Atlantic Cod: Age Determination Methods for Northwest Atlantic Species

How to use baked and broken otoliths to age Atlantic Cod

New England/Mid-Atlantic

Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua

J. Penttila

Left-facing illustration of yellow, olive green Atlantic cod fish with black speckles, barbel/whisker under lower jaw, and white line going across its side.

The Atlantic cod is a cold-temperate, demersal gadoid distributed in the Northwest Atlantic from Greenland to North Carolina with commercially important concentrations occurring southward from Greenland to Cape Cod. Wise (1963) proposed the existence of four separate groups of cod in the New England area: Gulf of Maine, Georges Bank, Southern New England, and Mid-Atlantic coastal cod. The latter group spends the summer in Southern New England. Age data from the Southern New England and Mid-Atlantic groups are usually combined because of the difficulties experienced in separating cod from the two groups collected during the autumn (Penttila and Gifford 1976). Migration pattern indicate movement towards the south and west (shoaler waters) in winter and early spring and towards the north and east (deeper waters) in late spring and summer (Schroeder 1930, Wise 1963). Growth rates for males and females are similar and sexual maturity is typically attained at age 2 or 3. Spawning occurs from December through April. Maximum age is in excess of 20 years, and a record size of a 96 kg (211 pounds) fish >180 cm in length is reported (Bigelow and Schroeder 1953).

Early studies depended on scales for age determination, but Schroeder (1930) concluded that they were not reliable for individuals older than 6 or 7 years. Studies at the NEFSC, Woods Hole Laboratory during the early 1970's confirmed that scales are not generally reliable even for younger specimens and accordingly, age determinations are based on otoliths. Otolith preparation involves baking to produce permanent brown hyaline zones in contrast to white opaque zones. This enhances visibility of the annuli during examination with reflected light. Otolith thin-sections may also be prepared, but require much more time than baking and do not appreciably improve the distinction of annuli. Ageing criteria and techniques based on baking have been informally validated by comparing cod length frequencies from 1969-74 research vessel surveys with corresponding age-length frequencies. Jensen (1970) validated the use of otoliths for Gulf of Maine cod, and Kohler (1964) validated otoliths for western Gulf of St. Lawrence cod. Recent studies utilizing oxygen isotope analyses have also validated the periodicity of annulus formation (Weidman, unpubl. data).

Cod, section from shifted otolith, age unknown — Figure 1. Otolith section cut from a typical shifted cod otolith of an 88 cm age unknown specimen collected in July from Georges Bank showing only 3 discernable annuli.

Otoliths are stored dry, and one otolith from each fish is baked at 275°C (525°F) for 3-6 minutes, or until it turns a caramel brown color. Smaller otoliths require a longer baking time than do larger otoliths, perhaps because their hyaline zones are less well defined. The otolith is then broken at the nucleus and examined under a binocular microscope at a magnification of about 15x using reflected light. Wetting the broken surface of the otolith with undiluted Kodak Photo-Flo 200 solution enhances visibility of the rings. Rings formed during periods of slow winter-type growth appear as brown, hyaline zones, while growth increments formed during periods of rapid summer-type growth appear as white, opaque zones. Crystallized otoliths should not be aged. Shifted otoliths are generally unreadable (Figure 1) but may occasionally be readable if complete winter growth zones are visible.

Cod, baked otolith half, age 4 — Figure 2. Baked otolith half from a 79 cm age 4 cod collected in September from the Gulf of Maine showing split second and fourth annuli with an opaque edge still forming.

An annulus is defined as a hyaline zone marking the end of a year of growth, i.e., the winter growth zone. It has the following characteristics (following Jensen and Wise 1962): 1) it is concentric with the margin of the otolith, 2) it can be traced entirely around the otolith, and 3) it is separated from other such zones and does not ordinarily meet them at any point. Age determinations for cod are usually made by counting from the nucleus out to the distal edge of the otolith. On older specimens, the dorsal end of the otolith may be best for distinguishing annuli close to the edge. Also, the proximal edge on either side of the sulcus groove often displays clear annuli.

By convention, a January 1 birthdate is used therefore, a winter hyaline zone forming on the edge of the otolith is counted as an annulus on January 1, even though the zone is not complete. Opaque edge material generally forms on the otolith during the late spring, summer, and early fall (Figure 2); hyaline edge forms during the late fall, winter, and early spring (Figure 3). Older fish begin depositing opaque edge material later than younger fish, and the hyaline edge also tends to form earlier. A check may be distinguished by its width and location relative to true annuli. If two hyaline zones are found relatively close together, but all other hyaline winter zones on the otolith are relatively far apart, one of these zones is considered a check, or the annulus is termed split (Figure 4). For a split annulus, it is often difficult to determine which zone is the check. Checks and splits may also be distinguished by following them around the otolith to the proximal side near the nucleus to determine if they merge to form one annular zone. On otoliths from older fish, annuli formed after the fifth or sixth year are often split and these annuli are expected to be fairly close together (Figures 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8).

Cod, sectioned otolith, age 4 — Figure 3. Otolith section from a 59 cm age 4 cod collected in the spring from Georges Bank showing a checky first annulus with a hyaline edge still forming.

Cod, baked otolith half, age 5 — Figure 4. Baked otolith half from an 87 cm age 5 cod collected in January from Georges Bank showing a split fourth annulus.

Cod, baked otolith half, age 7 — Figure 6. Baked otolith half from a 122 cm age 7 cod collected in July from Georges Bank showing a split third annulus.

Cod, baked otolith half, age 9 — Figure 7. Baked otolith half from a 107 cm age 9 cod collected in August from Georges Bank showing a clear settling check.

General patterns based on the geographic origin of the fish may also be used as an aid in identifying annuli. Fish from Georges Bank grow more rapidly than do fish from the Gulf of Maine or Southern New England waters and tend to have more checks on their otoliths. They generally have a large, checky first year with the first annulus situated far from the nucleus, and may often show a strong check before the second annulus (Figures 3 and 5). The second annulus is generally the strongest (i.e., the darkest or widest hyaline zone) on the otolith (Figure 9). Annual growth increments are usually largest during the first and second years but rapid growth still occurs through the third year, followed by a gradual decrease in growth thereafter (Figures 6 and 7).

Cod, sectioned otolith, age 6(5) — Figure 9. Otolith section from an 88 cm age 6(5) cod collected in the spring from Georges Bank showing a strong second annulus and a possible weak fifth annulus close to the sixth annulus forming on the edge.

Cod, sectioned otolith, age 14? — Figure 11. Otolith section from a 130 cm age 14? cod collected in the spring from the Gulf of Maine showing the small first annulus typical for this area.

Cod from Southern New England show a small first year growth increment and rapid growth in the second year, followed by a gradual decrease in growth in subsequent years (Figure 10). Their growth rate is slower than that of Georges Bank fish for the first two years, but after the third year, growth is generally comparable (Penttila and Gifford 1976).

Cod, sectioned otolith, age 7 — Figure 12. Otolith section from a 97 cm age 7 cod collected in the spring from Browns Bank showing the close first, second, and third annuli typical of this area.

Fish from the Gulf of Maine have a slower growth rate and a fairly small first annulus. Comparatively good growth in the second year is followed by a decrease thereafter (Figure 2, 8, 11).

Browns Bank and Scotian Shelf cod exhibit the slowest growth of any of the areas we study. Browns Bank cod otoliths often exhibit a growth pattern characteristic of the area with comparatively slow growth during the first three years, followed by more rapid growth in the fourth through sixth years, and then a gradual decrease in subsequent years (Figure 12).

A major problem in age determinations of cod is distinguishing between the settling check and the first annulus. The settling check is usually a thin, single, or split hyaline zone immediately surrounding an amorphous, translucent nucleus. This check tends to be more nearly circular in shape than annuli, and a definite opaque summer zone found inside the first hyaline annulus is not apparent inside a settling check (Figures 5, 7, 8).

Difficulties may arise in identifying the first annulus on otoliths that have not been broken precisely at the collum of the sulcus. An inability to find the settling check or the appearance of an abnormally small or irregularly shaped first annulus usually indicates that the otolith was not broken at the nucleus and that the remaining stored otolith for the fish should be processed. Figure 13 shows serial sections cut from a single cod otolith, from the anterior to the posterior area of the first annulus. This figure illustrates the change in appearance and shape of the settling check and first annulus according to how far off the collum the break or cut is made.

Series of sections from one cod otolith, age 5 — Figure 13. Series of sections cut from a single cod otolith (84 cm age 5 cod collected in the spring from Southern New England) from the anterior (leftmost) to the posterior (rightmost) of the first annulus. The star (*) indicates the section cut at the center of the nucleus.

References

Bigelow, H., and W. Schroeder. 1953. Fishes of the Gulf of Maine. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Fish. Bull. 53(74): 182-196.

Jensen, A.C. 1970. Validation of ages determined from otoliths of Gulf of Maine cod. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 1970(2):359-362.

Jensen, A.C., and J.P. Wise. 1962. Determining age of young haddock from their scales. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Fish. Bull. 195(61):439-450.

Kohler, A.C. 1964. Variations in the growth of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua, L.). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 21(1):57-100.

Penttila, J.A., and V.M. Gifford. 1976. Growth and mortality rates for cod from the Georges Bank and Gulf of Maine areas. Int. Comm. Northw. Atl. Fish., Res. Bull. 12:29-36.

Schroeder, W.C. 1930. Migrations and other phases in the life history of the cod off Southern New England. U.S. Bur. Fish.. Bull. 46:1-136.

Wise, J.P. 1963. Cod groups in the New England area. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Fish. Bull. 63(1): 189-203.