Search Help Show/Hide Menu
Summary
Item Identification
Support Roles
Distribution Info
Catalog Details

Summary

Description

This document is the individual CIE Reviewer report of the SEDAR 68 Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Scamp assessment conducted during August-September 2021 and provided at the request of the Center for Independent Experts (CIE).

This report solely represents the view of the independent reviewer (Prof. Massimiliano Cardinale). The text in this report is mainly based on the original assessment reports and background documents provided to the reviewer in advance of the meeting.

The Assessment team tackled all the assigned terms of reference (TORs).

The reviewer considers that the Assessment team has done a satisfactory job in carrying out the assessment, analysing all available data, modelling part of the uncertainty and providing some sensitivity analyses of both the data and the models. However, the reviewer does not completely agree with all of the findings reported in the SEDAR 68 Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Scamp assessment report. Taking into account all available information, the reviewer considers that a single best model cannot be singled out to be used for advice. Instead, given the uncertainties in the data used as input, and in key biological parameters and processes, a model ensemble should be developed in the future.

Distribution Information

Contact Information

Distributor
SEDAR
(843) 571-4366

Item Identification

Title: SEDAR 68 CIE Reviewer Report - Cardinale
Status: Completed
Publication Date: 2021-11
Abstract:

This document is the individual CIE Reviewer report of the SEDAR 68 Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Scamp assessment conducted during August-September 2021 and provided at the request of the Center for Independent Experts (CIE).

This report solely represents the view of the independent reviewer (Prof. Massimiliano Cardinale). The text in this report is mainly based on the original assessment reports and background documents provided to the reviewer in advance of the meeting.

The Assessment team tackled all the assigned terms of reference (TORs).

The reviewer considers that the Assessment team has done a satisfactory job in carrying out the assessment, analysing all available data, modelling part of the uncertainty and providing some sensitivity analyses of both the data and the models. However, the reviewer does not completely agree with all of the findings reported in the SEDAR 68 Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Scamp assessment report. Taking into account all available information, the reviewer considers that a single best model cannot be singled out to be used for advice. Instead, given the uncertainties in the data used as input, and in key biological parameters and processes, a model ensemble should be developed in the future.

Purpose:

Independent peer review report of the SEDAR 68 Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Scamp assessment review Prepared for the Center for Independent Experts

By Professor Massimiliano Cardinale

Support Roles

Distributor

CC ID: 1286402
Date Effective From: 2022
Date Effective To:
Contact (Organization): SEDAR
Address: 4055 Faber Place
North Charleston, SC 29405
United States
Phone: (843) 571-4366
URL: http://sedarweb.org

Distribution Information

Distribution 1

CC ID: 1286403
Start Date: 2022
End Date: Present
Download URL: https://sedarweb.org/documents/sedar-68-cie-reviewer-report-cardinale/
Distributor: SEDAR (2022 - Present)
File Name: sedar-68-cie-reviewer-report-cardinale.pdf
File Type (Deprecated): PDF
Distribution Format: PDF - Adobe Portable Document Format
File Size: 844k
Compression: Uncompressed
Review Status: Chked Viruses Inapp Content

Catalog Details

Catalog Item ID: 71738
GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:71738
Metadata Record Created By: Lee M Weinberger
Metadata Record Created: 2023-12-26 12:17+0000
Metadata Record Last Modified By: Lee M Weinberger
Metadata Record Last Modified: 2023-12-26 22:53+0000
Metadata Record Published: 2023-12-26
Owner Org: SEFSC
Metadata Publication Status: Published Externally
Do Not Publish?: N
Metadata Last Review Date: 2021-07-26
Metadata Review Frequency: 1 Year
Metadata Next Review Date: 2022-07-26