Data Management Plan (Deprecated)
GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:63442 | Published / External
This is an outdated version of the NOAA Data Management Plan template. InPort now supports a dedicated Data Management Plan Catalog Item type, which is up-to-date with the latest NOAA DMP template. The ability to generate Data Management Plans from Data Sets will be discontinued in a future release. Please see the Data Management Plan Help Guide to learn more.
Data Management Plan
DMP Template v2.0.1 (2015-01-01)
Please provide the following information, and submit to the NOAA DM Plan Repository.Reference to Master DM Plan (if applicable)
As stated in Section IV, Requirement 1.3, DM Plans may be hierarchical. If this DM Plan inherits provisions from a higher-level DM Plan already submitted to the Repository, then this more-specific Plan only needs to provide information that differs from what was provided in the Master DM Plan.
1. General Description of Data to be Managed
This data set consists of salt marsh habitats for the state of Rhode Island derived from high resolution (0.5m) imagery collecting during June 2012. This data set utilized 4 Band multispectral aerial orthoimagery contributed to RIGIS by the Rhode Island Eelgrass Mapping Taskforce [(c) 2012 RIGIS] and LiDAR data collected through the LiDAR for the NorthEast project (2011).
Notes: Only a maximum of 4000 characters will be included.
Notes: Data collection is considered ongoing if a time frame of type "Continuous" exists.
Notes: All time frames from all extent groups are included.
Notes: All geographic areas from all extent groups are included.
(e.g., digital numeric data, imagery, photographs, video, audio, database, tabular data, etc.)
(e.g., satellite, airplane, unmanned aerial system, radar, weather station, moored buoy, research vessel, autonomous underwater vehicle, animal tagging, manual surveys, enforcement activities, numerical model, etc.)
2. Point of Contact for this Data Management Plan (author or maintainer)
Notes: The name of the Person of the most recent Support Role of type "Metadata Contact" is used. The support role must be in effect.
Notes: The name of the Organization of the most recent Support Role of type "Metadata Contact" is used. This field is required if applicable.
3. Responsible Party for Data Management
Program Managers, or their designee, shall be responsible for assuring the proper management of the data produced by their Program. Please indicate the responsible party below.
Notes: The name of the Person of the most recent Support Role of type "Data Steward" is used. The support role must be in effect.
4. Resources
Programs must identify resources within their own budget for managing the data they produce.
5. Data Lineage and Quality
NOAA has issued Information Quality Guidelines for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information which it disseminates.
(describe or provide URL of description):
Process Steps:
- 2017-03-17 00:00:00 - This data set was created by NOAA Office of Coastal Management (NOAA OCM). This version of the classification was created by the Narragansett Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve (NBNERR) and partner agencies to include multiple vegetation communities that individually and collectively indicate aspects of marsh health. This section outlines the classification procedure for the Rhode Island Salt Marsh Habitats maps. This product was developed through a partnership between NBNERR and the NOAA OCM. The product was derived from high resolution 4 band digital imagery in combination with derivatives from LiDAR data. The mapping methodology employed an Object Based Image Analysis (image segmentation) approach. Data Preparation: The aerial imagery was supplied to NOAA OCM by NBNERR. Orthoimagery from the spring of 2012 was pre-processed into spectral indices and band derivatives. LiDAR data collected through the LiDAR for the NorthEast project (2011) were processed into elevation and surface models. Field Data Collection: Field samples were collected prior to (August 2014) and during (June 2015) the mapping effort. Salt Marsh Extent Classification: Image segmentation was performed in Trimble's eCognition Developer software package. The resulting image objects or segments were classified using modeling routines which leveraged existing wetland datasets acquired from RIGIS. Boundaries were refined using spectral and elevation information. The final extent was used to focus the supervised habitat classification process. Salt Marsh Habitat Classification: A new set of image objects were derived within the salt marsh extent boundary. The resulting image objects classified into habitat classes using a Random Forest classifier. Logical rule sets and contextual modeling were used to introduce classes such as Dieoff Depressions and Natural Pools and to improve, and refine the habitat classification. Anomalies in the classification that were not addressed through the automated processes were corrected through manual editing. Review and Map Finalization: Once various stages of the salt marsh extent and habitat classification processing were completed, the resulting maps were provided to the Narragansett Bay NERR and other local experts for comments. The majority of the resulting feedback was incorporated to improve the final habitat dataset. Attributes for this product are as follows: 0 Background 1 Unclassified 2 Invasive Phragmites australis 3 High Marsh; S.patens-D.spicata 4 Mudflat /Bare 5 Open Water 6 Dieoff Depression 7 Natural Pool 8 Salt Shrub 9 High Marsh; S.alterniflora 10 High Marsh; Mix 11 Low Marsh 12 Brackish Marsh, Native 13 High Marsh; J.gerardii 14 Wrack
(describe or provide URL of description):
6. Data Documentation
The EDMC Data Documentation Procedural Directive requires that NOAA data be well documented, specifies the use of ISO 19115 and related standards for documentation of new data, and provides links to resources and tools for metadata creation and validation.
Missing/invalid information:
- 1.7. Data collection method(s)
- 3.1. Responsible Party for Data Management
- 4.1. Have resources for management of these data been identified?
- 4.2. Approximate percentage of the budget for these data devoted to data management
- 5.2. Quality control procedures employed
- 7.1. Do these data comply with the Data Access directive?
- 7.1.1. If data are not available or has limitations, has a Waiver been filed?
- 7.1.2. If there are limitations to data access, describe how data are protected
- 7.3. Data access methods or services offered
- 7.4. Approximate delay between data collection and dissemination
- 8.1. Actual or planned long-term data archive location
- 8.3. Approximate delay between data collection and submission to an archive facility
- 8.4. How will the data be protected from accidental or malicious modification or deletion prior to receipt by the archive?
(describe or provide URL of description):
7. Data Access
NAO 212-15 states that access to environmental data may only be restricted when distribution is explicitly limited by law, regulation, policy (such as those applicable to personally identifiable information or protected critical infrastructure information or proprietary trade information) or by security requirements. The EDMC Data Access Procedural Directive contains specific guidance, recommends the use of open-standard, interoperable, non-proprietary web services, provides information about resources and tools to enable data access, and includes a Waiver to be submitted to justify any approach other than full, unrestricted public access.
None
Notes: The name of the Organization of the most recent Support Role of type "Distributor" is used. The support role must be in effect. This information is not required if an approved access waiver exists for this data.
Notes: This field is required if a Distributor has not been specified.
Notes: All URLs listed in the Distribution Info section will be included. This field is required if applicable.
Notes: This field is required if applicable.
8. Data Preservation and Protection
The NOAA Procedure for Scientific Records Appraisal and Archive Approval describes how to identify, appraise and decide what scientific records are to be preserved in a NOAA archive.
(Specify NCEI-MD, NCEI-CO, NCEI-NC, NCEI-MS, World Data Center (WDC) facility, Other, To Be Determined, Unable to Archive, or No Archiving Intended)
Notes: This field is required if archive location is World Data Center or Other.
Notes: This field is required if archive location is To Be Determined, Unable to Archive, or No Archiving Intended.
Notes: Physical Location Organization, City and State are required, or a Location Description is required.
Discuss data back-up, disaster recovery/contingency planning, and off-site data storage relevant to the data collection
9. Additional Line Office or Staff Office Questions
Line and Staff Offices may extend this template by inserting additional questions in this section.