Data Management Plan (Deprecated)
GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:48849 | Published / External
This is an outdated version of the NOAA Data Management Plan template. InPort now supports a dedicated Data Management Plan Catalog Item type, which is up-to-date with the latest NOAA DMP template. The ability to generate Data Management Plans from Data Sets will be discontinued in a future release. Please see the Data Management Plan Help Guide to learn more.
Data Management Plan
DMP Template v2.0.1 (2015-01-01)
Please provide the following information, and submit to the NOAA DM Plan Repository.Reference to Master DM Plan (if applicable)
As stated in Section IV, Requirement 1.3, DM Plans may be hierarchical. If this DM Plan inherits provisions from a higher-level DM Plan already submitted to the Repository, then this more-specific Plan only needs to provide information that differs from what was provided in the Master DM Plan.
1. General Description of Data to be Managed
Anchorages are well-defined navigable waters where a vessel may safely drop anchor. The size, shape, and conditions for use of these areas can vary widely. Generally, anchorages are not used for an indefinite duration, nor are they routinely used for maintenance, repair, overhaul, bunkering, or sea trials.
Notes: Only a maximum of 4000 characters will be included.
Notes: Data collection is considered ongoing if a time frame of type "Continuous" exists.
Notes: All time frames from all extent groups are included.
Notes: All geographic areas from all extent groups are included.
(e.g., digital numeric data, imagery, photographs, video, audio, database, tabular data, etc.)
(e.g., satellite, airplane, unmanned aerial system, radar, weather station, moored buoy, research vessel, autonomous underwater vehicle, animal tagging, manual surveys, enforcement activities, numerical model, etc.)
2. Point of Contact for this Data Management Plan (author or maintainer)
Notes: The name of the Person of the most recent Support Role of type "Metadata Contact" is used. The support role must be in effect.
Notes: The name of the Organization of the most recent Support Role of type "Metadata Contact" is used. This field is required if applicable.
3. Responsible Party for Data Management
Program Managers, or their designee, shall be responsible for assuring the proper management of the data produced by their Program. Please indicate the responsible party below.
Notes: The name of the Person of the most recent Support Role of type "Data Steward" is used. The support role must be in effect.
4. Resources
Programs must identify resources within their own budget for managing the data they produce.
5. Data Lineage and Quality
NOAA has issued Information Quality Guidelines for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information which it disseminates.
(describe or provide URL of description):
Process Steps:
- 2017-06-01 00:00:00 - 1. Go to http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2016-title33-vol1/pdf/CFR-2016-title33-vol1-chapI.pdf, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2016-title33-vol2/pdf/CFR-2016-title33-vol2-chapI.pdf & http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2016-title33-vol3/pdf/CFR-2016-title33-vol3-chapIV.pdf and record all anchorage area info into a spreadsheet including lat/long data 2. Import sheet into ArcGIS, convert to xy coordinates, and export as a point feature class 3. Convert point feature class to polygon by connecting corner coordinates and joining attribute info NOTE: Areas from the following locations were not included, as they are all inland locations: Section 110.127 Lake Mohave and Lake Mead, NV and AZ Section 110.127a Lake Powell, UT-AZ Section 110.127b Flaming Gorge Lake, WY-UT Section 110.72c Lake Murray, SC 4. Go to https://encdirect.noaa.gov/ and download the following at full extent: Approach_Anchor_Berth_area, Approach_Anchor_Berth_point Approach_Anchorage_Area, Approach_Anchorage_Area_point Coastal_Anchorage_Area, Coastal_Anchorage_Area_point General_Anchorage_Area, General_Anchorage_Area_point Harbour_Anchor_Berth_area, Harbour_Anchor_Berth_point Harbour_Anchorage_Area, Harbour_Anchorage_Area_point Berthing_Anchorage_Area Overview_Anchorage_Area_point 5. Import all of the polygon layers into a single feature class and the point layers into a separate feature class 6. Buffer the point features to 500 feet 7. Compare between the layers, removing duplicates, and compare to NOAA_RNC continuous raster at ArcGIS on seamlessrnc.nauticalcharts.noaa.gov as a guide 8. Union the polygon and point feature classes with the CFR feature class and merge and combine features where overlap occurs, again giving the CFR features the most importance 9. Fill in any missing attributes using RNC info 10. Delete all superfluous fields 11. Check geometry and project data into WGS 1984 Auxiliary Sphere
- 2023-08-01 00:00:00 - 1. Review existing geometry to determine which features should be re-created from the CFR. 2. Within a new feature class, add existing features or create new features, in the order these are listed within section 110 of the latest available CFR. 3. In two cases (110.128, Columbia River, OR and 110.168(a)(5)(iii), Hampton Roads, VA), the RNC was used since it was the more reliable source. 4. Update or add attributes as features are created. 5. Features from the CFR that are not part of this data set include: 5a. The 14 features (for 110.127 Lake Mohave and Lake Mead, Nevada and Arizona) were not created, since there are no nautical charts or shorelines to assist with the generation of geometry. 5b. The 6 features (for 110.127a Lake Powell, Utah-Arizona) were not created, since there are no nautical charts or shorelines to assist with the generation of geometry. 5c. The 4 features (for 110.127b Flaming Gorge Lake, Wyoming-Utah) were not created, since there are no nautical charts or shorelines to assist with the generation of geometry. 6. Use the U.S. State Submerged Lands data set to create features outside CONUS (e.g. 110.129 in Hawaii). 7. It was discovered that not all new CFR features (since the last data update) were reflected by their respective currentness date in the CFR (e.g. 110.157a 19 and 20, which still showed a date of 12/12/1967, or 110.195a 34-37, which still showed a date of 10/8/1981). 8. Check Geometry for Esri and OGC validation.
(describe or provide URL of description):
6. Data Documentation
The EDMC Data Documentation Procedural Directive requires that NOAA data be well documented, specifies the use of ISO 19115 and related standards for documentation of new data, and provides links to resources and tools for metadata creation and validation.
Missing/invalid information:
- 1.7. Data collection method(s)
- 2.1. Point of Contact Name
- 2.4. Point of Contact Email
- 3.1. Responsible Party for Data Management
- 4.1. Have resources for management of these data been identified?
- 4.2. Approximate percentage of the budget for these data devoted to data management
- 5.2. Quality control procedures employed
- 7.1. Do these data comply with the Data Access directive?
- 7.1.1. If data are not available or has limitations, has a Waiver been filed?
- 7.1.2. If there are limitations to data access, describe how data are protected
- 7.2. Name of organization of facility providing data access
- 7.2.1. If data hosting service is needed, please indicate
- 7.3. Data access methods or services offered
- 7.4. Approximate delay between data collection and dissemination
- 8.1. Actual or planned long-term data archive location
- 8.3. Approximate delay between data collection and submission to an archive facility
- 8.4. How will the data be protected from accidental or malicious modification or deletion prior to receipt by the archive?
(describe or provide URL of description):
7. Data Access
NAO 212-15 states that access to environmental data may only be restricted when distribution is explicitly limited by law, regulation, policy (such as those applicable to personally identifiable information or protected critical infrastructure information or proprietary trade information) or by security requirements. The EDMC Data Access Procedural Directive contains specific guidance, recommends the use of open-standard, interoperable, non-proprietary web services, provides information about resources and tools to enable data access, and includes a Waiver to be submitted to justify any approach other than full, unrestricted public access.
None
Notes: The name of the Organization of the most recent Support Role of type "Distributor" is used. The support role must be in effect. This information is not required if an approved access waiver exists for this data.
Notes: This field is required if a Distributor has not been specified.
Notes: All URLs listed in the Distribution Info section will be included. This field is required if applicable.
Notes: This field is required if applicable.
8. Data Preservation and Protection
The NOAA Procedure for Scientific Records Appraisal and Archive Approval describes how to identify, appraise and decide what scientific records are to be preserved in a NOAA archive.
(Specify NCEI-MD, NCEI-CO, NCEI-NC, NCEI-MS, World Data Center (WDC) facility, Other, To Be Determined, Unable to Archive, or No Archiving Intended)
Notes: This field is required if archive location is World Data Center or Other.
Notes: This field is required if archive location is To Be Determined, Unable to Archive, or No Archiving Intended.
Notes: Physical Location Organization, City and State are required, or a Location Description is required.
Discuss data back-up, disaster recovery/contingency planning, and off-site data storage relevant to the data collection
9. Additional Line Office or Staff Office Questions
Line and Staff Offices may extend this template by inserting additional questions in this section.