2020 USGS Lidar DEM: 8 County, WI
Data Set (DS) | OCM Partners (OCMP)GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:79827 | Updated: May 26, 2026 | Published / External
-
View As
- Full List View
- EXPORTS
- InPort XML
- ISO 19115
- WAF Files
- View in Hierarchy
Summary
Short Citation
OCM Partners, 2026: 2020 USGS Lidar DEM: 8 County, WI, https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/79827.
Full Citation Examples
WI_8County_Chippewa (Work Unit 191373)
The Chippewa County lidar project area covers approximately 1084 square miles which includes a 100 meter buffer around the county boundary. The lidar data was acquired at a nominal point spacing (NPS) of 0.7 meters and a single swath nominal point density (NPD) of 2.0. Project specifications are based on Chippewa County requirements and on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program LiDAR Base Specification, Version 2.1. LiDAR data was acquired using two Riegl LMS 1560 sensors with serial numbers SN754 and SN1264 from April 30, 2020 to May 7, 2020 in 4 total lifts. Acquisition occurred with leaves absent from deciduous trees, when no snow was present on the ground, and with rivers at or below normal levels.
WI_8County_Columbia (Work Unit 219073)
The Columbia County lidar project area covers approximately 836 square miles which includes a 100 meter buffer around the county boundary. The lidar data was acquired at a nominal point spacing (NPS) of 0.907 meters and an aggregate nominal point density (ANPD) of 2.0. Project specifications are based on Columbia County requirements and on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program LiDAR Base Specification, Version 2.1. LiDAR data was acquired using a Riegl LMS-Q1560 sensor with serial number SN1264 from April 11, 2020 to April 18, 2020 in 2 total lifts. Acquisition occurred with leaves absent from deciduous trees, when no snow was present on the ground, and with rivers at or below normal levels.
WI_8County_EauClaire (Work Unit 219076)
The Eau Claire County lidar project area covers approximately 674 square miles which includes a 100 meter buffer around the county boundary. The lidar data was acquired at a nominal point spacing (NPS) of 0.7 meters and an aggregate nominal point density (ANPD) of 2.0. Project specifications are based on Eau Claire County requirements and on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program LiDAR Base Specification, Version 2.1. LiDAR data was acquired using two Riegl LMS-Q1560 LiDAR sensors with serial numbers SN754 and SN1264 from April 30, 2020 to May 7, 2020 in 4 total lifts. Acquisition occurred with leaves absent from deciduous trees, when no snow was present on the ground, and with rivers at or below normal levels.
WI_8County_Grant (Work Unit 219079)
The Grant County lidar project area covers approximately 1250 square miles which includes a 100 meter buffer around the county boundary. The lidar data was acquired at a nominal point spacing (NPS) of 0.7 meters and a aggregate nominal point density (ANPD) of 2.0. Project specifications are based on Grant County requirements and on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program LiDAR Base Specification, Version 2.1. LiDAR data was acquired using two Riegl VQ 1560 sensors with serial numbers SN754 and SN1264 from April 19, 2020 to April 30, 2020 in 5 total lifts. Acquisition occurred with leaves absent from deciduous trees, when no snow was present on the ground, and with rivers at or below normal levels.
WI_8County_Menominee (Work Unit 219082)
The Menominee County lidar project area covers approximately 399 square miles which includes a 100 meter buffer around the county boundary. The lidar data was acquired at a nominal point spacing (NPS) of 0.6 meters and a nominal point density (ANPD) of 2.0. Project specifications are based on Menominee County requirements and on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program LiDAR Base Specification, Version 2.1. LiDAR data was acquired using a Leica ALS80 with serial number SN8239 from April 25, 2020 to April 30, 2020 in 2 total lifts. Acquisition occurred with leaves absent from deciduous trees, when no snow was present on the ground, and with rivers at or below normal levels.
WI_8County_Rock (Work Unit 219085)
The Rock County lidar project area covers approximately 771 square miles which includes a 100 meter buffer around the county boundary. The lidar data was acquired at a nominal point spacing (NPS) of 0.7 meters and a aggregate nominal point density (ANPD) of 2.0. Project specifications are based on Rock County requirements and on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program LiDAR Base Specification, Version 2.1. LiDAR data was acquired using a Riegl VQ 1560i sensor with serial number 4040 from April 16, 2020 to April 26, 2020 in 5 total lifts. Acquisition occurred with leaves absent from deciduous trees, when no snow was present on the ground, and with rivers at or below normal levels.
WI_8County_Sauk (Work Unit 219088)
The Sauk County lidar project area covers approximately 906 square miles which includes a 100 meter buffer around the county boundary. The lidar data was acquired at a nominal point spacing (NPS) of 0.907 meters and an aggregate nominal point density (ANPD) of 2.0. Project specifications are based on Sauk County requirements and on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program LiDAR Base Specification, Version 2.1. LiDAR data was acquired using a Riegl LMS-Q1560 sensor with serial number SN1264 from April 11, 2020 to April 21, 2020 in 3 total lifts. Acquisition occurred with leaves absent from deciduous trees, when no snow was present on the ground, and with rivers at or below normal levels.
WI_8County_Vernon (Work Unit 219091)
The Vernon County lidar project area covers approximately 874 square miles which includes a 100 meter buffer around the county boundary. The lidar data was acquired at a nominal point spacing (NPS) of 0.7 meters and a single swath nominal point density (NPD) of 2.0. Project specifications are based on Vernon County requirements and on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program LiDAR Base Specification, Version 2.1. LiDAR data was acquired using a Riegl VQ 1560i sensor serial number SN4040 from April 18, 2020 to April 21, 2020 in 3 total lifts. Acquisition occurred with leaves absent from deciduous trees, when no snow was present on the ground, and with rivers at or below normal levels.
This metadata record supports the digital elevation model (DEM) data for the 2020 USGS Lidar DEM: 8 County, WI dataset in the NOAA Digital Coast Data Access Viewer (DAV). For this data set, the DAV is leveraging the GeoTIFF files hosted by USGS on Amazon Web Services.
This data, along with its derivatives, is the result of a countywide elevation mapping with cooperative partnerships from the counties, Wisconsin DOA, and the USGS 3DEP program. This data was produced from lidar data collected in April 2020, which was processed and delivered in 2021.
Data Access & Downloads
-
Create custom data files by choosing data area, map projection, file format, etc. A new metadata will be produced to reflect your request using this record as a base.
-
GeoTIFF
Bulk download of data files in GeoTIFF format, WISCRS County, NAD83(2011), US survey feet coordinates and NAVD88 (Geoid12B) elevations in US survey feet.
None
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. Acknowledgement of the U.S. Geological Survey would be appreciated for products derived from these data.
Controlled Theme Keywords
DIGITAL ELEVATION/TERRAIN MODEL (DEM), elevation, TERRAIN ELEVATION
URLs
-
The Data Access Viewer (DAV) allows a user to search for and download elevation, imagery, and land cover data for the coastal U.S. and its territories. The data, hosted by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management, can be customized and requested for free download through a checkout interface. An email provides a link to the customized data, while the original data set is available through a link within the viewer.
-
Link to the USGS Project Report that provides information about the project, vertical accuracy results, the point classes and sensors used.
-
Link to the reports, breaklines, metadata, and spatial metadata.
-
Link to the Ayres Associates lidar report for Chippewa County
-
Link to the Ayres Associates lidar report for Columbia County
-
Link to the Ayres Associates lidar report for Eau Claire County
-
Link to the Ayres Associates lidar report for Grant County
-
Link to the Ayres Associates lidar report for Menominee County
-
Link to the Ayres Associates lidar report for Rock County
-
Link to the Ayres Associates lidar report for Sauk County
-
Link to the Ayres Associates lidar report for Vernon County
-
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud.
-
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud.
-
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud.
-
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud.
-
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud.
-
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud.
-
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud.
-
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud.
-
Link to view the point cloud, using the Entwine Point Tile (EPT) format, in the 3D Potree viewer.
Child Items
No Child Items for this record.
Contact Information
Point of Contact
NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM)
coastal.info@noaa.gov
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
Metadata Contact
NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM)
coastal.info@noaa.gov
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
Extents
-91.674671° W,
-90.90704° E,
45.301534° N,
44.847042° S
WI_8County_Chippewa (Work Unit 191373)
2020-04-30 - 2020-05-07
Dates of collection for WI_8County_Chippewa (Work Unit 191373)
Item Identification
| Title: | 2020 USGS Lidar DEM: 8 County, WI |
|---|---|
| Short Name: | wi2020_8cnty_dem_m14194 |
| Status: | Completed |
| Creation Date: | 2020 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Abstract: |
WI_8County_Chippewa (Work Unit 191373) The Chippewa County lidar project area covers approximately 1084 square miles which includes a 100 meter buffer around the county boundary. The lidar data was acquired at a nominal point spacing (NPS) of 0.7 meters and a single swath nominal point density (NPD) of 2.0. Project specifications are based on Chippewa County requirements and on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program LiDAR Base Specification, Version 2.1. LiDAR data was acquired using two Riegl LMS 1560 sensors with serial numbers SN754 and SN1264 from April 30, 2020 to May 7, 2020 in 4 total lifts. Acquisition occurred with leaves absent from deciduous trees, when no snow was present on the ground, and with rivers at or below normal levels. WI_8County_Columbia (Work Unit 219073) The Columbia County lidar project area covers approximately 836 square miles which includes a 100 meter buffer around the county boundary. The lidar data was acquired at a nominal point spacing (NPS) of 0.907 meters and an aggregate nominal point density (ANPD) of 2.0. Project specifications are based on Columbia County requirements and on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program LiDAR Base Specification, Version 2.1. LiDAR data was acquired using a Riegl LMS-Q1560 sensor with serial number SN1264 from April 11, 2020 to April 18, 2020 in 2 total lifts. Acquisition occurred with leaves absent from deciduous trees, when no snow was present on the ground, and with rivers at or below normal levels. WI_8County_EauClaire (Work Unit 219076) The Eau Claire County lidar project area covers approximately 674 square miles which includes a 100 meter buffer around the county boundary. The lidar data was acquired at a nominal point spacing (NPS) of 0.7 meters and an aggregate nominal point density (ANPD) of 2.0. Project specifications are based on Eau Claire County requirements and on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program LiDAR Base Specification, Version 2.1. LiDAR data was acquired using two Riegl LMS-Q1560 LiDAR sensors with serial numbers SN754 and SN1264 from April 30, 2020 to May 7, 2020 in 4 total lifts. Acquisition occurred with leaves absent from deciduous trees, when no snow was present on the ground, and with rivers at or below normal levels. WI_8County_Grant (Work Unit 219079) The Grant County lidar project area covers approximately 1250 square miles which includes a 100 meter buffer around the county boundary. The lidar data was acquired at a nominal point spacing (NPS) of 0.7 meters and a aggregate nominal point density (ANPD) of 2.0. Project specifications are based on Grant County requirements and on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program LiDAR Base Specification, Version 2.1. LiDAR data was acquired using two Riegl VQ 1560 sensors with serial numbers SN754 and SN1264 from April 19, 2020 to April 30, 2020 in 5 total lifts. Acquisition occurred with leaves absent from deciduous trees, when no snow was present on the ground, and with rivers at or below normal levels. WI_8County_Menominee (Work Unit 219082) The Menominee County lidar project area covers approximately 399 square miles which includes a 100 meter buffer around the county boundary. The lidar data was acquired at a nominal point spacing (NPS) of 0.6 meters and a nominal point density (ANPD) of 2.0. Project specifications are based on Menominee County requirements and on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program LiDAR Base Specification, Version 2.1. LiDAR data was acquired using a Leica ALS80 with serial number SN8239 from April 25, 2020 to April 30, 2020 in 2 total lifts. Acquisition occurred with leaves absent from deciduous trees, when no snow was present on the ground, and with rivers at or below normal levels. WI_8County_Rock (Work Unit 219085) The Rock County lidar project area covers approximately 771 square miles which includes a 100 meter buffer around the county boundary. The lidar data was acquired at a nominal point spacing (NPS) of 0.7 meters and a aggregate nominal point density (ANPD) of 2.0. Project specifications are based on Rock County requirements and on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program LiDAR Base Specification, Version 2.1. LiDAR data was acquired using a Riegl VQ 1560i sensor with serial number 4040 from April 16, 2020 to April 26, 2020 in 5 total lifts. Acquisition occurred with leaves absent from deciduous trees, when no snow was present on the ground, and with rivers at or below normal levels. WI_8County_Sauk (Work Unit 219088) The Sauk County lidar project area covers approximately 906 square miles which includes a 100 meter buffer around the county boundary. The lidar data was acquired at a nominal point spacing (NPS) of 0.907 meters and an aggregate nominal point density (ANPD) of 2.0. Project specifications are based on Sauk County requirements and on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program LiDAR Base Specification, Version 2.1. LiDAR data was acquired using a Riegl LMS-Q1560 sensor with serial number SN1264 from April 11, 2020 to April 21, 2020 in 3 total lifts. Acquisition occurred with leaves absent from deciduous trees, when no snow was present on the ground, and with rivers at or below normal levels. WI_8County_Vernon (Work Unit 219091) The Vernon County lidar project area covers approximately 874 square miles which includes a 100 meter buffer around the county boundary. The lidar data was acquired at a nominal point spacing (NPS) of 0.7 meters and a single swath nominal point density (NPD) of 2.0. Project specifications are based on Vernon County requirements and on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program LiDAR Base Specification, Version 2.1. LiDAR data was acquired using a Riegl VQ 1560i sensor serial number SN4040 from April 18, 2020 to April 21, 2020 in 3 total lifts. Acquisition occurred with leaves absent from deciduous trees, when no snow was present on the ground, and with rivers at or below normal levels. This metadata record supports the digital elevation model (DEM) data for the 2020 USGS Lidar DEM: 8 County, WI dataset in the NOAA Digital Coast Data Access Viewer (DAV). For this data set, the DAV is leveraging the GeoTIFF files hosted by USGS on Amazon Web Services. |
| Purpose: |
This data, along with its derivatives, is the result of a countywide elevation mapping with cooperative partnerships from the counties, Wisconsin DOA, and the USGS 3DEP program. This data was produced from lidar data collected in April 2020, which was processed and delivered in 2021. |
| Supplemental Information: |
Raster File Type = TIFF Bit Depth/Pixel Type = 32-bit float Raster Cell Size = 2 foot Interpolation or Resampling Technique = Triangulated Irregular Network Required Vertical Accuracy = 19.6 cm NVA |
Keywords
Theme Keywords
| Thesaurus | Keyword |
|---|---|
| Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords |
EARTH SCIENCE > LAND SURFACE > TOPOGRAPHY > TERRAIN ELEVATION
|
| Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords |
EARTH SCIENCE > LAND SURFACE > TOPOGRAPHY > TERRAIN ELEVATION > DIGITAL ELEVATION/TERRAIN MODEL (DEM)
|
| ISO 19115 Topic Category |
elevation
|
Spatial Keywords
| Thesaurus | Keyword |
|---|---|
| Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
| Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > WISCONSIN
|
| Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
VERTICAL LOCATION > LAND SURFACE
|
| UNCONTROLLED | |
| None | Chippewa County |
| None | Columbia County |
| None | Eau Claire County |
| None | Grant County |
| None | Menominee County |
| None | Rock County |
| None | Sauk County |
| None | Vernon County |
Instrument Keywords
| Thesaurus | Keyword |
|---|---|
| Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Instrument Keywords |
LIDAR > Light Detection and Ranging
|
Platform Keywords
| Thesaurus | Keyword |
|---|---|
| Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords |
Airplane > Airplane
|
Physical Location
| Organization: | Office for Coastal Management |
|---|---|
| City: | Charleston |
| State/Province: | SC |
Data Set Information
| Data Set Scope Code: | Data Set |
|---|---|
| Data Set Type: | Elevation |
| Maintenance Frequency: | None Planned |
| Data Presentation Form: | Model (digital) |
| Distribution Liability: |
Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of NOAA, the Office for Coastal Management or its partners. |
| Data Set Credit: | Ayres Associates, USGS |
Support Roles
Data Steward
| Date Effective From: | 2026 |
|---|---|
| Date Effective To: | |
| Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
| Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
| Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
| Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
| URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Distributor
| Date Effective From: | 2026 |
|---|---|
| Date Effective To: | |
| Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
| Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
| Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
| Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
| URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Distributor
| Date Effective From: | 2021 |
|---|---|
| Date Effective To: | |
| Contact (Organization): | U.S. Geological Survey |
| Address: |
12201 Sunrise Valley Drive Reston, VA 20191 USA |
| URL: | USGS Home |
Metadata Contact
| Date Effective From: | 2026 |
|---|---|
| Date Effective To: | |
| Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
| Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
| Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
| Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
| URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Point of Contact
| Date Effective From: | 2026 |
|---|---|
| Date Effective To: | |
| Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
| Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
| Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
| Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
| URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Extents
| Currentness Reference: | Ground Condition |
|---|
Extent Group 1
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 1
| W° Bound: | -91.674671 | |
|---|---|---|
| E° Bound: | -90.90704 | |
| N° Bound: | 45.301534 | |
| S° Bound: | 44.847042 | |
| Description |
WI_8County_Chippewa (Work Unit 191373) |
|
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 1
| Time Frame Type: | Range |
|---|---|
| Start: | 2020-04-30 |
| End: | 2020-05-07 |
| Description: |
Dates of collection for WI_8County_Chippewa (Work Unit 191373) |
Extent Group 2
Extent Group 2 / Geographic Area 1
| W° Bound: | -89.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| E° Bound: | -88.99 | |
| N° Bound: | 43.66 | |
| S° Bound: | 43.27 | |
| Description |
WI_8County_Columbia (Work Unit 219073) |
|
Extent Group 2 / Time Frame 1
| Time Frame Type: | Range |
|---|---|
| Start: | 2020-04-11 |
| End: | 2020-04-18 |
| Description: |
Dates of collection for WI_8County_Columbia (Work Unit 219073) |
Extent Group 3
Extent Group 3 / Geographic Area 1
| W° Bound: | -91.67 | |
|---|---|---|
| E° Bound: | -90.9 | |
| N° Bound: | 44.87 | |
| S° Bound: | 44.58 | |
| Description |
WI_8County_EauClaire (Work Unit 219076) |
|
Extent Group 3 / Time Frame 1
| Time Frame Type: | Range |
|---|---|
| Start: | 2020-04-30 |
| End: | 2020-05-07 |
| Description: |
Dates of collection for WI_8County_EauClaire (Work Unit 219076) |
Extent Group 4
Extent Group 4 / Geographic Area 1
| W° Bound: | -91.17 | |
|---|---|---|
| E° Bound: | -90.41 | |
| N° Bound: | 43.22 | |
| S° Bound: | 42.5 | |
| Description |
WI_8County_Grant (Work Unit 219079) |
|
Extent Group 4 / Time Frame 1
| Time Frame Type: | Range |
|---|---|
| Start: | 2020-04-19 |
| End: | 2020-04-30 |
| Description: |
Dates of collection for WI_8County_Grant (Work Unit 219079) |
Extent Group 5
Extent Group 5 / Geographic Area 1
| W° Bound: | -89 | |
|---|---|---|
| E° Bound: | -88.47 | |
| N° Bound: | 45.13 | |
| S° Bound: | 44.84 | |
| Description |
WI_8County_Menominee (Work Unit 219082) |
|
Extent Group 5 / Time Frame 1
| Time Frame Type: | Range |
|---|---|
| Start: | 2020-04-25 |
| End: | 2020-04-30 |
| Description: |
Dates of collection for WI_8County_Menominee (Work Unit 219082) |
Extent Group 6
Extent Group 6 / Geographic Area 1
| W° Bound: | -89.39 | |
|---|---|---|
| E° Bound: | -88.76 | |
| N° Bound: | 42.86 | |
| S° Bound: | 42.48 | |
| Description |
Wi_8County_Rock (Work Unit 219085) |
|
Extent Group 6 / Time Frame 1
| Time Frame Type: | Range |
|---|---|
| Start: | 2020-04-16 |
| End: | 2020-04-26 |
| Description: |
Dates of collection for WI_8County_Rock (Work Unit 219085) |
Extent Group 7
Extent Group 7 / Geographic Area 1
| W° Bound: | -90.33 | |
|---|---|---|
| E° Bound: | -89.58 | |
| N° Bound: | 43.65 | |
| S° Bound: | 43.13 | |
| Description |
WI_8County_Sauk (Work Unit 219088) |
|
Extent Group 7 / Time Frame 1
| Time Frame Type: | Range |
|---|---|
| Start: | 2020-04-11 |
| End: | 2020-04-21 |
| Description: |
Dates of collection for WI_8County_Sauk (Work Unit 219088) |
Extent Group 8
Extent Group 8 / Geographic Area 1
| W° Bound: | -91.28 | |
|---|---|---|
| E° Bound: | -90.29 | |
| N° Bound: | 43.74 | |
| S° Bound: | 43.41 | |
| Description |
WI_8County_Vernon (Work Unit 219091) |
|
Extent Group 8 / Time Frame 1
| Time Frame Type: | Range |
|---|---|
| Start: | 2020-04-18 |
| End: | 2020-04-21 |
| Description: |
Dates of collection for WI_8County_Vernon (Work Unit 219091) |
Spatial Information
Spatial Resolution
| Horizontal Distance: | 2.0 Foot |
|---|
Spatial Representation
Representations Used
| Grid: | Yes |
|---|---|
| Vector: | No |
| Text / Table: | No |
| TIN: | No |
| Stereo Model: | No |
| Video: | No |
Reference Systems
Reference System 1
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Reference System 2
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reference System 3
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reference System 4
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reference System 5
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reference System 6
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reference System 7
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reference System 8
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reference System 9
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Access Information
| Security Class: | Unclassified |
|---|---|
| Data Access Procedure: |
Data is available online for bulk and custom downloads. |
| Data Access Constraints: |
None |
| Data Use Constraints: |
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. Acknowledgement of the U.S. Geological Survey would be appreciated for products derived from these data. |
Distribution Information
Distribution 1
| Download URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=14194/details/14194 |
|---|---|
| Distributor: | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) (2026 - Present) |
| File Name: | Customized Download |
| Description: |
Create custom data files by choosing data area, map projection, file format, etc. A new metadata will be produced to reflect your request using this record as a base. |
| File Type (Deprecated): | Zip |
| Compression: | Zip |
Distribution 2
| Download URL: | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/WI_8County_2020_A20/ |
|---|---|
| Distributor: | U.S. Geological Survey (2021 - Present) |
| File Name: | Bulk Download |
| Description: |
Bulk download of data files in GeoTIFF format, WISCRS County, NAD83(2011), US survey feet coordinates and NAVD88 (Geoid12B) elevations in US survey feet. |
| File Type (Deprecated): | LAZ |
| Distribution Format: | GeoTIFF |
URLs
URL 1
| URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/ |
|---|---|
| Name: | NOAA's Office for Coastal Management (OCM) Data Access Viewer (DAV) |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | HTML |
| Description: |
The Data Access Viewer (DAV) allows a user to search for and download elevation, imagery, and land cover data for the coastal U.S. and its territories. The data, hosted by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management, can be customized and requested for free download through a checkout interface. An email provides a link to the customized data, while the original data set is available through a link within the viewer. |
URL 2
| URL: | https://rockyweb.usgs.gov/vdelivery/Datasets/Staged/Elevation/metadata/WI_8County_2020_A20/USGS_WI_8County_2020_A20_Project_Report.pdf |
|---|---|
| Name: | USGS Project Report |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | |
| Description: |
Link to the USGS Project Report that provides information about the project, vertical accuracy results, the point classes and sensors used. |
URL 3
| URL: | https://rockyweb.usgs.gov/vdelivery/Datasets/Staged/Elevation/metadata/WI_8County_2020_A20/ |
|---|---|
| Name: | USGS Additional Info |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| Description: |
Link to the reports, breaklines, metadata, and spatial metadata. |
URL 4
| URL: | https://rockyweb.usgs.gov/vdelivery/Datasets/Staged/Elevation/metadata/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Chippewa_2020/reports/Chippewa%20County%20Collection%20Report.pdf |
|---|---|
| Name: | Lidar Report - WI_8County_Chippewa |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | |
| Description: |
Link to the Ayres Associates lidar report for Chippewa County |
URL 5
| URL: | https://rockyweb.usgs.gov/vdelivery/Datasets/Staged/Elevation/metadata/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Columbia_2020/reports/Columbia%20County%20Collection%20Report_Ayres.pdf |
|---|---|
| Name: | Lidar Report - WI_8County_Columbia |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | |
| Description: |
Link to the Ayres Associates lidar report for Columbia County |
URL 6
| URL: | https://rockyweb.usgs.gov/vdelivery/Datasets/Staged/Elevation/metadata/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_EauClaire_2020/reports/Eau%20Claire%20County%20Collection%20Report.pdf |
|---|---|
| Name: | Lidar Report - WI_8County_Eau Claire |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | |
| Description: |
Link to the Ayres Associates lidar report for Eau Claire County |
URL 7
| URL: | https://rockyweb.usgs.gov/vdelivery/Datasets/Staged/Elevation/metadata/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Grant_2020/reports/Grant%20County%20Collection%20Report_Ayres.pdf |
|---|---|
| Name: | Lidar Report - WI_8County_Grant |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | |
| Description: |
Link to the Ayres Associates lidar report for Grant County |
URL 8
| URL: | https://rockyweb.usgs.gov/vdelivery/Datasets/Staged/Elevation/metadata/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Menominee_2020/reports/Menominee%20County%20Collection%20Report.pdf |
|---|---|
| Name: | Lidar Report - WI_8County_Menominee |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | |
| Description: |
Link to the Ayres Associates lidar report for Menominee County |
URL 9
| URL: | https://rockyweb.usgs.gov/vdelivery/Datasets/Staged/Elevation/metadata/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Rock_2020/reports/Rock%20County%20Collection%20Report.pdf |
|---|---|
| Name: | Lidar Report - WI_8County_Rock |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | |
| Description: |
Link to the Ayres Associates lidar report for Rock County |
URL 10
| URL: | https://rockyweb.usgs.gov/vdelivery/Datasets/Staged/Elevation/metadata/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Sauk_2020/reports/Sauk%20County%20Collection%20Report_rev120721.pdf |
|---|---|
| Name: | Lidar Report - WI_8County_Sauk |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | |
| Description: |
Link to the Ayres Associates lidar report for Sauk County |
URL 11
| URL: | https://rockyweb.usgs.gov/vdelivery/Datasets/Staged/Elevation/metadata/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Vernon_2020/reports/Vernon%20County%20Collection%20Report.pdf |
|---|---|
| Name: | Lidar Report - WI_8County_Vernon |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | |
| Description: |
Link to the Ayres Associates lidar report for Vernon County |
URL 12
| URL: | https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/WI_8County_Chippewa_2020/ept.json |
|---|---|
| Name: | USGS Entwine Point Tile (EPT) - WI_8County_Chippewa |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | json |
| Description: |
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud. |
URL 13
| URL: | https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/WI_8County_Columbia_2020/ept.json |
|---|---|
| Name: | USGS Entwine Point Tile (EPT) - WI_8County_Columbia |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | json |
| Description: |
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud. |
URL 14
| URL: | https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/WI_8County_EauClaire_2020/ept.json |
|---|---|
| Name: | USGS Entwine Point Tile (EPT) - WI_8County_EauClaire |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | json |
| Description: |
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud. |
URL 15
| URL: | https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/WI_8County_Rock_2020/ept.json |
|---|---|
| Name: | USGS Entwine Point Tile (EPT) - WI_8County_Rock |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | json |
| Description: |
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud. |
URL 16
| URL: | https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/WI_8County_Grant_2020/ept.json |
|---|---|
| Name: | USGS Entwine Point Tile (EPT) - WI_8County_Grant |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | json |
| Description: |
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud. |
URL 17
| URL: | https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/WI_8County_Menominee_2020/ept.json |
|---|---|
| Name: | USGS Entwine Point Tile (EPT) - WI_8County_Menominee |
| File Resource Format: | json |
| Description: |
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud. |
URL 18
| URL: | https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/WI_8County_Sauk_2020/ept.json |
|---|---|
| Name: | USGS Entwine Point Tile (EPT) - WI_8County_Sauk |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | json |
| Description: |
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud. |
URL 19
| URL: | https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/WI_8County_Vernon_2020/ept.json |
|---|---|
| Name: | USGS Entwine Point Tile (EPT) - WI_8County_Vernon |
| URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
| File Resource Format: | json |
| Description: |
Entwine Point Tile (EPT) is a simple and flexible octree-based storage format for point cloud data. The data is organized in such a way that the data can be reasonably streamed over the internet, pulling only the points you need. EPT files can be queried to return a subset of the points that give you a representation of the area. As you zoom further in, you are requesting higher and higher densities. A dataset in EPT will contain a lot of files, however, the ept.json file describes all the rest. The EPT file can be used in Potree and QGIS to view the point cloud. |
URL 20
Technical Environment
| Description: |
Terrasolid |
|---|
Data Quality
| Vertical Positional Accuracy: |
This data set was produced to meet ASPRS Positional Accuracy Standard for Digital Geospatial Data (2014) for a 10-cm RMSEz Vertical Accuracy Class. USGS Determined DEM Vertical Accuracy: Non-Vegetated Vertical Accuracy (NVA) = 3.3 cm RMSE Vegetated Vertical Accuracy (VVA) = 18.55 cm at 95th Percentile |
|---|---|
| Completeness Report: |
Datasets contain complete coverage of tiles. No points have been removed or excluded. A visual qualitative assessment was performed to ensure data completeness. There are no void areas or missing data. The raw point cloud is of good quality and data passes Non-Vegetated Vertical Accuracy specifications. |
| Conceptual Consistency: |
Data covers the entire area specified for this project. |
Data Management
| Have Resources for Management of these Data Been Identified?: | Yes |
|---|---|
| Approximate Percentage of Budget for these Data Devoted to Data Management: | Unknown |
| Do these Data Comply with the Data Access Directive?: | Yes |
| Actual or Planned Long-Term Data Archive Location: | NCEI-CO |
| How Will the Data Be Protected from Accidental or Malicious Modification or Deletion Prior to Receipt by the Archive?: |
Data is backed up to tape and to cloud storage. |
Lineage
| Lineage Statement: |
The NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) ingested references to the USGS GeoTIFF files that are hosted on Amazon Web Services (AWS), into the Digital Coast Data Access Viewer (DAV). The DAV accesses the raster data as it resides on AWS. |
|---|
Sources
USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files - WI_8County_Chippewa
| Contact Role Type: | Publisher |
|---|---|
| Contact Type: | Organization |
| Contact Name: | USGS |
| Citation URL: | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Chippewa_2020/TIFF/ |
| Citation URL Name: | USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files for WI_8County_Chippewa |
USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files - WI_8County_Columbia
| Contact Role Type: | Publisher |
|---|---|
| Contact Type: | Organization |
| Contact Name: | USGS |
| Citation URL: | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Columbia_2020/TIFF/ |
| Citation URL Name: | USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files for WI_8County_Columbia |
USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files - WI_8County_EauClaire
| Contact Role Type: | Publisher |
|---|---|
| Contact Type: | Organization |
| Contact Name: | USGS |
| Citation URL: | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_EauClaire_2020/TIFF/ |
| Citation URL Name: | USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files for WI_8County_EauClaire |
USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files - WI_8County_Grant
| Contact Role Type: | Publisher |
|---|---|
| Contact Type: | Organization |
| Contact Name: | USGS |
| Citation URL: | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Grant_2020/TIFF/ |
| Citation URL Name: | USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files for WI_8County_Grant |
USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files - WI_8County_Menominee
| Contact Role Type: | Publisher |
|---|---|
| Contact Type: | Organization |
| Contact Name: | USGS |
| Citation URL: | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Menominee_2020/TIFF/ |
| Citation URL Name: | USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files for WI_8County_Menominee |
USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files - WI_8County_Rock
| Contact Role Type: | Publisher |
|---|---|
| Contact Type: | Organization |
| Contact Name: | USGS |
| Citation URL: | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Rock_2020/TIFF/ |
| Citation URL Name: | USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files for WI_8County_Rock |
USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files - WI_8County_Sauk
| Contact Role Type: | Publisher |
|---|---|
| Contact Type: | Organization |
| Contact Name: | USGS |
| Citation URL: | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Sauk_2020/TIFF/ |
| Citation URL Name: | USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files for WI_8County_Sauk |
USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files - WI_8County_Vernon
| Contact Role Type: | Publisher |
|---|---|
| Contact Type: | Organization |
| Contact Name: | USGS |
| Citation URL: | https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Vernon_2020/TIFF/ |
| Citation URL Name: | USGS AWS GeoTIFF Files for WI_8County_Vernon |
Process Steps
Process Step 1
| Description: |
The boresight for each lift was done individually as the solution may change slightly from lift to lift. The following steps describe the Raw Data Processing and Boresight process: 1) Technicians processed the raw data to LAS format flight lines using the final GPS/IMU solution. This LAS data set was used as source data for boresight. 2) Technicians first used RIEGL RiPROCESS software to calculate initial boresight adjustment angles based on sample areas selected in the lift. These areas cover calibration flight lines collected in the lift, cross tie and production flight lines. These areas are well distributed in the lift coverage and cover multiple terrain types that are necessary for boresight angle calculation. The technician then analyzed the results and made any necessary additional adjustment until it is acceptable for the selected areas. 3) Once the boresight angle calculation was completed for the selected areas, the adjusted settings were applied to all of the flight lines of the lift and checked for consistency. The technicians utilized commercial and proprietary software packages to analyze how well flight line overlaps match for the entire lift and adjusted as necessary until the results met the project specifications. 4) Once all lifts were completed with individual boresight adjustment, the technicians checked and corrected the vertical misalignment of all flight lines and also the matching between data and ground truth. The relative accuracy was less than or equal to 7 cm RMSEz within individual swaths and less than or equal to 10 cm RMSEz or within swath overlap (between adjacent swaths). 5) The technicians ran a final vertical accuracy check of the boresighted flight lines against the surveyed check points after the z correction to ensure the requirement of NVA = 19.6 cm 95% Confidence Level (Required Accuracy) was met. Point classification was performed according to USGS Lidar Base Specification 2.1, and breaklines were collected for water features. Bare earth DEMs were exported from the classified point cloud using collected breaklines for hydroflattening. |
|---|---|
| Process Date/Time: | 2020-06-24 00:00:00 |
Process Step 2
| Description: |
LAS Point Cloud Classification: LiDAR data processing for the point cloud deliverable consists of classifying the LiDAR using a combination of automated classification and manual edit/reclassification processes. On most projects the automated classification routines will correctly classify 90-95 percent of the LiDAR points. The remaining 5-10 percent of the bare earth ground class must undergo manual edit and reclassification. Because the classified points serve as the foundation for the Terrain, DEM and breakline products, it is necessary for the QA/QC supervisor to review the completed point cloud deliverables prior to the production of any additional products. The following workflow steps are followed for automated LiDAR classification: 1. Lead technicians review the group of LiDAR tiles to determine which automated classification routines will achieve the best results. Factors such as vegetation density, cultural features, and terrain can affect the accuracy of the automated classification. The lead technicians have the ability to edit or tailor specific routines in order to accommodate the factors mentioned above, and achieve the best results and address errors. 2. Distributive processing is used to maximize the available hardware resources and speed up the automated processing as this is a resource-intensive process. 3. Once the results of the automated classification have been reviewed and passed consistent checks, the supervisor then approves the data tiles for manual classification. The following workflow steps are followed for manual edits of the LiDAR bare earth ground classification: 1. LiDAR technicians review each tile for errors made by the automated routines and correctly address errors any points that are in the wrong classification. By methodically panning through each tile, the technicians view the LiDAR points in profile, with a TIN surface, and as a point cloud. 2. Any ancillary data available, such as Google Earth, is used to identify any features that may not be identifiable as points so that the technician can make the determination to which classification the feature belongs. The QA/QC processes for the LiDAR processing phase consist of: 1. The lead technician reviews all automated classification results and adjust the macros as necessary to achieve the optimal efficiency. This is an iterative process, and the technician may need to make several adjustments to the macros, depending upon the complexity of the features in the area being processed. During the manual editing process, the LiDAR technicians use a system of QA, whereby they check each other’s edits. This results in several benefits to the process: There is a greater chance of catching minor blunders It increases communication between technicians on technique and appearance Solutions to problems are communicated efficiently To ensure consistency across the project area, the supervisor reviews the data once the manual editing is complete. For this phase of a project, the following specifications are checked against: • Point cloud – all points must be classified according to the USGS classification standard for LAS. The all-return point cloud must be delivered in fully-compliant LAS version 1.4. • LAS files will use the Spatial Reference Framework according to project specification and all files shall be projected and defined. • General Point classifications: Class 1. Processed, but unclassified Class 2. Bare Earth Class 5. High Vegetation Class 6. Building Class 7. Noise Class 9. Water Class 17. Bridge Decks Class 18. High Noise Class 20. Ignored ground (Breakline proximity) • Outliers, noise, blunders, duplicates, geometrically unreliable points near the extreme edge of the swath, and other points deemed unusable are to be identified using the "Withheld" flag. This applies primarily to points which are identified during pre-processing or through automated post-processing r |
|---|---|
| Process Date/Time: | 2020-06-24 00:00:00 |
Process Step 3
| Description: |
LiDAR processing utilizes several software packages, including GeoCue and the TerraSolid suite of processing components. The GeoCue software is a database management system for housing the LiDAR dataset (usually multiple gigabytes in size). GeoCue incorporates a thorough checklist of processing steps and quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures that assist in the LiDAR workflow. The TerraSolid software suite is used to automate the initial classification of the LiDAR point cloud based on a set of predetermined parameters. Lidar technicians refer to ground cover research (natural and cultural features) within the project area and determine algorithms most suitable for the initial automated LiDAR classification. (Some algorithms/filters recognize the ground in forests well, while others have greater capability in urban areas). During this process each point is given an initial classification (e.g., as ground, vegetation, or noise) based on the point's coordinates and the relation to its neighbors. Classifications to be assigned include all those outlined by ASPRS standards. The initial classifications produce a coarse and inexact dataset, but offer an adequate starting point for the subsequent manual classification procedure. During this step, "overlap" points are automatically classified (those originating from neighboring flightlines) using information gathered from the ABGPS and IMU data. Any duplicate points existing from adjacent flightlines are removed during this process. Hydrographic breaklines are collected using LiDARgrammetry to ensure hydroflattened water surfaces. This process involves manipulating the LiDAR data's intensity information to create a metrically sound stereo environment. From this generated "imagery", breaklines are photogrammetrically compiled. Breakline polygons are created to represent open water bodies. The LiDAR points that fall within these areas are classified as "water." All hydrographic breaklines include a 3.125 foot buffer, with the Class 2 (bare earth) points being re-classified as Class 20 (ignored ground). TerraSolid is further used for the subsequent manual classification of the LiDAR points allowing technicians to view the point cloud in a number of ways to ensure accuracy and consistency of points and uniformity of point coverage. The TIN was processed to create a GRID or digital elevation model (DEM) with 2 foot pixels. |
|---|---|
| Process Date/Time: | 2020-06-19 00:00:00 |
Process Step 4
| Description: |
The NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) created references to the USGS GeoTIFF files that were ingested into the NOAA Digital Coast Data Access Viewer (DAV). No changes were made to the data. The DAV will access the raster data as it resides on Amazon Web Services (AWS). These are the GeoTIFF files that are being accessed: https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Chippewa_2020/TIFF/ https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Columbia_2020/TIFF/ https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_EauClaire_2020/TIFF/ https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Grant_2020/TIFF/ https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Menominee_2020/TIFF/ https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Rock_2020/TIFF/ https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Sauk_2020/TIFF/ https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=StagedProducts/Elevation/OPR/Projects/WI_8County_2020_A20/WI_8County_Vernon_2020/TIFF/ |
|---|---|
| Process Date/Time: | 2026-05-21 00:00:00 |
| Process Contact: | Office for Coastal Management (OCM) |
| ROR: | https://ror.org/05v14bq57 |
Related Items
| Item Type | Relationship Type | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Data Set (DS) | Cross Reference |
2020 USGS Lidar: 8 County, WI |
Catalog Details
| Catalog Item ID: | 79827 |
|---|---|
| GUID: | gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:79827 |
| Metadata Record Created By: | Rebecca Mataosky |
| Metadata Record Created: | 2026-05-21 18:49+0000 |
| Metadata Record Last Modified By: | Rebecca Mataosky |
| Metadata Record Last Modified: | 2026-05-26 20:45+0000 |
| Metadata Record Published: | 2026-05-22 |
| Owner Org: | OCMP |
| Metadata Publication Status: | Published Externally |
| Do Not Publish?: | N |
| Metadata Last Review Date: | 2023-08-10 |
| Metadata Review Frequency: | 1 Year |
| Metadata Next Review Date: | 2024-08-10 |
