2014 Suwannee River Water Management District Lidar: Cooks Hammock (FL)

The Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) dataset is a survey of the Suwannee River G14PD00206 0.7 Meter LiDAR Survey in central Florida and encompasses 571 square miles. The LiDAR point cloud was flown at a nominal post spacing of 0.7 meters for unobscured areas. The LiDAR data and derivative products produced are in compliance with the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program Guidelines and Base Specifications, Version 1. The flight lines were acquired by Digital Aerial Solutions, LLC. between Feb 19, 2014 and March 1st , 2014. Derivative products from the aerial acquisition include: Raw point cloud data in LAS v1.2, classified point cloud data in LAS v1.2, bare earth surface tiles (raster DEM ERDAS Imagine format), bare earth surface DEMs mosaic (raster DEM ESRI Arc Grid format), control points, project report, and FGDC compliant XML metadata.

The purpose of collecting this LIDAR data to improve the SRWMD district-wide elevation data set for mapping, spatial analysis, and other SRWMD tasks and applications. This LIDAR data is replacing the digital USGS Topographic 7.5 Minute Map 5 foot contours that we have relied on for over 20 years. In addition the SRWMD wants to cooperate with Federal and State agencies to meet accepted LIDAR standards in order to produce the highest quality and consistent data possible. In addition, we collected this LIDAR data as part of a district, state, and national goal to have complete 100 percent LIDAR data coverage of the entire State of Florida. And last the SRWMD wants these data to become part of the USGS National Elevation Data program (NED) and NOAA Digital Coast for public use and distribution.

10361

A report for this project is available at:

https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/4895/supplemental/fl2014_srwmd_cookshammock_m4895_surveyreport.pdf

A footprint of this data set may be viewed in Google Earth at:

https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/4895/supplemental/fl2014_srwmd_cookshammock_m4895.kmz

LAS 1.2 format (classes 1,2,7,9,10,15,17,18)

none

Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of Digital Aerial Solutions, SRWMD, NOAA, the Office for Coastal Management or its partners.

This data was created by the Suwannee River Water Management District (SRWMD) to be used for planning purposes only.

SRWMD shall not be held liable for any injury or damage caused by the use of data distributed as a public records request

regardless of their use or application. SRWMD does not guarantee the accuracy, or suitability for any use of these data,

and no warranty is expressed or implied. In no event will the SRWMD, its staff, or the contributing agencies be liable for

any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential or other damages, including loss of profit, arising from the use

of these data, even if the District has been advised of the possibility of such damages. Users of this data should therefore

do so at their own risk.

This data can be obtained on-line at the following URL:

https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=4895

The data set is dynamically generated based on user-specified parameters.;

None

The data depicts the elevations at time of survey and are accurate only for that time. Exercise professional judgment in using this data.

Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. These data depict the heights at the time of the survey and are only accurate for that time.

There is not a systematic method of testing when testing horizontal accuracy in LiDAR. The horizontal accuracy is checked by collecting building corners during the survey. Lines are then digitized representing the building outline and the differences are measure from each individual survey point to the corner of the building outline. Stats are calculated to ensure horizontal tolerances are met. These measurements resulted in an RMSE of .42 meters and equals a .73 meter horizontal accuracy at the 95 % confidence level.

There is not a systematic method of testing when testing horizontal accuracy in LiDAR. However this is tested during calibration of the sensor and is rechecked during the comparing of parallel and perpendicular flight lines. Additionally the horizontal accuracy is checked by collecting building corners during the survey. Lines are then digitized representing the building outline and the differences are measure from each individual survey point to the corner of the building outline. Stats are calculated to ensure horizontal tolerances are met. These measurements resulted in an RMSE of .42 meters and equals a .73 meter horizontal accuracy at the 95 % confidence level. Accuracy defined by NSSDA at the 95 % confidence level would be multiplier by 1.7308 times the RMSE.

Data over well-defined surfaces has been tested to meet an 18.2 cm (0.59 ft.) Fundamental Vertical Accuracy (FVA) at 95% confidence level using RMSE(z) x 1.9600 as defined by the National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA); assessed and reported using National Digital Elevation Program (NDEP)/ASPRS Guidelines.; Quantitative Value: 0.175 meters, Test that produced the value: Tested 17.5 cm (0.57 ft.) vertical accuracy at the 95% confidence level in open terrain, based on RMSEz x 1.9600. Tested against the DEM; Quantitative Value: 0.213 meters, Test that produced the value: Tested 21.3 cm (0.69 ft.) supplemental vertical accuracy (SVA) at the 95th percentile in Tallweed catagories. Tested against the DEM.; Quantitative Value: 0.213 meters, Test that produced the value: Tested 21.3 cm (0.69 ft.) supplemental vertical accuracy (SVA) at the 95th percentile in Brushland catagories. Tested against the DEM.; Quantitative Value: 0.255 meters, Test that produced the value: Tested 25.5 cm (0.83 ft.) supplemental vertical accuracy (SVA) at the 95th percentile in Forested catagories. Tested against the DEM.; Quantitative Value: 0.119 meters, Test that produced the value: Tested 11.9 cm (0.39 ft.) supplemental vertical accuracy (SVA) at the 95th percentile in urban catagories. Tested against the DEM.; Quantitative Value: 0.214 meters, Test that produced the value: Tested21.4 cm (0.69 ft.) consolidated vertical accuracy (CVA) at the 95th percentile in all categories of data. Tested against the DEM.; Quantitative Value: 0.170 meters, Test that produced the value: Tested 17.0 cm (0.55 ft.) vertical accuracy at the 95% confidence level in open terrain, based on RMSEz x 1.960. Tested against TIN.

Ground Truth data was collected of the three major land cover classes dispersed within the area of interest. 30 points were collected in each of the three predominate vegetation classes tall weed vegetation, brushland vegetation, and forested vegetation. Urban catagory represenrs less than 10% of the project area so the minimun 30 points in that class couls not be collected.Pair of points was surveyed using the Trimble VRS network once completed the total station is used to collect the high vegetation ground class. A Topcon 7000 total station was used to collect all the shots collected in the high vegetation class, due to the limited GPS signal when working in and around tree canopy.

The GPS survey was tied into the Trimble VRS Now Network located in Florida. The Trimble VRS Now network is a network of continuously operating GPS reference stations that provides Real Time Kinematic (RTK) capabilities within a Real Time Network (RTN). This allows corrections to be applied to the points as they are being collected, eliminating the need for an adjustment. Several existing control monuments listed in the NSRS database were used as checks within the Trimble VRS Now Network. This confirmed network accuracies were being met during the field survey as well as providing a redundancy check on the Trimble VRSnetwork. The Specified local network accuracy of 5cm at the 95% confidence level was met or exceeded. Data analysis was accomplished by comparing ground truth checkpoints with LIDAR points from the edited data set, which were within 3.3 feet horizontally from the ground truth points. Based on the number of returns and the density of points in this project, it was not necessary to compare to anything further away than 3.3 feet horizontally from the ground truth points. Note that the edited LIDAR points are simply a subset of the raw LIDAR points. The points that fell above the ground surface on vegetation canopies, buildings, or other obstructions were removed from the data set. Comparisons were also made between the survey points and the LIDAR derived terrain surface. These comparisons provide an additional verification of the LIDAR data against the survey data.