1887 - 2016 USGS CoNED Topobathy DEM (Compiled 2016): New England
Data Set (DS) | OCM Partners (OCMP)GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:49419 | Updated: June 13, 2024 | Published / External
Summary
Short Citation
OCM Partners, 2024: 1887 - 2016 USGS CoNED Topobathy DEM (Compiled 2016): New England, https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/49419.
Full Citation Examples
Hurricane Sandy was the deadliest and most destructive hurricane of the 2012 Atlantic hurricane season, and the second-costliest with an estimated $71.4 billion (2013 USD). Hurricane Sandy affected 24 states, including the entire eastern seaboard with particularly severe damage in New Jersey and New York. In response to the storm, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Coastal and Marine Geology Program in collaboration with the USGS National Geospatial Program (NGP), and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) developed a three-dimensional (3D) 1-meter topobathymetric elevation model (TBDEM) for the New England sub-region including the and adjacent coastline. High-resolution coastal elevation data is required to identify flood, hurricane, and sea-level rise inundation hazard zones and other earth science applications, such as the development of sediment transport and storm surge models. The new TBDEM consists of the best available multi-source topographic and bathymetric elevation data for New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Massachusetts coastal areas.The New England TBDEM integrates over 321 different data sources including topographic and bathymetric LiDAR point clouds, hydrographic surveys, side-scan sonar surveys, and multi-beam surveys obtained from USGS, NOAA, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and other state and local agencies. The LiDAR and bathymetry surveys were sorted and prioritized based on survey date, accuracy, spatial distribution, and point density to develop a model based on the best available elevation data. Because bathymetric data is typically referenced to tidal referenced datums (such as Mean High Water or Mean Low Water), all tidally-referenced heights were transformed into orthometric heights that are normally used for mapping elevation on land (based on the North American Vertical Datum of 1988). The spatial resolution is 1 meter and includes the coastal areas of New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts. The temporal range of the input topography and bathymetry is 1887 to 2016.
Original contact information:
Contact Name: Jeffrey Danielson / Dean Tyler *
Contact Org: U.S. Geological Survey
Title: Physical Geographer
Phone: 605-594-6148 / 605-594-2624 *
Email: daniels@usgs.gov / dtyler@usgs.gov *
Distribution Information
-
Create custom data files by choosing data area, product type, map projection, file format, datum, etc.
-
GeoTIFF
Simple download of data files.
Any acquisition or use of these data signifies a user's agreement to comprehension and compliance of the USGS Standard Disclaimer. Ensure all portions of metadata are read and clearly understood before using these data in order to protect both user and USGS interests.
There is no guarantee or warranty concerning the accuracy of the data. Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since these data were collected and that some parts of these data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use these data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. These data should not be used for navigation purposes. Acknowledgement of the originating agencies would be appreciated in products derived from these data. Any user who modifies the data is obligated to describe the types of modifications they perform. User specifically agrees not to misrepresent the data, nor to imply that changes made were approved or endorsed by the USGS. Please refer to http://www.usgs.gov/privacy.html for the USGS disclaimer.
Controlled Theme Keywords
COASTAL ELEVATION, elevation, TOPOGRAPHICAL RELIEF MAPS
Child Items
No Child Items for this record.
Contact Information
Point of Contact
NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM)
coastal.info@noaa.gov
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
Metadata Contact
NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM)
coastal.info@noaa.gov
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
Extents
-74.786924° W,
-69.761458° E,
42.79872° N,
40.377544° S
1887-01-03 - 2016-02-01
Item Identification
Title: | 1887 - 2016 USGS CoNED Topobathy DEM (Compiled 2016): New England |
---|---|
Short Name: | coned_new_england_dem_m6194_metadata |
Status: | Completed |
Publication Date: | 2017-03-03 |
Abstract: |
Hurricane Sandy was the deadliest and most destructive hurricane of the 2012 Atlantic hurricane season, and the second-costliest with an estimated $71.4 billion (2013 USD). Hurricane Sandy affected 24 states, including the entire eastern seaboard with particularly severe damage in New Jersey and New York. In response to the storm, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Coastal and Marine Geology Program in collaboration with the USGS National Geospatial Program (NGP), and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) developed a three-dimensional (3D) 1-meter topobathymetric elevation model (TBDEM) for the New England sub-region including the and adjacent coastline. High-resolution coastal elevation data is required to identify flood, hurricane, and sea-level rise inundation hazard zones and other earth science applications, such as the development of sediment transport and storm surge models. The new TBDEM consists of the best available multi-source topographic and bathymetric elevation data for New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Massachusetts coastal areas.The New England TBDEM integrates over 321 different data sources including topographic and bathymetric LiDAR point clouds, hydrographic surveys, side-scan sonar surveys, and multi-beam surveys obtained from USGS, NOAA, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and other state and local agencies. The LiDAR and bathymetry surveys were sorted and prioritized based on survey date, accuracy, spatial distribution, and point density to develop a model based on the best available elevation data. Because bathymetric data is typically referenced to tidal referenced datums (such as Mean High Water or Mean Low Water), all tidally-referenced heights were transformed into orthometric heights that are normally used for mapping elevation on land (based on the North American Vertical Datum of 1988). The spatial resolution is 1 meter and includes the coastal areas of New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts. The temporal range of the input topography and bathymetry is 1887 to 2016. Original contact information: Contact Name: Jeffrey Danielson / Dean Tyler * Contact Org: U.S. Geological Survey Title: Physical Geographer Phone: 605-594-6148 / 605-594-2624 * Email: daniels@usgs.gov / dtyler@usgs.gov * |
Purpose: |
As a collaboration between the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Coastal and Marine Geology Program (CMGP), the National Geospatial Program (NGP), and the NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), the CoNED Applications Project integrates disparate light detection and ranging (LiDAR) and bathymetric data sources into a common 3D database aligned both vertically and horizontally to a common reference system. CoNED Project TBDEM elevation model development is focused in select regions around the U.S. Coast, such as in the Northern Gulf of Mexico (NGOM), the Hurricane Sandy Region, the San Francisco Bay Region, the Pacific Northwest, and the North Slope of Alaska. CoNED Project topobathymetric elevation model (TBDEM) provide a required seamless elevation product for several science application studies such as shoreline delineation, coastal inundation mapping, sediment-transport, sea-level rise, storm surge models, tsunami impact assessment, and also to analyze the impact of various climate change scenarios on coastal regions. The raster elevation topobathymetric elevation product, the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) metadata, and the spatially referenced metadata are contained in the downloadable bundle. Spatially referenced metadata are contained within an ESRI geodatabase that contains footprints for each of the source input areas. The National Map provides basic elevation information for earth science studies and mapping applications in the United States. The data are utilized by the scientific and resource management communities for global change research, hydrologic modeling, resource monitoring, and mapping and visualization applications. References: USGS Butman, Bradford, Valentine, P.C., Middleton, T.J., and Danforth, W.W., 2007, A GIS Library of multibeam data for Massachusetts Bay and the Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary, Offshore of Boston, Massachusetts: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 99, DVD-ROM. Gesch, D.B., 2007, The National Elevation Dataset, in Maune, D., ed., Digital Elevation Model Technologies and Applications: The DEM Users Manual, 2nd Edition, in Digital Elevation Model Technologies and Applications: The DEM Users Manual, 2nd Edition, Bethesda, Maryland, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, p. 99-118. Sugarbaker, L.J., Constance, E.W., Heidemann, H.K., Jason, A.L., Lukas, Vicki, Saghy, D.L., and Stoker, J.M., 2014, The 3D Elevation Program initiative-A call for action: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1399, 35 p. Winters, W.J., Lorenson, T.D., and Paull, C.K., eds., 2007, Initial Report of the IMAGES VIII/PAGE 127 Gas Hydrate and Paleoclimate Cruise on the RV Marion Dufresne in the Gulf of Mexico, 2-18 July 2002: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2004-1358, one DVD, online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2004/1358/ USGS - Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center Barnhardt, Walter A., Andrews, Brian, D., and Butman, Bradford, 2005, High-Resolution Geologic Mapping of the Inner Continental Shelf: Nahant to Gloucester, Massachusetts: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2005-1293, online at http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/pubs/of2005-1293/ McMullen, K.Y., Poppe, L.J., Signell, R.P., Denny, J.F., Crocker, J.M., Beaver, A.L., and Schattgen, P.T., 2006, Surficial Geology in Central Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island: Interpretations of Sidescan Sonar and Multibeam Bathymetry: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1199, online at http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/pubs/of2006-1199/ Poppe, Lawrence J., Ackerman, Seth D., Doran, Elizabeth F., Moser, Marc, S., Stewart, Helen, F., Forfinski, Nicholas A., Gardner, Uther, L., and Keene, Jennifer A., 2006, Geologic Interpretation and Multibeam Bathymetry of the Sea floor in Southeastern Long Island Sound: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1059, online at http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/pubs/of2006-1059/ Poppe, Lawrence J., Ackerman, Foster, David, S., Blackwood, Dann, S., Butman, Bradford, Moser, S.K., and Stewart, H.F., 2006, Sea-Floor Character and Surface Processes in the Vicinity of Quicks Hole, Elizabeth Islands, Massachusetts: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1357, online at http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/pubs/of2006-1357/ McMullen, K.Y., Poppe, L.J., Twomey, E.R., Danforth, W.W., Haupt, T.A., and Crocker, J.M., 2007, Sidescan-Sonar Imagery, Multibeam Bathymetry, and Surficial Geologic Interpretations of the Sea Floor in Rhode Island Sound, off Sakonnet Point, Rhode Island: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1150, online at http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/pubs/of2007-1150/ McMullen, K.Y., Poppe, L.J., Denny, J.F., Haupt, T.A., and Crocker, J.M., 2007, Sidescan-Sonar Imagery and Surficial Geologic Interpretations of the Sea Floor in Central Rhode Island Sound: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1366, online at http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/pubs/of2007-1366/ Poppe, Lawrence J., Ackerman, Foster, David, S., Blackwood, Dann, S., Williams, Jeffress, S., Moser, M.S., Stewart, H.F., and Glomb, K.A., 2007, Sea-Floor Character and Sedimentary Processes of Great Round Shoal Channel, Offshore Massachusetts: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1138, online at http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/pubs/of2007-1138/ McMullen, K.Y., Poppe, L.J., Haupt, T.A., and Crocker, J.M., 2008, Sidescan-Sonar Imagery and Surficial Geologic Interpretations of the Sea Floor in Western Rhode Island Sound: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1181, online at http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/pubs/of2008-1181/ Poppe, L.J., McMullen, K.Y., Foster, D.S., Blackwood, D.S., Williams, S.J., Ackerman, S.D., Barnum, S.R., and Brennan, R.T., 2008, Sea-Floor Character and Sedimentary Processes in the Vicinity of Woods Hole, Massachusetts: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1004, online at http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/pubs/of2008-1004/ Poppe, L.J., Ackerman, S.D., McMullen, K.Y., Schattgen, P.T., Schaer, J.D., and Doran, E.F., 2008, Interpolation of Reconnaissance Multibeam and Single-Beam Bathymetry Offshore of Milford, Connecticut: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1146, online at http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/pubs/of2008-1146/ EAARL Wright, C.W., Kranenburg, C.J., Klipp, E.S., Troche, R.J., Fredericks, Xan, Masessa, M.L., and Nagle, D.B., 2014, EAARL-B coastal topography-Fire Island, New York, pre-Hurricane Sandy, 2012; seamless (bare earth and submerged): U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 888, http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ds888 |
Notes: |
12081 |
Supplemental Information: |
The data obtained through Earth Explorer, http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov, and The National Map Viewer, http://nationalmap.gov/viewer.html, is considered to be the "best available" data from the USGS. For questions on distribution, please refer to the Distribution Section, Contact Information. For processing, please see Data Quality Section, Processing Step, and Contact Information. |
Keywords
Theme Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords |
EARTH SCIENCE > LAND SURFACE > TOPOGRAPHY > TERRAIN ELEVATION > TOPOGRAPHICAL RELIEF MAPS
|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords |
EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > COASTAL PROCESSES > COASTAL ELEVATION
|
ISO 19115 Topic Category |
elevation
|
UNCONTROLLED | |
None | 013 |
None | 3DEP |
None | 3DEP-Coastal Zone |
None | 3DEP-CZ |
None | Acoustic Sonar |
None | Base Maps |
None | CMGP |
None | Coastal Marine and Geology Program |
None | Coastal Zone |
None | CoNED |
None | CZ |
None | DEM |
None | DTM |
None | Earth Cover |
None | Hydrologic |
None | imagery |
None | Light Detection and Ranging |
None | location |
None | National Standards for Spatial Digital Accuracy |
None | Topobathy |
None | U.S. Geological Survey |
None | USGS |
Spatial Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > CONNECTICUT
|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > MASSACHUSETTS
|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > NEW YORK
|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > RHODE ISLAND
|
UNCONTROLLED | |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Barnstable |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Bristol |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Bronx |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Dukes |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Dutchess |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Fairfield |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Hartford |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Kent |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Litchfield |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Middlesex |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Nantucket |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Nassau |
Geographic Names Information System | County of New Haven |
Geographic Names Information System | County of New London |
Geographic Names Information System | County of New York |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Newport |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Norfolk |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Orange |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Plymouth |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Providence |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Putnam |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Queens |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Rockland |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Suffolk |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Tolland |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Ulster |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Washington |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Westchester |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Windham |
Geographic Names Information System | County of Worcester |
Geographic Names Information System | State of Connecticut |
Geographic Names Information System | State of Massachusetts |
Geographic Names Information System | State of New York |
Geographic Names Information System | State of Rhode Island |
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1987, Codes for the identification of the States, the District of Columbia and the outlying areas of the United States, and associated areas (Federal Information Processing Standard 5-2): Washington, D.C., National Instit | CT |
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1987, Codes for the identification of the States, the District of Columbia and the outlying areas of the United States, and associated areas (Federal Information Processing Standard 5-2): Washington, D.C., National Instit | ME |
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1987, Codes for the identification of the States, the District of Columbia and the outlying areas of the United States, and associated areas (Federal Information Processing Standard 5-2): Washington, D.C., National Instit | NY |
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1987, Codes for the identification of the States, the District of Columbia and the outlying areas of the United States, and associated areas (Federal Information Processing Standard 5-2): Washington, D.C., National Instit | RI |
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1995, Countries, dependencies, areas of special sovereignty, and their principal administrative divisions, Federal Information Processing Standard 10-4,): Washington, D.C., National Institute of Standards and Technology | U.S. |
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1995, Countries, dependencies, areas of special sovereignty, and their principal administrative divisions, Federal Information Processing Standard 10-4,): Washington, D.C., National Institute of Standards and Technology | United States |
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1995, Countries, dependencies, areas of special sovereignty, and their principal administrative divisions, Federal Information Processing Standard 10-4,): Washington, D.C., National Institute of Standards and Technology | US |
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1995, Countries, dependencies, areas of special sovereignty, and their principal administrative divisions, Federal Information Processing Standard 10-4,): Washington, D.C., National Institute of Standards and Technology | USA |
Physical Location
Organization: | Office for Coastal Management |
---|---|
City: | Charleston |
State/Province: | SC |
Data Set Information
Data Set Scope Code: | Data Set |
---|---|
Maintenance Frequency: | As Needed |
Data Presentation Form: | Map (digital) |
Entity Attribute Overview: |
This collection of high-resolution coastal elevation data is available in a user-friendly Georeferenced Tagged Image File Format (GeoTIFF). The elevation model has floating point numeric values. Areas where data is incomplete due to lack of full image coverage or NoData are represented with the numeric value of -3.40282346639e+038. Spatially referenced metadata are contained within an ESRI vector shapefile that contains footprints with accompanying attribute fields for each of the source input areas. |
Entity Attribute Detail Citation: |
None |
Distribution Liability: |
Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the USGS, no warranty expressed or implied is made by the USGS regarding the use of the data on any other system, nor does the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. Data may have been compiled from various outside sources. Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This information may be updated without notification. The USGS, NOAA, NOAA OCM and it partners shall not be liable for any activity involving these data, installation, fitness of the data for a particular purpose, its use, or analyses results. |
Data Set Credit: | Please refer to the Data Quality Section, Source Citations for original source data information. |
Support Roles
Data Steward
Date Effective From: | 2017-03-03 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Distributor
Date Effective From: | 2017-03-03 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Metadata Contact
Date Effective From: | 2017-03-03 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Point of Contact
Date Effective From: | 2017-03-03 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Extents
Currentness Reference: | Ground Condition |
---|
Extent Group 1
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 1
W° Bound: | -74.786924 | |
---|---|---|
E° Bound: | -69.761458 | |
N° Bound: | 42.79872 | |
S° Bound: | 40.377544 |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 1
Time Frame Type: | Range |
---|---|
Start: | 1887-01-03 |
End: | 2016-02-01 |
Spatial Information
Spatial Representation
Representations Used
Grid: | Yes |
---|
Grid Representation 1
Dimension Count: | 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cell Geometry: | Area | ||||
Transformation Parameters Available?: | No | ||||
Axis Dimension 1 |
|||||
|
|||||
Axis Dimension 2 |
|||||
|
|||||
Axis Dimension 3 |
|||||
|
Reference Systems
Reference System 1
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reference System 2
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Access Information
Security Class: | Unclassified |
---|---|
Security Classification System: |
None |
Security Handling Description: |
None |
Data Access Procedure: |
This data can be obtained on-line at the following URL: https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=6194; |
Data Access Constraints: |
Any acquisition or use of these data signifies a user's agreement to comprehension and compliance of the USGS Standard Disclaimer. Ensure all portions of metadata are read and clearly understood before using these data in order to protect both user and USGS interests. |
Data Use Constraints: |
There is no guarantee or warranty concerning the accuracy of the data. Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since these data were collected and that some parts of these data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use these data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. These data should not be used for navigation purposes. Acknowledgement of the originating agencies would be appreciated in products derived from these data. Any user who modifies the data is obligated to describe the types of modifications they perform. User specifically agrees not to misrepresent the data, nor to imply that changes made were approved or endorsed by the USGS. Please refer to http://www.usgs.gov/privacy.html for the USGS disclaimer. |
Distribution Information
Distribution 1
Start Date: | 2019-11-12 |
---|---|
End Date: | Present |
Download URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=6194 |
Distributor: | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) (2017-03-03 - Present) |
File Name: | Customized Download |
Description: |
Create custom data files by choosing data area, product type, map projection, file format, datum, etc. |
File Type (Deprecated): | Zip |
Compression: | Zip |
Distribution 2
Start Date: | 2019-11-12 |
---|---|
End Date: | Present |
Download URL: | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/dem/New_England_Coned_Topobathy_DEM_2016_6194/index.html |
Distributor: | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) (2017-03-03 - Present) |
File Name: | Bulk Download |
Description: |
Simple download of data files. |
File Type (Deprecated): | GeoTIFF |
Distribution Format: | GeoTIFF |
URLs
URL 1
URL: | https://topotools.cr.usgs.gov/topobathy_viewer/ |
---|---|
Name: | USGS topobathy viewer |
URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
Description: |
USGS topobathy viewer |
URL 2
URL: | https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ |
---|---|
Name: | USGS earth explorer |
URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
Description: |
USGS earth explorer |
URL 3
URL: | https://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/ |
---|---|
Name: | USGS National Map |
URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
Description: |
USGS National Map |
URL 4
URL: | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/dem/New_England_Coned_Topobathy_DEM_2016_6194/index.html |
---|---|
Name: | Spatial Metadata |
URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
File Resource Format: | zip |
Description: |
Link to the NOAA OCM page for the topobathymetric model for New England. This page has a link to the spatial metadata in Esri Geodatabase (gdb) and OGC GeoPackage (gpkg) formats. |
Activity Log
Activity Log 1
Activity Date/Time: | 2017-03-03 |
---|---|
Description: |
Date that the source FGDC record was last modified. |
Activity Log 2
Activity Date/Time: | 2017-11-14 |
---|---|
Description: |
Converted from FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata (version FGDC-STD-001-1998) using 'fgdc_to_inport_xml.pl' script. Contact Tyler Christensen (NOS) for details. |
Activity Log 3
Activity Date/Time: | 2018-02-08 |
---|---|
Description: |
Partial upload of Positional Accuracy fields only. |
Activity Log 4
Activity Date/Time: | 2018-02-13 |
---|---|
Description: |
Partial upload to move data access links to Distribution Info. |
Technical Environment
Description: |
Microsoft Windows 7 Version 6.1 (Build 7601) Service Pack 1; Esri ArcGIS 10.3.1.4959 |
---|
Data Quality
Horizontal Positional Accuracy: |
The horizontal accuracy for the integrated topobathymetric model was not assessed quantitatively. |
---|---|
Vertical Positional Accuracy: |
The vertical accuracy of the input topographic data varies depending on the input source. Because the input elevation data were derived primarily from LiDAR, the vertical accuracy ranges from 15 to 20 centimeters in root mean square error (RMSE). The vertical accuracy for the integrated topobathymetric model was not assessed quantitatively. |
Completeness Report: |
Visual inspection |
Conceptual Consistency: |
Visual inspection |
Lineage
Sources
2014 NOAA Post Hurricane Sandy Topobathymetric LiDAR Mapping for Shoreline Mapping
Contact Role Type: | Originator |
---|---|
Contact Type: | Organization |
Contact Name: | NOAA, National Geodetic Survey (NGS) |
Publish Date: | 2014-09-01 |
Extent Type: | Discrete |
Extent Start Date/Time: | 2014 |
Citation URL: | ftp://coast.noaa.gov/pub/DigitalCoast/lidar1_z/geoid12b/data/4800/ |
Citation URL Name: | Data Access Viewer |
Source Contribution: |
This data set is an LAZ (compressed LAS) format file containing LIDAR point cloud data. These data were collected by the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration National Geodetic Survey Remote Sensing Division using a Riegl VQ820G system. The data were acquired from 20140108 - 20140522 in four missions. | Source Geospatial Form: map | Type of Source Media: onLine |
Bathymetry Multiple Data; D00102; D00111; D00149; F00321; F00323; F00325; F00340; F00341; F00364; F00365; F00367; F00375; F00376; F00378; F00379; F00406; F00411; F00491; F00522; F00545; F00550; F00559; H01802; H04797; H05045; H05141; H05223; H05341; H05342; H05343; H05343; H05400; H05401; H05543; H05553; H05588; H05589; H05610; H05621; H05622; H05623; H05628; H05629; H05630; H05670; H05733; H05734; H05880; H05881; H05882; H06123; H06124; H06125; H06330; H06348; H06349; H06350; H06442; H06443; H06444; H06445; H06446; H06468; H06469; H06470; H06471; H06472; H06473; H06533; H06534; H06561; H06562; H06563; H06642; H06643; H06668; H06859; H06863; H06970; H06995; H07060; H07061; H07062; H07063; H07066; H07159; H07640; H07715; H07724; H07841;
Extent Type: | Range |
---|---|
Extent Start Date/Time: | 1887 |
Extent End Date/Time: | 2013 |
Citation URL: | http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/bathymetry/relief.html ; http://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/ |
Source Contribution: |
Bathymetry, 1887 to 2013, NOAA, National Centers for Environmental Information | Type of Source Media: onLine |
Connecticut Southeast, 2011, USGS 1-Meter; Massachusetts Statewide, 2011, USGS 1-Meter; Rhode Island Statewide, 2011, USGS 1-Meter; Massachusetts-New England Sandy, 2013, USGS 1-Meter; New York Sandy, Ulster-Dutchess-Orange, 2013, USGS 1-Meter; New York StatenIsland, 2013, USGS 1-Meter; Connecticut Sandy, 2014, USGS 1-Meter; New Jersey Sandy, Lot5. 2014, USGS 1-Meter; New York Long Island Sandy, 2014, USGS 1-Meter; New England NED, USGS 10-Meter; USGS Long Island Sandy LiDAR; USGS New York CMGP Sandy LiDAR
Extent Type: | Range |
---|---|
Extent Start Date/Time: | 2011 |
Extent End Date/Time: | 2014 |
Citation URL: | http://nationalmap.gov/viewer.html |
Source Contribution: |
USGS historical and current 3 Bare-earth DEMs (3D) National Elevation Data. | Source Geospatial Form: map | Type of Source Media: onLine |
ds-99; of 2005-1293; of 2006-1059; of 2006-1357; of 2006-1199; of 2007-1138; of 2007-1150; of 2007-1366; of 2008-1146; of 2008-1004; of 2008-1181; of2009-1001; of2009-1072,of2010-1066; of2011-1003; of2011-1222; of2014-1012; and * 2009-1001, 2009-1072, 2010-1066, 2011-1003, 2011-1222, 2014-1012
Citation URL: | http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/pubs/ ; * http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/ |
---|---|
Source Contribution: |
Bathymetry from Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center, Woods Hole, Massachusetts , U.S. Geological Survey, Coastal and Marine Geology Program | Type of Source Media: onLine |
FEMA Topographic LiDAR: Connecticut Coastline Survey, 2006, 1-meter; FEMA Massachusetts-New_Hampshire, Merrimack, 2011, 1-meter
Extent Type: | Range |
---|---|
Extent Start Date/Time: | 2006 |
Extent End Date/Time: | 2011 |
Citation URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/ |
Source Contribution: |
FEMA Topographic LiDAR | Type of Source Media: onLine |
Long Island Sound Topobathy, 2016, 3-meter
Publish Date: | 2016-01-01 |
---|---|
Extent Type: | Discrete |
Extent Start Date/Time: | 2016 |
Citation URL: | http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/inundation/sandy/sandy_geoc.html |
Source Contribution: |
NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) has developed a suite of digital elevation models (DEMs) of the U.S. Atlantic Coast impacted by Hurricane Sandy in October 2012. These DEMs are the initial part of a planned framework for a seamless depiction of merged bathymetry and topography along U.S. coasts. | Type of Source Media: onLine |
New Jersey-DelawareTopobathy DEM USGS v1 1-Meter
Publish Date: | 2015-01-01 |
---|---|
Extent Type: | Discrete |
Extent Start Date/Time: | 2015 |
Citation URL: | https://lta.cr.usgs.gov/coned_tbdem |
Source Contribution: |
CoNED 1-Meter Topobathymetric Elevation Model (TBDEM) | Source Geospatial Form: raster digital data | Type of Source Media: onLine |
New_York_PutnmanCounty, 2008, NOAA 1-meter; Connecticut, Fairfield County, 2010, USGS 1-meter; Connecticut, Litchfield-FairField, 2011, USACE 1-meter; Connecticut Coastline, Post_Sandy, 2012, USACE 1-meter
Extent Type: | Range |
---|---|
Extent Start Date/Time: | 2008 |
Extent End Date/Time: | 2012 |
Citation URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer |
Source Contribution: |
2012 USACE Post Sandy Topographic LiDAR: Coastal Connecticut - "This data has been acquired and developed by the U.S. Corps of Engineers ST. Louis District to collect and deliver topographic elevation point data derived from multiple return light detection and ranging (LiDAR) measurements for the 116 sq. mile project area encompassing the entire coastal region of the State of Connecticut. Fugro EarthData, Inc. acquired 46 flight lines in 4 lifts from November 14, 2012 to December 16, 2012." Connecticut_Litchfield_FairField_2011_USACE_1m - "The purpose of this LiDAR data was to produce high accuracy 3D elevation products, including tiled LiDAR in LAS 1.2 format, 3D breaklines, and 1 m cell size hydro flattened Digital Elevation Models (DEMs). This data was produced for the U.S. Corp of Engineers and USDA-NRCS Connecticut for use in projects dealing with conservation planning, design, research, floodplain mapping, dam safety assessments, and hydrologic modeling." Collected 20111213 to 20111219. LiDAR Elevation Data Collection - Putnam County, NY, 2008 (NYSDEC) - "Summary of the surface elevation data collection project in Putnam County, NY (NYSDEC) 2008. Products generated include LiDAR point data in LAS Binary format v1.1. In the spring of 2008, The Sanborn Map Company, Inc. (Sanborn) acquired 111 square miles of terrestrial LiDAR data in Putnam County, NY. An Optech ALTM 2050 Airborne LiDAR sensor was used for the collection. The LiDAR data associated with this metadata file is in LAS binary format, version 1.1." | Type of Source Media: onLine |
pre-Hurricane Sandy (October 2012 hurricane) EAARLB
Extent Type: | Discrete |
---|---|
Extent Start Date/Time: | 2012 |
Citation URL: | http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/0888/ |
Source Contribution: |
These remotely sensed, geographically referenced elevation measurements of LiDAR-derived submerged topography datasets were produced by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center, St. Petersburg, Florida. | Type of Source Media: onLine |
USACE Topobathy Lidar: Long Island, New York, 2013
Publish Date: | 2013-01-01 |
---|---|
Extent Type: | Discrete |
Extent Start Date/Time: | 2013 |
Citation URL: | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid12a/3664/ |
Source Contribution: |
Topobathymetric LiDAR | Type of Source Media: onLine |
Process Steps
Process Step 1
Description: |
The principal methodology for developing the integrated topobathymetric elevation model can be organized into three main components. The "topography component" consists of the land-based elevation data, which is primarily comprised from high-resolution LiDAR data. The topographic source data will include LiDAR data from different sensors (Topographic, Bathymetric) with distinct spectral wavelengths (NIR-1064nm, Green-532nm). The "bathymetry component" consists of hydrographic sounding (acoustic) data collected using boats rather than bathymetry acquired from LiDAR. The most common forms of bathymetry that are used include: multi-beam, single-beam, and swath. The final component, "Integration", encompasses the assimilation of the topographic and bathymetric data along the near-shore based on a predefined set of priorities. The land/water interface (+1 m- -1.5 m) is the most critical area, and green laser systems, such as the Experimental Advanced Airborne Research LiDAR (EAARL-B) and the Coastal Zone Mapping and Imaging LiDAR (CZMIL) that cross the near-shore interface are valuable in developing a seamless transition. The end product from the topography and bathymetry components is a raster with associated spatial masks and metadata that can be passed to the integration component for final model incorporation. Topo/Bathy Creation Steps: Topography Processing Component: a) Quality control check the vertical and horizontal datum and projection information of the input lidar source to ensure the data is referenced to NAVD88 and NAD83, UTM. If the source data is not NAVD88, transform the input LiDAR data to NAVD88 reference frame using current National Geodetic Survey (NGS) geoid models. Likewise, if required, convert the input source data to NAD83 and reproject to UTM. b) Check the classification of the topographic LiDAR data to verify the data are classified with the appropriate classes. If the data have not been classified, then classify the raw point cloud data to non-ground (class 1) ground (class 2), and water (class 9) classes using LP360-Classify. c) Derive associated breaklines from the classified LiDAR to capture internal water bodies, such as lakes and ponds and inland waterways. Inland waterways and water bodies will be hydro-flattened where no bathymetry is present. d) Extract the ground returns from the classified LiDAR data and randomly spatial subset the points into two point sets based on the criteria of 95 percent of the points for the "Actual Selected" set and the remaining 5 percent for the "Test Control" set. The "Actual Selected" points will be gridded in the terrain model along with associated breaklines and masks to generate the topographic surface, while the "Test Control" points will be used to compute the interpolation accuracy (Root Mean Square Error) from the derived surface. e) Generate the minimum convex hull boundary from the classified ground LiDAR points that creates a mask that extracts the perimeter of the exterior LiDAR points. The mask is then applied in the terrain to remove extraneous terrain artifacts outside of the extent of the ground LiDAR points. f) Using a terrain model based on triangulated irregular networks (TINs), grid the "Actual Selected" ground points using breaklines and the minimum convex hull boundary mask at a 3-meter spatial resolution using a natural neighbor interpolation algorithm. g) Compute the interpolation accuracy by comparing elevation values in the "Test Control" points to values extracted from the derived gridded surface; report the results in terms of Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). |
---|---|
Process Date/Time: | 2016-04-04 00:00:00 |
Process Step 2
Description: |
Bathymetry Processing Component: a) Quality control check the vertical and horizontal datum and projection information of the input bathymetric source to ensure the data is referenced to NAVD88 and NAD83, UTM. If the source data is not NAVD88, transform the input bathymetric data to NAVD88 reference frame using VDatum. Likewise, if required, convert the input source data to NAD83 and reproject to UTM. b) Prioritize and spatially sort the bathymetry based on date of acquisition, spatial distribution, accuracy, and point density to eliminate any outdated or erroneous points and to minimize interpolation artifacts. c) Randomly spatial subset the bathymetric points into two point sets based on the criteria of 95 percent of the points for the "Actual Selected" set and the remaining 5 percent for the "Test Control" set. The "Actual Selected" points will be gridded in the empirical bayesian krigging model along with associated masks to generate the bathymetric surface, while the "Test Control" points will be used to compute the interpolation accuracy (Root Mean Square Error) from the derived surface. d) Spatially interpolate bathymetric single-beam, multi-beam, and hydrographic survey source data using an empirical bayesian krigging gridding algorithm. This approach uses a geostatistical interpolation method that accounts for the error in estimating the underlying semivariogram (data structure - variance) through repeated simulations. e) Cross validation - Compare the predicted value in the geostatistical model to the actual observed value to assess the accuracy and effectiveness of model parameters by removing each data location one at a time and predicting the associated data value. The results will be reported in terms of RMSE. f) Compute the interpolation accuracy by comparing elevation values in the "Test Control" points to values extracted from the derived gridded surface; report the results in terms of RMSE. |
---|---|
Process Date/Time: | 2016-04-11 00:00:00 |
Process Step 3
Description: |
Mosaic Dataset Processing (Integration) Component: a) Determined priority of input data based on project characteristics, including acquisition dates, cell size, retention of features, water surface treatment, visual inspection and presence of artifacts. b) Develop an ArcGIS geodatabase (Mosaic Dataset) and spatial seamlines for each individual topographic (minimum convex hull boundary) and bathymetric raster layer included in the integrated elevation model. c) Generalize seamline edges to smooth transition boundaries between neighboring raster layers and split complex raster datasets with isolated regions into individual unique raster groups. d) Develop an integrated shoreline transition zone from the best available topographic and bathymetric data to blend the topographic and bathymetric elevation sources. Where feasible, use the minimum convex hull boundary, create a buffer to logically mask input topography/bathymetry data. Then, through the use of TINs, interpolate the selected topographic and bathymetric points to gap-fill, if required any near-shore holes in the bathymetric coverage. Topobathymetric LiDAR data sources such as the EAARL-B or CZMIL systems provide up-to-date, high-resolution data along the critical land/water interface within inter-tidal zone. e) Prioritize and spatially sort the input topographic and bathymetric raster layers based on date of acquisition and accuracy to sequence the raster data in the integrated elevation model. f) Based on the prioritization, spatially mosaic the input raster data sources to create a seamless topobathymetric composite at a cell size of 3 meters using blending (spatial weighting). g) Performed a visual quality assurance (Q/A) assessment on the output composite to review the mosaic seams for artifacts. h) Generate spatially referenced metadata for each unique data source. The spatially reference metadata consists of a group of geospatial polygons that represent the spatial footprint of each data source used in the generation of the topobathymetric dataset. Each polygon is to be populated with attributes that describe the source data, such as, resolution, acquisition date, source name, source organization, source contact, source project, source URL, and data type (topographic LiDAR, bathymetric LiDAR, multi-beam bathymetry, single-beam bathymetry, etc.). |
---|---|
Process Date/Time: | 2016-04-18 00:00:00 |
Process Step 4
Description: |
Data were received from USGS by NOAA and ingested into the Digital Coast system for download via custom processing and ftp. Metadata was modified to reflect distribution through this mechanism. |
---|---|
Process Date/Time: | 2017-03-01 00:00:00 |
Process Contact: | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Phone (Voice): | (843) 740-1202 |
Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Catalog Details
Catalog Item ID: | 49419 |
---|---|
GUID: | gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:49419 |
Metadata Record Created By: | Anne Ball |
Metadata Record Created: | 2017-11-15 15:13+0000 |
Metadata Record Last Modified By: | Rebecca Mataosky |
Metadata Record Last Modified: | 2024-06-13 15:14+0000 |
Metadata Record Published: | 2024-01-10 |
Owner Org: | OCMP |
Metadata Publication Status: | Published Externally |
Do Not Publish?: | N |
Metadata Last Review Date: | 2022-03-16 |
Metadata Review Frequency: | 1 Year |
Metadata Next Review Date: | 2023-03-16 |