gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:40245
eng
UTF8
dataset
Office of Response and Restoration
resourceProvider
ESI Program Manager
7600 Sand Point Way NE
Seattle
WA
98115
orr.esi@noaa.gov
pointOfContact
2024-02-29T00:00:00
ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata Part 2 Extensions for imagery and gridded data
ISO 19115-2:2009(E)
curve
5492
surface
182
Sensitivity of Coastal Environments and Wildlife to Spilled Oil: Central California: FISHL (Fish Lines)
Central_California_fishl
2006-06
publication
NOAA/NMFS/EDM
40245
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/40245
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
Full Metadata Record
View the complete metadata record on InPort for more information about this dataset.
information
http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/esi
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
Citation URL
Online Resource
download
Prepared by Research Planning, Inc., Columbia, South Carolina for Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, Sanctuary Integrated Monitoring Network (SIMoN), Monterey, California; Department of Fish and Game, Office of Spill Prevention and Response, Sacramento, California; Monterey Bay Sanctuary Foundation, Monterey, California; and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service, Office of Response and Restoration, Hazardous Materials Response Division, Seattle, Washington.
This data set contains sensitive biological resource data for anadromous fish and rare fish species occurrences in Central California. Vector lines in this data set represent the beginning points for coastal anadromous runs, juvenile rearing and adult congregation areas for anadromous species, and sensitive habitat for rare species (tidewater goby). Species-specific abundance, seasonality, status, life history, and source information are stored in relational data tables (described below) designed to be used in conjunction with this spatial data layer.This data set comprises a portion of the Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) data for Central California. ESI data characterize the marine and coastal environments and wildlife by their sensitivity to spilled oil. The ESI data include information for three main components: shoreline habitats, sensitive biological resources, and human-use resources. See also the FISH (Fish Polygons) data layer, part of the larger Central California ESI database, for additional fish information.
The ESI data were collected, mapped, and digitized to provide environmental data for oil spill planning and response. The Clean Water Act with amendments by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 requires response plans for immediate and effective protection of sensitive resources.
This project was supported by Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, Sanctuary Integrated Monitoring Network (SIMoN), Monterey, California; Department of Fish and Game, Office of Spill Prevention and Response, Sacramento, California; Monterey Bay Sanctuary Foundation, Monterey, California; and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service, Office of Response and Restoration, Hazardous Materials Response Division, Seattle, Washington.
completed
ESI Program Manager
7600 Sand Point Way NE
Seattle
WA
98115
orr.esi@noaa.gov
pointOfContact
ESI Program Manager
7600 Sand Point Way NE
Seattle
WA
98115
orr.esi@noaa.gov
custodian
notPlanned
Environmental Monitoring
theme
NOS Topic Category
Coastal Zone Management
Coastal resources
ESI
Fish
Oil spill planning
Sensitivity maps
Wildlife
theme
Central California
place
DOC/NOAA/NOS/ORR > Office of Response and Restoration, National Ocean Service, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce
dataCentre
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Data Center Keywords
2017-04-24
publication
8.5
Central California, 2006
project
InPort
otherRestrictions
Cite As: Office of Response and Restoration, [Date of Access]: Sensitivity of Coastal Environments and Wildlife to Spilled Oil: Central California: FISHL (Fish Lines) [Data Date Range], https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/40245.
NOAA provides no warranty, nor accepts any liability occurring from any incomplete, incorrect, or misleading data, or from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading use of the data. It is the responsibility of the user to determine whether or not the data is suitable for the intended purpose.
otherRestrictions
Access Constraints: None
otherRestrictions
Use Constraints: DO NOT USE MAPS FOR NAVIGATIONAL PURPOSES.Besides the above warning, there are no use constraints on these data. Note that the ESI database should not be used to the exclusion of other pertinent data or information held by state or federal agencies or other organizations. Likewise, information contained in the database cannot be used in place of consultations with environmental, natural resource, and cultural resource agencies, or in place of field surveys. Recognize that the information contained in the ESI database represents known concentration areas or occurrences of natural, cultural, and human-use resources, but does not necessarily represent the full distribution or range of each species or resource. This is particularly important to recognize when considering potential impacts to protected resources, such as endangered species, wetlands, etc. Acknowledgment of the originators, publishers, contributors, and sources listed would be appreciated in products derived from these data.
otherRestrictions
Distribution Liability: Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by NOAA regarding the utility of the data on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. NOAA warrants the delivery of this product in computer-readable format, and will offer a replacement copy of the product when the product is determined unreadable by computer-input peripherals, or when the physical medium is delivered in damaged condition.
unclassified
NOAA Data Management Plan (DMP)
NOAA/NMFS/EDM
40245
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inportserve/waf/noaa/nos/orr/dmp/pdf/40245.pdf
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
NOAA Data Management Plan (DMP)
NOAA Data Management Plan for this record on InPort.
information
crossReference
vector
eng; US
environment
oceans
The software packages used to develop the atlas are Environmental Systems Research Institute's ARC/INFO(r) (version 9.1) and SQL SERVER(r) (version 2000). The hardware configuration is PC's with Windows Operating System (2000/XP/2003).The Spatial_Data_Organization Information section refers only to the source files in the ARC export format. The following files are included in that data set: alerts.e00, birds.e00, esi.e00, fish.e00, fishl.e00, habitats.e00, hydro.e00, index.e00, invert.e00, m_mammal.e00, mgt.e00, nests.e00, reptilel.e00, reptiles.e00, socecon.e00, and t_mammal.e00. Associated relational and desktop data tables provided in Arc export and text format are bio_lut, biofile, biores, breed, breed_dt, seasonal, soc_dat, soc_lut, sources, species, and status.
-123.5
-120.375
34.217
38.125
| Currentness: The biological data were compiled during 2005-2006. The currentness dates for the data range from 1999 to 2006 and are documented in the Lineage section.
1999
2006
Resource Description - ESI Atlas for Central California
false
eng
false
FISHL.AAT
2017-08-07
publication
BIO_LUT
2017-08-07
publication
BIORES
2017-08-07
publication
SPECIES
2017-08-07
publication
SEASONAL
2017-08-07
publication
BREED
2017-08-07
publication
SOURCES
2017-08-07
publication
STATUS
2017-08-07
publication
ESI Program Manager
7600 Sand Point Way NE
Seattle
WA
98115
orr.esi@noaa.gov
distributor
http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/esi
WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/esi
Online Resource
download
dataset
Accuracy
A multi-stage error checking process is used to verify both attribute accuracy and logical consistency throughout data production. The process includes a standardized data entry methodology, hardcopy data review by in-house and external resource experts, a final Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) process, and multiple automated logical consistency checks. Quantitative data (such as densities, counts, abundances, or concentrations) provided by resource experts for inclusion in the data set may vary widely in attribute accuracy, depending upon the methodology used to collect and compile such data. For a more detailed evaluation of source data attribute accuracy, contact the sources listed in the Lineage section.
Horizontal Positional Accuracy
Spatial components for the biological data layers can come from expert interviews, hardcopy, or digital sources. Some of the spatial components of the biological data layers may have been developed using regional experts who estimate concentration areas. It is difficult to estimate the positional accuracy of such data, except to state that they are compiled on hardcopy base maps with a scale of 1:24,000. Some of the spatial components of the biological data sets are developed from pre-existing digital or hardcopy sources and reflect the positional accuracy of these original data. See the Lineage and Process_Description sections for more information on the original data source and how these data were integrated or manipulated to create the final data set. Note that biological resource data by their very nature are considered "fuzzy", and this should be understood when considering the positional accuracy of vector digital objects representing these resources.
Completeness Report
These data represent a synthesis of expert knowledge and hardcopy reports on anadromous and rare species occurrences. See also the FISH (Fish Polygons) data layer, part of the larger Central California ESI database, for additional fish information. These data do not necessarily represent all fish occurrences in Central California. The following species are included in this data set: (Species_ID, Common Name, Scientific Name [n/a if not applicable]): 69, Coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch; 74, Steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss; 219, Pacific lamprey, Lampetra tridentata; 226, Tidewater goby, Eucyclogobius newberryi.
Conceptual Consistency
A multi-stage error checking process, described in the above Attribute_Accuracy_Report, is used to verify both attribute accuracy and logical consistency throughout data production. This process includes multiple automated logical consistency checks that test the files for missing or duplicate data, rules for proper coding, GIS topological consistencies (such as dangles, unnecessary nodes, etc.), and SQL SERVER(r) to ARC/INFO(r) consistencies. A final review is made by the GIS manager, where the data are written to CD-ROM and the metadata are written.After the data are delivered to NOAA, they are again subjected to a number of quality and consistency checks. In the process of checking for topological and database consistencies, new ID's and RARNUM's or HUNUM's are also generated. The new ID's are a combination of atlas number, element number, and record number. In addition, the value used to represent the element is modified to reflect the type of feature being mapped. In the case of an element that is normally represented by a point or polygon, a value of 20 is added to the standard element value for mapping of linear features. In the case where an element usually mapped as a polygon is represented by a point, a value of 30 is added to the regular element value. The RARNUM's are also modified to include the atlas number, so multiple atlases can be combined and RARNUM's remain unique. RARNUM's are redefined on an element basis, so "resource at risk" groupings will contain only a single element. HUNUM's are also modified to include the atlas number.
Two main sources of data were used to depict fish distribution and seasonality for this data layer: (1) personal interviews with resource experts from California Department of Fish and Game (CDF&G) and National Park Service (NPS), and (2) U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) and CDF&G reports.The above digital and/or hardcopy sources were compiled by the project biologist to create the FISHL data layer. Depending on the type of source data, three general approaches are used for compiling a biology data layer: (1) information gathered during initial interviews and from hardcopy sources are compiled onto U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000 topographic quadrangles and digitized; (2) hardcopy maps are digitized at their source scale; (3) digital data layers are evaluated and used "as is" or integrated with the hardcopy data sources. See the Lineage section for additional information on the type of source data for this data layer. The compiled ESI, biology, and human-use data are plotted onto hardcopy draft maps. Following the delivery of draft maps to the participating resource experts, a second set of interviews is conducted to review the maps. If necessary, edits to the FISHL data layer are made based on the recommendations of the resource experts, and final hardcopy maps and digital data are created.
2006-05-01T00:00:00
Source Contribution: FISH LINE INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: HARDCOPY TEXT | Type of Source Media: online
4612 SITE SUMMARY & STRATEGY SHEETS - SANTA BARBARA COUNTY, VENTURA COUNTY
1999-01-01
publication
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME (CDF&G)
1999
Source Contribution: FISH LINE INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: EXPERT KNOWLEDGE | Type of Source Media: PERSONAL COMMUNICATION
DISTRIBUTION OF GGNRA SPECIES
2005-01-01
publication
FONG, D. (NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA [NPS-GGNRA], SAN FRANCISCO)
2005
Source Contribution: FISH LINE INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: HARDCOPY TEXT | Type of Source Media: paper
DISTRIBUTION OF STEELHEAD, SALMON, AND T/E REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS IN STREAMS
2005-01-01
publication
NELSON, J. (CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME [CDF&G], APTOS)
2005
Source Contribution: FISH LINE INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: HARDCOPY TEXT | Type of Source Media: EMAIL
RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE TIDEWATER GOBY (EUCYCLOGOBIUS NEWBERRYI)
2005-01-01
publication
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
2005
Source Contribution: FISH LINE INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: EXPERT KNOWLEDGE | Type of Source Media: PERSONAL COMMUNICATION
SLO COUNTY SPECIES DISTRIBUTION
2006-01-01
publication
BOGGS-BLALACK, M. (CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME [CDF&G], MORRO BAY)
2006