Reef Resilience Scores - Field Descriptions
Entity (ENT) | Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center (PIFSC)GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:50522 | Updated: August 9, 2022 | Published / External
-
View As
- Full List View
- Printable Form
- EXPORTS
- InPort XML
- View in Hierarchy
Summary
Composite 11 Resilience Scores:
File provide scores for individual resilience metrics for the primary analysis with all 11 metrics. Raw scores from each of the individual metrics were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. Although it is not a metric used to analyze resilience, percent coral cover is provided as it is frequently used to evaluate reef status and prioritize management.
Composite 8 Resilience scores:
File provide scores for the secondary analysis with the eight metrics available for Taema Bank. Raw scores from each of the individual metrics were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. Although it is not a metric used to analyze resilience, percent coral cover is provided as it is frequently used to evaluate reef status and prioritize management.
DescriptionThe field descriptions for the reef resilience dataset.
Entity Information
Entity Type
Data View
Data Attribute / Type | Description |
---|---|
RANK
INTEGER |
Rank of the zones, based on the resilience score (field COMP 11 or COMP 8) . Values range from 1-11. |
COMP 11
NUMERIC |
Composite 11 resilience score, based on the mean of the 11 resilience metrics (BLE, DZ, DIV, FP, HERB, REC, MA, DAM, POLL, SED, and SST VAR). |
BLE
NUMERIC |
Bleaching resistance. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
DZ
NUMERIC |
Disease prevalence. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
DIV
NUMERIC |
Coral diversity. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
FP
NUMERIC |
Fishing pressure. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
HERB
NUMERIC |
Herbivory (reef fish). Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
REC
NUMERIC |
Coral recruitment. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
MA
NUMERIC |
Macroalgae cover. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
DAM
NUMERIC |
Physical damage. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
POLL
NUMERIC |
Pollution. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
SED
NUMERIC |
Sedimentation. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
SST VAR
NUMERIC |
Sea surface temperature variability. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
% CORAL
NUMERIC |
Percent coral cover. Although not a metric used to analyze resilience, percent coral cover is provided as it is frequently used to evaluate reef status and prioritize management. Values range from 2.4-37.5%. |
COMP 8
NUMERIC |
Composite 8 resilience score, based on the mean of the 8 resilience metrics (BLE, DZ, DIV, HERB, REC, MA, DAM, and SST VAR). |
ZONE
TEXT |
The study zones around Tutuila and Aunu'u in American Samoa used in the reef resilience analysis: 11 zones in COMPOSITE 8 (includes Taema Bank), 10 zones in COMPOSITE 11 (excludes Taema Bank) |
Child Items
No Child Items for this record.
Contact Information
No contact information is available for this record.
Please contact the owner organization (PIFSC) for inquiries on this record.
Item Identification
Title: | Reef Resilience Scores - Field Descriptions |
---|---|
Short Name: | Reef Resilience Field Descriptions |
Status: | Completed |
Abstract: |
Composite 11 Resilience Scores: File provide scores for individual resilience metrics for the primary analysis with all 11 metrics. Raw scores from each of the individual metrics were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. Although it is not a metric used to analyze resilience, percent coral cover is provided as it is frequently used to evaluate reef status and prioritize management. Composite 8 Resilience scores: File provide scores for the secondary analysis with the eight metrics available for Taema Bank. Raw scores from each of the individual metrics were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. Although it is not a metric used to analyze resilience, percent coral cover is provided as it is frequently used to evaluate reef status and prioritize management. |
Entity Information
Entity Type: | Data View |
---|---|
Active Version?: | Yes |
Description: |
The field descriptions for the reef resilience dataset. |
Data Attributes
Attribute Summary
Name | Type | Description | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
100
|
RANK | INTEGER | Rank of the zones, based on the resilience score (field COMP 11 or COMP 8) . Values range from 1-11. | |
100
|
COMP 11 | NUMERIC | Composite 11 resilience score, based on the mean of the 11 resilience metrics (BLE, DZ, DIV, FP, HERB, REC, MA, DAM, POLL, SED, and SST VAR). | |
100
|
BLE | NUMERIC | Bleaching resistance. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
DZ | NUMERIC | Disease prevalence. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
DIV | NUMERIC | Coral diversity. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
FP | NUMERIC | Fishing pressure. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
HERB | NUMERIC | Herbivory (reef fish). Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
REC | NUMERIC | Coral recruitment. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
MA | NUMERIC | Macroalgae cover. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
DAM | NUMERIC | Physical damage. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
POLL | NUMERIC | Pollution. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
SED | NUMERIC | Sedimentation. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
SST VAR | NUMERIC | Sea surface temperature variability. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
% CORAL | NUMERIC | Percent coral cover. Although not a metric used to analyze resilience, percent coral cover is provided as it is frequently used to evaluate reef status and prioritize management. Values range from 2.4-37.5%. | |
100
|
COMP 8 | NUMERIC | Composite 8 resilience score, based on the mean of the 8 resilience metrics (BLE, DZ, DIV, HERB, REC, MA, DAM, and SST VAR). | |
100
|
ZONE | TEXT | The study zones around Tutuila and Aunu'u in American Samoa used in the reef resilience analysis: 11 zones in COMPOSITE 8 (includes Taema Bank), 10 zones in COMPOSITE 11 (excludes Taema Bank) |
Attribute Details
RANK
Data Storage Type: | INTEGER |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Rank of the zones, based on the resilience score (field COMP 11 or COMP 8) . Values range from 1-11. |
COMP 11
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Composite 11 resilience score, based on the mean of the 11 resilience metrics (BLE, DZ, DIV, FP, HERB, REC, MA, DAM, POLL, SED, and SST VAR). |
BLE
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Bleaching resistance. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
DZ
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Disease prevalence. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
DIV
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Coral diversity. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
FP
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Fishing pressure. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
HERB
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Herbivory (reef fish). Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
REC
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Coral recruitment. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
MA
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Macroalgae cover. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
DAM
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Physical damage. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
POLL
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Pollution. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
SED
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Sedimentation. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
SST VAR
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Sea surface temperature variability. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
% CORAL
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Percent coral cover. Although not a metric used to analyze resilience, percent coral cover is provided as it is frequently used to evaluate reef status and prioritize management. Values range from 2.4-37.5%. |
COMP 8
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Composite 8 resilience score, based on the mean of the 8 resilience metrics (BLE, DZ, DIV, HERB, REC, MA, DAM, and SST VAR). |
ZONE
Data Storage Type: | TEXT |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
The study zones around Tutuila and Aunu'u in American Samoa used in the reef resilience analysis: 11 zones in COMPOSITE 8 (includes Taema Bank), 10 zones in COMPOSITE 11 (excludes Taema Bank) |
Catalog Details
Catalog Item ID: | 50522 |
---|---|
GUID: | gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:50522 |
Metadata Record Created By: | Annette M DesRochers |
Metadata Record Created: | 2017-12-01 13:25+0000 |
Metadata Record Last Modified By: | SysAdmin InPortAdmin |
Metadata Record Last Modified: | 2022-08-09 17:11+0000 |
Metadata Record Published: | 2018-01-05 |
Owner Org: | PIFSC |
Metadata Publication Status: | Published Externally |
Do Not Publish?: | N |
Metadata Last Review Date: | 2018-01-05 |
Metadata Review Frequency: | 1 Year |
Metadata Next Review Date: | 2019-01-05 |