Search Help Show/Hide Menu

Data Management Plan

DMP Template v2.0.1 (2015-01-01)

Please provide the following information, and submit to the NOAA DM Plan Repository.

Reference to Master DM Plan (if applicable)

As stated in Section IV, Requirement 1.3, DM Plans may be hierarchical. If this DM Plan inherits provisions from a higher-level DM Plan already submitted to the Repository, then this more-specific Plan only needs to provide information that differs from what was provided in the Master DM Plan.

URL of higher-level DM Plan (if any) as submitted to DM Plan Repository:
Always left blank

1. General Description of Data to be Managed

1.1. Name of the Data, data collection Project, or data-producing Program:
2015 WA DNR Lidar DEM: Hood Canal, WA
1.2. Summary description of the data:

No metadata record was provided with the data. This record is populated with information from the GeoTerra technical report downloaded from the Washington Dept. of Natural Resources Washington Lidar Portal. The technical report is available for download from the link provided in the URL section of this metadata record.

Washington Department of Natural Resources (WA DNR) contracted with GeoTerra to collect Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data for the 2015 Hood Canal LiDAR study area. A total of 146 square miles of 8 pulses per square meter (PPSM) LiDAR data were acquired and delivered to the client. The data were collected February 15 - 17, 2015.

Taken From: Item Identification | Abstract
Notes: Only a maximum of 4000 characters will be included.
1.3. Is this a one-time data collection, or an ongoing series of measurements?
One-time data collection
Taken From: Extents / Time Frames | Time Frame Type
Notes: Data collection is considered ongoing if a time frame of type "Continuous" exists.
1.4. Actual or planned temporal coverage of the data:
2015-02-15 to 2015-02-17
Taken From: Extents | Time Frame - Start, Time Frame - End
Notes: All time frames from all extent groups are included.
1.5. Actual or planned geographic coverage of the data:
W: -123.226073, E: -122.743591, N: 47.637422, S: 47.373416
Taken From: Extents | Geographic Area Bounds, Geographic Area Description
Notes: All geographic areas from all extent groups are included.
1.6. Type(s) of data:
(e.g., digital numeric data, imagery, photographs, video, audio, database, tabular data, etc.)
Model (digital)
1.7. Data collection method(s):
(e.g., satellite, airplane, unmanned aerial system, radar, weather station, moored buoy, research vessel, autonomous underwater vehicle, animal tagging, manual surveys, enforcement activities, numerical model, etc.)
No information found
1.8. If data are from a NOAA Observing System of Record, indicate name of system:
Always left blank due to field exemption
1.8.1. If data are from another observing system, please specify:
Always left blank due to field exemption

2. Point of Contact for this Data Management Plan (author or maintainer)

2.1. Name:
NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM)
Taken From: Support Roles (Metadata Contact) | Person
Notes: The name of the Person of the most recent Support Role of type "Metadata Contact" is used. The support role must be in effect.
2.2. Title:
Metadata Contact
Always listed as "Metadata Contact"
2.3. Affiliation or facility:
NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM)
Taken From: Support Roles (Metadata Contact) | Organization
Notes: The name of the Organization of the most recent Support Role of type "Metadata Contact" is used. This field is required if applicable.
2.4. E-mail address:
coastal.info@noaa.gov
Notes: The email address is taken from the address listed for the Person assigned as the Metadata Contact in Support Roles.
2.5. Phone number:
(843) 740-1202
Notes: The phone number is taken from the number listed for the Person assigned as the Metadata Contact in Support Roles. If the phone number is missing or incorrect, please contact your Librarian to update the Person record.

3. Responsible Party for Data Management

Program Managers, or their designee, shall be responsible for assuring the proper management of the data produced by their Program. Please indicate the responsible party below.

3.1. Name:
No information found
Taken From: Support Roles (Data Steward) | Person
Notes: The name of the Person of the most recent Support Role of type "Data Steward" is used. The support role must be in effect.
3.2. Position Title:
Data Steward
Always listed as "Data Steward"

4. Resources

Programs must identify resources within their own budget for managing the data they produce.

4.1. Have resources for management of these data been identified?
Yes
4.2. Approximate percentage of the budget for these data devoted to data management (specify percentage or "unknown"):
Unknown

5. Data Lineage and Quality

NOAA has issued Information Quality Guidelines for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information which it disseminates.

5.1. Processing workflow of the data from collection or acquisition to making it publicly accessible
(describe or provide URL of description):

Lineage Statement:
The NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) downloaded the GeoTiff files from the Washington Lidar Portal.

Process Steps:

  • Lidar Acquisition and Survey Control GeoTerra, Inc. acquired the LiDAR sensor data on the 15th, 16th and 17th of February 2015. A system calibration was performed prior to the project execution. Weather conditions during time of flight were fair with intermittent cloud cover and some moisture in the air. Pitch and roll were less than 3 degrees for all strips acquired. Real time data was monitored closely to review any errors and gaps prior to de-mobilization from the project site. During the aerial LiDAR missions, the Airborne GNSS (AGNSS) technique was employed which entails obtaining the X,Y,Z coordinates of the laser during the aerial acquisition. The data collected during the flight is post-processed into a Smoothed Best Estimate of Trajectory (SBET) binary file of the laser trajectory which is the combined processed data from both GNSS satellite data and Inertial Motion Unit (IMU) data and is used along with the ground control points to geo-reference the laser point cloud during the mapping process. The LiDAR data was acquired utilizing an Optech Orion H sensor with integrated Applanix POS AV GNSS/IMU system mounted in a Cessna 180 aircraft. During the flights the receiver on board the aircraft logged GNSS data at 1 Hz interval and IMU data at 200 Hz interval. The LiDAR acquisition flights occurred on 15, 16, 17-Feb-2015 with two separate flights on each of the three days. After the flight, the GNSS and IMU data was post-processed using NovAtel’s Waypoint Products Group software package Inertial Explorer Version 8.60.4131. The GNSS data was processed using a differential GNSS technique utilizing Washington State Reference Network (WSRN) Continuously Operating reference Stations (CORS) for the ground stations. CORS sites CUSH and/or ELSH were utilized. The published (22-May 2014) WSRN NAD83(2011)(Epoch 2010.0) values were held fixed to control the AGNSS trajectory. The processed GNSS data were then combined with the IMU data using a loosely coupled technique. Lever arm offsets between the IMU and the L1 phase center of the aircraft antenna were measured and held fixed as follows: x=-0.075, y=-0.160, z=1.054 m (x-right, y-fwd, z-up). The lever arm from the IMU to the mirror were held fixed at the internal Optech provided values of x=-0.051, y=-0.153, z=0.003 m (x-right, y-fwd, z-up, IMU->Mirror). This resulted in a precise trajectory of the laser that was output as an NAD83(2011)(Epoch 2010.0) SBET file with data points each 1/200 of a second.
  • Laser Point Post-Processing During the aerial LiDAR missions, the Airborne GNSS (AGNSS) technique was employed which entails obtaining the X,Y,Z coordinates of the laser during the aerial acquisition. The data collected during the flight is post-processed into a Smoothed Best Estimate of Trajectory (SBET) binary file of the laser trajectory which is the combined processed data from both GNSS satellite data and Inertial Motion Unit (IMU) data and is used along with the ground control points to geo-reference the laser point cloud during the mapping process. The LiDAR data was acquired utilizing an Optech Orion H sensor with integrated Applanix POS AV GNSS/IMU system. During the flights the receiver on board the aircraft logged GNSS data at 1 Hz interval and IMU data at 200 Hz interval. The LiDAR acquisition flights occurred on 15, 16, 17-Feb-2015 with two separate flights on each of the three days. After the flight, the GNSS and IMU data was post-processed using NovAtel’s Waypoint Products Group software package Inertial Explorer Version 8.60.4131. The GNSS data was processed using a differential GNSS technique utilizing Washington State Reference Network (WSRN) Continuously Operating reference Stations (CORS) for the ground stations. CORS sites CUSH and/or ELSH were utilized. The published (22-May 2014) WSRN NAD83(2011)(Epoch 2010.0) values were held fixed to control the AGNSS trajectory. The processed GNSS data were then combined with the IMU data using a loosely coupled technique. Lever arm offsets between the IMU and the L1 phase center of the aircraft antenna were measured and held fixed as follows: x=-0.075, y=-0.160, z=1.054 m (x-right, y-fwd, z-up). The lever arm from the IMU to the mirror were held fixed at the internal Optech provided values of x=-0.051, y=-0.153, z=0.003 m (x-right, y-fwd, z-up, IMU->Mirror). This resulted in a precise trajectory of the laser that was output as an NAD83(2011)(Epoch 2010.0) SBET file with data points each 1/200 of a second. Raw range data from the sensor was decoded using Optech’s LMS software. Instrument corrections were applied to the laser ranges and scan angles, and then the range files were split into the separate flight lines. The laser point computation uses the results of decoding, description of the instrument and location of the aircraft (from the SBET file) as input data and calculates the coordinates of points for each laser pulse from the sensor.
  • Relative and Absolute Adjustment Relative and absolute adjustment of all strips was accomplished using Optech’s LMS software. The software performs automated extraction of planar surfaces from the cloud of points according to specified parameters per project. Tie plane determination establishes the correspondence between planes in overlapping flight lines. All plane centers of all lines that form a block are sorted into a grid. Planes from overlapping flight lines, co-located to within an acceptable tolerance are then tested for correspondence. A set of appropriate tie planes is selected for the self-calibration. Selection criteria are size and shape, number of laser points, slope, orientation with respect to flight direction, location within the flight line and fitting error. All these criteria have an effect as they determine the geometry of the adjustment. Self-Calibration parameters are then calculated. After they are retrieved they are used to re-calculate the laser point coordinates (x,y,z). The planar surfaces are re-calculated as well for a final adjustment. Point to plane analysis was performed to assess the internal fit of the data block. For each tie plane, the mean values are computed for each flight line that covers the tie plane. Mean values of the point to plane distances are plotted over scan angle. After a tight relative fit was achieved, an absolute vertical offset was calculated using surveyed control points. The algorithm computes an average value for the height differences for all control points by comparison to the laser points within a specified radius around the control point. Calculations were performed on 15 control points.
  • Point Cloud Classification Once the absolute point cloud adjustment was achieved with desired accuracy, all strips were exported from Optech LMS into LAS format. Data in LAS format was first automatically classified followed by strict QC procedures. The entire area was cut into working tiles of a manageable size and manually checked and edited using LP360 software to correct any misclassification using the following methods: i. Selected boxes of rotating 3D point clouds, viewed with color-coded classification points. ii. Point clouds viewed in profile view iii. Temporary creation of TIN over ground points to assist in identifying points incorrectly classified as ground. Following classes were delineated in the process of classification: 01_Unclassified - Temporary (cars, debris, etc.) 02_Ground 03_Low Vegetation - vegetation level that falls within 0 - 10 ft from the ground 04_Medium Vegetation - vegetation level that falls within 10 - 20 ft from the ground 05_High Vegetation - vegetation level that falls within 20 ft and above ground 06_Buildings and Associated Structures 09_Water - points reflected off water bodies 10_Unclassified - Permanent (fences, poles, guardrails, bridges, etc.)
  • Final, classified points were trimmed to the project boundary buffered by 100 feet and cut into final corridor delivery tiles to match the orthophoto delivery tile scheme. GIS format: Raster Grid of ground surface in ArcGIS format
  • 2022-05-23 00:00:00 - The NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) downloaded 11 raster DEM files in GeoTiff format from the Washington Lidar Portal. The data were in Washington State Plane South NAD83(HARN), US survey feet coordinates and NAVD88 (Geoid12A) elevations in feet. The bare earth raster files were at a 3 feet grid spacing. No metadata record was provided with the data. This record is populated with information from the GeoTerra technical report downloaded from the Washington Dept. of Natural Resources Washington Lidar Portal. OCM performed the following processing on the data for Digital Coast storage and provisioning purposes: 1. Used internal an script to assign the EPSG codes (Horizontal EPSG: 2927 and Vertical EPSG: 6360) to the GeoTiff formatted files. 2. Copied the files to https.
5.1.1. If data at different stages of the workflow, or products derived from these data, are subject to a separate data management plan, provide reference to other plan:
Always left blank
5.2. Quality control procedures employed
(describe or provide URL of description):
No information found

6. Data Documentation

The EDMC Data Documentation Procedural Directive requires that NOAA data be well documented, specifies the use of ISO 19115 and related standards for documentation of new data, and provides links to resources and tools for metadata creation and validation.

6.1. Does metadata comply with EDMC Data Documentation directive?
No
Notes: All required DMP fields must be populated and valid to comply with the directive.
6.1.1. If metadata are non-existent or non-compliant, please explain:

Missing/invalid information:

  • 1.7. Data collection method(s)
  • 3.1. Responsible Party for Data Management
  • 5.2. Quality control procedures employed
  • 7.1.1. If data are not available or has limitations, has a Waiver been filed?
  • 7.4. Approximate delay between data collection and dissemination
  • 8.3. Approximate delay between data collection and submission to an archive facility
Notes: Required DMP fields that are not populated or invalid are listed here.
6.2. Name of organization or facility providing metadata hosting:
NMFS Office of Science and Technology
Always listed as "NMFS Office of Science and Technology"
6.2.1. If service is needed for metadata hosting, please indicate:
Always left blank
6.3. URL of metadata folder or data catalog, if known:
Always listed as the URL to the InPort Data Set record
6.4. Process for producing and maintaining metadata
(describe or provide URL of description):
Metadata produced and maintained in accordance with the NOAA Data Documentation Procedural Directive: https://nosc.noaa.gov/EDMC/DAARWG/docs/EDMC_PD-Data_Documentation_v1.pdf
Always listed with the above statement

7. Data Access

NAO 212-15 states that access to environmental data may only be restricted when distribution is explicitly limited by law, regulation, policy (such as those applicable to personally identifiable information or protected critical infrastructure information or proprietary trade information) or by security requirements. The EDMC Data Access Procedural Directive contains specific guidance, recommends the use of open-standard, interoperable, non-proprietary web services, provides information about resources and tools to enable data access, and includes a Waiver to be submitted to justify any approach other than full, unrestricted public access.

7.1. Do these data comply with the Data Access directive?
Yes
7.1.1. If the data are not to be made available to the public at all, or with limitations, has a Waiver (Appendix A of Data Access directive) been filed?
No information found
7.1.2. If there are limitations to public data access, describe how data are protected from unauthorized access or disclosure:

None

7.2. Name of organization of facility providing data access:
NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM)
Taken From: Support Roles (Distributor) | Organization
Notes: The name of the Organization of the most recent Support Role of type "Distributor" is used. The support role must be in effect. This information is not required if an approved access waiver exists for this data.
7.2.1. If data hosting service is needed, please indicate:
Taken From: Data Management | If data hosting service is needed, please indicate
Notes: This field is required if a Distributor has not been specified.
7.2.2. URL of data access service, if known:
Taken From: Distribution Info | Download URL
Notes: All URLs listed in the Distribution Info section will be included. This field is required if applicable.
7.3. Data access methods or services offered:

Data is available online for bulk and custom downloads.

7.4. Approximate delay between data collection and dissemination:
No information found
7.4.1. If delay is longer than latency of automated processing, indicate under what authority data access is delayed:

8. Data Preservation and Protection

The NOAA Procedure for Scientific Records Appraisal and Archive Approval describes how to identify, appraise and decide what scientific records are to be preserved in a NOAA archive.

8.1. Actual or planned long-term data archive location:
(Specify NCEI-MD, NCEI-CO, NCEI-NC, NCEI-MS, World Data Center (WDC) facility, Other, To Be Determined, Unable to Archive, or No Archiving Intended)
NCEI_CO
8.1.1. If World Data Center or Other, specify:
Taken From: Data Management | Actual or planned long-term data archive location
Notes: This field is required if archive location is World Data Center or Other.
8.1.2. If To Be Determined, Unable to Archive or No Archiving Intended, explain:
Taken From: Data Management | If To Be Determined, Unable to Archive or No Archiving Intended, explain
Notes: This field is required if archive location is To Be Determined, Unable to Archive, or No Archiving Intended.
8.2. Data storage facility prior to being sent to an archive facility (if any):
Office for Coastal Management - Charleston, SC
Taken From: Physical Location | Organization, City, State, Location Description
Notes: Physical Location Organization, City and State are required, or a Location Description is required.
8.3. Approximate delay between data collection and submission to an archive facility:
No information found
8.4. How will the data be protected from accidental or malicious modification or deletion prior to receipt by the archive?
Discuss data back-up, disaster recovery/contingency planning, and off-site data storage relevant to the data collection

Data is backed up to tape and to cloud storage.

9. Additional Line Office or Staff Office Questions

Line and Staff Offices may extend this template by inserting additional questions in this section.

Always left blank