Search Help Show/Hide Menu
Summary
Item Identification
Entity Info
Data Attributes
Catalog Details

Summary

Abstract

Composite 11 Resilience Scores:

File provide scores for individual resilience metrics for the primary analysis with all 11 metrics. Raw scores from each of the individual metrics were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. Although it is not a metric used to analyze resilience, percent coral cover is provided as it is frequently used to evaluate reef status and prioritize management.

Composite 8 Resilience scores:

File provide scores for the secondary analysis with the eight metrics available for Taema Bank. Raw scores from each of the individual metrics were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. Although it is not a metric used to analyze resilience, percent coral cover is provided as it is frequently used to evaluate reef status and prioritize management.

Description

The field descriptions for the reef resilience dataset.

Entity Information

Entity Type
Data View

Data Attribute / Type Description
RANK
INTEGER
Rank of the zones, based on the resilience score (field COMP 11 or COMP 8) . Values range from 1-11.
COMP 11
NUMERIC
Composite 11 resilience score, based on the mean of the 11 resilience metrics (BLE, DZ, DIV, FP, HERB, REC, MA, DAM, POLL, SED, and SST VAR).
BLE
NUMERIC
Bleaching resistance. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
DZ
NUMERIC
Disease prevalence. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
DIV
NUMERIC
Coral diversity. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
FP
NUMERIC
Fishing pressure. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
HERB
NUMERIC
Herbivory (reef fish). Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
REC
NUMERIC
Coral recruitment. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
MA
NUMERIC
Macroalgae cover. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
DAM
NUMERIC
Physical damage. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
POLL
NUMERIC
Pollution. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
SED
NUMERIC
Sedimentation. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
SST VAR
NUMERIC
Sea surface temperature variability. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
% CORAL
NUMERIC
Percent coral cover. Although not a metric used to analyze resilience, percent coral cover is provided as it is frequently used to evaluate reef status and prioritize management. Values range from 2.4-37.5%.
COMP 8
NUMERIC
Composite 8 resilience score, based on the mean of the 8 resilience metrics (BLE, DZ, DIV, HERB, REC, MA, DAM, and SST VAR).
ZONE
TEXT
The study zones around Tutuila and Aunu'u in American Samoa used in the reef resilience analysis: 11 zones in COMPOSITE 8 (includes Taema Bank), 10 zones in COMPOSITE 11 (excludes Taema Bank)

Child Items

No Child Items for this record.

Contact Information

No contact information is available for this record.

Please contact the owner organization (PIFSC) for inquiries on this record.

Item Identification

Title: Reef Resilience Scores - Field Descriptions
Short Name: Reef Resilience Field Descriptions
Status: Completed
Abstract:

Composite 11 Resilience Scores:

File provide scores for individual resilience metrics for the primary analysis with all 11 metrics. Raw scores from each of the individual metrics were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. Although it is not a metric used to analyze resilience, percent coral cover is provided as it is frequently used to evaluate reef status and prioritize management.

Composite 8 Resilience scores:

File provide scores for the secondary analysis with the eight metrics available for Taema Bank. Raw scores from each of the individual metrics were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. Although it is not a metric used to analyze resilience, percent coral cover is provided as it is frequently used to evaluate reef status and prioritize management.

Entity Information

Entity Type: Data View
Active Version?: Yes
Description:

The field descriptions for the reef resilience dataset.

Data Attributes

Attribute Summary

Rubric Score Primary Key? Name Type Description
100
RANK INTEGER Rank of the zones, based on the resilience score (field COMP 11 or COMP 8) . Values range from 1-11.
100
COMP 11 NUMERIC Composite 11 resilience score, based on the mean of the 11 resilience metrics (BLE, DZ, DIV, FP, HERB, REC, MA, DAM, POLL, SED, and SST VAR).
100
BLE NUMERIC Bleaching resistance. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
100
DZ NUMERIC Disease prevalence. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
100
DIV NUMERIC Coral diversity. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
100
FP NUMERIC Fishing pressure. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
100
HERB NUMERIC Herbivory (reef fish). Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
100
REC NUMERIC Coral recruitment. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
100
MA NUMERIC Macroalgae cover. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
100
DAM NUMERIC Physical damage. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
100
POLL NUMERIC Pollution. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
100
SED NUMERIC Sedimentation. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
100
SST VAR NUMERIC Sea surface temperature variability. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.
100
% CORAL NUMERIC Percent coral cover. Although not a metric used to analyze resilience, percent coral cover is provided as it is frequently used to evaluate reef status and prioritize management. Values range from 2.4-37.5%.
100
COMP 8 NUMERIC Composite 8 resilience score, based on the mean of the 8 resilience metrics (BLE, DZ, DIV, HERB, REC, MA, DAM, and SST VAR).
100
ZONE TEXT The study zones around Tutuila and Aunu'u in American Samoa used in the reef resilience analysis: 11 zones in COMPOSITE 8 (includes Taema Bank), 10 zones in COMPOSITE 11 (excludes Taema Bank)

Attribute Details

RANK

CC ID: 708603
Data Storage Type: INTEGER
Required: No
Primary Key: No
Status: Active
Description:

Rank of the zones, based on the resilience score (field COMP 11 or COMP 8) . Values range from 1-11.

COMP 11

CC ID: 708604
Data Storage Type: NUMERIC
Required: No
Primary Key: No
Status: Active
Description:

Composite 11 resilience score, based on the mean of the 11 resilience metrics (BLE, DZ, DIV, FP, HERB, REC, MA, DAM, POLL, SED, and SST VAR).

BLE

CC ID: 708605
Data Storage Type: NUMERIC
Required: No
Primary Key: No
Status: Active
Description:

Bleaching resistance. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.

DZ

CC ID: 708606
Data Storage Type: NUMERIC
Required: No
Primary Key: No
Status: Active
Description:

Disease prevalence. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.

DIV

CC ID: 708607
Data Storage Type: NUMERIC
Required: No
Primary Key: No
Status: Active
Description:

Coral diversity. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.

FP

CC ID: 708608
Data Storage Type: NUMERIC
Required: No
Primary Key: No
Status: Active
Description:

Fishing pressure. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.

HERB

CC ID: 708615
Data Storage Type: NUMERIC
Required: No
Primary Key: No
Status: Active
Description:

Herbivory (reef fish). Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.

REC

CC ID: 708616
Data Storage Type: NUMERIC
Required: No
Primary Key: No
Status: Active
Description:

Coral recruitment. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.

MA

CC ID: 708617
Data Storage Type: NUMERIC
Required: No
Primary Key: No
Status: Active
Description:

Macroalgae cover. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.

DAM

CC ID: 708618
Data Storage Type: NUMERIC
Required: No
Primary Key: No
Status: Active
Description:

Physical damage. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.

POLL

CC ID: 708619
Data Storage Type: NUMERIC
Required: No
Primary Key: No
Status: Active
Description:

Pollution. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.

SED

CC ID: 708620
Data Storage Type: NUMERIC
Required: No
Primary Key: No
Status: Active
Description:

Sedimentation. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.

SST VAR

CC ID: 708621
Data Storage Type: NUMERIC
Required: No
Primary Key: No
Status: Active
Description:

Sea surface temperature variability. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study.

% CORAL

CC ID: 708622
Data Storage Type: NUMERIC
Required: No
Primary Key: No
Status: Active
Description:

Percent coral cover. Although not a metric used to analyze resilience, percent coral cover is provided as it is frequently used to evaluate reef status and prioritize management. Values range from 2.4-37.5%.

COMP 8

CC ID: 708623
Data Storage Type: NUMERIC
Required: No
Primary Key: No
Status: Active
Description:

Composite 8 resilience score, based on the mean of the 8 resilience metrics (BLE, DZ, DIV, HERB, REC, MA, DAM, and SST VAR).

ZONE

CC ID: 708639
Data Storage Type: TEXT
Required: No
Primary Key: No
Status: Active
Description:

The study zones around Tutuila and Aunu'u in American Samoa used in the reef resilience analysis: 11 zones in COMPOSITE 8 (includes Taema Bank), 10 zones in COMPOSITE 11 (excludes Taema Bank)

Catalog Details

Catalog Item ID: 50522
GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:50522
Metadata Record Created By: Annette M DesRochers
Metadata Record Created: 2017-12-01 13:25+0000
Metadata Record Last Modified By: SysAdmin InPortAdmin
Metadata Record Last Modified: 2022-08-09 17:11+0000
Metadata Record Published: 2018-01-05
Owner Org: PIFSC
Metadata Publication Status: Published Externally
Do Not Publish?: N
Metadata Last Review Date: 2018-01-05
Metadata Review Frequency: 1 Year
Metadata Next Review Date: 2019-01-05