Data Management Plan (Deprecated)
GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:48357 | Published / External
This is an outdated version of the NOAA Data Management Plan template. InPort now supports a dedicated Data Management Plan Catalog Item type, which is up-to-date with the latest NOAA DMP template. The ability to generate Data Management Plans from Data Sets will be discontinued in a future release. Please see the Data Management Plan Help Guide to learn more.
Data Management Plan
DMP Template v2.0.1 (2015-01-01)
Please provide the following information, and submit to the NOAA DM Plan Repository.Reference to Master DM Plan (if applicable)
As stated in Section IV, Requirement 1.3, DM Plans may be hierarchical. If this DM Plan inherits provisions from a higher-level DM Plan already submitted to the Repository, then this more-specific Plan only needs to provide information that differs from what was provided in the Master DM Plan.
1. General Description of Data to be Managed
The probability rating which covers landcover mapping provides a continuum of wetness from dry to water. The layer is not a wetland classification but provides the wetland likelihood at a specific location. The rating was developed through a modelling process combining multiple GIS and remote sensing data sets including soil characteristics, elevation, existing wetland inventories, hydrographical extents and satellite imagery .
Data available via download from the Digital Coast, either from customizable download in NOAA's Digital Access Viewer or FTP download by regions.
Notes: Only a maximum of 4000 characters will be included.
Notes: Data collection is considered ongoing if a time frame of type "Continuous" exists.
Notes: All time frames from all extent groups are included.
Notes: All geographic areas from all extent groups are included.
(e.g., digital numeric data, imagery, photographs, video, audio, database, tabular data, etc.)
(e.g., satellite, airplane, unmanned aerial system, radar, weather station, moored buoy, research vessel, autonomous underwater vehicle, animal tagging, manual surveys, enforcement activities, numerical model, etc.)
2. Point of Contact for this Data Management Plan (author or maintainer)
Notes: The name of the Person of the most recent Support Role of type "Metadata Contact" is used. The support role must be in effect.
Notes: The name of the Organization of the most recent Support Role of type "Metadata Contact" is used. This field is required if applicable.
3. Responsible Party for Data Management
Program Managers, or their designee, shall be responsible for assuring the proper management of the data produced by their Program. Please indicate the responsible party below.
Notes: The name of the Person of the most recent Support Role of type "Data Steward" is used. The support role must be in effect.
4. Resources
Programs must identify resources within their own budget for managing the data they produce.
5. Data Lineage and Quality
NOAA has issued Information Quality Guidelines for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information which it disseminates.
(describe or provide URL of description):
Process Steps:
- 2010-03-01 00:00:00 - Data Collection: This involved the acquisition of pre-existing data sets to be used in the creation of the probability rating. These data were all sourced from national geospatial programs and most were available at no charge. The input data sets and their sources are: National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) from US Fisheries and Wildlife, National Hydrology Data set (NHD) from USGS, Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) from Natural Resource Conservation Service, 30m National Elevation Data set (NED) from USGS, and satellite imagery (Landsat, but 2009 NAIP imagery for state of Washington). Where available, wetland maps from County GIS Departments were used for validation.
- 2010-03-01 00:00:00 - Pre-process data: Each data sets mentioned above was preprocessed in preparation for the comprehensive modelling step (see the last process step). This included converting vector data (NWI and NHD areas & flowlines) into the ERDAS IMAGINE raster format and resampling to a 30m spatial resolution. The SSURGO data was processed to create a percent hydric soils layer ranging from 0-100. Additionally, a slope and curvature models were derived from the 30m NED. Cloud free Landsat 7 TM scenes were acquired for each regional project. The Hydric Soils and NHD raster were then modelled based on topographic characteristics to remove areas that did not support wetlands such as areas with high slopes and convexity. The NWI rasterized polygons were recoded to give each class a rating with a higher rating designated to the Woody wetland classes. The resulting raster layers from these preprocesing steps provided the building blocks for the probability rating.
- 2014-04-23 00:00:00 - The final step was to generate a comprehensive probability rating that combined information from the various modelled layers. Multiple models were constructed that weighted the NWI rasterized polygons and linear data, Topo modelled Soils, Topo modelled NHD Polygons and Topo modelled image segments that intersected with NHD flowlines. No single model was developed to combine all of the processed data; instead, many models were developed that contributed to the final rating. As a result, based on the combination of: inclusion in the NWI, percentage of hydric soils and location in the floodplain a layer was generated with values ranging from 0 (Unlikely) to 8 (highly likely). Areas of open water were designated as 10.
(describe or provide URL of description):
6. Data Documentation
The EDMC Data Documentation Procedural Directive requires that NOAA data be well documented, specifies the use of ISO 19115 and related standards for documentation of new data, and provides links to resources and tools for metadata creation and validation.
Missing/invalid information:
- 1.7. Data collection method(s)
- 3.1. Responsible Party for Data Management
- 4.1. Have resources for management of these data been identified?
- 4.2. Approximate percentage of the budget for these data devoted to data management
- 5.2. Quality control procedures employed
- 7.1. Do these data comply with the Data Access directive?
- 7.1.1. If data are not available or has limitations, has a Waiver been filed?
- 7.1.2. If there are limitations to data access, describe how data are protected
- 7.4. Approximate delay between data collection and dissemination
- 8.1. Actual or planned long-term data archive location
- 8.3. Approximate delay between data collection and submission to an archive facility
- 8.4. How will the data be protected from accidental or malicious modification or deletion prior to receipt by the archive?
(describe or provide URL of description):
7. Data Access
NAO 212-15 states that access to environmental data may only be restricted when distribution is explicitly limited by law, regulation, policy (such as those applicable to personally identifiable information or protected critical infrastructure information or proprietary trade information) or by security requirements. The EDMC Data Access Procedural Directive contains specific guidance, recommends the use of open-standard, interoperable, non-proprietary web services, provides information about resources and tools to enable data access, and includes a Waiver to be submitted to justify any approach other than full, unrestricted public access.
None
Notes: The name of the Organization of the most recent Support Role of type "Distributor" is used. The support role must be in effect. This information is not required if an approved access waiver exists for this data.
Notes: This field is required if a Distributor has not been specified.
Notes: All URLs listed in the Distribution Info section will be included. This field is required if applicable.
This data can be obtained on-line at the following URL:
https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/imagery/search/where:ID=4708;
Notes: This field is required if applicable.
8. Data Preservation and Protection
The NOAA Procedure for Scientific Records Appraisal and Archive Approval describes how to identify, appraise and decide what scientific records are to be preserved in a NOAA archive.
(Specify NCEI-MD, NCEI-CO, NCEI-NC, NCEI-MS, World Data Center (WDC) facility, Other, To Be Determined, Unable to Archive, or No Archiving Intended)
Notes: This field is required if archive location is World Data Center or Other.
Notes: This field is required if archive location is To Be Determined, Unable to Archive, or No Archiving Intended.
Notes: Physical Location Organization, City and State are required, or a Location Description is required.
Discuss data back-up, disaster recovery/contingency planning, and off-site data storage relevant to the data collection
9. Additional Line Office or Staff Office Questions
Line and Staff Offices may extend this template by inserting additional questions in this section.