Terracing at Pierce Marsh in Galveston Bay 2001-2002
Data Set (DS) | Southeast Fisheries Science Center (SEFSC)GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:10010 | Updated: August 15, 2023 | Published / External
- View As
- View in Hierarchy
Summary
Short Citation
Southeast Fisheries Science Center, 2025: Terracing at Pierce Marsh in Galveston Bay 2001-2002, https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/10010.
Full Citation Examples
Marsh terracing is used to restore coastal wetlands by converting shallow nonvegetated bottom to intertidal marsh. Terraces are constructed from excavated bottom sediments, and are commonly arranged in a checkerboard pattern of square cells with open corners to form terrace fields. The project was located in shallow estuarine waters, and used bottom sediments or upland soils to construct intertidal areas planted with smooth cordgrass, Spartina alterniflora. We used a quantitative sampling device to compare nekton densities and biomass in habitat types of marsh terraces of three cell sizes at Pierce Marsh in Galveston Bay to a nearby reference marsh. Within terrace cells, density, biomass, and species richness were generally higher in marsh vegetation than over nonvegetated bottom. We also used Geographic Information System (GIS) and high-resolution aerial photography to classify areas into land (marsh vegetation) and water and applied fishery density models to assess fishery support. These models describe finescale distribution patterns for brown shrimp Farfantepenaeus aztecus, white shrimp Litopenaeus setiferus, and blue crab Callinectes sapidus across shallow estuarine habitat types (emergent marsh and shallow open water) of Galveston Bay. We show that populations of most fishery species increase as cell size decreases. However, as cell size decreases, the cost of terrace construction increases much faster than population size. Therefore, terrace fields constructed of medium or large cells would be more cost effective in providing fishery habitat than would terraces composed of small cells. Based on our modeling results, restored sites supported relatively high populations of fishery species compared to pre-restoration conditions. However, restoration sites did not support populations’ equivalent to a reference marsh system. Restoration projects should maximize the area of marsh vegetation and create a high degree of water-marsh interspersion to provide the most benefit for fishery species.
Distribution Information
-
zip file on SEFSCc PARR Data Server containing all data files for this dataset and a readme file
None
Child Items
Type | Title |
---|---|
Entity | Pierce Marsh 2001-2002 tblFishLength.xlsx |
Entity | Pierce Marsh 2001-2002 tblFishMass.xlsx |
Entity | Pierce Marsh 2001-2002 tblInvertLength.xlsx |
Entity | Pierce Marsh 2001-2002 tblPenaeids.xlsx |
Entity | Pierce Marsh 2001-2002 tblSamples.xlsx |
Entity | Pierce_Marsh2001-2002tblFishlength.csv |
Entity | Pierce_Marsh2001-2002tblFishmass.csv |
Entity | Pierce_Marsh2001-2002tblInvertlength.csv |
Entity | Pierce_Marsh2001-2002tblPenaeids.csv |
Entity | Pierce_Marsh2001-2002tblSamples.csv |
Entity | fishlength_column_descriptions.csv |
Entity | fishlength_table_description.csv |
Entity | fishmass_column_descriptions.csv |
Entity | fishmass_table_description.csv |
Entity | invertlength_column_descriptions.csv |
Entity | invertlength_table_description.csv |
Entity | misc_descriptors.csv |
Entity | penaeids_column_descriptions.csv |
Entity | penaeids_table_description.csv |
Document | readme_10010.pdf |
Entity | samples_column_descriptions.csv |
Entity | samples_table_description.csv |
Contact Information
Point of Contact
Tim J Baumer
tim.baumer@noaa.gov
409-766-3784
Metadata Contact
Lawrence P Rozas
Extents
-94.97576° W,
-94.956894° E,
29.324421° N,
29.19163° S
Gulf Of Mexico
2001 - 2002
Item Identification
Title: | Terracing at Pierce Marsh in Galveston Bay 2001-2002 |
---|---|
Short Name: | Pierce Marsh Terracing 2001-2002 |
Status: | Completed |
Creation Date: | 2001 |
Revision Date: | 2003 |
Publication Date: | 2017 |
Abstract: |
Marsh terracing is used to restore coastal wetlands by converting shallow nonvegetated bottom to intertidal marsh. Terraces are constructed from excavated bottom sediments, and are commonly arranged in a checkerboard pattern of square cells with open corners to form terrace fields. The project was located in shallow estuarine waters, and used bottom sediments or upland soils to construct intertidal areas planted with smooth cordgrass, Spartina alterniflora. We used a quantitative sampling device to compare nekton densities and biomass in habitat types of marsh terraces of three cell sizes at Pierce Marsh in Galveston Bay to a nearby reference marsh. Within terrace cells, density, biomass, and species richness were generally higher in marsh vegetation than over nonvegetated bottom. We also used Geographic Information System (GIS) and high-resolution aerial photography to classify areas into land (marsh vegetation) and water and applied fishery density models to assess fishery support. These models describe finescale distribution patterns for brown shrimp Farfantepenaeus aztecus, white shrimp Litopenaeus setiferus, and blue crab Callinectes sapidus across shallow estuarine habitat types (emergent marsh and shallow open water) of Galveston Bay. We show that populations of most fishery species increase as cell size decreases. However, as cell size decreases, the cost of terrace construction increases much faster than population size. Therefore, terrace fields constructed of medium or large cells would be more cost effective in providing fishery habitat than would terraces composed of small cells. Based on our modeling results, restored sites supported relatively high populations of fishery species compared to pre-restoration conditions. However, restoration sites did not support populations’ equivalent to a reference marsh system. Restoration projects should maximize the area of marsh vegetation and create a high degree of water-marsh interspersion to provide the most benefit for fishery species. |
Purpose: |
The purposes of this study were to evaluate marsh terracing as a method for restoring estuarine habitat and fishery production in Galveston Bay, and to test whether cell size affects the fishery value of habitat created by marsh terracing. |
Keywords
Theme Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
UNCONTROLLED | |
None | abundance |
None | Callinectes sapidus |
None | cost to benefit |
None | distribution |
None | Farfantepenaeus aztecus |
None | fisheries independent data |
None | Litopenaeus setiferus |
None | marsh terracing |
None | modelling |
None | non-vegetative bottom |
None | nursery habitats |
None | Spartina alterniflora |
Temporal Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
UNCONTROLLED | |
None | 2001-2002 |
Spatial Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
UNCONTROLLED | |
NODC SEA AREA NAMES | Gulf of Mexico |
None | Galveston Bay, Texas |
None | Pierce Marsh |
Physical Location
Organization: | Southeast Fisheries Science Center |
---|---|
City: | Miami |
State/Province: | FL |
Country: | USA |
Location Description: |
Location Of The Main Office Of The South East Fisheries Science Center |
Data Set Information
Data Set Scope Code: | Data Set |
---|---|
Data Set Type: | Mixed |
Maintenance Frequency: | None Planned |
Data Presentation Form: | Table (digital) |
Support Roles
Data Steward
Date Effective From: | 2001-09-26 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Person): | Ditty, James |
Address: |
4700 Avenue U Galveston, TX 77551-5997 |
Email Address: | Jim.Ditty@noaa.gov |
Phone: | 409-766-3782 |
Fax: | 409-766-3508 |
Data Steward
Date Effective From: | 2001 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Person): | Rozas, Lawrence P |
Contact Instructions: |
Contact by email preferred. |
Distributor
Date Effective From: | 2001 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | Southeast Fisheries Science Center (SEFSC) |
Address: |
75 Virginia Beach Drive Miami, FL 33149 USA |
Phone: | (305)361-5761 |
URL: | https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/about/southeast-fisheries-science-center |
Business Hours: | 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. EST |
Contact Instructions: |
Contact by email preferred. |
Metadata Contact
Date Effective From: | 2001 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Person): | Rozas, Lawrence P |
Contact Instructions: |
Contact by email preferred. |
Point of Contact
Date Effective From: | 2016 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Person): | Baumer, Tim J |
Address: |
4700 Avenue U Galveston, TX 77551 |
Email Address: | tim.baumer@noaa.gov |
Phone: | 409-766-3784 |
Contact Instructions: |
Contact by email preferred. |
Extents
Currentness Reference: | Ground Condition |
---|
Extent Group 1
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 1
W° Bound: | -94.97576 | |
---|---|---|
E° Bound: | -94.956894 | |
N° Bound: | 29.324421 | |
S° Bound: | 29.19163 | |
Description |
Gulf Of Mexico |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 1
Time Frame Type: | Range |
---|---|
Start: | 2001 |
End: | 2002 |
Access Information
Security Class: | Unclassified |
---|---|
Data Access Procedure: |
Download from provided link |
Data Access Constraints: |
None |
Distribution Information
Distribution 1
Start Date: | 2018 |
---|---|
End Date: | Present |
Download URL: | http://grunt.sefsc.noaa.gov/parr/10010.zip |
Distributor: | Southeast Fisheries Science Center (SEFSC) (2001 - Present) |
File Name: | 10010.zip |
Description: |
zip file on SEFSCc PARR Data Server containing all data files for this dataset and a readme file |
File Type (Deprecated): | zip |
Compression: | Zip |
Review Status: | Chked Viruses Inapp Content |
Data Quality
Accuracy: |
Data were entered into spreadsheets and checked against the raw data sheet to avoid entry errors |
---|---|
Quality Control Procedures Employed: |
Each sample was assigned a unique identification code. Field collected samples were tagged redundantly (e.g. one label inside of the collection vessel and a matching label attached to the outside of the vessel). The identifier and its associated information (e.g. date, location, habitat) was recorded on field data sheets. Once a sample arrived at the laboratory, the label remained with the sample throughout the various stages of sample processing. After data were entered into an Excel spreadsheet or similar database file, the information was printed out and compared against the field data sheets by two biologists. Corrections were made at this time and saved. The resultant electronic file was also sorted and examined by the Lab Supervisor or other project personnel in a variety of ways to look for outliers, missing data, and other potential errors. |
Data Management
Have Resources for Management of these Data Been Identified?: | No |
---|---|
Approximate Percentage of Budget for these Data Devoted to Data Management: | 0 |
Do these Data Comply with the Data Access Directive?: | Yes |
Is Access to the Data Limited Based on an Approved Waiver?: | No |
If Distributor (Data Hosting Service) is Needed, Please Indicate: | No |
Approximate Delay Between Data Collection and Dissemination: | 365 |
If Delay is Longer than Latency of Automated Processing, Indicate Under What Authority Data Access is Delayed: |
N/A |
Actual or Planned Long-Term Data Archive Location: | To Be Determined |
If To Be Determined, Unable to Archive, or No Archiving Intended, Explain: |
The archival process is currently under development. |
Approximate Delay Between Data Collection and Archiving: | 365 |
How Will the Data Be Protected from Accidental or Malicious Modification or Deletion Prior to Receipt by the Archive?: |
The data resides on a secure government network requiring multi-factor authentication for network access. |
Lineage
Process Steps
Process Step 1
Description: |
After sample collection, field data were entered into an Excel spreadsheet or database file (DBF) using database manager software. A text file was created to describe these data and associated variables. Entered data were checked against the field sheets by two biologists to minimize entry errors. Samples were processed in the laboratory, sorted, specimens identified and measured, and information was entered into an Excel spreadsheet or DBF file. Files were printed out and compared against original data sheets by two biologists for data entry errors. Corrections were made at this time, the electronic file was saved, and a back-up copy made. Hard copies of the QCd files were printed and stored in the project folder along with the original field and laboratory data sheets. The electronic file was also sorted and examined by the Lab Supervisor or other project personnel in a variety of ways to look for outliers, missing data, and other potential errors. Verified data files were then saved electronically on the Galveston Laboratory server and backed-up as needed. |
---|---|
Process Contact: | Ditty, James |
Phone (Voice): | 409-766-3782 |
Email Address: | Jim.Ditty@noaa.gov |
Child Items
Rubric scores updated every 15m
![]() |
Type | Title |
---|---|---|
Entity | Pierce Marsh 2001-2002 tblFishLength.xlsx | |
Entity | Pierce Marsh 2001-2002 tblFishMass.xlsx | |
Entity | Pierce Marsh 2001-2002 tblInvertLength.xlsx | |
Entity | Pierce Marsh 2001-2002 tblPenaeids.xlsx | |
Entity | Pierce Marsh 2001-2002 tblSamples.xlsx | |
Entity | Pierce_Marsh2001-2002tblFishlength.csv | |
Entity | Pierce_Marsh2001-2002tblFishmass.csv | |
Entity | Pierce_Marsh2001-2002tblInvertlength.csv | |
Entity | Pierce_Marsh2001-2002tblPenaeids.csv | |
Entity | Pierce_Marsh2001-2002tblSamples.csv | |
Entity | fishlength_column_descriptions.csv | |
Entity | fishlength_table_description.csv | |
Entity | fishmass_column_descriptions.csv | |
Entity | fishmass_table_description.csv | |
Entity | invertlength_column_descriptions.csv | |
Entity | invertlength_table_description.csv | |
Entity | misc_descriptors.csv | |
Entity | penaeids_column_descriptions.csv | |
Entity | penaeids_table_description.csv | |
Document | readme_10010.pdf | |
Entity | samples_column_descriptions.csv | |
Entity | samples_table_description.csv |
Catalog Details
Catalog Item ID: | 10010 |
---|---|
GUID: | gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:10010 |
Metadata Record Created By: | Lee M Weinberger |
Metadata Record Created: | 2009-08-28 13:47+0000 |
Metadata Record Last Modified By: | SysAdmin InPortAdmin |
Metadata Record Last Modified: | 2023-08-15 17:09+0000 |
Metadata Record Published: | 2021-10-21 |
Owner Org: | SEFSC |
Metadata Publication Status: | Published Externally |
Do Not Publish?: | N |
Metadata Last Review Date: | 2021-10-21 |
Metadata Review Frequency: | 1 Year |
Metadata Next Review Date: | 2022-10-21 |