Skip to main content
Unsupported Browser Detected

Internet Explorer lacks support for the features of this website. For the best experience, please use a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox, or Edge.

Does Rebuilding an Island Rebuild Fish Habitat?

December 15, 2022

Scientists from the NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office are investigating whether fish are using restored areas at Maryland’s Poplar Island.

A man and a woman, both wearing hip waders, work with a fyke net at the edge of a marsh. Scientists retrieve fish caught in a fyke net near Poplar Island to record species, number, and lengths. Photo: NOAA Fisheries/NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office

Scientists at the NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office are monitoring fish at the Paul S. Sarbanes Ecosystem Restoration Project at Poplar Island. They plan to conduct field work three times each year (generally, in April, July, and October). They’ll keep tabs on how different species of fish may be using habitat in and around Poplar Island. They are seeing indications that restored marsh areas may be providing nursery habitat for some species.

How to Restore an Entire Island

Back in the mid-1800s, Poplar Island was more than 1,000 acres. In the early 1900s, it was home to a community of about 100 people. But it gradually fell victim to severe erosion, and by the early 1990s, the island had shrunk to only 4 acres. 

Image
Aerial view of an island, with areas where restoration is happening labeled as "cells."
The Poplar Island project plans to restore the island to roughly its 1847 footprint. Photo: Maryland Environmental Service

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Maryland’s Port Administration, and other agencies recognized that the loss of Poplar Island meant the loss of remote island habitat. At the same time, they realized that material dredged from the shipping channels leading into Baltimore Harbor needed to go somewhere. The result? A win-win situation.

Image
An excavator works near a marshy shoreline
Construction is still under way at Poplar Island. Photo: NOAA Fisheries/NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rebuilding Poplar Island is a massive construction project, under way since the mid-1990s. The project, still in progress, uses material dredged from the shipping channels into Baltimore Harbor to restore lost island habitat. As the project progresses, new “cells” are created to receive the dredged material. Each cell is created to include features like creeks, high marsh, low marsh, and upland areas, in order to provide healthy habitat for Bay species. As we face a changing climate, restored habitat such as this becomes even more important to support healthy fish populations.

Tracking Fish Use of Restored and Reference Areas

Fish use habitat 24 hours a day, so the field work to determine which fish use which areas goes on 24 hours a day, too. Each restored marsh cell is monitored for 5 years. Monitoring is currently under way in three of the completed cells at Poplar Island (three sites in each of the three cells). Sampling also takes place at three reference sites on the mainland near Tilghman Island. The reference sites were selected to get an idea of how fish might have used areas on Poplar Island before it eroded. 

Image
A man and a woman on a center-console boat at night-time. The man, wearing a red lifejacket, is driving the boat while the woman, in an orange rain jacket, holds an illuminated flood light.
The team tracks down a sampling site in the pre-dawn hours. Photo: NOAA Fisheries/NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In each location, the team deploys both fyke nets and gill nets. Fyke nets are set against a marshy edge at high tide and retrieved at low tide. Scientists record the species caught, how many of each kind of fish, and how big they are. The gill nets are used in marsh channels and ponds, and are fished overnight for 12 to 14 hours. Fish caught in the gill nets are also tracked for species, number, and length.

As the team conducts this sampling work over time, they will be able to track trends in how different species use the different areas. 

Image
A woman wearing hip waders and a warm purple jacket retrieves a gill net that was deployed in a creek with marshy shoreline.
In more open-water areas, the team uses gill nets to catch fish. Photo: NOAA Fisheries/NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Species collected in the fyke nets in the marshy areas include mummichog, silversides, sheepshead minnow, spot, and striped killifish. The gill nets in more open waters collected a slightly different set of species including menhaden, gizzard shad, spot, striped bass, and white perch. 

In general, the reference sites caught a greater variety of species than did the recently restored areas. In analyzing the data, the scientists noticed that more juvenile spot (1–2 inches long) were collected in the restored marshes than at the reference sites. This may indicate that the marsh cells on Poplar Island can provide significant nursery habitat for this species. 

Monitoring will continue to track the health of newly restored habitat at Poplar Island, and to learn more about how fish species are using these areas. Some of this work will include using acoustic telemetry to track tagged fish. This is similar to work we do in other parts of the Chesapeake Bay. We look forward to learning more about how fish use this newly restored habitat.

Image
Hands hold open a mesh bag containing striped killifish, mummichogs, and silversides
Contents of one fyke net set include striped killifish, mummichogs, and silversides. Photo: NOAA Fisheries/NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office

Last updated by NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office on January 02, 2023

Climate