2020 OR DOT Lidar DEM: Blue Pool, OR
Data Set (DS) | OCM Partners (OCMP)GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:64727 | Updated: October 17, 2023 | Published / External
Summary
Short Citation
OCM Partners, 2024: 2020 OR DOT Lidar DEM: Blue Pool, OR, https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/64727.
Full Citation Examples
In December 2019, Quantum Spatial (QSI) was contracted by the State of Oregon’s Department of Administrative Services (DAS) on behalf of Oregon State Parks and the Oregon Department of Transportation to collect Light Detection and Ranging (lidar) data and digital imagery in the spring of 2020 for the Blue Pool Lidar & Imagery site in Oregon.
The NOAA Office for Coastal Management received the data from the Oregon Department of Parks and Recreation and processed it to the Data Access Viewer (DAV) and http. In addition to these bare earth Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data, the lidar point data that these DEM data were created from, are also available. These data are available for custom download at the link provided in the URL section of this metadata record. No metadata record was provided for this data set. This record was created by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) using information from the data report.
Distribution Information
-
GeoTIFF
Bulk download of data files in GeoTiff format, Oregon LCC NAD83 (2011) coordinates, orthometric heights.
-
Create custom data files by choosing data area, product type, map projection, file format, datum, etc. A new metadata will be produced to reflect your request using this record as a base.
None
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations.
Controlled Theme Keywords
elevation, geoscientificInformation, TERRAIN ELEVATION
Child Items
No Child Items for this record.
Contact Information
Point of Contact
NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM)
coastal.info@noaa.gov
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
Metadata Contact
NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM)
coastal.info@noaa.gov
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
Extents
-122.414411° W,
-122.082457° E,
43.803672° N,
43.590079° S
2020-06-18 - 2020-06-19
Item Identification
Title: | 2020 OR DOT Lidar DEM: Blue Pool, OR |
---|---|
Short Name: | or2020_blue_pool_dem_m9308_metadata |
Status: | Completed |
Creation Date: | 2020 |
Publication Date: | 2020 |
Abstract: |
In December 2019, Quantum Spatial (QSI) was contracted by the State of Oregon’s Department of Administrative Services (DAS) on behalf of Oregon State Parks and the Oregon Department of Transportation to collect Light Detection and Ranging (lidar) data and digital imagery in the spring of 2020 for the Blue Pool Lidar & Imagery site in Oregon. The NOAA Office for Coastal Management received the data from the Oregon Department of Parks and Recreation and processed it to the Data Access Viewer (DAV) and http. In addition to these bare earth Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data, the lidar point data that these DEM data were created from, are also available. These data are available for custom download at the link provided in the URL section of this metadata record. No metadata record was provided for this data set. This record was created by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) using information from the data report. |
Purpose: |
Data were collected to aid DAS in assessing the topographic and geophysical properties of the study area to support various Department of Transportation needs, including road engineering. |
Keywords
Theme Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords |
EARTH SCIENCE > LAND SURFACE > TOPOGRAPHY > TERRAIN ELEVATION
|
ISO 19115 Topic Category |
elevation
|
ISO 19115 Topic Category |
geoscientificInformation
|
UNCONTROLLED | |
Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office Metadata Keyword Thesaurus | bare earth |
Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office Metadata Keyword Thesaurus | digital elevation model (DEM) |
Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office Metadata Keyword Thesaurus | digital terrain model (DTM) |
Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office Metadata Keyword Thesaurus | hillshade |
Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office Metadata Keyword Thesaurus | intensity |
Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office Metadata Keyword Thesaurus | quadrangle |
Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office Metadata Keyword Thesaurus | topography |
None | erosion |
None | laser |
None | lidar |
Spatial Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA
|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > OREGON
|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
VERTICAL LOCATION > LAND SURFACE
|
UNCONTROLLED | |
Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office Metadata Keyword Thesaurus | USA |
None | Continent > North America > United States Of America > Oregon > Lane County |
Instrument Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Instrument Keywords |
LIDAR > Light Detection and Ranging
|
Platform Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords |
Airplane > Airplane
|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords |
DEM > Digital Elevation Model
|
Physical Location
Organization: | Office for Coastal Management |
---|---|
City: | Charleston |
State/Province: | SC |
Data Set Information
Data Set Scope Code: | Data Set |
---|---|
Data Set Type: | Elevation |
Maintenance Frequency: | None Planned |
Data Presentation Form: | Model (digital) |
Distribution Liability: |
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this dataset was collected and that some parts of these data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, surveying, or site specific purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of NOAA, the Office for Coastal Management or its partners. |
Data Set Credit: | Oregon Department of Administrative Services Geospatial Enterprise Office (DAS-GEO) |
Support Roles
Data Steward
Date Effective From: | 2021 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Distributor
Date Effective From: | 2021 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Metadata Contact
Date Effective From: | 2021 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Point of Contact
Date Effective From: | 2021 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Extents
Currentness Reference: | Ground Condition |
---|
Extent Group 1
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 1
W° Bound: | -122.414411 | |
---|---|---|
E° Bound: | -122.082457 | |
N° Bound: | 43.803672 | |
S° Bound: | 43.590079 |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 1
Time Frame Type: | Range |
---|---|
Start: | 2020-06-18 |
End: | 2020-06-19 |
Spatial Information
Spatial Representation
Representations Used
Grid: | Yes |
---|---|
Vector: | No |
Text / Table: | No |
TIN: | No |
Stereo Model: | No |
Video: | No |
Reference Systems
Reference System 1
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reference System 2
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Access Information
Security Class: | Unclassified |
---|---|
Data Access Procedure: |
Data is available online for bulk and custom downloads. |
Data Access Constraints: |
None |
Data Use Constraints: |
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. |
Distribution Information
Distribution 1
Start Date: | 2019-10-11 |
---|---|
End Date: | Present |
Download URL: | https://chs.coast.noaa.gov/htdata/raster5/elevation/OR_Blue_Pool_DEM_2020_9308 |
Distributor: | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) (2021 - Present) |
File Name: | Bulk Download |
Description: |
Bulk download of data files in GeoTiff format, Oregon LCC NAD83 (2011) coordinates, orthometric heights. |
File Type (Deprecated): | GeoTIFF |
Distribution Format: | GeoTIFF |
Distribution 2
Start Date: | 2019-10-11 |
---|---|
End Date: | Present |
Download URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=9308/details/9308 |
Distributor: | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) (2021 - Present) |
File Name: | Customized Download |
Description: |
Create custom data files by choosing data area, product type, map projection, file format, datum, etc. A new metadata will be produced to reflect your request using this record as a base. |
File Type (Deprecated): | Zip |
Compression: | Zip |
URLs
URL 1
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov/htdata/lidar4_z/geoid18/data/9304/supplemental/or2020_blue_pool_m9304.kmz |
---|---|
Name: | Browse graphic |
URL Type: |
Browse Graphic
|
File Resource Format: | KML |
Description: |
This graphic displays the footprint for this lidar data set. |
URL 2
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov/htdata/lidar4_z/geoid18/data/9304/supplemental/Blue_Pool_NIR_LiDAR_Data_Report.pdf |
---|---|
Name: | Data Set Report |
URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
File Resource Format: | |
Description: |
Link to project report for this data set. |
URL 3
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/ |
---|---|
Name: | NOAA's Office for Coastal Management (OCM) Data Access Viewer (DAV) |
URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
File Resource Format: | HTML |
Description: |
The Data Access Viewer (DAV) allows a user to search for and download elevation, imagery, and land cover data for the coastal U.S. and its territories. The data, hosted by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management, can be customized and requested for free download through a checkout interface. An email provides a link to the customized data, while the original data set is available through a link within the viewer. |
URL 4
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=9304/details/9304 |
---|---|
Name: | Custom download point data |
URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
File Resource Format: | LAZ |
Description: |
Link to custom download, from the Data Access Viewer (DAV), the lidar point data from which these raster Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data were created. |
Data Quality
Vertical Positional Accuracy: |
Absolute accuracy was assessed using Non-Vegetated Vertical Accuracy (NVA) reporting designed to meet guidelines presented in the FGDC National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy3. NVA compares known ground check point data that were withheld from the calibration and post-processing of the lidar point cloud to the triangulated surface generated by the unclassified lidar point cloud as well as the derived gridded bare earth DEM. NVA is a measure of the accuracy of lidar point data in open areas where the lidar system has a high probability of measuring the ground surface and is evaluated at the 95% confidence interval (1.96 * RMSE). The mean and standard deviation (sigma) of divergence of the ground surface model from quality assurance point coordinates are also considered during accuracy assessment. These statistics assume the error for x, y and z is normally distributed, and therefore the skew and kurtosis of distributions are also considered when evaluating error statistics. For the Blue Pool, Oregon survey, 24 ground check points were withheld from the calibration and post processing of the lidar point cloud, with resulting non-vegetated vertical accuracy of 0.045 meters 95 percent confidence (2.3 cm RMSE) as compared to unclassified LAS, and 0.055 meters 95 percent confidence (2.8 cm RMSE) as compared to the bare earth DEM. |
---|
Data Management
Have Resources for Management of these Data Been Identified?: | Yes |
---|---|
Approximate Percentage of Budget for these Data Devoted to Data Management: | Unknown |
Do these Data Comply with the Data Access Directive?: | Yes |
Actual or Planned Long-Term Data Archive Location: | NCEI-CO |
How Will the Data Be Protected from Accidental or Malicious Modification or Deletion Prior to Receipt by the Archive?: |
Data is backed up to tape and to cloud storage. |
Lineage
Lineage Statement: |
Data were collected and processed by Quantum Spatial, Inc. for the OR DAS, on behalf of the OR DOT. The data were provided to the NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) where the data were processed to make it available for custom download from the Data Access Viewer (DAV) and bulk download from https. |
---|
Sources
Raw Lidar
Contact Role Type: | Originator |
---|---|
Contact Type: | Organization |
Contact Name: | Quantum Spatial |
Citation URL: | http://quantumspatial.com/ |
Citation URL Name: | Quantum Spatial |
Citation URL Description: |
Data collector's website |
Process Steps
Process Step 1
Description: |
Ground Survey Ground control surveys, including monumentation, aerial targets and ground survey points (GSPs) were conducted to support the airborne acquisition. Ground control data were used to geospatially correct the aircraft positional coordinate data and to perform quality assurance checks on final lidar data and orthoimagery products. Base stations were utilized for collection of ground survey points using real time kinematic (RTK), post processed kinematic (PPK), and fast static (FS) survey techniques. Base station locations were selected with consideration for satellite visibility, field crew safety, and optimal location for GSP coverage. QSI utilized nine existing base stations for the Blue Pool, Oregon project. Base stations were set with a 9” MAG spike marked with orange flagging. QSI’s professional land surveyor, Evon Silvia (ORPLS#81104) oversaw and certified the establishment of all monuments. QSI utilized static Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data collected at 1 Hz recording frequency for each base station. During post-processing, the static GNSS data were triangulated with nearby Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) using the Online Positioning User Service (OPUS1) for precise positioning. Multiple independent sessions over the same monument were processed to confirm antenna height measurements and to refine position accuracy. Monuments were established according to the national standard for geodetic control networks, as specified in the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Geospatial Positioning Accuracy Standards for geodetic networks. This standard provides guidelines for classification of monument quality at the 95% confidence interval as a basis for comparing the quality of one control network to another. For the Blue Pool, Oregon project, the monument coordinates contributed no more than 5.6 cm of positional error to the geolocation of the final ground survey points and lidar, with 95% confidence. Ground Survey Points Ground survey points were collected using real time kinematic (RTK), post-processed kinematic (PPK), and fast-static (FS) survey techniques. For RTK surveys, a roving receiver receives corrections from a nearby base station or Real-Time Network (RTN) via radio or cellular network, enabling rapid collection of points with relative errors less than 1.5 cm horizontal and 2.0 cm vertical. PPK and FS surveys compute these corrections during post-processing to achieve comparable accuracy. RTK and PPK surveys record data while stationary for at least five seconds, calculating the position using at least three one-second epochs. FS surveys record observations for up to fifteen minutes on each GSP in order to support longer baselines. All GSP measurements were made during periods with a Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP) of ≤ 3.0 with at least six satellites in view of the stationary and roving receivers. See for Trimble unit specifications. GSPs were collected in areas where good satellite visibility was achieved on paved roads and other hard surfaces such as gravel or packed dirt roads. GSP measurements were not taken on highly reflective surfaces such as center line stripes or lane markings on roads due to the increased noise seen in the laser returns over these surfaces. GSPs were collected within as many flightlines as possible; however, the distribution of GSPs depended on ground access constraints and monument locations and may not be equitably distributed throughout the study area. |
---|---|
Process Date/Time: | 2020-06-19 00:00:00 |
Process Step 2
Description: |
Airborne Survey The lidar survey was accomplished using a Riegl VQ 1560ii system mounted in a Cessna Caravan. The survey settings and specs were used to yield an average pulse density of greater than or equal to 20 pulses/m2 over the Blue Pool, Oregon project area. The Riegl laser system can record unlimited range measurements (returns) per pulse, although only up to 15 pulses can be stored due to restraints of the LAS v1.4 format. It is not uncommon for some types of surfaces (e.g., dense vegetation or water) to return fewer pulses to the lidar sensor than the laser originally emitted. The discrepancy between first return and overall delivered density will vary depending on terrain, land cover, and the prevalence of water bodies. All discernible laser returns were processed for the output dataset. All areas were surveyed with an opposing flight line side-lap of ≥50% (≥100% overlap) in order to reduce laser shadowing and increase surface laser painting. To accurately solve for laser point position (geographic coordinates x, y and z), the positional coordinates of the airborne sensor and the attitude of the aircraft were recorded continuously throughout the lidar data collection mission. Position of the aircraft was measured twice per second (2 Hz) by an onboard differential GPS unit, and aircraft attitude was measured 200 times per second (200 Hz) as pitch, roll and yaw (heading) from an onboard inertial measurement unit (IMU). To allow for post-processing correction and calibration, aircraft and sensor position and attitude data are indexed by GPS time. |
---|---|
Process Date/Time: | 2020-06-19 00:00:00 |
Process Step 3
Description: |
Processing Upon completion of data acquisition, QSI processing staff initiated a suite of automated and manual techniques to process the data into the requested deliverables. Processing tasks included GPS control computations, smoothed best estimate trajectory (SBET) calculations, kinematic corrections, calculation of laser point position, sensor and data calibration for optimal relative and absolute accuracy, and Lidar point classification. Processing methodologies were tailored for the landscape. Resolve kinematic corrections for aircraft position data using kinematic aircraft GPS and static ground GPS data. Develop a smoothed best estimate of trajectory (SBET) file that blends post-processed aircraft position with sensor head position and attitude recorded throughout the survey. Calculate laser point position by associating SBET position to each laser point return time, scan angle, intensity, etc. Create raw laser point cloud data for the entire survey in *.las (ASPRS v. 1.4) format. Convert data to orthometric elevations by applying a geoid correction. Import raw laser points into manageable blocks to perform manual relative accuracy calibration and filter erroneous points. Classify ground points for individual flight lines. Using ground classified points per each flight line, test the relative accuracy. Perform automated line-to-line calibrations for system attitude parameters (pitch, roll, heading), mirror flex (scale) and GPS/IMU drift. Calculate calibrations on ground classified points from paired flight lines and apply results to all points in a flight line. Use every flight line for relative accuracy calibration. Classify resulting data to ground and other client designated ASPRS classifications (Table 9). Assess statistical absolute accuracy via direct comparisons of ground classified points to ground control survey data. Generate bare earth models as triangulated surfaces. Generate highest hit models as a surface expression of all classified points. Export all surface models as GeoTIFF format at a 1.0 meter (3.0 ft) pixel resolution. |
---|---|
Process Date/Time: | 2020-10-31 00:00:00 |
Process Step 4
Description: |
The NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) received 9 digital elevation model (DEM) files in GeoTiff format from the Oregon Parks and Recreation Dept. The bare earth raster files were at a 3 ft grid spacing. The data were in Oregon Lambert Conformal Conic NAD83 (2011), international feet coordinates and NAVD88 (Geoid 12B) elevations in feet. OCM assigned the appropriate EPSG codes (Horiz - 6557, Vert - 8228) and copied the raster files to https for Digital Coast storage and provisioning purposes. No metadata record was provided for this data set. This record was created by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) using information from the data report. |
---|---|
Process Date/Time: | 2021-06-02 00:00:00 |
Process Contact: | Office for Coastal Management (OCM) |
Related Items
Item Type | Relationship Type | Title |
---|---|---|
Data Set (DS) | Cross Reference |
2020 OR DOT Lidar: Blue Pool, OR |
Catalog Details
Catalog Item ID: | 64727 |
---|---|
GUID: | gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:64727 |
Metadata Record Created By: | Rebecca Mataosky |
Metadata Record Created: | 2021-06-02 18:11+0000 |
Metadata Record Last Modified By: | SysAdmin InPortAdmin |
Metadata Record Last Modified: | 2023-10-17 16:12+0000 |
Metadata Record Published: | 2021-06-03 |
Owner Org: | OCMP |
Metadata Publication Status: | Published Externally |
Do Not Publish?: | N |
Metadata Last Review Date: | 2021-06-03 |
Metadata Review Frequency: | 1 Year |
Metadata Next Review Date: | 2022-06-03 |