2018 - 2019 USGS QL2 Lidar DEM: Northern California Wildfires
Data Set (DS) | OCM Partners (OCMP)GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:78405 | Updated: October 14, 2025 | Published / External
-
View As
- Full List View
- EXPORTS
- InPort XML
- ISO 19115
- WAF Files
- View in Hierarchy
Summary
Short Citation
OCM Partners, 2026: 2018 - 2019 USGS QL2 Lidar DEM: Northern California Wildfires, https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/78405.
Full Citation Examples
Original Product: These are Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data for California as part of the required deliverables for the Northern California - QL2 project. Class 2 (ground) LiDAR points in conjunction with the hydro breaklines were used to create a 1 meter hydro-flattened Raster DEM.
Original Geographic Extent: 27 counties in California, covering approximately 16,846 total square miles.
Original Dataset Description: The Northern California - QL2 project called for the planning, acquisition, processing, and derivative products of lidar data to be collected at a nominal pulse spacing (NPS) of 0.71 meters. Project specifications are based on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program Base LiDAR Specification, Version 1.3. The data were developed based on a horizontal projection/datum of NAD 1983 2011 Contiguous USA Albers, Meter and vertical datum of NAVD88 GEOID 12B, Meters. LiDAR data were delivered as processed Classified LAS 1.4 files formatted to 43332 individual 1000 m x 1000 m tiles, as tiled intensity imagery, and as tiled bare earth DEMs; all tiled to the same 1000 m x 1000 m schema. Continuous breaklines were produced in Esri file geodatabase format.
Ground Conditions: LiDAR was collected in summer, fall, and winter 2018 and winter, spring, and summer 2019, while no snow was on the ground and rivers were at or below normal levels. In order to post process the LiDAR data to meet task order specifications and meet ASPRS vertical accuracy guidelines, Quantum Spatial, Inc. utilized a total of 387 ground control points that were used to calibrate the LiDAR to known ground locations established throughout the project area. An additional 678 independent accuracy checkpoints, 380 in Bare Earth and Urban landcovers (380 NVA points), 298 in Tall Weeds categories (298 VVA points), were used to assess the vertical accuracy of the data. These checkpoints were not used to calibrate or post process the data.
This metadata record supports the data entry in the NOAA Digital Coast Data Access Viewer (DAV). For this data set, the DAV is leveraging the GeoTIFF files hosted by USGS on Amazon Web Services.
To acquire detailed surface elevation data for use in conservation planning, design, research, floodplain mapping, dam safety assessments and elevation modeling, etc. Classified LAS files are used to show the manually reviewed bare earth surface. This allows the user to create intensity images, breaklines and raster DEMs. The purpose of these LiDAR data was to produce high accuracy 3D hydro-flattened digital elevation models (DEMs) with a 1 meter cell size. These raw LiDAR point cloud data were used to create classified LiDAR LAS files, intensity images, 3D breaklines, and hydro-flattened DEMs as necessary.
Data Access & Downloads
-
Create custom data files by choosing data area, map projection, file format, etc. A new metadata will be produced to reflect your request using this record as a base.
-
GeoTIFF
Bulk download of data files in GeoTIFF format, NAD 1983 2011 Contiguous USA Albers, meters projection and orthometric heights in meters.
None
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations.
Controlled Theme Keywords
COASTAL ELEVATION, DIGITAL ELEVATION/TERRAIN MODEL (DEM), elevation, TERRAIN ELEVATION
URLs
-
Link to the lidar report.
-
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud.
-
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud.
-
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud.
-
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud.
-
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud.
-
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud.
-
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud.
-
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud.
-
Link to view the point cloud, using the Entwine Point Tile (EPT) format, in the 3D Potree viewer.
-
This link is to the reports, breaklines, metadata, spatial metadata, and shapefiles.
Child Items
No Child Items for this record.
Contact Information
Point of Contact
NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM)
coastal.info@noaa.gov
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
Metadata Contact
NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM)
coastal.info@noaa.gov
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
Extents
-124.428962° W,
-119.853493° E,
41.386852° N,
37.727043° S
2018-07-07 - 2019-09-05
Item Identification
| Title: | 2018 - 2019 USGS QL2 Lidar DEM: Northern California Wildfires |
|---|---|
| Short Name: | ca2018_ql2_wldfires_m13723 |
| Status: | Completed |
| Creation Date: | 2018 |
| Publication Date: | 2020 |
| Abstract: |
Original Product: These are Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data for California as part of the required deliverables for the Northern California - QL2 project. Class 2 (ground) LiDAR points in conjunction with the hydro breaklines were used to create a 1 meter hydro-flattened Raster DEM. Original Geographic Extent: 27 counties in California, covering approximately 16,846 total square miles. Original Dataset Description: The Northern California - QL2 project called for the planning, acquisition, processing, and derivative products of lidar data to be collected at a nominal pulse spacing (NPS) of 0.71 meters. Project specifications are based on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program Base LiDAR Specification, Version 1.3. The data were developed based on a horizontal projection/datum of NAD 1983 2011 Contiguous USA Albers, Meter and vertical datum of NAVD88 GEOID 12B, Meters. LiDAR data were delivered as processed Classified LAS 1.4 files formatted to 43332 individual 1000 m x 1000 m tiles, as tiled intensity imagery, and as tiled bare earth DEMs; all tiled to the same 1000 m x 1000 m schema. Continuous breaklines were produced in Esri file geodatabase format. Ground Conditions: LiDAR was collected in summer, fall, and winter 2018 and winter, spring, and summer 2019, while no snow was on the ground and rivers were at or below normal levels. In order to post process the LiDAR data to meet task order specifications and meet ASPRS vertical accuracy guidelines, Quantum Spatial, Inc. utilized a total of 387 ground control points that were used to calibrate the LiDAR to known ground locations established throughout the project area. An additional 678 independent accuracy checkpoints, 380 in Bare Earth and Urban landcovers (380 NVA points), 298 in Tall Weeds categories (298 VVA points), were used to assess the vertical accuracy of the data. These checkpoints were not used to calibrate or post process the data. This metadata record supports the data entry in the NOAA Digital Coast Data Access Viewer (DAV). For this data set, the DAV is leveraging the GeoTIFF files hosted by USGS on Amazon Web Services. |
| Purpose: |
To acquire detailed surface elevation data for use in conservation planning, design, research, floodplain mapping, dam safety assessments and elevation modeling, etc. Classified LAS files are used to show the manually reviewed bare earth surface. This allows the user to create intensity images, breaklines and raster DEMs. The purpose of these LiDAR data was to produce high accuracy 3D hydro-flattened digital elevation models (DEMs) with a 1 meter cell size. These raw LiDAR point cloud data were used to create classified LiDAR LAS files, intensity images, 3D breaklines, and hydro-flattened DEMs as necessary. |
| Supplemental Information: |
Raster File Type = GeoTIFF; Bit Depth/Pixel Type = 32-bit float; Raster Cell Size = 1 meter; Interpolation or Resampling Technique = Triangulated Irregular Network (TIN), Linear Interpolation, Proprietary; Required Vertical Accuracy = 0.196 |
Keywords
Theme Keywords
| Thesaurus | Keyword |
|---|---|
| Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords |
EARTH SCIENCE > LAND SURFACE > TOPOGRAPHY > TERRAIN ELEVATION
|
| Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords |
EARTH SCIENCE > LAND SURFACE > TOPOGRAPHY > TERRAIN ELEVATION > DIGITAL ELEVATION/TERRAIN MODEL (DEM)
|
| Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords |
EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > COASTAL PROCESSES > COASTAL ELEVATION
|
| ISO 19115 Topic Category |
elevation
|
Temporal Keywords
| Thesaurus | Keyword |
|---|---|
| UNCONTROLLED | |
| None | 2018 |
| None | 2019 |
Spatial Keywords
| Thesaurus | Keyword |
|---|---|
| Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
| Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > CALIFORNIA
|
| Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
VERTICAL LOCATION > LAND SURFACE
|
| UNCONTROLLED | |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Alameda County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Butte County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Carson City County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Colusa County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Contra Costa County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > El Dorado County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Glenn County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Humboldt County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Lake County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Lassen County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Marin County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Mendocino County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Napa County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Nevada County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Placer County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Plumas County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Sacramento County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > San Francisco County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Sierra County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Solano County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Sonoma County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Sutter County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Tehama County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Trinity County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Washoe County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Yolo County |
| None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > California > Yuba County |
Instrument Keywords
| Thesaurus | Keyword |
|---|---|
| Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Instrument Keywords |
LIDAR > Light Detection and Ranging
|
Platform Keywords
| Thesaurus | Keyword |
|---|---|
| Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords |
Airplane > Airplane
|
Physical Location
| Organization: | Office for Coastal Management |
|---|---|
| City: | Charleston |
| State/Province: | SC |
Data Set Information
| Data Set Scope Code: | Data Set |
|---|---|
| Data Set Type: | Elevation |
| Maintenance Frequency: | None Planned |
| Data Presentation Form: | Model (digital) |
| Distribution Liability: |
Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of Quantum Spatial, Inc., USGS, NOAA, the Office for Coastal Management or its partners. |
| Data Set Credit: | Quantum Spatial, Inc. |
Support Roles
Data Steward
| Date Effective From: | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Date Effective To: | |
| Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
| Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
| Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
| Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
| URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Distributor
| Date Effective From: | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Date Effective To: | |
| Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
| Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
| Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
| Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
| URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Distributor
| Date Effective From: | 2020 |
|---|---|
| Date Effective To: | |
| Contact (Organization): | U.S. Geological Survey |
| Address: |
12201 Sunrise Valley Drive Reston, VA 20191 USA |
| URL: | USGS Home |
Metadata Contact
| Date Effective From: | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Date Effective To: | |
| Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
| Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
| Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
| Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
| URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Point of Contact
| Date Effective From: | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Date Effective To: | |
| Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
| Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
| Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
| Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
| URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Extents
| Currentness Reference: | Ground Condition |
|---|
Extent Group 1
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 1
| W° Bound: | -124.428962 | |
|---|---|---|
| E° Bound: | -119.853493 | |
| N° Bound: | 41.386852 | |
| S° Bound: | 37.727043 |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 1
| Time Frame Type: | Range |
|---|---|
| Start: | 2018-07-07 |
| End: | 2019-09-05 |
Spatial Information
Spatial Representation
Representations Used
| Grid: | Yes |
|---|---|
| Vector: | No |
| Text / Table: | No |
| TIN: | No |
| Stereo Model: | No |
| Video: | No |
Reference Systems
Reference System 1
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Reference System 2
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Access Information
| Security Class: | Unclassified |
|---|---|
| Data Access Procedure: |
Data is available online for bulk and custom downloads. |
| Data Access Constraints: |
None |
| Data Use Constraints: |
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. |
Distribution Information
Distribution 1
| Download URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=13723/details/13723 |
|---|---|
| Distributor: | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) (2025 - Present) |
| File Name: | Customized Download |
| Description: |
Create custom data files by choosing data area, map projection, file format, etc. A new metadata will be produced to reflect your request using this record as a base. |
| File Type (Deprecated): | Zip |
| Compression: | Zip |
Distribution 2
| Download URL: | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/ |
|---|---|
| Distributor: | U.S. Geological Survey (2020 - Present) |
| File Name: | Bulk Download |
| Description: |
Bulk download of data files in GeoTIFF format, NAD 1983 2011 Contiguous USA Albers, meters projection and orthometric heights in meters. |
| File Type (Deprecated): | LAZ |
| Distribution Format: | GeoTIFF |
URLs
URL 1
| URL: | https://rockyweb.usgs.gov/vdelivery/Datasets/Staged/Elevation/metadata/CA_NoCAL_3DEP_Supp_Funding_2018_D18/CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B4_2018/reports/33371_USGS_NoCal_LiDAR_ProjectReport.pdf |
|---|---|
| Name: | Lidar Report |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| Description: |
Link to the lidar report. |
URL 2
| URL: | https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/USGS_LPC_CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B1_2018/ept.json |
|---|---|
| Name: | USGS Entwine Point Tile (EPT) - USGS_LPC_CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B1_2018 |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | json |
| Description: |
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud. |
URL 3
| URL: | https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/USGS_LPC_CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B2_2018/ept.json |
|---|---|
| Name: | USGS Entwine Point Tile (EPT) - USGS_LPC_CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B2_2018 |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | json |
| Description: |
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud. |
URL 4
| URL: | https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/USGS_LPC_CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B3_2018/ept.json |
|---|---|
| Name: | USGS Entwine Point Tile (EPT) - USGS_LPC_CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B3_2018 |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | json |
| Description: |
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud. |
URL 5
| URL: | https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/USGS_LPC_CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B4_2018/ept.json |
|---|---|
| Name: | USGS Entwine Point Tile (EPT) - USGS_LPC_CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B4_2018 |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | json |
| Description: |
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud. |
URL 6
| URL: | https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/USGS_LPC_CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B5a_2018/ept.json |
|---|---|
| Name: | USGS Entwine Point Tile (EPT) - USGS_LPC_CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B5a_2018 |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | json |
| Description: |
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud. |
URL 7
| URL: | https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/USGS_LPC_CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B5b_2018/ept.json |
|---|---|
| Name: | USGS Entwine Point Tile (EPT) - USGS_LPC_CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B5b_2018 |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | json |
| Description: |
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud. |
URL 8
| URL: | https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_TL_QL2_2018/ept.json |
|---|---|
| Name: | USGS Entwine Point Tile (EPT) - CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_TL_QL2_2018 |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | json |
| Description: |
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud. |
URL 9
| URL: | https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/USGS_LPC_CA_NoCal_Wildfires_GMEG_2018/ept.json |
|---|---|
| Name: | USGS Entwine Point Tile (EPT) - USGS_LPC_CA_NoCal_Wildfires_GMEG_2018 |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | json |
| Description: |
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud. |
URL 10
URL 11
| URL: | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/metadata/CA_NoCAL_3DEP_Supp_Funding_2018_D18/ |
|---|---|
| Name: | USGS Additional Data |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| Description: |
This link is to the reports, breaklines, metadata, spatial metadata, and shapefiles. |
Technical Environment
| Description: |
MicroStation Version 8; TerraScan Version 18; TerraModeler Version 18; GeoCue Version 2017.1.14.1; Esri ArcGIS 10.3; Global Mapper 19; Leica Cloud Pro 1.2.4, RiProcess 1.8.5; Windows 10 Operating System \\point_cloud\tilecls\*.las |
|---|
Data Quality
| Horizontal Positional Accuracy: |
Not provided |
|---|---|
| Vertical Positional Accuracy: |
The project specifications require the accuracy (ACCz) of the derived DEM be calculated and reported in two ways: 1. The required NVA is: 19.6 cm at a 95% confidence level, derived according to NSSDA, i.e., based on RMSE of 10 cm in the "bare earth" and "urban" land cover classes. This is a required accuracy. The NVA was tested with 380 checkpoints located in bare earth and urban (non-vegetated) areas. 2. Vegetated Vertical Accuracy (VVA): VVA shall be reported for "tall weeds" land cover classes. The target VVA is: 29.4 cm at the 95th percentile, derived according to ASPRS Guidelines, Vertical Accuracy Reporting for LiDAR Data, i.e., based on the 95th percentile error in all vegetated land cover classes combined. The data tested 0.086 meters NVA at a 95% confidence level using 380 independent survey points located in open terrain. The survey check points were distributed throughout the project area. The 380 independent check points were surveyed using GPS techniques. Elevations from the unclassified LiDAR surface were measured for the x,y location of each checkpoint. Elevations interpolated from the LiDAR surface were then compared to the elevations values of the surveyed control points. The root mean square error vertical (RMSEz) was computed to be 0.044 meters. AccuracyZ has been tested to meet 19.0 cm NVA at 95-percent confidence level using (RMSEz * 1.9600) as defined by the National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA); assessed and reported using American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS) Guidelines. The VVA was tested with 298 checkpoints located in forested and tall weeds (vegetated) areas. The checkpoints were distributed throughout the project area and were surveyed using GPS techniques. AccuracyZ has been tested to meet 19.6 cm or better Non-Vegetated Vertical Accuracy at 95% confidence level using RMSE(z) x 1.9600 as defined by the National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA); assessed and reported using National Digital Elevation Program (NDEP)/ASRPS Guidelines. The data tested 0.27 meters VVA was calculated using 298 checkpoints located in vegetation at the 95th percentile, derived according to ASPRS Guidelines, Vertical Accuracy Reporting for LiDAR Data. Tested against the DEM. |
| Completeness Report: |
Datasets contain complete coverage of tiles. No points have been removed or excluded. A visual qualitative assessment was performed to ensure data completeness. There are no void areas or missing data. The raw point cloud is of good quality and data pass Non-Vegetated Vertical Accuracy specifications. |
| Conceptual Consistency: |
Data covers the entire area specified for this project. |
Data Management
| Have Resources for Management of these Data Been Identified?: | Yes |
|---|---|
| Approximate Percentage of Budget for these Data Devoted to Data Management: | Unknown |
| Do these Data Comply with the Data Access Directive?: | Yes |
| Actual or Planned Long-Term Data Archive Location: | NCEI-CO |
| How Will the Data Be Protected from Accidental or Malicious Modification or Deletion Prior to Receipt by the Archive?: |
Data is backed up to tape and to cloud storage. |
Lineage
| Lineage Statement: |
The NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) ingested references to the USGS GeoTIFF files that are hosted on Amazon Web Services (AWS), into the Digital Coast Data Access Viewer (DAV). The DAV accesses the raster data as it resides on AWS. |
|---|
Sources
USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files - CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B1_2018
| Contact Role Type: | Publisher |
|---|---|
| Contact Type: | Organization |
| Contact Name: | USGS |
| Citation URL: | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B1_2018/TIFF/ |
| Citation URL Name: | USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files for CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B1_2018 |
USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files - CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B2_2018
| Contact Role Type: | Publisher |
|---|---|
| Contact Type: | Organization |
| Contact Name: | USGS |
| Citation URL: | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B2_2018/TIFF/ |
| Citation URL Name: | USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files for CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B2_2018 |
USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files - CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B3_2018
| Contact Role Type: | Publisher |
|---|---|
| Contact Type: | Organization |
| Contact Name: | USGS |
| Citation URL: | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B3_2018/TIFF/ |
| Citation URL Name: | USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files for CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B3_2018 |
USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files - CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B4_2018
| Contact Role Type: | Publisher |
|---|---|
| Contact Type: | Organization |
| Contact Name: | USGS |
| Citation URL: | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B4_2018/TIFF/ |
| Citation URL Name: | USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files for CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B4_2018 |
USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files - CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B5a_2018
| Contact Role Type: | Publisher |
|---|---|
| Contact Type: | Organization |
| Contact Name: | USGS |
| Citation URL: | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B5a_2018/TIFF/ |
| Citation URL Name: | USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files for CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B5a_2018 |
USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files - CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B5b_2018
| Contact Role Type: | Publisher |
|---|---|
| Contact Type: | Organization |
| Contact Name: | USGS |
| Citation URL: | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B5b_2018/TIFF/ |
| Citation URL Name: | USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files for CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B5b_2018 |
USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files - CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_GMEG_2018
| Contact Role Type: | Publisher |
|---|---|
| Contact Type: | Organization |
| Contact Name: | USGS |
| Citation URL: | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/CA_NoCal_Wildfires_GMEG_2018/TIFF/ |
| Citation URL Name: | USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files for CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_GMEG_2018 |
USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files - CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_TL_QL2_2018
| Citation URL: | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/CA_NoCAL_3DEP_Supp_Funding_2018_D18/CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_TL_QL2_2018/TIFF/ |
|---|---|
| Citation URL Name: | USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files for CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_TL_QL2_2018 |
Process Steps
Process Step 1
| Description: |
Raw Data and Boresight Processing: The boresight for each lift was done individually as the solution may change slightly from lift to lift. The following steps describe the Raw Data Processing and Boresight process: 1) Technicians processed the raw data to LAS format flight lines using the final GPS/IMU solution. This LAS data set was used as source data for boresight. 2) Technicians first used Quantum Spatial, Inc. proprietary and commercial software to calculate initial boresight adjustment angles based on sample areas selected in the lift. These areas cover calibration flight lines collected in the lift, cross tie, and production flight lines. These areas are well distributed in the lift coverage and cover multiple terrain types that are necessary for boresight angle calculation. The technicians then analyzed the results and made any necessary additional adjustment until it was acceptable for the selected areas. 3) Once the boresight angle calculation was completed for the selected areas, the adjusted settings were applied to all of the flight lines of the lift and checked for consistency. The technicians utilized commercial and proprietary software packages to analyze how well flight line overlaps matched for the entire lift and adjusted as necessary until the results met the project specifications. 4) Once all lifts were completed with individual boresight adjustment, the technicians checked and corrected the vertical misalignment of all flight lines and also the matching between data and ground truth. The relative accuracy was less than or equal to 7 cm RMSEz within individual swaths and less than or equal to 10 cm RMSEz or within swath overlap (between adjacent swaths). 5) The technicians ran a final vertical accuracy check of the boresighted flight lines against the surveyed checkpoints after the z correction to ensure the requirement of NVA = 19.6 cm 95% Confidence Level (Required Accuracy) was met. |
|---|---|
| Process Date/Time: | 2019-01-01 00:00:00 |
Process Step 2
| Description: |
LAS Point Classification: The point classification was performed as described below. The bare earth surface was manually reviewed to ensure correct classification on the Class 2 (Ground) points. After the bare-earth surface was finalized, it was then used to generate all hydro-breaklines through heads-up digitization. All ground (ASPRS Class 2) LiDAR data inside of the Lake Pond and Double Line Drain hydro-flattened breaklines were then classified to Water (ASPRS Class 9) using TerraScan macro functionality. A buffer of 1 meter was also used around each hydro-flattened feature to classify these ground (ASPRS Class 2) points to Ignored ground (ASPRS Class 20). All Lake Pond Island and Double Line Drain Island features were checked to ensure that the ground (ASPRS Class 2) points were reclassified to the correct classification after the automated classification was completed. All overlap data was processed through automated functionality provided by TerraScan to classify the overlapping flight line data to approved classes. The overlap data was classified using standard LAS overlap bit. These classes were created through automated processes only and were not verified for classification accuracy. Due to software limitations within TerraScan, these classes were used to trip the withheld bit within various software packages. These processes were reviewed and accepted through numerous conference calls and pilot study areas. All data were manually reviewed and any remaining artifacts removed using functionality provided by TerraScan and TerraModeler. Global Mapper was used as a final check of the bare earth dataset. GeoCue was then used to create the deliverable industry-standard LAS files for both the All Point Cloud Data and the Bare Earth. Quantum Spatial, Inc. proprietary software was used to perform final statistical analysis of the classes in the LAS files, on a per tile level to verify final classification metrics and full LAS header information. |
|---|---|
| Process Date/Time: | 2019-01-01 00:00:00 |
Process Step 3
| Description: |
Hydro-Flattened Raster DEM Processing: Class 2 (Ground) LiDAR points in conjunction with the hydro-breaklines were used to create a 1 meter hydro-flattened raster DEM. Using automated scripting routines within ArcMap, GeoTIFF files were created for each tile. Each surface was reviewed using Global Mapper to check for any surface anomalies or incorrect elevations found within the surface. |
|---|
Process Step 4
| Description: |
The NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) created references to the USGS GeoTIFF files that were ingested into the NOAA Digital Coast Data Access Viewer (DAV). No changes were made to the data. The DAV will access the raster data as it resides on Amazon Web Services (AWS). These are the GeoTIFF files that are being accessed: https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/CA_NoCAL_3DEP_Supp_Funding_2018_D18/CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_TL_QL2_2018/TIFF/ https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B1_2018/TIFF/ https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B2_2018/TIFF/ https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B3_2018/TIFF/ https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B4_2018/TIFF/ https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B5a_2018/TIFF/ https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_B5b_2018/TIFF/ https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/CA_NoCAL_Wildfires_GMEG_2018/TIFF/ |
|---|---|
| Process Date/Time: | 2025-10-14 00:00:00 |
| Process Contact: | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
| Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
| Phone (Voice): | (843) 740-1202 |
Related Items
| Item Type | Relationship Type | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Data Set (DS) | Cross Reference |
2018 - 2019 USGS QL2 Lidar: Northern California Wildfires |
Catalog Details
| Catalog Item ID: | 78405 |
|---|---|
| GUID: | gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:78405 |
| Metadata Record Created By: | Rebecca Mataosky |
| Metadata Record Created: | 2025-10-14 18:44+0000 |
| Metadata Record Last Modified By: | Rebecca Mataosky |
| Metadata Record Last Modified: | 2025-10-14 19:46+0000 |
| Metadata Record Published: | 2025-10-14 |
| Owner Org: | OCMP |
| Metadata Publication Status: | Published Externally |
| Do Not Publish?: | N |
| Metadata Last Review Date: | 2022-03-16 |
| Metadata Review Frequency: | 1 Year |
| Metadata Next Review Date: | 2023-03-16 |
