indicate the importance of seed sources in potential future eelgrass restoration, in addition to focusing on site selection. The team used the results to develop a draft decision-making framework to guide eelgrass restoration efforts with an emphasis on climate resilience. The framework integrates genomic data, environmental monitoring, and site-specific stressor assessments to inform donor site selection and restoration planning. This framework not only synthesized a wide range of data but also incorporated early and consistent input from the End User Advisory Group, which helped ensure that it was both scientifically rigorous and practically relevant. |
| Purpose: |
The Impact Generated new insights into spatial and temporal patterns of eelgrass resiliency in both North Carolina and Virginia and set the stage for future comparative work with other submerged aquatic vegetation communities. Directly supported the development of two major externally funded initiatives, including a large-scale restoration project funded by the National Park Service and the National Park Foundation, which examines eelgrass populations from North Carolina to Massachusetts. Advanced an innovative framework for eelgrass restoration projects in Chesapeake Bay that incorporates resilience to climate change. Provided professional development opportunities for undergraduate and graduate students to practice bridging research with real-world management needs. |
| Supplemental Information: |
Project Lead: Jessie Jarvis, University of North Carolina Wilmington, jarvisj@uncw.edu Technical Lead: Erin Shields, Chesapeake Bay NERR Virginia, eshields@vims.edu Collaborative Lead: Cirse Gonzalez, Chesapeake Bay NERR Virginia, cagonzalez@vims.edu Co-PI: Stephanie Kamel, University of North Carolina Wilmington, kamels@uncw.edu
Partners: Virginia Marine Resources Commission; North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries; Chesapeake Bay Program; Albemarle Pamlico National Estuary Partnership; National Park Service; Boston University |
Keywords
Theme Keywords
| Thesaurus | Keyword |
|---|---|
| Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords |
EARTH SCIENCE > BIOSPHERE > VEGETATION > RECLAMATION/REVEGETATION/RESTORATION
|
| UNCONTROLLED | |
| None | climate change |
| None | common garden |
| None | eelgrass |
| None | eelgrass genomics |
| None | PAR |
| None | percent cover |
| None | restoration |
| None | seagrass |
| None | seed bank |
| None | seed source |
| None | seed viability |
| None | shoot density |
| None | SNPs |
| None | stress |
| None | thermal adaptation |
| None | transplant |
| None | water quality |
| None | Zostera marina |
Spatial Keywords
| Thesaurus | Keyword |
|---|---|
| UNCONTROLLED | |
| None | Chesapeake Bay, VA NERR |
Data Set Information
| Data Set Scope Code: | Data Set |
|---|---|
| Maintenance Frequency: | As Needed |
| Distribution Liability: |
The distributor does not assume liability. |
Support Roles
Data Steward
| Date Effective From: | 2015 |
|---|---|
| Date Effective To: | |
| Contact (Organization): | Office for Coastal Management (OCM) |
| Address: |
2234 South Hobson Avenue Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
| ROR: | https://ror.org/05v14bq57 |
| URL: | https://www.coast.noaa.gov/ |
Distributor
| Date Effective From: | 2015 |
|---|---|
| Date Effective To: | |
| Contact (Organization): | Office for Coastal Management (OCM) |
| Address: |
2234 South Hobson Avenue Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
| ROR: | https://ror.org/05v14bq57 |
| URL: | https://www.coast.noaa.gov/ |
Metadata Contact
| Date Effective From: | 2017-10-31 |
|---|---|
| Date Effective To: | |
| Contact (Person): | Cothran, Jeremy |
| Address: | |
| Email Address: | jeremy.cothran@gmail.com |
Extents
| Currentness Reference: | Ground Condition |
|---|
Extent Group 1
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 1
| W° Bound: | -76.91 | |
|---|---|---|
| E° Bound: | -76.35 | |
| N° Bound: | 37.6 | |
| S° Bound: | 37.2 | |
| Description |
Chesapeake Bay, VA NERR |
|
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 1
| Time Frame Type: | Range |
|---|---|
| Start: | 2022-10 |
| End: | 2025-03 |
Access Information
| Security Class: | Unclassified |
|---|---|
| Data Access Constraints: |
None |
| Data Use Constraints: |
Cite this dataset when used as a source: NOAA retains the right to analyze, synthesize and publish summaries of the NERRS/NSC data. The NERRS/NSC retains the right to be fully credited for having collected and process the data. Following academic courtesy standards, the NERR site where the data were collected should be contacted and fully acknowledged in any subsequent publications in which any part of the data are used. The data enclosed within this package/transmission are only as accurate as the quality assurance and quality control procedures that are described in the associated metadata reporting statement allow. The user bears all responsibility for its subsequent use/misuse in any further analyses or comparisons. The Federal government does not assume liability to the Recipient or third persons, nor will the Federal government reimburse or indemnify the Recipient for its liability due to any losses resulting in any way from the use of this data. Requested citation format: NOAA National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS) Science Collaborative(NSC). |
Distribution Information
Distribution 1
| Download URL: | https://nerrssciencecollaborative.org/project/Jarvis22 |
|---|---|
| Distributor: | Office for Coastal Management (OCM) (2015 - Present) |
| File Name: | Jarvis22 |
| File Type (Deprecated): | Multiple formats |
URLs
URL 1
| URL: | https://nerrssciencecollaborative.org/project/Jarvis22 |
|---|---|
| Name: | Jarvis22 |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
Data Quality
| Representativeness: |
N/A |
|---|---|
| Quality Control Procedures Employed: |
This information is detailed within the project links. |
Lineage
| Lineage Statement: |
This information is detailed within the project links. |
|---|
Sources
N/A
Process Steps
Process Step 1
| Description: |
N/A |
|---|---|
| Process Contact: | Office for Coastal Management (OCM) |
| ROR: | https://ror.org/05v14bq57 |
Child Items
Rubric scores updated every 15m
|
|
Type | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Entity | N/A |
Catalog Details
| Catalog Item ID: | 78322 |
|---|---|
| GUID: | gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:78322 |
| Metadata Record Created By: | Jeremy Cothran |
| Metadata Record Created: | 2025-10-02 22:31+0000 |
| Metadata Record Last Modified By: | SysAdmin InPortAdmin |
| Metadata Record Last Modified: | 2026-03-04 19:17+0000 |
| Metadata Record Published: | 2025-10-02 |
| Owner Org: | OCM |
| Metadata Publication Status: | Published Externally |
| Do Not Publish?: | N |
| Metadata Last Review Date: | 2019-11-08 |
| Metadata Review Frequency: | 3 Years |
| Metadata Next Review Date: | 2022-11-08 |
