Search Help Show/Hide Menu
Summary
Item Identification
Keywords
Physical Location
Data Set Info
Support Roles
Extents
Spatial Info
Access Info
Distribution Info
URLs
Activity Log
Tech Environment
Data Quality
Lineage
Child Items
Catalog Details

Summary

Short Citation
National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, 2024: National Status and Trends, Benthic Surveillance Project Fluorescent Aromatic Compounds (FAC) Data, 1984-1991, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/39259.
Full Citation Examples

Abstract

The National Status and Trends (NSandT) Benthic Surveillance Fluorescent Aromatic Compounds (FAC) file reports the trace concentrations of Fluorescent Aromatic Compounds. The presence of FACs in fish liver and bile indicate exposure to toxins, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The Benthic Surveillance Fluorescent Aromatic Compounds file is constructed as a horizontally formatted table.

Distribution Information

Access Constraints:

None

Use Constraints:

NOAA requests that all individuals who download NSandT data acknowledge the source of these data in any reports, papers, or presentations. If you publish these data, please include a statement similar to: "Some or all of the data described in this article were produced by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration through its National Status and Trends Program".

Controlled Theme Keywords

environment

Contact Information

Point of Contact
NCCOS Scientific Data Coordinator
NCCOS.data@noaa.gov

Metadata Contact
NCCOS Scientific Data Coordinator
NCCOS.data@noaa.gov

Extents

Geographic Area 1

-166.5° W, -67.3° E, 70.5° N, 25.6° S

Time Frame 1
1984 - 1991

Item Identification

Title: National Status and Trends, Benthic Surveillance Project Fluorescent Aromatic Compounds (FAC) Data, 1984-1991, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science
Short Name: bsfac_h
Status: Completed
Publication Date: 1991
Abstract:

The National Status and Trends (NSandT) Benthic Surveillance Fluorescent Aromatic Compounds (FAC) file reports the trace concentrations of Fluorescent Aromatic Compounds. The presence of FACs in fish liver and bile indicate exposure to toxins, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The Benthic Surveillance Fluorescent Aromatic Compounds file is constructed as a horizontally formatted table.

Purpose:

In response to concerns over environmental quality of the Nation's coastal and estuarine ecosystems, NOAA created the National Status and Trends (NSandT) Program in 1984. From 1984 through 1993, the Benthic Surveillance Project monitored chemical concentrations in the livers (and for metabolites of PAH's in the bile) of bottom-dwelling fish and in sediments at the sites of fish capture. The Benthic Surveillance Project also measured the biological effects of contaminant exposure, primarily as prevalence's of toxicopathic liver diseases.

Notes:

983

Keywords

Theme Keywords

Thesaurus Keyword
ISO 19115 Topic Category
environment
UNCONTROLLED
None Bioindicator
None Chemical contaminants of benthic fish
None Coastal Monitoring
None FAC
None Fluorescent Aromatic Compounds
None NCCOS Research Data Type > Field Observation
None NCCOS Research Priority > Long-term Monitoring
None NCCOS Research Priority > Stressors, Impacts, Mitigation, and Restoration (SIMR)
None NCCOS Research Topic > Bioeffects/Toxicity
None NCCOS Research Topic > Chemical Contaminants
None NCCOS Research Topic > Monitoring
None NSandT
None Oceans
None Pollution

Spatial Keywords

Thesaurus Keyword
UNCONTROLLED
None Apalachicola Bay, St. George Island
None Baltimore Harbor, Brewerton Channel
None Barataria Bay, Barataria Pass
None Beaufort Sea, Oliktok Point
None Bering Sea, Dutch Harbor
None Biscayne Bay, Chicken Key
None Boca de Quadra, Bacrian Point
None Bodega Bay, North
None Boston Harbor, Deer Island
None Buzzards Bay, West Island
None Calcasieu River, Bayou d Inde
None Cape Elizabeth, Richmond Island
None Cape Fear River, Horseshoe Shaol
None Casco Bay, Great Chebeague Island
None Charleston Harbor, Coastal
None Charlotte Harbor, Cape Haze
None Chesapeake Bay, Chester River
None Choctawhatchee Bay, Choctawhatchee Bay
None Chukchi Sea, Red Dog Mine
None Columbia River, Desdemona Sands
None Coos Bay, North Bend
None Corpus Christi Bay, Long Reef
None Dana Point Harbor, Outside
None Dana Point, Inside Harbor
None Delaware Bay, Brandywine Shoal
None Estero Bay, Estero Bay
None Frenchmans Bay, Long Porcupine Island
None Galveston Bay, East Bay
None Great Bay, Intracoastal Waterway
None Gulf of Alaska, Kamishak Bay
None Heron Bay, Heron Bay
None Hudson River, Englewood Cliffs
None Humboldt Bay, Indian Island
None Johns Bay, Pemaquid Neck
None Lavaca Bay, Point Comfort
None Long Island Sound, Lloyd Point
None Lower Laguna Madre, Laguna Heights
None Lutak Inlet, Chilkoot River Mouth
None Machias Bay, Chance Island
None Massachusetts Bay, Plymouth Entrance
None Merrimac River, Plum Island
None Mission Bay, Outside
None Mississippi River Delta, Head of Passes
None Mobile Bay, North Point
None Monterey Bay, Indian Head Beach
None Nahku Bay, East Side
None Narragansett Bay, Conanicut Island
None NCCOS Research Location > Geographic Area > Coastal Ocean
None NCCOS Research Location > Region > Alaska
None NCCOS Research Location > Region > East Coast
None NCCOS Research Location > Region > Gulf of Mexico
None NCCOS Research Location > Region > West Coast
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > Alabama
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > Alaska
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > California
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > Connecticut
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > Delaware
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > Florida
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > Georgia
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > Louisiana
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > Maine
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > Maryland
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > Massachusetts
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > Mississippi
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > New Jersey
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > New York
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > North Carolina
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > Oregon
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > Rhode Island
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > South Carolina
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > Texas
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > Virginia
None NCCOS Research Location > U.S. States and Territories > Washington
None New Bedford Harbor, Clarks Point
None Niantic Bay, Black Point
None Norton Sound, Nome
None Pamlico Sound, Jones Bay
None Pascagoula River, Escatawpa River
None Penobscot Bay, Colt Head Island
None Pensacola Bay, Pensacola Bay
None Prince William Sound, Port Valdez
None Puget Sound, Commencement Bay
None Raritan Bay, East Reach
None Round Island, Round Island
None Salem Harbor, Folger Point
None San Antonio Bay, Mosquito Point
None San Diego Bay, Harbor Island
None San Francisco Bay, Castro Creek
None San Luis Obispo Bay, San Luis Obispo Bay
None San Pedro Bay, Cerritos Channel
None Santa Monica Bay, Manhatten Beach
None Sapelo Sound, Dog Hammock
None Savannah River, Elba Island
None Skagway, Skagway River
None St. Andrews Bay, Military Point
None St. Johns River, Arlington Channel
None St. Lucie River, Stuart
None Tampa Bay, Northern Tampa Bay
None U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone

Physical Location

Organization: National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science
City: Silver Spring
State/Province: MD

Data Set Information

Data Set Scope Code: Data Set
Maintenance Frequency: None Planned
Data Presentation Form: Table (digital)
Distribution Liability:

None

Support Roles

Data Steward

CC ID: 463225
Date Effective From: 1991
Date Effective To:
Contact (Position): NCCOS Scientific Data Coordinator
Email Address: NCCOS.data@noaa.gov

Distributor

CC ID: 463227
Date Effective From: 1991
Date Effective To:
Contact (Position): NCCOS Scientific Data Coordinator
Email Address: NCCOS.data@noaa.gov

Metadata Contact

CC ID: 463228
Date Effective From: 1991
Date Effective To:
Contact (Position): NCCOS Scientific Data Coordinator
Email Address: NCCOS.data@noaa.gov

Point of Contact

CC ID: 463226
Date Effective From: 1991
Date Effective To:
Contact (Position): NCCOS Scientific Data Coordinator
Email Address: NCCOS.data@noaa.gov

Principal Investigator

CC ID: 463229
Date Effective From: 1991
Date Effective To:
Contact (Person): Piniak, Greg
Email Address: greg.piniak@noaa.gov

Extents

Currentness Reference: Publication Date

Extent Group 1

Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 1

CC ID: 463232
W° Bound: -166.5
E° Bound: -67.3
N° Bound: 70.5
S° Bound: 25.6

Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 1

CC ID: 463231
Time Frame Type: Range
Start: 1984
End: 1991

Spatial Information

Spatial Representation

Representations Used

Vector: Yes

Access Information

Security Class: Unclassified
Data Access Constraints:

None

Data Use Constraints:

NOAA requests that all individuals who download NSandT data acknowledge the source of these data in any reports, papers, or presentations. If you publish these data, please include a statement similar to: "Some or all of the data described in this article were produced by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration through its National Status and Trends Program".

Distribution Information

Distribution 1

CC ID: 463234
Download URL: https://products.coastalscience.noaa.gov/collections/ltmonitoring/nsandt/default.aspx
Distributor:
Description:

Live Data and Maps

File Type (Deprecated): XML
Distribution Format: XML (Structured Text)

Distribution 2

CC ID: 463233
Download URL: https://products.coastalscience.noaa.gov/collections/ltmonitoring/nsandt/default.aspx
Distributor:
Description:

Live Data and Maps

File Type (Deprecated): ASCII
Distribution Format: Text (Unstructured)

URLs

Activity Log

Activity Log 1

CC ID: 463350
Activity Date/Time: 2016-11-16
Description:

Date that the source FGDC record was last modified.

Activity Log 2

CC ID: 463349
Activity Date/Time: 2017-04-05
Description:

Converted from FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata (version FGDC-STD-001-1998) using 'fgdc_to_inport_xml.pl' script. Contact Tyler Christensen (NOS) for details.

Activity Log 3

CC ID: 584195
Activity Date/Time: 2017-09-13
Description:

Partial upload of Spatial Info section only.

Activity Log 4

CC ID: 716625
Activity Date/Time: 2018-02-08
Description:

Partial upload of Positional Accuracy fields only.

Technical Environment

Description:

Microsoft Windows 2000 Version 5.0 (Build 2195) Service Pack 3; ESRI ArcCatalog 8.3.0.800

Data Quality

Accuracy:

The quality of the analytical data generated by the NSandT Program is overseen by the QA Project component, which has been in operation since 1985 and is designed to document sampling and analytical procedures, and to reduce intralaboratory and interlaboratory variation. The QA Project documentation will facilitate comparisons among different monitoring programs with similar QA activities and thus will extend the temporal and spatial scale of such programs. To document laboratory expertise, the QA Project requires all NSandT laboratories to participate in a continuing series of intercomparison exercises utilizing a variety of materials. The organic analytical intercomparison exercises are coordinated by the NIST, and the inorganic exercises by the National Research Council (NRC) of Canada. Details of quality assurance for the Benthic Surveillance Program can be found in Lauenstein and Cantillo, 1993. The analytical instruments were calibrated by standard laboratory procedures including: constructing calibration curves, running blank and spiked quality control samples, and analyzing standard reference materials.

Horizontal Positional Accuracy:

The same kind of field/site data have been supplied since the start of the Benthic Surveillance Project, in 1984. Original site coordinates were derived from Loran-C time conversions. Early sites information resulting from Loran-C was converted from time delay information to latitudes and longitudes. These earlier data may be suspect when sites were located close to large structures that could have interfered with accurate time delays. When GPS was first available the signal was intentionally degraded so earlier coordinate information, even if it resulted from GPS, is not as accurate as data would be today.Because fish are not sessile, fish trawls have been made along different tracks in the water body of interest. The latitude/longitude coordinates provided in this file represent a site center and trawling occurs within a 1 km radius of this location.

Completeness Report:

Analytical protocols for the quantification of the NSandT organic contaminants were developed by MacLeod et al. (1984) at the NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) Northwest Fisheries Science Center in Seattle, WA. These methods were prescribed for all NMFS laboratories participating in the Benthic Surveillance Program, when it began in 1984. Three NMFS laboratories used these methods in 1984: Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC), Gloucester, MA; Southeast Fisheries Science Center (SEFSC), Charleston, SC; and Northwest Fisheries Science Center (NWFSC), Seattle WA. The philosophy associated with the development of exacting protocols for the quantification of organic contaminants was that the same analytical methods would increase the likelihood of data being comparable among laboratories. Even though interlaboratory comparisons were initiated at the start of the NSandT Program, it was felt that a method-driven QA and analytical effort for the quantification of organic contaminants was the best way to begin. In 1985, the protocols were updated by MacLeod et al., 1985. This method has been further edited and can be found in volume 1 of Technical Memorandum 71. The NSandT Mussel Watch Project (MWP) began in 1986. At that time, both the MWP and BSP laboratories were allowed to use any analytical method if it could be proven that the proposed alternate procedure was equal to or better than earlier MacLeod et al. (1984,1985) methods.

Conceptual Consistency:

Fish in the correct size range were dissected in the onboard laboratory immediately after collection. This ensured that a determination could be made regarding whether sufficient material had been collected and whether the sample material was of high quality. If either one of these criteria was not met, the opportunity existed to continue sample collection. Also, field dissection minimizes contamination problems associated with dissection of frozen fish samples. Frozen fish tissues when thawed, may lose their integrity and one tissue type may contaminate another (e.g., a liver sample could be contaminated by PAH metabolites from the bile duct). Because most fish were dissected onboard ship, a special effort was made to develop an environment as close to clean-room conditions as possible. All fish were dissected in positive pressure laminar flow hoods. Air was drawn into the laminar flow hood from above and filtered by a high efficiency particle attenuator (HEPA) filter before it passed over the fish samples. Stainless steel tools were used to dissect fish for organic analysis. Titanium tools were used to dissect fish for trace metal analyses because tools made of this element do not pose the problem of introducing nickel, chromium, and/or iron into the specimens to be analyzed. Specimens were analyzed for the latter three elements by the NSandT Program. After knives had been sharpened, and before dissections began at a new site or of a new species, the dissection equipment was thoroughly cleaned with detergent solution, rinsed extensively with tap water, rinsed in distilled or high-purity water (i.e., milli-Q or HPLC-grade water), rinsed with isopropanol (dichloromethane before 1990) under a fume hood, followed by a rinse with distilled water, and placed on a similarly cleaned Teflon cutting board that was allowed to air-dry in the laminar-flow hood. Between individual fish of the same species at the same site, the tools were rinsed with distilled water before any fluid or tissue had a chance to dry on the knife. Sexually mature fish were primarily used in this program, determined by size of each species.

Lineage

Process Steps

Process Step 1

CC ID: 463221
Description:

The primary collection apparatus was Otter trawls. Occasionally, along the Southeast and Gulf Coasts, fish were taken with seine nets, gill nets, or with hook and line. These alternate collection methods were necessary because larger fish, such as older Atlantic croaker, were able to avoid an Otter trawl, or were found in untrawlable habitats such as shallow water, along marsh edges, and over oyster reefs. Fish in the correct size range were dissected in the onboard laboratory immediately after collection. This ensured that a determination could be made regarding whether sufficient material had been collected and whether the sample material was of high quality. If either one of these criteria was not met, the opportunity existed to continue sample collection. Because most fish were dissected onboard ship, a special effort was made to develop an environment as close to clean-room conditions as possible. All fish were dissected in positive pressure laminar flow hoods. Air was drawn into the laminar flow hood from above and filtered by a high efficiency particle attenuator (HEPA) filter before it passed over the fish samples. Stainless steel tools were used to dissect fish for organic analysis. Titanium tools were used to dissect fish for trace metal analyses because tools made of this element do not pose the problem of introducing nickel, chromium, and/or iron into the specimens to be analyzed. Specimens were analyzed for the latter three elements by the NSandT Program. After knives had been sharpened, and before dissections began at a new site or of a new species, the dissection equipment was thoroughly cleaned with detergent solution, rinsed extensively with tap water, rinsed in distilled or high-purity water (i.e., milli-Q or HPLC-grade water), rinsed with isopropanol (dichloromethane before 1990) under a fume hood, followed by a rinse with distilled water, and placed on a similarly cleaned Teflon cutting board that was allowed to air-dry in the laminar-flow hood. Between individual fish of the same species at the same site, the tools were rinsed with distilled water before any fluid or tissue had a chance to dry on the knife. Sexually mature fish were primarily used in this program, determined by size of each species.Process Date Range is 1984 - 1991

Process Date/Time: 1991-01-01 00:00:00

Child Items

Catalog Details

Catalog Item ID: 39259
GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:39259
Metadata Record Created By: Tyler Christensen
Metadata Record Created: 2017-04-05 12:51+0000
Metadata Record Last Modified By: SysAdmin InPortAdmin
Metadata Record Last Modified: 2023-10-17 16:12+0000
Metadata Record Published: 2018-02-08
Owner Org: NCCOS
Metadata Publication Status: Published Externally
Do Not Publish?: N
Metadata Last Review Date: 2018-02-08
Metadata Review Frequency: 1 Year
Metadata Next Review Date: 2019-02-08