47862
San Francisco Bay Interferometric Bathymetry: Area A
ca_sfb14_sss_bath-A-meta
Data Set
Published / External
37225
Benthic
Project
Completed
These interferometric bathymetric data were collected with the Edgetech 6205 sonar system in the San Francisco Bay. Bathymetric and acoustic backscatter data were collected simultaneously in 84 survey blocks. Seventy five of these blocks were surveyed with 100% cover of backscatter imagery and nine blocks were surveyed with 50% backscatter coverage. These data were collected as source material for planned benthic habitat mapping. An earlier project had been completed to map the very-shallow subtidal and intertidal areas using optical methods.
Original contact information:
Contact Name: Jen Eckerle
Contact Org: California Ocean Protection Council (OPC)
Title: Deputy Director, OPC
Phone: 916-653-9416
Email: jen.eckerle@resources.ca.gov
The primary purpose of this San Francisco Bay habitat mapping acquisition is to provide the California Ocean Protection Council (OPC), as required for the California Seafloor Mapping Program (CSMP) modern, accurately positioned sonar imagery data of San Francisco Bay coastal and near shore waters to delineate marine habitat types. Secondarily, the survey shall provide OPC and NOAA with bathymetric survey data from a combination of multi-beam and interferometric sonars. The interferometric bathymetry will not be as accurate as the bathymetry acquired with a multi-beam sonar. Thus, the areas with water depths greater than 20 meters, which shall be surveyed with a multi-beam system, are expected to have a higher order of accuracy. The combined survey data, including the imagery and the bathymetry, will support OPC's goals as well as assist with NOAA's mandate for port and harbor maintenance (dredging), coastal engineering (beach erosion and replenishment studies), and coastal zone management.
10020
Seventy-five survey blocks in Area A were acquired with the Edgetech 6205 sonar. The bathymetric products are organized by these blocks. The blocks represent the priority areas determined by the project partners and were arranged to avoid areas where data had already been collected. Data for each block was collected on the following dates. Block CA1B01 was acquired between 10/11/2014 and 10/12/2014. Block CA1B02 was acquired between 10/12/2014 and 12/5/2014. Block CA1B03 was acquired between 10/11/2014 and 10/11/2014. Block CA1B04 was acquired between 10/11/2014 and 12/5/2014. Block CA1B05 was acquired between 10/11/2014 and 12/6/2014. Block CA1B06 was acquired between 10/11/2014 and 12/21/2014. Block CA1B07 was acquired between 10/12/2014 and 12/6/2014. Block CA1B10 was acquired between 11/13/2014 and 11/13/2014. Block CA1B11 was acquired between 10/15/2014 and 12/5/2014. Block CA1B12 was acquired between 10/6/2014 and 11/13/2014. Block CA1B13 was acquired between 10/6/2014 and 12/6/2014. Block CA1B14 was acquired between 10/8/2014 and 12/7/2014. Block CA1B15 was acquired between 10/8/2014 and 12/14/2014. Block CA1B16 was acquired between 10/8/2014 and 12/15/2014. Block CA1B17 was acquired between 10/8/2014 and 12/7/2014. Block CA1B18 was acquired between 10/8/2014 and 12/7/2014. Block CA1B19 was acquired between 10/9/2014 and 10/9/2014. Block CA1B20 was acquired between 10/9/2014 and 12/7/2014. Block CA1B21 was acquired between 10/13/2014 and 12/5/2014. Block CA1B23 was acquired between 12/4/2014 and 12/4/2014. Block CA1B25 was acquired between 10/7/2014 and 12/14/2014. Block CA1B27 was acquired between 10/9/2014 and 12/14/2014. Block CA1B28 was acquired between 10/3/2014 and 12/6/2014. Block CA1B29 was acquired between 10/1/2014 and 12/5/2014. The survey data for Block CA1B30 was acquired between 10/6/2014 and 12/8/2014. Block CA1B31 was acquired between 10/4/2014 and 12/16/2014. Block CA1B32 was acquired between 10/7/2014 and 10/7/2014. Block CA1B33 was acquired between 10/15/2014 and 10/15/2014. Block CA1B34 was acquired between 10/7/2014 and 10/7/2014. Block CA2B01 was acquired between 10/16/2014 and 10/17/2014. Block NA1B01 was acquired between 11/2/2014 and 11/5/2014. Block NA1B02 was acquired between 11/1/2014 and 12/8/2014. Block NA1B03 was acquired between 12/9/2014 and 12/9/2014. Block NA1B04 was acquired between 10/26/2014 and 10/26/2014. Block NA1B05 was acquired between 10/18/2014 and 10/18/2014. Block NA1B06 was acquired between 10/17/2014 and 10/17/2014. Block NA1B07-08-09 was acquired between 10/11/2014 and 12/12/2014. Block NA1B10 was acquired between 10/18/2014 and 10/18/2014. Block NA1B11 was acquired between 10/10/2014 and 10/10/2014. Block NA1B12 was acquired between 12/12/2014 and 12/12/2014. Block NA1B13 was acquired between 11/2/2014 and 12/12/2014. NA1B14 was acquired between 10/19/2014 and 12/21/2014. Block NA1B16 was acquired between 12/10/2014 and 12/10/2014. Block NA1B17 was acquired between 12/10/2014 and 12/10/2014. Block NA1B18 was acquired between 10/16/2014 and 12/10/2014. Block NA1B19 was acquired between 10/8/2014 and 10/26/2014. Block NA1B20 was acquired between 10/8/2014 and 12/10/2014. Block NA1B21 was acquired between 11/10/2014 and 11/10/2014. Block NA1B22 was acquired between 11/5/2014 and 11/11/2014. Block NA1B24 was acquired between 10/31/2014 and 12/18/2014. Block NA1B25 was acquired between 10/28/2014 and 10/28/2014. Block NA1B26 was acquired between 10/28/2014 and 11/14/2014. Block NA1B27 was acquired between 10/5/2014 and 12/9/2014. Block NA2B01 was acquired between 10/31/2014 and 11/14/2014. Block NA2B02 was acquired between 11/5/2014 and 11/12/2014. Block NA2B03 was acquired between 11/5/2014 and 11/9/2014. Block NA2B04 was acquired between 10/29/2014 and 11/6/2014. Block NA2B05 was acquired between 10/18/2014 and 12/8/2014. Block SA1B01 was acquired between 11/15/2014 and 12/13/2014. Block SA1B02 was acquired between 11/18/2014 and 12/13/2014. Block SA1B03 was acquired between 11/20/2014 and 12/13/2014. Block SA1B04 was acquired between 10/15/2014 and 12/14/2014. Block SA1B05 was acquired between 10/21/2014 and 10/24/2014. Block SA1B06 was acquired between 10/20/2014 and 12/14/2014. Block SA1B07 was acquired between 11/24/2014 and 11/25/2014. Block SA1B08 was acquired between 11/21/2014 and 12/13/2014. Block SA1B09 was acquired between 11/25/2014 and 12/13/2014. Block SA1B10 was acquired between 11/25/2014 and 12/1/2014. Block SA1B11 was acquired between 11/29/2014 and 12/9/2014. Block SA1B12 was acquired between 11/28/2014 and 12/1/2014. Block SA2B01 was acquired between 11/18/2014 and 11/24/2014. Block SA2B02 was acquired between 10/24/2014 and 12/13/2014. Block SA2B03 was acquired between 11/24/2014 and 11/25/2014.
Theme
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords
EARTH SCIENCE > BIOSPHERE > ECOSYSTEMS > MARINE ECOSYSTEMS > BENTHIC
Theme
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords
EARTH SCIENCE > BIOSPHERE > ECOSYSTEMS > MARINE ECOSYSTEMS > COASTAL
Theme
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords
EARTH SCIENCE > BIOSPHERE > ECOSYSTEMS > MARINE ECOSYSTEMS > ESTUARY
Theme
ISO 19115 Topic Category
elevation
Theme
ISO 19115 Topic Category
geoscientificInformation
Theme
ISO 19115 Topic Category
imageryBaseMapsEarthCover
Theme
ISO 19115 Topic Category
oceans
Spatial
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > CALIFORNIA
Theme
California Ocean Protection Council
Theme
California Seafloor Mapping Program (CSMP)
Theme
Edgetech 6205
Theme
interferometric bathymetry
Spatial
Geographic Names Information System
Alameda County
Spatial
Geographic Names Information System
California
Spatial
Geographic Names Information System
Contra Costa County
Spatial
Geographic Names Information System
Marin County
Spatial
Geographic Names Information System
San Francisco Bay
Spatial
Geographic Names Information System
San Francisco County
Spatial
Geographic Names Information System
San Mateo County
Spatial
Geographic Names Information System
Solano County
Spatial
Geographic Names Information System
Sonoma County
Spatial
Geographic Names Information System
United States
Office for Coastal Management
Charleston
SC
Data Set
As Needed
Map (digital)
California Ocean Protection Council (OPC) and Fugro Pelagos, Inc.
Data Steward
2017-02-13
Organization
NOAA Office for Coastal Management
NOAA/OCM
coastal.info@noaa.gov
2234 South Hobson Ave
Charleston
SC
29405-2413
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page
Online Resource
Distributor
2017-02-13
Organization
NOAA Office for Coastal Management
NOAA/OCM
coastal.info@noaa.gov
2234 South Hobson Ave
Charleston
SC
29405-2413
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page
Online Resource
Metadata Contact
2017-02-13
Organization
NOAA Office for Coastal Management
NOAA/OCM
coastal.info@noaa.gov
2234 South Hobson Ave
Charleston
SC
29405-2413
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page
Online Resource
Point of Contact
2017-02-13
Organization
NOAA Office for Coastal Management
NOAA/OCM
coastal.info@noaa.gov
2234 South Hobson Ave
Charleston
SC
29405-2413
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page
Online Resource
Ground Condition
-122.5032
-122.0462
38.13586
37.455
Range
2014-10-01
2014-12-14
Yes
Unclassified
None
These bathymetry files depict the existing conditions of the seafloor at the time of the survey and are only accurate for that time. Use of these products is to be determined by the California Ocean Protection Council.
2017-02-13
Date that the source FGDC record was last modified.
2017-11-14
Converted from FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (version FGDC-STD-001-1998) using 'fgdc_to_inport_xml.pl' script. Contact Tyler Christensen (NOS) for details.
2018-02-08
Partial upload of Positional Accuracy fields only.
2018-04-11
Partial upload to move data access FTP links to Distribution Info and remove broken URLs.
Microsoft Windows 7 Version 6.1 (Build 7601) Service Pack 1; Esri ArcGIS 10.1.1.3143
These data are not attributed.
Interferometric horizontal positioning met IHO Order 1A specifications, meaning the horizontal accuracy of the data had to be within 5 meters + 5% of depth. The actual horizontal accuracy of the bathymetry exceeded these requirements, as the navigation/position data for the vessel was post-processed using an Applanix SmartBase post-processed kinematic solution, resulting in vessel horizontal positioning RMS values under 5 centimeters. Likewise, the vessel equipment offsets were measured to an accuracy of approximately 1 centimeter (1 sigma level) using a Total Station. Vessel roll and pitch were measured to an accuracy of approximately 0.02 degrees (1 sigma level) using an Applanix POS MV. These factors created highly accurate horizontal positioning of the data that exceeded IHO Order 1A standards. Overlapping features in the bathymetry were examined to confirm accuracy standards were met.; Quantitative Value: 1.0 meters, Test that produced the value: Approximated maximum horizontal uncertainty in meters
The Edgetech 6205 interferometric swath bathymetry were not expected to meet IHO Order 1a standards across the entire width of the survey swath. Instead, the QC crosslines were used to approximate the amount of swath that fell within IHO Order 1a standards. The crossline reports indicate that approximately the middle 50% of the swath achieved IHO Order 1a accuracy specifications. During acquisition, the interferometric lines were set to acquire data to 6 times water depth to each side of nadir, for a total of 12 times water depth. Thus, the crossline analysis indicates that approximately half, or a total of 3 times water depth to each side of nadir, achieved IHO Order 1a specifications. This analysis agrees with a manual review of the swath in the CARIS HIPS Subset Editor window.; Quantitative Value: 1.7 meters, Test that produced the value: Maximum Total Propagated Uncertainty in meters in outer beams
The data set was derived after manually rejecting erroneous soundings. The final bathymetric product was generated using a CUBE surface model of the cleaned bathymetry.
Overlapping data sets were analyzed for agreement. Crossline analysis was performed to ensure IHO Order 1a standards were met at the 95% confidence level. Total propagation of uncertainty values was calculated in CARIS HIPS software to ensure standards were met or exceeded.
1
Interferometric bathymetry data acquisition. These bathymetry data were acquired in JSF files using an Edgetech 6205.
2014-01-01T00:00:00
2
Interferometric bathymetry data processing. The bathymetry was processed in CARIS HIPS software to correct for post-processed navigation/positioning, tides, sound velocity, calibration values, and noise. After processing in CARIS HIPS, CUBE base surfaces in the CSAR file format were generated at a 1-meter bin size for each survey block. These CSAR surfaces were exported to BAG format, ESRI Grid format, and color-coded geo-tiff formats. More detailed information on data processing can be found in the project Data Acquisition and Processing Report NCNP0000-14-01192_DAPR.pdf
2015-03-31T00:00:00
gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:47862
Anne Ball
2017-11-14T12:57:16
SysAdmin InPortAdmin
2023-05-30T18:09:28
2018-04-11
Office for Coastal Management
OCM
1002
Public
No
2018-04-11
1 Year
2019-04-11