Golden Tilefish, Lopholatilus chamaeleonticeps
Image
Katie Rogers (KR) has been working with Golden Tilefish since 2016; before that, the age reader was Nikole Jalbert (NJ). Sectioned otoliths are viewed with transmitted light.
In tests where agreement is below 90%, bias indicates either the P-value of a symmetry test or ‘n/s’ (test not significant at the α = 0.05 level). The Evans & Hoenig test was used to test bias starting 1/2022; prior to that, a Bowker's test was used.
| Sample Source | Test Type | Date Completed | Age Reader | Number Aged | Number Tested | CV (%) | Agree-ment (%) | Bias |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Commercial Samples (Q4) | Precision | 10/2023 | KR | 232 | 54 | 2.17 | 75.9 | n/s |
| 2022 Commercial Samples (Q3) | Precision | 10/2023 | KR | 361 | 71 | 2.88 | 73.2 | n/s |
| 2022 Commercial Samples (Q2) | Precision | 10/2023 | KR | 323 | 80 | 1.81 | 78.8 | n/s |
| 2021 Commercial Samples (Q4) | Precision | 10/2023 | KR | 139 | 39 | 3.41 | 76.9 | n/s |
| 2021 Commercial Samples (Q3) | Precision | 10/2023 | KR | 169 | 40 | 2.79 | 72.5 | n/s |
| 2021 Commercial Samples (Q2) | Precision | 10/2023 | KR | 188 | 41 | 2.36 | 78.0 | n/s |
| 2021 Commercial Samples (Q1) | Precision | 10/2023 | KR | 267 | 51 | 3.27 | 72.5 | n/s |
| 2022 Commercial Samples (Q1) | Precision | 10/2023 | KR | 237 | 41 | 1.72 | 78.0 | n/s |
| 2020 Commercial Samples (Q4) | Precision | 8/2021 | KR | 133 | 42 | 1.29 | 85.7 | n/s |
| 2020 Commercial Samples (Q3) | Precision | 8/2021 | KR | 297 | 64 | 2.17 | 78.1 | n/s |
| 2020 Commercial Samples (Q2) | Precision | 8/2021 | KR | 324 | 64 | 0.73 | 90.6 | |
| 2020 Commercial Samples (Q1) | Precision | 8/2021 | KR | 411 | 73 | 0.34 | 94.5 | |
| 2019 Commercial Samples (Q4) | Precision | 8/2021 | KR | 284 | 57 | 1.96 | 86.0 | n/s |
| 2019 Commercial Samples (Q3) | Precision | 7/2021 | KR | 345 | 75 | 1.49 | 84.0 | n/s |
| 2019 Commercial Samples (Q2) | Precision | 7/2021 | KR | 360 | 65 | 0.56 | 92.3 | |
| 2019 Commercial Samples (Q1) | Precision | 7/2021 | KR | 332 | 65 | 1.33 | 86.2 | n/s |
| 2018 Commercial Samples (Q4) | Precision | 7/2021 | KR | 302 | 40 | 1.14 | 87.5 | n/s |
| 2018 Commercial Samples (Q3) | Precision | 7/2021 | KR | 409 | 80 | 3.25 | 72.5 | n/s |
| 2018 Commercial Samples (Q1-2) | Precision | 9/2019 | KR | 828 | 100 | 2.11 | 79.0 | n/s |
| 2017 Commercial Samples (Q3-4) | Precision | 10/2018 | KR | 401 | 78 | 4.28 | 65.3 | n/s |
| 2017 Commercial Samples (Q2) | Precision | 10/2018 | KR | 385 | 78 | 2.08 | 80.8 | n/s |
| 2017 Commercial Samples (Q1) | Precision | 8/2018 | KR | 343 | 71 | 1.86 | 81.7 | n/s |
| 2016 Commercial Samples (Q3-4) | Precision | 12/2017 | KR | 740 | 83 | 2.26 | 79.5 | n/s |
| 2016 Commercial Samples (Q1-2) | Precision | 12/2017 | KR | 885 | 96 | 2.39 | 76.0 | n/s |
| 2014 Commercial Samples (Q3-4) | Precision | 2/2017 | KR | 466 | 86 | 3.93 | 74.4 | n/s |
| 2014 Commercial Samples (Q1-2) | Precision | 1/2017 | KR | 565 | 96 | 2.21 | 81.3 | n/s |
| 2015 Commercial Samples (Q3-4) | Precision | 12/2016 | KR | 356 | 62 | 2.34 | 77.4 | n/s |
| 2015 Commercial Samples (Q2) | Precision | 11/2016 | KR | 417 | 81 | 2.15 | 81.5 | n/s |
| 2015 Commercial Samples (Q1) | Precision | 11/2016 | KR | 437 | 84 | 7.46 | 53.6 | n/s |
| 2011 Commercial Samples (Q1-4) | Precision | 1/2014 | NH | 765 | 99 | 4.01 | 63.6 | n/s |
| 2008 Commercial Samples (Q2-4) | Precision | 1/2014 | NH | 459 | 95 | 2.38 | 73.7 | n/s |
| 2006 Commercial Samples (Q1-4) | Precision | 11/ 2013 | NH | 570 | 95 | 2.99 | 71.6 | n/s |
| 2007 Commercial Samples (Q1-4) | Precision | 11/2013 | NH | 444 | 92 | 3.52 | 68.5 | n/s |
| 2008 Commercial Samples (Q1-2) | Precision | 10/2013 | NH | 442 | 89 | 4.06 | 59.6 | n/s |
| 2009 Commercial Samples (Q1-4) | Precision | 8/2013 | NJ* | 607 | 98 | 5.88 | 54.1 | n/s |
| 2010 Commercial Samples (Q1-4) | Precision | 6/2013 | NJ* | 591 | 97 | 4.87 | 55.7 | n/s |
