Geographic and temporal patterns in the acoustic detection of sperm whales Physeter macrocephalus in the central and western North Pacific Ocean

The easily identifiable, high-amplitude echolocation signals produced by sperm whales Physeter macrocephalus make the species ideal for long-term passive acoustic monitoring. Sperm whale signals were manually identified in the recordings from high-frequency acoustic recording packages monitoring 13 deep-water locations across the central and western North Pacific Ocean from 2005 to 2013, constituting the longest passive acoustic study of sperm whales to date. The species was detected at all of the sites, with the highest detection rate at Ladd Sea- mount (>18% of analyzed periods) and the lowest rates at equatorial sites (<1% of analyzed peri- ods). Generalized additive models and generalized estimating equations were used to produce explanatory models to assess temporal and geographic patterns. The model variables included diel phase, lunar day, day of the year, year, and site. The site-specific variability in detection rates was high across the North Pacific, but there were also common patterns, including a seasonal trend, with decreased detections during the summer or fall, and a diel trend, with increased detections at night. There appeared to be a seasonal movement pattern, with minimum detection rates occurring later in the year at more northerly sites. The nocturnal pattern was seen across all data sets but was not strong at equatorial locations. Although lunar cycles were important at many sites, there was no consistent trend at any spatial scale. Overall, this analysis confirms the broad distribution of sperm whales across the North Pacific and highlights the subtle temporal patterns in their acoustic activity, which may be related to shifts in animal behavior or movement.

Merkens KP, Simonis AE, Oleson EM (2019) Geographic and temporal patterns in the acoustic detection of sperm whales Physeter macrocephalus in the central and western North Pacific Ocean. Endang Species Res 39:115-133. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00960

Requester will be asked to submit a request by email to Erin Oleson (erin.oleson@noaa.gov) or Karlina Merkens (karlina.merkens@noaa.gov)

Requester will be asked to submit a request by email to Erin Oleson (erin.oleson@noaa.gov) or Karlina Merkens (karlina.merkens@noaa.gov)

Requester will be asked to submit a request by email to Erin Oleson (erin.oleson@noaa.gov) or Karlina Merkens (karlina.merkens@noaa.gov)

Requester will be asked to submit a request by email to Erin Oleson (erin.oleson@noaa.gov) or Karlina Merkens (karlina.merkens@noaa.gov)

none

none

Raw data (.hrp) are checked when initially copied from the drives to determine the total recording duration and assess errors in recording. Raw data are converted to .wav files that are checked during analyses of datasets.