Data Management Plan (Deprecated)
GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:73852 | Published / External
This is an outdated version of the NOAA Data Management Plan template. InPort now supports a dedicated Data Management Plan Catalog Item type, which is up-to-date with the latest NOAA DMP template. The ability to generate Data Management Plans from Data Sets will be discontinued in a future release. Please see the Data Management Plan Help Guide to learn more.
Data Management Plan
DMP Template v2.0.1 (2015-01-01)
Please provide the following information, and submit to the NOAA DM Plan Repository.Reference to Master DM Plan (if applicable)
As stated in Section IV, Requirement 1.3, DM Plans may be hierarchical. If this DM Plan inherits provisions from a higher-level DM Plan already submitted to the Repository, then this more-specific Plan only needs to provide information that differs from what was provided in the Master DM Plan.
1. General Description of Data to be Managed
This dataset is comprised of proteomics results to better understand gamete compatibility factors. The dataset includes gametes from three species, Acropora cervicornis, Acropora Palmata, Orbicella faveolate, which were collected in three locations near Key Largo, Florida (Ofav: Horseshoe Reef, Apal: North Dry Rocks, Acer: Carysfort) during three different time periods (August 2022, August 2023, and September 2023).
Notes: Only a maximum of 4000 characters will be included.
Notes: Data collection is considered ongoing if a time frame of type "Continuous" exists.
Notes: All time frames from all extent groups are included.
Reef Location Bounding Box where corals were originally sourced.
Notes: All geographic areas from all extent groups are included.
(e.g., digital numeric data, imagery, photographs, video, audio, database, tabular data, etc.)
(e.g., satellite, airplane, unmanned aerial system, radar, weather station, moored buoy, research vessel, autonomous underwater vehicle, animal tagging, manual surveys, enforcement activities, numerical model, etc.)
Platform(s): MaxQuant Software
2. Point of Contact for this Data Management Plan (author or maintainer)
Notes: The name of the Person of the most recent Support Role of type "Metadata Contact" is used. The support role must be in effect.
Notes: The name of the Organization of the most recent Support Role of type "Metadata Contact" is used. This field is required if applicable.
3. Responsible Party for Data Management
Program Managers, or their designee, shall be responsible for assuring the proper management of the data produced by their Program. Please indicate the responsible party below.
Notes: The name of the Person of the most recent Support Role of type "Data Steward" is used. The support role must be in effect.
4. Resources
Programs must identify resources within their own budget for managing the data they produce.
5. Data Lineage and Quality
NOAA has issued Information Quality Guidelines for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information which it disseminates.
(describe or provide URL of description):
Lineage Statement:
These data were generated after collecting gametes spawned from Acropora palmata, Acorpora cervicornis, and Orbicella faveolata off the coast of Key Largo in August 2022 and August/September 2023.
Process Steps:
- Fertilization trials were conducted by performing reciprocal crosses. Gamete bundles from a single coral genet were collected in a 15 mL tube and incubated at room temperature until bundles lyse. Sperm were transferred to a clean 15 mL tube without disrupting ova. Sperm were diluted and concentration was calculated using a cellometer. Sperm were diluted and added to the appropriate vials. Ova were washed with artificial sea water and added to the appropriate vials. The gametes were incubated together for 4-6 hours prior to fixing for counting. (Citation: Collection of gametes in Key Largo 2022 and 2023)
- After gametes were combined for fertilization assays, the remaining sperm and ova were preserved for other molecular analyses. For glycan imaging, sperm and ova were fixed and stored at 4*C until processing. (Citation: Collection of gametes in Key Largo 2022 and 2023)
- Gametes from collected bundles were frozen at -20*C in protein lysis buffer (5% SDS with protease inhibitor). The proteins were extracted by tip sonicating on ice and then centrifuged at 2,000 rcf for 5 minutes. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube and then centrifuged at 10,000 rcf for 10 minutes. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube and 50 ul was reserved for protein quantification. Protein was quantified using Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit. (Citation: Collection of gametes in Key Largo 2022 and 2023)
- Based on quantification, a volume equivalent to 100 ug was diluted to a volume of 80 ul in 5% SDS. Samples were reduced with 10 ul DTT at 60*C for 10 minutes. After cooling to room temperature (10 minutes), samples were alkylated with calcium acetamide and incubating in dark for 30 minutes. Alkylation was quenched by adding 12% phosphoric acid. Protein samples were digested following Protofi's S-trap protocol, using a 1:20 trypsin:sample ratio and incubating for 2 hours at 47*C. The resulting peptides were evaporated until dry and resuspended in 100 ul 0.1% formic acid in water. Peptide concentration was quantified using Pierce Quantitative Fluorometric Peptide Assay kit. (Citation: Collection of gametes in Key Largo 2022 and 2023)
- Peptides in solution were sent to University of Arkansas and analyzed using LC-MS/MS analysis. Peptide and proteins were identified using Mascot running against a known Orbicella faveolata annotated metagenome. Resulting search data was imported to Scaffold and identifications were accepted at <1% local FDR for peptides and proteins. Normalized spectral abundance factor was derived from normalized spectral counts and intensity based on absolute quantification (iBAQ) intensity data. (Citation: Collection of gametes in Key Largo 2022 and 2023)
(describe or provide URL of description):
Proteomic Analysis
Peptides digested from isolated proteins were identified from annotated genomes
6. Data Documentation
The EDMC Data Documentation Procedural Directive requires that NOAA data be well documented, specifies the use of ISO 19115 and related standards for documentation of new data, and provides links to resources and tools for metadata creation and validation.
Missing/invalid information:
- 1.6. Type(s) of data
- 7.4. Approximate delay between data collection and dissemination
- 8.3. Approximate delay between data collection and submission to an archive facility
(describe or provide URL of description):
7. Data Access
NAO 212-15 states that access to environmental data may only be restricted when distribution is explicitly limited by law, regulation, policy (such as those applicable to personally identifiable information or protected critical infrastructure information or proprietary trade information) or by security requirements. The EDMC Data Access Procedural Directive contains specific guidance, recommends the use of open-standard, interoperable, non-proprietary web services, provides information about resources and tools to enable data access, and includes a Waiver to be submitted to justify any approach other than full, unrestricted public access.
Will become publicly available after publication of a peer-reviewed manuscript.
Notes: The name of the Organization of the most recent Support Role of type "Distributor" is used. The support role must be in effect. This information is not required if an approved access waiver exists for this data.
Notes: This field is required if a Distributor has not been specified.
Notes: All URLs listed in the Distribution Info section will be included. This field is required if applicable.
Project Name: Proteomics of gametes collected from Acropora cervicornis, Acropora palmata, Orbicella faveolata
Project accession: PXD057823
Token: DJjiY09bxcWh
Project DOI: Not applicable
Notes: This field is required if applicable.
8. Data Preservation and Protection
The NOAA Procedure for Scientific Records Appraisal and Archive Approval describes how to identify, appraise and decide what scientific records are to be preserved in a NOAA archive.
(Specify NCEI-MD, NCEI-CO, NCEI-NC, NCEI-MS, World Data Center (WDC) facility, Other, To Be Determined, Unable to Archive, or No Archiving Intended)
Notes: This field is required if archive location is World Data Center or Other.
Notes: This field is required if archive location is To Be Determined, Unable to Archive, or No Archiving Intended.
Hollings Marine Laboratory
Notes: Physical Location Organization, City and State are required, or a Location Description is required.
Discuss data back-up, disaster recovery/contingency planning, and off-site data storage relevant to the data collection
NCCOS IT Policy
9. Additional Line Office or Staff Office Questions
Line and Staff Offices may extend this template by inserting additional questions in this section.