Removal of corallivorous snails as a proactive tool for the conservation of acroporid corals
Document (DOC) | Southeast Fisheries Science Center (SEFSC)GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:26794 | Updated: August 9, 2022 | Published / External
-
View As
- Full List View
- Printable Form
- EXPORTS
- InPort XML
- View in Hierarchy
Summary
Corallivorous snail feeding is a common source of tissue loss for the threatened coral, Acropora palmata, accounting for roughly one-quarter of tissue loss in monitored study plots over seven years. In contrast with larger threats such as bleaching, disease, or storms, corallivory by Coralliophila abbreviata is one of the few direct sources of partial mortality that may be locally managed.We conducted a field experiment to explore the effectiveness and feasibility of snail removal. Long-term monitoring plots on six reefs in the upper Florida Keys were assigned to one of three removal treatments: (1) removal from A. palmata only, (2) removal fromall host coral species, or (3) no-removal controls. During the initial removal in June 2011, 436 snails were removed from twelve 150 m2 plots. Snails were removed three additional times during a seven month “removal phase”, then counted at five surveys over the next 19 months to track recolonization. At the conclusion, snails were collected, measured and sexed. Before-After-Control-Impact analysis revealed that both snail abundance and feeding scar prevalence were reduced in removal treatments compared to the control, but there was no difference between removal treatments. Recolonization by snails to baseline abundance is estimated to be 3.7 years and did not differ between removal treatments. Recolonization rate was significantly correlated with baseline snail abundance.Maximum snail size decreased from47.0mmto 34.6mmin the removal treatments. The effort required to remove snails from A. palmata was 30 diver minutes per 150m2 plot, compared with 51 min to remove snails from all host corals. Since there was no additional benefit observed with removing snails from all host species, removals can be more efficiently focused on only A. palmata colonies and in areas where C. abbreviata abundance is high, to effectively conserve A. palmata in targeted areas.
Document Information
Document Type
Journal article
Document Format
Acrobat Portable Document Format
Publication Date
2014-11-27
Contact Information
Distributor
Southeast Fisheries Science Center (SEFSC)
(305)361-5761
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/about/southeast-fisheries-science-center
Item Identification
Title: | Removal of corallivorous snails as a proactive tool for the conservation of acroporid corals |
---|---|
Status: | Completed |
Publication Date: | 2014-11-27 |
Abstract: |
Corallivorous snail feeding is a common source of tissue loss for the threatened coral, Acropora palmata, accounting for roughly one-quarter of tissue loss in monitored study plots over seven years. In contrast with larger threats such as bleaching, disease, or storms, corallivory by Coralliophila abbreviata is one of the few direct sources of partial mortality that may be locally managed.We conducted a field experiment to explore the effectiveness and feasibility of snail removal. Long-term monitoring plots on six reefs in the upper Florida Keys were assigned to one of three removal treatments: (1) removal from A. palmata only, (2) removal fromall host coral species, or (3) no-removal controls. During the initial removal in June 2011, 436 snails were removed from twelve 150 m2 plots. Snails were removed three additional times during a seven month “removal phase”, then counted at five surveys over the next 19 months to track recolonization. At the conclusion, snails were collected, measured and sexed. Before-After-Control-Impact analysis revealed that both snail abundance and feeding scar prevalence were reduced in removal treatments compared to the control, but there was no difference between removal treatments. Recolonization by snails to baseline abundance is estimated to be 3.7 years and did not differ between removal treatments. Recolonization rate was significantly correlated with baseline snail abundance.Maximum snail size decreased from47.0mmto 34.6mmin the removal treatments. The effort required to remove snails from A. palmata was 30 diver minutes per 150m2 plot, compared with 51 min to remove snails from all host corals. Since there was no additional benefit observed with removing snails from all host species, removals can be more efficiently focused on only A. palmata colonies and in areas where C. abbreviata abundance is high, to effectively conserve A. palmata in targeted areas. |
Purpose: |
To explore the effectiveness and feasibility of snail removal from coral reefs |
Other Citation Details: |
DOI 10.7717/peerj.680 |
Keywords
Theme Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
UNCONTROLLED | |
None | Acropora palmata |
None | Conservation Biology |
None | Coralliophila abbreviata |
None | Ecology |
None | Ecosystem Science |
None | Elkhorn |
None | Marine Biology |
None | Predator |
None | snail |
Temporal Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
UNCONTROLLED | |
None | 2011-2013 |
Spatial Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
UNCONTROLLED | |
None | Florida |
Document Information
Document Type: | Journal article |
---|---|
Format: | Acrobat Portable Document Format |
Status Code: | Published |
Support Roles
Author
Date Effective From: | 2014 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Person): | Williams, Dana E |
Address: |
75 Virginia Beach Drive Miami, FL 33149 Unites States |
Email Address: | dana.williams@noaa.gov |
Phone: | 305-767-3262 |
URL: | https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dana_Williams3 |
Co-Author
Date Effective From: | 2014 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Person): | Miller, Margaret W |
Email Address: | m.miller.@secore.org |
Co-Author
Date Effective From: | 2014 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Person): | Bright, Alan J |
Address: |
75 Virginia Beach Drive Miami, FL 1 |
Email Address: | allan.bright@noaa.gov |
Phone: | 305-361-4561 |
Co-Author
Date Effective From: | 2014 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Person): | Cameron, Caitlin |
Address: |
75 Virginia Beach Drive Miami, FL 33149 USA |
Email Address: | caitlin.cameron@noaa.gov |
Distributor
Date Effective From: | 2014 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | Southeast Fisheries Science Center (SEFSC) |
Address: |
75 Virginia Beach Drive Miami, FL 33149 USA |
Phone: | (305)361-5761 |
URL: | https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/about/southeast-fisheries-science-center |
Business Hours: | 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. EST |
Access Information
Security Class: | Unclassified |
---|---|
Data Access Policy: |
Open to everyone |
Data Access Procedure: |
Download from provided url |
Data Access Constraints: |
none |
Data Use Constraints: |
Please cite appropriately |
Metadata Access Constraints: |
None |
Metadata Use Constraints: |
Please cite appropriately |
URLs
URL 1
URL: | https://peerj.com/articles/680/ |
---|---|
Description: |
open source peer-reviewed pupblication |
Catalog Details
Catalog Item ID: | 26794 |
---|---|
GUID: | gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:26794 |
Metadata Record Created By: | Margaret W Miller |
Metadata Record Created: | 2015-09-01 12:52+0000 |
Metadata Record Last Modified By: | SysAdmin InPortAdmin |
Metadata Record Last Modified: | 2022-08-09 17:11+0000 |
Metadata Record Published: | 2022-04-27 |
Owner Org: | SEFSC |
Metadata Publication Status: | Published Externally |
Do Not Publish?: | N |
Metadata Last Review Date: | 2022-04-27 |
Metadata Review Frequency: | 1 Year |
Metadata Next Review Date: | 2023-04-27 |